 So my name is Sonja Eib Karlsson. I work for the United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security in Bonn, Germany, based in Bangladesh now with the Project on Livelihood Resilience, where we have seven sites all over the country, together with the ICAD and the Munich Foundation. So I both acted as a facilitator, where I helped the groups how to use the tool and go through the two cases that they were given. And I also gave one tool that we've been working with in Bangladesh, an example of a participatory learning tool that we've been using in the communities. So all the groups, they were given two fake reality cases that they were supposed to go through based on a tool that was explained in the beginning of the session. So it was a very interactive session where the groups worked together and were faced with these cases and then tried to score it based on a couple of indexes. So in the end they would be able to define the cases if it's a simple case, it's a complicated case, a complex case, or even cows. So one of the tools that people have come up to me after, and also that I think some took people back to reality a little bit, was a tool that I explained on this called participatory project evaluation. So it focuses, it's a participatory learning tool where you work very closely with the community. So it starts with a project recall where you sit down with the communities, you make a list of all the project interventions that you have in a site, then you move on to project evaluation, which is not focused on evaluating one project but rather all the interventions in a site. So you ask questions like, is it a successful project? Why? Why not? Successful to whom? Does it include vulnerable groups, for example? And then after that you do a similar evaluation with some organizations to better understand how to work with the community. And finally, there's a need assessment to make sure that you don't forget any of the needs communicated from the communities. So I think that the reason why people liked that was because we're moving on a very global scale where we talk about policy implications, for example, what we can do on a high level, and that kind of brought people back down to local scale where you need to consult the communities to be able to understand what's going on. I can give an example from one of the sites that we have in Bangladesh. So there's a site which is struggling with cyclones. And on paper there's an early warning system that seems to be working. So the system is in place, the training has been done and the tools are there. But when we went down and visited a site during cyclone warning, you find out that the flags hasn't been hosted or there is no early warning, people don't know that there's a cyclone coming. And then you have different explanations to why. It can be questions like, people don't know where the tools are or they don't know who's responsible or the person who's responsible, he doesn't want to be responsible because he doesn't get paid. Or even to make it more complex, it might be that the signal reaches people but they still decide not to evacuate to the cyclone shelters for different reasons. So it can be a question of trust or it can be a question of gender, for example, that women are afraid of getting raped or hurt on the way to the shelters or they don't find it appropriate to be in a cyclone shelter with mixed gender. I think that it was interactive. I think people feel like they learn more when they get to, they're faced with reality and they kind of brought back to how they work normally and what they can do different. They learn from each other, they all work on different scales and levels and they might get perspectives that they don't get in other situations. So I know that a lot of people came up to me after and also before, we were very excited before the session and after they came up and said, ah, this is one of the best sessions, like I learned a lot, it was really good. So I think that's one thing that is very interactive and learning. And I think secondly, that people were faced with, sometimes very, very simple, like to, like I said, to have a people-centered approach. Sometimes you forget the people, so you move up on a high scale and I mean, we're here on community-based adaptations. You have to involve and consult the communities to be able to understand what people appreciate, what they need, what they don't need, what they dislike, et cetera. So I think that that's two things that people like.