 The evils of free market capitalism. Oh you! Shut your mouth and look at my wad! No, you're mad at me! This is a journey into money. Loads of money. He's like a man. Shut your mouth! More money is stuck, I can instead he's warm and put together. Inequality has made me so to speak. Those people have made me so to speak. The state has made me so to speak. There is more to it than just this. So to speak. Monarchy. Private property. So to speak. Inequality. Aristocracy. So to speak. Libertarians. Good evening, good evening everybody. Ah, I didn't change the background. Still the same background as when I was talking to Andrew. You know I thought we were going to be away without any sort of technical issues but talk amongst yourselves while I fix this. I'll try not to be too long. You know I was going to open with like a completely useless piece of information so I'll just say that anywhere while I'm fixing the background. You did call it dude. I thought I wasn't going to dignify your statement about how I always have technical issues and be a boomer because I thought now surely surely by now I still won't be. Now of course I am. So my cold open was going to be you're going to hear this noise a lot. Okay and if that bothers you cope, cry about it, stay mad. There's nothing none can do about it. So what I've got some creatine and it's creatine monohydrate. It's not the posh, micronized creatine stuff which dissolves in water really quickly. This fucking thing. I have to stir it for like 20 minutes before it properly all goes in. So you're going to hear a lot of clinking with my spoon rattling around inside my glass. I was also a bit annoyed with this fucking creatine as well right because oh fuck hang on I'm doing something wrong here still. Because I got this from a friend who he's a bit of an interesting character. I don't think he realized that you're only supposed to put a tiny scoop of creatine in well just in. There we go I fixed it. Okay let me finish my story then. I'm trying scooping creatine. Holy shit that'd be funny. Yeah so he probably didn't realize you need a very very very small scoop of creatine. He went to the fucking hospital with stomach problems from taking this creatine and I asked for it from him and like you know probably wasn't a very wise thing to do. This creatine sent you to the hospital. Oh can I have it? That's me. Rather than spending ten fucking quid I took it off him and it's been absolutely fine. The fucking stuff just doesn't dissolve at all and it's flavored it's strawberry flavor. This was disappointing to me because I really wanted to put it in my protein shake so you can just like knock out protein shake and creatine in one go but I've got chocolate protein shake mixing that with this strawberry creatine you know chocolate and strawberry doesn't sound like that bad of a combination but it's it's I mean come on it's it's fucking powdery it's not going to taste like actual strawberries it's quite a quite a eccentric source of strawberry taste like you know the kind of stuff again McDonald's milkshakes it never tastes like actual strawberry does it so this would not be a good mix with my protein shake which actually does taste like chocolate. I do swear an oath of love for a catholic and I don't think that's ever really going to change you know every time I swear I'll do a rosary I'll have no fucking free time left in the day just swore then didn't even mean to all right so let's crack on you've heard my amazing stories oh by the way not many questions came in for this oh there's 20 that's probably more than I actually get through in per stream yeah today there wasn't that many responses for questions so I might get through them all in which case I'll just go straight to the chat but if you guys have any questions go ahead and post them on the community post and if I get through all of these questions I'll start getting I'll refresh it and start taking the newer ones so if I miss them then by all means I might still go to the chat afterwards but any burning questions you've still got a chance to put them on the community post and I'll get around to them so let me just no that's not the right one there it is all right start off with negative beast says with your recent video on reading about the reactionary movement do you find the general diagnosis of Yavin and land of to be accurate and how do you feel about their methods of achieving their desired outcome I personally believe Yavin's diagnosis of the situation actually mirrors Hopper or more even strengthens his position however his statist ideas move me away from his conclusion so the first thing I'll say about is about Nick land I don't think I'm ever going to get on with that guy's writing style he's extremely esoteric well maybe I wouldn't say extremely there's many more people who are more esoteric than him but like nobody takes him seriously because you shouldn't esotericism it's just never never my thing like you don't have to go all schizo mode and like hyperborea posting just tell me what you're trying to say uh land has an issue with that you need a lexicon to be able to read his work just to know like what the fuck every third word actually means so haven't been able to gel with land I won't give up I know lots of people really like him I just don't I don't see much of an appeal it's maybe his ideas are great but trying to get through the language to his ideas can be a bit of a struggle Yavin on the other hand yeah he's the guy that completely brought me around on all this and you're right uh his his diagnosis of the situation mirrors hopper a lot probably a bit more broad than hopper he's not afraid to I wouldn't say hopper's afraid to like talk about more than political legal issues but it's like you know he is very much a libertarian theorist that's where all of his energy goes uh he can he likes to talk about how governments promote de-civilizing effects for the purpose of their own growth it's I think it's just that Yavin takes a more broad approach not to say they're different that's no sorry not to say one is wrong by any means uh a shared influence between hopper and Yavin is Dejuvenel I forgot the guy's first name uh but yeah there's quite a few sort of mid-century and also uh people like Thomas Carlisle I don't know if hopper took any influence of him but you've got lots of Victorian English authors as well uh if hopper's not influenced by him I'd be quite surprised he was extremely influential in his own day but yeah there's a lot of crossover their diagnosis yes absolutely I think is correct especially when they take a more scathing and broad brush to the problem uh of course hopper is more broad than most libertarians or lulberts like in his diagnosis of what's wrong but I I like how Yavin goes like all the way uh and oh yeah to round off the question that it's the politics of Yavin it's like okay right I think Yavin improves on hopper's diagnosis really doesn't improve on his politics and solutions if you want to call it that that's I mean read what must be done by hopper and you'll realize like he's not a fucking pacifist anyway k-tech pl you have a couple of questions you have three actually you've got four okay I'll try and get through them all quickly because it's not fair is it it's not egalitarian if I give you loads of time and not everyone else all right on a scale from completely allegorical to completely literal how would you judge your interpretation of genesis uh I think it depends on different parts of genesis I saw a very good uh this has caught me off guard I sometimes I do review the questions before I get to them this time not so much um well I certainly wouldn't take a literal interpretation at least the first few chapters in just about not not in in many ways um it's well of course the main reason being the obvious one God created the sun on the fourth day how do you have a day without the sun that that's gotta be allegorical there's no way that's completely literal um and there's a current movement among like tradcaths who to like stab anyone in the face who tries to reconcile evolution with uh genesis even though that is the church's official position has been for decades and it's not contradictory uh the creation of Adam can absolutely be allegorical for man's evolution out of apes this can absolutely be something directed by God even if it wasn't literally molded out of dust yeah I I hope hopefully that covers the question because I'll have to move on and get to your others uh thoughts on libertarian science fiction or exemplified by authors like Robert A. Highline I have a lot of respect for him uh I'd never actually read any of his works what was kind of the name of his big one about uh people who go live on the moon that's a very famous one and the Highline was actually like really successful it's not just libertarians who know about him when I say really successful I mean for like quite a niche sci-fi author at least uh but I haven't read it uh fiction isn't my thing I've got the Fountainhead by Iron Rand made it like a third a half of the way through and couldn't do it I don't do fiction uh it's just my you know honorarily autistic brain I'm not autistic but I'm friends with autists because I do think I have a lot in common and one of those is don't don't give me fiction just tell me what you mean and I'll I'll read it and see if I think it's right or wrong so in terms of authors like Highline yeah massively respect him is it my thing no what are my thoughts concerning the topic of the theory of civilization and distinctions between different civilizations have you heard of the philosopher Felix Konechni uh I'm not sure what you mean do you mean in terms of like uh against what's it called cultural relativism and things like that certainly don't agree with cultural relativism I don't know what you mean by distinctions between different civilizations I haven't heard of that philosopher so that'll be why so I'm sorry I can't answer that one any better lastly have I read the populist illusion by Nima Parvini it's on my reading list uh my reading list is huge and I don't have much time to read I will over the summer though and I probably will get the populist illusion because if anyone doesn't know that book is by academic agents who most people watching this probably have at least heard of him and I'd really like to read that it really gets at the structure of power which is I don't want to I don't want to sound about like libertarians don't understand power I'm not going to go off on that tangent but one thing they really most people really really really don't understand is that power is absolutely top-down if you could watch what happened throughout the COVID pandemic and not realize that which I don't know what to say like at January 6th as well populism does not work the the populace does not change anything but the only reason the American revolution worked is because the elites were in on it a society does not change if it's from the bottom up you get a million people with no power and get them to storm the capital well a million times zero is still zero like it doesn't matter how many people you had at January the 6th nothing was going to change because it was a populist movement and the plebs have no power if you want to get anything done we need people like Elon Musk on our side and he's not on our side he's still a centrist but like you know we've gone so far left that centrists are welcome now fat dave uh everyone fat dave is having a boy can we get some w's in the chat like now let's do it i'll start it w i'll drop a Rothbard giving a chalky milk fat dave having a human rather than a woman that isn't that great big dubs all around and he asked me have i read any of Dante's divine trilogy if so what are your thoughts i haven't i'd really like to i've got for my birthday i was given by a friend wasn't my birthday shit if it was my birthday it means that's nearly a year ago and i haven't even opened it that's not good i think it was um a super super nicely bound edition of the divine comedy by Dante i really want to read it again like i said not pick on fiction uh and it's a it's a bit of a chunker and i go but from everything i've heard right it's it's it's kind of full of a lot of failed philosophy especially termistic philosophy because it's a thoroughly medieval catholic book i mean that just that just goes hand in hand with being tomist really uh but apparently there's also like when he goes through hell in the inferno which everyone calls it Dante's inferno fat dave is right when he calls it a trilogy you've got the inferno purgatorio and paradiso the three stages of the afterlife according to catholic theology apparently like uh in the inferno like Dante just said like all of his political opponents were there in hell uh Dante disagrees with you you're going to hell uh but apparently that can mean that like a lot of it's confusing if you don't it was quite a product of its time in that sense and if you don't know who this particular politician or statesman was that Dante is saying is burning in a pile of liquid shit then you might not understand what he's trying to get at but if you've got a smartphone you know always by your side and you can just look up who this person was and what they stood for that's probably fine so that was a long winded way of saying no but i will and i'm interested too what are the best books to recommend to a neoconservative to convince them libertarianism is better you know a neocon specifically it's like they're not they're not bright like i don't want to be a dickhead about it but a neocon is a normie a neocon is a normie and a progressive just not as progressive as the democrats so for them it would be more talking than a book like a quick socratic method if these people have any sort of cognitive ability is normally enough to just i don't even mean to just like go straight for libertarianism but to snap them out of being a neocon that shouldn't be difficult unless they have the fucking IQ of an animate sponge but in terms of actual books i think you'll like you need to do a lot of decoding before you even recommend a book to them but the first one to go to i say is anatomy of the state you cannot go wrong with a perfect pamphlet to just like radicalize anyone and what government is and how it operates anatomy of the state by Rothbard if you know first go to but i wouldn't immediately recommend them to read books because you can you can snap them out of their programming pretty quickly without books at all would i consider making a video on the Protestant Reformation you know what probably no because i covered quite a lot of it in my i covered most of what i would have to say in my thoughts about it in my last video about philosophy when i was talking about like why modern European philosophy is so fucking bad and i i didn't piss off as many people as i thought i would when i said that's the fault of the Reformation i don't have much more to say about it than that really um yeah uh no no i guess the answer is no pretty easily sorry dany the pharaoh considering your devout personality will you make a video on vegetales also would you try ever try to speed run bible games no and no uh devout personality i wouldn't go so far as to say that i probably don't have enough of a devout personality for someone who takes their religion so seriously right now i'm not devout enough i'm still too fucking like bookworm ish and in my head i need to live it more than just know it all right fat dave again another dub let's just let's have another dub for fat dave here go on one more dub hey aw5 welcome welcome all right now hey we've got faith liberty in practice we've got caela brown here fucking fantastic dude head of austro-tomism which is the shit okay not going to get distracted by the chat fat dave what's your religious take that will get the most hate from people parentheses religious or atheists so this is one that i did get a glimpse at before i started and i was trying to think is there a religious take i can i have that will piss off both atheists and most religious people i don't think i really can because they have to be separate answers like what can piss off religious people the most and what can piss off atheist people the most what might i don't even know if this would piss off a lot of atheists because they might not even know what i mean uh but shit did i post this as a meme yeah i did post this as a meme let me hang on i'm gonna get a twitter post up to answer your question do do do do let me scroll through i also don't know if this will like entirely show up on the stream but i'm gonna hope it will it's the only way i can fucking see this hey yeah so it's all entirely up yeah redistributed high x thing if atheists understood divine simplicity they wouldn't be atheists that could piss some atheists off uh but i think it's true and i'm gonna go off a bit of a tangent here this is gonna get a bit more theological than most people were anticipating but the ontological argument something developed by anselm of canterbury in the medieval period um it's uh the ontological argument is a way of saying that by definition god must exist uh the way it is normally done which isn't the best way to do it is to say that if if you can can think of the greatest thing you can possibly think of in in regards to in degrees of being like the most perfect being you could think of okay if you thought of it well god's even greater than that and within the perfect perfect greatness like has to involve existence and uh yeah you can elaborate more on that a lot of people think that's really shit and i think it's not a good argument for the existence of god i think it's a better argument at displaying the nature of god if you say right okay you've told me god exists and he's omniscient he knows everything i have a god doesn't know what he doesn't know he doesn't know any unknown unknowns so therefore he's not perfect and omniscient you just go right okay so you think you found a flaw with god you can immediately shut down shut that down say no your conception of god is flawed if you found a flaw with god he's not perfect so you're not talking about a perfect god that's what i am oh well there we go so big elaborate answer to think that piss off the most atheist is um yeah they don't understand divine simplicity religious people i don't know i don't know what you could say that would like piss off religious people broadly the worst thing you could probably say is that i'm right and you're wrong but if you are religious of any kind of religion and don't think that if you don't think your religion is right and all others are wrong like what the fuck are you doing you're probably the kind of democrat that's screaming on twitter right now saying that a bishop shouldn't have excommunicated anti-pollosy so all right okay fuck you you just you just don't know what you're talking about bye bye go cry the gates of haiti shall not prevail against her porky am i planning to move to new Hampshire for the free state project nope immigration to the u.s unless you have a immediate family there or a hundred thousand dollars to invest in u.s companies is essentially impossible and you get lots of you go no it's not if you just jump through these five thousand loopholes you might be able to live there for two years uh no thanks no way too much fucking effort wish them all the best and if anyone does have a chance to move there i absolutely encourage them to but no that would just simply never happen to me what's the first book to read when getting into libertarianism anatomy of the state again it's a very easy book it's some how many pages is it you know i can go on the mesas website right now and just find the pdf how great's that fucking another shout out to the uh the mesas institute because they really need me shouting them out don't they that's really going to affect their numbers it's about 50 pages anatomy of the state is um definitely best first book to read it's not even really a book into like a bigger book uh maybe the law by frederick bustier i think that's that's fantastic that's one that gets like slept on by seasoned libertarians there's one we can often read while we're still babies and then uh actually look back on and go oh wow this fucking slaps oh no oh no we've got a fed post first fed post of the stream rabbit squirrel when are you going to honor the legacy of guy forks and do the deed i'm going to assume everyone watching knows who guy forks was and if you don't just go learn um i mean the guy wanted to restore catholic monarchy didn't he that's why he was trying to get rid of parliament and what have i been talking about a lot for the last couple months uh as to the second part of the question no comment i've already seen this one as well my guy i appreciate like the length of this but it's also not a question so i am going to skip this one uh do i watch anime and why is fucking this degenerate piece of shit the best one no i don't i just answered your own question uh go fucking touch grass uh go to church get married and have children and just stop just stop party may 14 what do you think is going to happen in the next few years in britain that's that's quite a funky name for actually i might use that will it become like v for vendetta stuff or like the us riots may i don't think fucking really much at all is going to happen in britain uh in terms of like when the next general election comes around who's gonna who's going to win that that's an interesting question because corbin uh like it what's very funny is that labor only wins in the elections when they're trying to be a different flavor of the tories when someone like corbin comes in and wants to make labor really left wing and like actually take being left wing seriously they fucking lose because the the left which used to be supported by the working class in this country has gone off the goop and the actual voting working class populace doesn't like labor the people who do are well they don't they don't like radical labor the people who do are fucking university students who wear dungarees and so yeah i don't know if the funny thing is if labor wins with kia starmer who these dungary man children hate they're going to kick off uh if labor loses they're going to kick off but what what what does kicking off look like in britain some people can carry a few signs around london and bristol and sunderland and that's like really it and for like a couple days no this this is a place that doesn't it does riot like every 30 years and it does proper fucking riot like burning like fucking half of london to the ground like they did in 2011 for basically no reason um it's kind of it's it's the british spirit all all around isn't it you just build everything up and just bury it deep inside until it fucking pops uh so i don't know if we're due for like another massive riot like nationwide riot or not i doubt it everyone's so placated and just happy to fucking call each other no you're the real nazi no you're the real nazi on twitter and fucking yeah all running around the nhs if someone actually tries to get rid of the nhs that's the only time you see these fat fuckers get off the chair and do something oh hey that's our nhs you can't touch that it's so apathetic so no i don't feel same as normal probably in terms of the actual politics economics who the fuck knows carol carol geico is that geico who i'm gonna assume it is isn't that like an american car insurance company all right more theology stuff recently said that you now now you now consider yourself a roman catholic i'll do you one better than that i am a roman catholic i got confirmed and had oil rubbed my forehead to prove it that's that's official what reasons convince you to that position so i'm pretty sure in my first introduction to christianity video where i said i wasn't roman catholic i was well going to become anglo-catholic the things i didn't buy were it was definitely papal infallibility was anything else and there might have been like one or two other things like quite minute that i said but it was really papal infallibility that was the big one what convinced me away from that well actually understanding what that means it's quite easy to think that something's wrong when you don't actually know what it is the way i just i used quite a a crude example the other day when a friend asked me to explain and i said it doesn't papal infallibility doesn't mean that if the pope one day tweeted no actually no i'm not i'm not gonna repeat it if the pope tweets something and says like chocolate is better than vanilla ice cream that doesn't become infallibly true and every catholic has to believe it or they're going to hell papal infallibility means under certain conditions where it is explicitly said by the pope and in communion with all the bishops of the church that a dogmatic teaching is infallible then it's infallible and you take it as true you accept it as true um and this is not because the pope said it it's because christ promised the holy spirit to guide the church away from error and they go all right well this is the church this is a something they teach as dogmatic the holy spirit protects the church from teaching error so there's no error and that that's what convinced me that just made a bunch of sense and that that just getting like generally convinced that the papacy makes sense and is justified by scripture am i still on the screen yeah do i believe christianity is compatible with the idea of anarchism yes just yeah wow yeah i am getting to the end of the comments all right how long we've been going for 26 minutes damn this i don't know why this caught such little traction i'm pretty sure this i always normally like uh put the community post up on a friday and then do on a sunday so favorite roman emperor depends what metric you mean by uh everyone loves orallian not orallius orallian in the was that the crisis of the fourth century i think really like reunited the empire after it nearly collapsed and then it collapsed again a hundred years later everyone really likes him and normally choose him as their favorite roman emperor i mean it's cool but we don't know a whole lot about the guy in terms of personality wise obviously i'll go with marcus orallius but someone i've been changing my mind a lot on recently is julia seiza like of course the obvious one everyone knows the name not many people know why he's famous um and i question i'm thinking about it in terms of could we do with another seiza this this is a popular idea in a lot of uh neo-reactionary circles is it's called the american seiza so you had the roman republic which had existed for 400 years i think at the point uh when seiza came in and it was becoming a shit show because it was a republic and it came with all the decadency and corruption that that does and seiza wanted to change that and he came along and uh yeah it took a lot of fucking power for himself and created a monarchy in a country that prided itself on its hatred of monarchy does that sound familiar to america um and well you can argue whether or not they prospered or suffered as an empire but i don't think a whole lot of that really whole lot really changed from the republic but if we if if we come from the starting point that a monarchy is better than democracy and well america would be better as a monarchy than a democracy then wouldn't it like that has to follow how would you get a monarch and the seiza model is pretty like it's probably a pretty good one get someone who is an elite because like we said you can't just get a million people with no power because you can't if you times a million by zero it's still zero they're not going to be able to affect any change you need one of the elites of society who does have power over societal institutions probably get the military on his side uh and uh saying no fuck debates fuck the votes you people are fucking criminal scum i'm taking over you can all fuck off but that not be pretty cool if that happened in america something to think about didn't really answer your question i don't really have one i don't have a flat out favorite roman emperor so there you go okay this guy i don't know who he is and he just makes me shudder i'm not going to answer that question uh you might not be able to see the bottom of my screen now no okay you can see the last two questions yeager twerk okay um gilgabra again palestine israel conflict who's in the right one two or zero state solution i don't know what you mean by i've heard of like two state solution before that seems like lefty language to me so i don't really know what it actually means uh who's in the right it probably has like in terms of the original claim it's got to be palestine in terms of who has the actual who's the aggressor here that questions that answers obvious as fuck and that's the most important question uh but do palestine do right things or like uh hamas that is hamas right in palestine i think it is uh well no obviously they don't do right things so it's not a fucking clear cut question whatsoever but you know let's let's prepare to get demonetized here israel shouldn't exist so there we go that's all the questions uh i'm going to refresh this page and sort by new and see if you guys put any more new ones on the post if there's not okay if there's some uh okay well yeah there's a few more i might not get through all of these new ones uh because i i do like to go to the chat for the last 10 minutes or so the stream which yeah you know i've got about another 15-20 minutes okay i might be able to get through all these did i read the Quran no nope uh what books would you recommend for the study of metaphysics probably just go straight to Aquinas um don't get the summa theologica that's Aquinas's magnum opus do you know why because four thousand pages long uh you can get lots of like um what do you call it selected works of Aquinas uh i believe Oxford does an 800 page selection of things that Aquinas wrote everything he wrote was full of metaphysics most of the time most of the time so if you get any sort of selected works by Thomas Aquinas you you will get amazing metaphysics you could go straight to the source with Aristotle where Aquinas got all of his ideas from but it was much it was a lot less categorized at the time of Aristotle you could almost say less systemized and i think that it's a very very good thorough approach that Aquinas gives and you can just go read him thoughts on the legacy of Winston Churchill yeah no i'm late worship and vilifications both fucking stupid yeah i hate to sound like you know uh spicy centrist here but demanded bad things demanded good things i don't know why i need to be more complicated than that a lot of people like him because it's sort of the he's supposed to represent some sort of national idea and i guess in a way he does stiff up a lip alcoholic aristocrat there are a lot of things that are generally symbolic of uh british identity which i think most most of his good things uh the left often very right when they critique like his bad things like uh it's very funny how they will call out his well the famine that happened in india while he was in charge uh like you haven't heard of the fucking holodomor they'll normally say that in response to the holodomor like if you talk about the holodomor right okay they starve how a million of ukrainians to death um because they were socialist and so the means of production were owned by the government so then you go oh no look uh wincent church will create a famine in india because the government was in charge of the means of production there and it was inefficient and killed a million people oh what's the common denominator here yes it's your fucking economic system even if oh well wincent church was said he was a captain who probably said he was capitalist like fucking titles aside what caused these famines public ownership of the means of production oh and that's what you want so you say no look church you'll create a famine yeah by doing what you think he should have done fucking idiots all right teatugglers mcintosh is that would you say mcintosh or mcintosh for that i've always thought it'd be mcintosh i'm interested in religion but i'm unconvinced of a lot of the metaphysics and supernaturalism so i have to believe in a god or miracles to buy taking any of the catholic stuff yeah you have to believe catholicism is true to be a catholic and they claim god exists um if if you're unconvinced by the metaphysics and the supernaturalism i'd suggest you read it like go to the source read what philosophers have to say about it fantastic book is answering atheism by trent horn definitely should read that that was the one that like absolutely red pilled me on all of the philosophical issues trent horn's amazing definitely my favorite modern catholic apologist and in answering atheism he takes the best philosophical and scientific uh claims of atheism steel man's them he's an absolute gentleman doesn't straw man a thing and i truly believe just lines them all up and shoots them down one by one that book is amazing um you you don't have to be like a fucking cuckoo to think the natural world doesn't explain itself it needs a supernatural explanation i you that you don't have to feel about that's a fucking stupid position i read i think once you actually read it what's your opinion on roderick long and the whole alliance of the libertarian left thing maybe i'm thinking of someone different with roderick long is there another like more is there another like austrian libertarian called something long because yeah saying the whole alliance of the libertarian left i must be thinking of a different guy because the long i'm thinking of i'm pretty sure it was written for the mesas institute and i don't think they would have anything like that on board is he the Aristotelian guy the guy i'm thinking of as an Aristotelian and i don't know if that was roderick let's see if anyone guys if anyone know uh no he's put it in the chat i don't know so yeah i can't really comment on that but in terms of like alliance with left-wing libertarians no well past that point opinions on distributism and its apologetics well i don't know what you mean by apologetics specifically unless you mean like the arguments for it um you know i can kind of i would say i have some sort i have more respect for distributism than i do for any other kind of left-leaning economic idea because they're not afraid to admit that it's not economically efficient they are happy to admit like that we should have a more moral economy if according to how they take that to mean they would say we should have a more moral economy fuck gdp like if if the price of a moral economy is significantly less gdp then that price is worth taking and fine that's a fine position to hold right if you the question yeah there's there's different you have to argue that on different grounds you can't say no distributism is bad because less gdp you'll just go yes and you'd have to argue why distributism actually won't achieve what they want what they want is a wide distribution of the means of production and you truly do get that with entrepreneurial free market capitalism you cannot do the stupid lefty thing and say that what we have now is free market capitalism you can't the left has a lot of power over the dialogue and the the the reason why the phrase socialism is when the government does stuff has like caught on so much and people think oh yeah that's that's that's a true that's a true sarcastic response that we shouldn't actually take that seriously no we should that is true just because they meme it doesn't mean it's not true anymore and just because they meme not real free market capitalism doesn't mean it isn't true we don't have real free market capitalism if we did the distributists would be a far more happier than they are now and probably a lot happier than they would be if they had the system they want because the question with all economic distribution who decides who gets to decide most people don't say the church most distributists would not be as like cuckoo to say the church does because these are very worldly affairs that the church should not be getting involved in at least i think at least shouldn't take like a decisive heavy hand and make people's decisions for them if it goes to the government you're saying the government should determine where the means of reduction go well then there's an easy argument for us to stand up yeah that's probably more i could say but like that's just going to go on for a while i don't think i'd make a video on distributism but it's something i'd definitely talk to other well i need to learn more about it i am interested in reading first hand it's just quite a wide spectrum you get lots of you can get distributist anarchists like uh shit what was her name the american woman who's currently blessed and is being considered for sainthood i've completely forgotten her name she was she was an anarchist quite a socialist anarchist but it was definitely a distributist and she's currently being investigated for the position of a canonization so it's a very interesting topic it should not be written off as just as stupid as marxism no way no way no way all right detail anglo i know that i've asked you before but as the recent video about you being a knee reaction i want to ask what do i think about anarcho nationalism never heard of that and i don't want to take it seriously if you want anarcho capitalism with a localist like a covenant community structure fine so do i but it's called that anarcho nationalism be stupid i'm assuming that's what it means but i don't know is peter shiffer genius or is he only right because he's always saying a crash is coming also general thoughts i'm going to assume you mean general thoughts on peter shiffer not general thoughts in general it's like i'm currently just thinking now that my balls itch but you probably don't want to know that but you do now so you're welcome um i think there is an element of a broken clock is right twice a day when it comes to peter shiff he it's it's funny the critic like he always jokes about how he was called chicken little and said the sky was falling but everyone forgets what happened in chicken little is the sky did fall he was right it's like well and the boy who cried wolf yeah the fucking wolf shows up so he was not unfounded here's the here's the thing when he predicted a lot of the 2008 market crash he was right everything he said was spot on it wasn't that he just ran around shouting the market's going to crash and then i did no he diagnosed it properly that's the point he deserves credit he did get that right he what he wasn't just lucky problem is he's been very unlucky a lot of the time as well he's been very unlucky in saying a massive crash around the corner again and it doesn't happen which is it was just a big problem he's he's certainly a smart guy he's a good economist he's worth still listening to but you have to take him with a pinch of salt because he he does cry wolf and one day the wolf will show up but not every time he says it will um that's it though those are all of it you know what my my voice is going already uh it normally takes me a lot longer for my voice to go but uh i've actually been having a little bit of a social life recently now the now the university is coming to an end and we're trying to make the most of it me and my friends sorry my friends and i so my voice is going a little bit but i'm going to take questions with chat now guys so dump them in the chat and we'll see if we can get another 15 minutes out of it i mean i hope you all went to church today by the way judging the fuck out of you how's the girl first question fiance fiance specifically she's very good she's already finished university she's just waiting to crack on uh get on with our lives in september the lady i was talking about was dorothy day thank you very much kay take you're absolutely right yeah it's very interesting to learn a bit about her i was going to make a video on her but just didn't find it was actually that interesting when we're studying uni economics i've got three weeks left of it opinion on giving the british monarchy more power to balance parliament well yeah uh it's not right to call it it's right when people call it a royal family they say the british royal family that's a much more accurate title than the british monarchy because they have no political power uh oh no but look just this this actor that got passed says that they have some power on paper yeah what do you think would happen if the queen actually used a fucking ounce of her power just get beheaded and thrown out no fucking chance mate and so they're not a monarchy they have absolutely no power all right i just saw this before it came in rock will live in two thousand one hundred and twelve super shade 49 budget 99 cents do you have a favorite historical error thank you for introducing me to the austrian school and the wonders of being an end cap god bless you for being a first rate mad lad well thank you very much that is extremely generous of you i'm i apologize for the bot fucking name up there rock what does a rock we live on twig one two one two one rock we all live on and that's true well thank you very much for that i'm very glad that i've been able to introduce you to the wonders and i'll take the title of first rate mad lad proudly thank you so my do i have a favorite historical era no probably not because again i don't want to sound like a subjectivist but it depends like but based on what as a little mean there for you now the what i'm currently really interesting in learning of course is english medieval history i'm going to learn a lot more about that and then move on to the holy roman empire now that's that's it we all know why that is a hefty task um crazy amounts of history there in the hre but that the most fruitful era to learn about for i would say a serious libertarian who the kind of libertarian who looks at the world and says what has worked before how can we do it again holy roman empire we'll learn about that uh used to be the napoleonic era of europe uh that that was my favorite era for quite a while loved learning about that and for like no political reason probably more an aesthetic reason yeah uh wouldn't say i have one because i can't say i have officially this is my favorite historical era i can say this is what i'm learning about the most and find the most interesting at the moment english medieval history from the time of the norman conquest up to the so there you go better to filter by era and location than just era yeah you're absolutely right like if you look at look what happened in uh the year 1300 across the entire world by all sorts of shit all sorts of completely disconnected things it's definitely gotta be yeah right location and era we've got awo five twitter mutual still on private got you got gotta sort that out uh what stuff from mulbuck have i read all i've read is just it's just a little bit of his open letter ah yeah i'm gonna start reading his open letters to open-minded progressives i've read you know i think i've read most of his blog but then i look at it and i'm like there's only like 10 posts here this can't be his entire blog so i've read about 10 blog posts from him essentially um listen to him on a couple of podcasts michael malice of course but there's one that wasn't that wasn't even one of the first times i heard about him i'm so ashamed that i'd heard of this guy loads of times listen to a podcast with him on on michael malice and it was still like fucking six months later i decided to actually look into him and see if he's worth taking seriously there you go that's my most controversial opinion if you follow me on twitter you'll see you'll see them these days uh you know talking about sexual ethics in any way post-fucking 2006 is a way to get yourself a massive controversy i haven't been getting that much controversy on twitter i think it's because like the shit i say is actually really fucking hard to argue against uh put out a tweet saying uh i i tweeted saying that women should be mothers and not office-based email writers who pay the government to raise their kids is literally slavery and like that didn't catch any heat so i'm out here saying like feminism and the sexual revolution were all completely fucking wrong and people just going yeah i guess so and then like transgender issues and even gay marriage and homosexuality yes the sexual ethics that are massively controversial but yeah i haven't i've i've not caught much flak on it yet uh i think that says says a fair bit unqualified reservation was this old blog when you grew up following but was but was that like a very small blog or am i just doing it wrong okay here's a question are you more of an ancap or a libertarian that question i'm afraid doesn't make any sense because ancaps are libertarians there's there's no difference i mean i should say it's a difference without a distinction not all libertarians ancaps all ancaps are libertarian awo five again saying you like Curtis Jarvin his recent work is a little too neutral for my taste but when unqualified reservations came out on 07 i think he's really coming to his own ideologically and politically yeah that's the thing i've seen his newer stuff where he's basically saying uh that what was it he said uh the true right should be culturally neutral and then i don't know i don't know how he justified that afterwards so it's okay i'm not going to call i'm not going to say that's like total bullshit because i respect you but what the fuck uh i want to read more context of that but me saying the right wing should be culturally neutral and like do you know your audience dude you did not you did not write for 15 years about how the like culture about fucking cultural relativism and you should actually just have a culturally neutral perspective yeah very very strangely tone deaf i'm not sure what the deal there is but i do actually need to read it i want to give him some benefit of a doubt and provide some context of what he said don't want to just write him off now here's one is the buff is the buffalo shooter topic and no no topic to discuss if it isn't am i the only one who thinks he glows at least a bit you're certainly not the only one who glows at least a bit uh you know i've not taken to talking about the current thing that the fucking mainstream media is trying to exploit to get to achieve their political gains the fucking demonic lizards i'm just not giving them any attention i haven't even tweeted about it haven't made a video on it and won't uh drawing attention to these things one it it just gives the center left more of a fucking platform to push what they want it's not beneficial um and we shouldn't give people attention who do that because it's the only thing they want okay oh okay so unqualified reservation reservations if i scroll down there's an archive of hundreds of posts okay i'm doing something wrong then and i'll continue to read him i like reading it a lot of people say he's a bad writer i really don't think so i he's extremely flowery and that normally pisses me off but the way he does it i quite like it oh wait was there an american psycho reference oh fucking no no i've forgotten the band's name now hui luis in the news that's it holy shit i completely missed that my bad my bad you had a fucking axe hanging over my head and i was just chatting shit what do i think about abortion of catholic opinion on the overexposed herd versus depth court case and this is something that my fiancee has been keeping track on yeah just she likes that kind of thing it's typical for women too and i don't i don't actually don't say that in a misogynistic sense now she's been keeping track of it and like telling me things that she thinks about it and like funny parts of like my dog stepped on a b and when she completely fucks herself over in court uh i don't really give a shit mostly i think it's very likely johnny's episode is innocent because of like all the shit that led up to this court case of him getting like berated in public and having his fucking what was his finger cut off or something yeah i think that's gonna turn out the way it probably should you haven't been on this channel since october 2020 well welcome back yavin's a little contrarian for the sake of it i disagree at this at this point he's let his micro celebrity status get to his head i don't think so either i don't think he does anything that makes it particularly seem like he's getting too big for his boots and i don't think he's too contrarian for the sake of it i think he's contrarian for the right reasons um bottle of water there you go let's see Curtis Yavin's card or nick lands if uh yeah yavin was going to be patrick Payton when i consider buying a 3d printer you know just in case not a fed i swear okay dude i mean you know what for like actual i'm i'm saying this seriously and no one's going to believe me because i said that i might get a 3d printer because you can print cool shit on it that doesn't go bang uh i definitely wouldn't print the things that go bang though and everyone's going to think that i'm like you know only a minecraft but i'm serious i don't want to get fucking arrested thank you would you consider yourself your hobby yes last question for you is my fiancé more politically neutral libertarian i'd say politically neutral culturally has been getting on board with like everything i've been saying pretty much we talk about it a lot and they've been much easier conversations than we've ever had political ones in the past like a year or two ago when my only thing was being libertarian and anti-government that caused more friction in conversation than me saying uh the modern world is fucked up when we can trace back why and here it is and here are all the things that are taught as gospel things that are like a women's liberation where it's like oh now you've completely fucking ruined what it means to be a woman good job um no i think she's quite on board with that probably thinks i go too far sometimes but like you know what yeah you know a woman can only do so much can't think i'm glad she's not here right now what were you before you became a hoppin and cap uh just an and cap i want to say like a Rothbardian but that doesn't mean anything um a consistent Rothbardian would be a hoppin because uh who was hopper's mentor oh yeah it was Rothbard so why don't i go to America when i afford it i'll absolutely go there uh to visit like many times i want to go meet all of the oomphies yeah i'll definitely get there hey marco's in the chat marco you know i've not made you a mod do that right now there you go don't let all this power go to your head you're a mod in my youtube chat and both of my discord cells ah aw5 you'll be keeping your account private and definitely you just want to interact with friends you recently purged your followers you're surprised at how many nameless faceless accounts are in there yeah twitter who who wasn't the said this before there's another friend of mine i think they said like uh twitter is about laughing at the out group with the in group use it as anything different and you'll just drive yourself insane that's completely true if going private is the way to do that sure but the way to make the way to get involved in your in group is to not be private and to engage it with them so yeah you've not always been private so it makes sense okay here we go you watch this channel a lot when you're a libertarian now you're a geo anarchist and your opinions change a lot yeah i've met some i'm yet to meet a geo anarchist who doesn't change their opinion every week sorry but it's it's the position that like uh people who can never settle on what is actually true like to take and then change it again and nobody actually sticks around what's my edc every day carry i've got a folding knife no sorry no i that could have actually got me fucking arrested if i said that wrong i've got a folding non locking knife fucking bobby's listening a rosary ring on my keychain wallet and that's it not as cool as i'd like of course what's that it was a lightning elite otf and you want to have a letterman letterman 3p4 is that is that a torch or sorry flashlight lightning elite otf yeah i don't know that but yeah i know what a leatherman is at least i can guess it's a multi-tilt opinion on john doil and the american first paleocon movement i don't know john doil is i mean obviously of course when i hear america first and paleocon i think nick fuentes he's fucking hilarious i don't care what anyone says nick fuentes is so fucking funny uh aside from that i don't have many thoughts um like the whole that's why i should say grippers is what i mean when you ask that question these are people who i think like you kind of you kind of have the right mindset you just don't really know what you're talking about uh they don't they don't know a whole lot about economics they don't know much about politics apart from being angry at the current thing of course i could be guilty of that being a neoreactionary but being an actual reactionary comes a lot with learning actual political strategy uh not just owning the libs so they're close you have to disconnect that nick you have to disconnect that homosexual nick fuentes from the american first label and paleocon services are really large that would probably help their case even though he is hilarious uh yeah he's just not a good mascot is he despite how funny he is which is that's the thing that's what draws everyone in he's hilarious and that's what gets people to listen to him but it will also be what gets why they don't go anywhere oh it's a switchblade you've got that's cool yeah thank god you live in texas you can't fucking get um switch blades or butterfly knives here so they're just so cool how would you feel about the idea of making a an iceberg explaining video about a nice fucking i feel like i'm having a stroke reading this one so yeah doing an iceberg video on libertarianism yeah maybe if there is like a good most iceberg like pictures are fucking cringe if i could find a good iceberg maybe but it's probably all sorts of fucking stupid statements that i'm just sick of hearing hey we've got another notification coming in soon this bot is so delayed compared to the chat there it is jc super shattered four dollars and ninety nine cents cheers m8 yes m8 thank you jc much obliged i hope i answered i didn't did you you might have said something in the chat after i answered your question but i don't see it but yeah thank you so much for that my man much appreciate it and again another shout out to rockwheel live on to one one two fucking legend still still there in the chat floating around get a butterfly knife at the flat bay that was probably way too british and how i just said that you can get a butterfly knife at the fat bay they're quite fun yeah that's probably true i've seen you can get like butterfly combs so it's not a knife inside there it's a fucking comb for your hair that's pretty cool do i know how to play chess if not have you considered learning i have considered um yeah i don't really know what the fuck i'm doing i've got a friend who really does know what he's doing he's indian of course they all know how to play chess how he kicks my ass and i would like to know but i don't all right probably have a couple more questions there's quite a few that i've missed so yeah i think that's a signal that it's going on for a bit of a while do i use linux net i used to have a very very old shitty laptop that i put linux on because it was so shit it just couldn't run windows it was so fucking slow but then i put linux mint on it because that's like the most user-friendly one i can't be fucked with the terminal like yes shut up i used mint fuck off i have a life i'm not dealing with all that bullshit just to try and see and call on reddit so that answers your question do i have investments uh no not at the moment i used to i'm taking them all out because i'm gonna have to like be very careful with spending until i start my job in a few months so yeah i've gone a few months with no income like i'm gonna need a lot of liquid stuff on hand but yeah uh regular investments in crypto i've always been on that what do you think conceptualism says another name i'm pretty sure i saw your comment on my philosophy video talking about conceptualism and i hit up an objectivist friend of mine on what their position is as a middle way between metaphysical realism like platonist metaphysics versus nominalism and he explained it to me i'm like okay i see your point i just i'm not i don't see how it is the most reflective of reality or at least the most consistent answer sorry i thought my door knocked i think i'm right what's my job gonna be not disclosing that what is it about ankat philosophy that convinced you more than fascism or other far-right ideologies i mean it's not like there's anything i've ever read about fascism i found i found particularly convincing uh yeah i don't know just to take that as what has convinced you most of anarcho capitalism well it did start with the economics since when is fascism far right good point it's fucking it's just centrist just angry centrist and thoroughly liberal like that's that's the that's the hilarious part fascists are liberals in the real sense of what it means to be liberal they are completely of the enlightenment they're not traditionalist whatsoever they're absolutely modernist anyway what convinced me the most about ancap ideologies started with the economics uh yeah the first thing that ever got me interested in libertarianism was Milton Friedman's talks on economics and then because i just didn't know what economics was heard him talk and thought yeah i like this i'll go study it Milton Friedman's the reason i went to even to university to learn any of this shit and then his politics and then swiftly moved on from there to Rothbard for the economics route like i wanted to oh there's Austrian school of economics that sounds pretty cool who's this guy marry Rothbard what was he about and then yeah i got swept in that way if that answers your question that's fascists are commies who just admit the state will not wither away yes but it's basically that with a hefty chunk of pragmatism thrown in there yes if you take liberal to mean what liberals these they call themselves that won't make sense if you know what liberal actually is in many of its foundations moldbug talks about this a lot he's a hundred percent right fascism is not far right or traditionalist it's a product of the enlightenment and modernism yes spot on it is it absolutely is it it's it's will to power it's anti-reason uh the will to power is the big part many people don't realize how much uh will subjective will what how much of an impact that had on enlightenment thought it doesn't matter if it's possible or not if you want it enough and if enough people want it so badly it can happen economic calculation problem no no no no no no no we just have to really want it and that is what fascism is all built on but no we want this world and we're going to fucking fight for it all that matters is that we want it and we fight doesn't matter if there's any constraints la la la our fingers and ears we want this we're going to take it now fellas okay all right uh there's a few more questions come through i'm going to answer them and then well hang on sorry you say isn't fascism economically like some form of corporatism yes it is uh Mussolini himself said it should be called corporatism and not fascism google that you said it uh and what what sort of economy do liberals want oh that's right they want big business and the state working hand in hand for the betterment of the people oh oh that sounds familiar that sounds like it's been tried before by an angry mustache man anyway i know you're pro-crypto what do you think of nfts nfts are a great idea but the memeage that they've been receiving is completely well deserved nfts can do much greater stuff than fucking board apes nfts will be an amazing way to track actual ownership and contract in a decentralized anti-fraud way nfts will do for ownership titles what crypto does for money nfts have a fantastic potential in terms of just being used for fucking jpegs and uh you're you're allowed to meme on people who buy a fucking jpeg for 100 thousand dollars absolutely to the same reason you're allowed to meme on people who are crypto bros in general because they're just fucking stupid a lot of time corporatism and corporatocracy i know what i described was corporatism not the corporations control the government's man they want us to hate each other no when the corp when corporations uh are formed in a guild system by the government approved by the government and they work hand in hand to achieve political and societal aims that's corporatism that's what the fucking democrats want oh okay adb where five again says afraid to say it but i'm being slowly indoctrinated into the post-libertarian dark side mainly by pete calib andrew and gold guy i i i love calib i love gold guy like andrew had him on the show pete still have a bit of a bad taste in my mouth but i don't i don't disrespect him um i got sorry someone said wash your overall thoughts on monarchism the pinned video on my channel is monarchy is better than democracy just wash that video so i mean well first of all they they wouldn't even say that they are post-libertarian's as andrew says a lot they are praxeans post-libertarian is a moment he says when you realise that libertarianism isn't going to work as he says um this i mean if you if you're curious i didn't really say much about what i actually think about it when i had andrew on here to talk but there are still some certain things i don't think they can get past however what they are really is libertarian need they were libertarian became neoreactionary and moved away a bit what they absolutely still are is allies so like i don't have i don't have anything bad to say with them about them and the general system i think there's some concepts that i don't think they get particularly right like andrew talking about um how an ownership claim is a use of force it's just a justified use of force i just don't think that's conceptually right um we can we can go back and forth all day quoting all the people we like um yeah there's just there's not as much and there's certainly not as much disagreement as i used to think there was all right okay i'm gonna i'm gonna end it by one quote from the chap from winslull who said fascism was not some revolt against modernity but the quest for an alternative modernity totally right they didn't have a problem with the idea with the ideas the west has been going towards the last few hundred years they just wanted to implement them in a different way it's absolutely right so i'm gonna end it there fellas we've got a few more questions coming in but we're going for an hour and 15 minutes it's about my time when i cut it off so i'm gonna give a massive thank you for all of you for tuning in the chat has been popping today we didn't get many questions on the community post but chat's been going off on one so thank you very much for being here fellas much appreciate and especially of course a massive thank you to rock we will live on to one one two for a fifty dollar donation absolutely insane jc also insane five dollar donation i'm sorry i should i should have i don't think there's any way i can do that which doesn't make me seem like a fucking total dick but massively appreciate it any absolutely unnecessary and just lovely so thank you all fellas love you all too i'm going to drop a quick uh roth bar with chocolate milk in the chat i'm going to call it there guys see you later fucking music stopped let's try this again oh there it goes all right see you later