 I don't know what to do with this question, but I'm going to answer it, see if you want to answer it. Have you heard of Jeff Bezos' recent divorce? They announced it today. I don't know if you saw the newspapers, but today he's got $117 billion. His wife is now entitled to half his wealth, estimated at $65 billion. I don't think that's right. It's a little less than that, but you know, that's not quibble. He's done nothing to deserve it, but I'm curious to know your thoughts. Well, we don't know what Jeff is like to live with, first of all. But you go ahead, because I do have feelings about something like this. I do too. I mean, I mean, I don't know if we're going to agree, but who are you to say she's done nothing to deserve it? I mean, if I split with my wife today, she would get half. I've made all the money in our relationship in that sense, right? I've gone out and produced in that sense. But she deserved every damn cent she got, you know, for making my life what it is, for being with me, for helping me, for being on the journey with me, for loving me, for everything. And the idea that you can enter into a relationship with the outside and say she doesn't deserve it or does deserve it or whatever, given the press release that came out today, certainly sounds like she deserves it. And I think most wives, in a loving, you know, most good women in a loving relationship, absolutely, even if they didn't do the actual work, deserve it. I mean, yeah, it's a marriage as a partnership in a lot of ways and you help one another up and lift one another up and support one another in ways that are intangible and definitely something you can't put a price tag on. That said, that said, I do think the laws around divorce and the divvying up property are very anachronistic. I don't think, I think they don't reflect changing times and the independence that women have now and the earning capacity that they have now. And even though we're still sort of progressing down that road, I personally think it's something that two people, there shouldn't be hard rules with respect to that in the States. I think it should be between the two individuals involved and it should be fair. I don't know that it's fair. I know a lot of men have been taken to the cleaners by women and unfortunately abused by a system and who are good parents who were deprived of visitation rights of their children who were used as pawns and there needs to be some reform with respect to that. But we don't know what Jeff was like to live with so he could have been a bear. We don't know what she's like and we don't know anything about their relationship so making assumptions about their lives would be wrong. And I agree with you and I think the more we move away from marriage as something grounded in religion and something that the state authorizes and the more we view it as a contract as a relationship as the more I think we'll have contracts that have more, you know, the state shouldn't be dictating all these things in advance and so rigidly so that it should be a much more flexible system in which these things should be contracted. Yeah and because they sort of preemptively decide for people, it makes the idea of negotiating an agreement between the two of you and preenups so ugly and unromantic and it's just sort of it's a buzzkill on every level but let's get the state out of it that would be a great job. That's why if you get the state out of it and you make it marriage is a contractual relationship then it's just a contract and you negotiate the best terms that you can.