 Edmonton and Calgary tied at four in the third period. This one happened a couple of weeks ago, but it's interesting and some people don't watch hockey and they might find this interesting and they might even generate an opinion on it. It's brought to you by Roman. The flames come in, crash the net, score the go ahead goal with six minutes left in the third period, which would save their season because if they lose, they're eliminated. Goalie comes up and says, what are you talking about? Ref, that ain't no goal. Now the first, no one had any idea what they were reviewing and then they realized that, did he kick it in? Did he intentionally kick the puck into the net? So they go to check it out, here's a review and he definitely, it hits his skate and goes in, but that's not quite the rule. It's allowed to hit his skate and go in. He's just not allowed to kick it in. Actually change the rules, think in 2020, to allow more goals that ricochet off feet and said the only way it's not allowed is if it's a kicking motion. So what do you guys got? Did he just skate into this puck or did he intentionally kick it? It really comes down to what the hell's a kick. Okay, so here's the official wording of the rule. A goal cannot be scored on a player where an attacking player propels the puck with his skate into the net using a distinct kicking motion and they go on to explain even further. A puck that deflects into the net off an attacking player's skate who does not use a distinct kicking motion is a legitimate goal. So was this a distinct kicking motion? That's what everyone has to decide. And when this rule got put into place, the Kraken, the new team, they benefited from it because this, they ruled not a kicking motion and they said that's a good goal. When in my opinion, that dude definitely kicks that puck with his skate but they said no, he was just deflecting it, not kicking it. So what are they gonna say here? Fucking kidding me? What? Edmonton fans excited, are you fucking kidding me? The fucking puck goes right in. What are you talking about? No way, no way. Now he admits that he deflected it with his foot. He says, I don't think I understand the rule. Fair, fair. He said, there's no intent. I'm just trying to get there. I opened my foot but my understanding is that you can redirect the puck off your foot as long as you're not lifting it and kicking it into the net. I'll go watch it again. Maybe it's glaringly obvious. I just didn't feel like I did what it looks like. So he's like, yeah, I skated into the puck. I thought that was the whole damn new rule. I didn't kick it. Let's watch it again. Is this a kicking motion? Or is he just gliding his foot as he skates into the net? What do you guys got? I think that's kind of bizarre to rule that a kicking motion when this one was ruled not a kicking motion. Doesn't seem consistent. The worst part about this is it goes to overtime and they lose. They maybe would have won and extended the playoffs but instead their playoff run and short just like most of your guys' time in the bedroom. And if you want that to stop, you gotta go to GetRoman.com slash Johnboy and you can get the Roman Swipes which are clinically proven to make you last longer in bed and you get $10 off your first order if you do it now, GetRoman.com slash Johnboy.