 This is a brief video introduction of the term male gaze. Tele technologies have been constructed through a masculinist paradigm of the gaze, which turns performance into something that can be objectified and fetishized. The male gaze is a product of patriarchal capitalist arrangements which channel the scopic drive into the hierarchical watched-watcher dichotomy. In Laura Mulvey's words, the fascination of film is reinforced by pre-existing patterns of fascination already at work within the individual subject and the social formations that have molded him or her. As a side note, we need to remember that the key phrase patriarchal capitalist arrangements does not refer to men or some sort of way to categorize men. Rather, the phrase patriarchal capitalist arrangements describes a structure of the world that is codified by a system which is enhanced by masculine coded ideals in which all objects, especially the female form, are exploited for profit. The core drives of the contemporary subject as a product of historical situations and matrices of the phallic state apparatus are translated and exploited in the structures of filming. As Laura Mulvey explains, in a world ordered by sexual imbalance, pleasure in looking has been split between active male and passive female. In doing so, that which is watched becomes objectified. Let's end on a quote by Susan Sontag who says, To photograph is to appropriate the thing photographed. It means putting oneself into a certain relation to the world that feels like knowledge and therefore like power.