 Mobility that relies on market-driven economic mechanisms enables threats to the regions that are heavily dependent on tourism, such as ultra periphery. Mobility in the Croatian islands, they generally serve the tourists rather than locals, and it's especially cute in the ultra periphery in Europe as well. In Croatia you can probably find a bunch of private car operators that drive tourists to Game of Thrones locations, for instance, and yet you may struggle as a local to get to the hospital during the winter season. Public transport in the islands only exists in the larger areas in the islands, but even then it's very poor in quality. In the last 30 years everything from public incentives and investments from transport went into highways. It's a consequence of mobility being developed in an unplanned and liberalized way. The main paradox and challenge here is how to continue to travel for tourist purposes in a way that is not only environmentally friendly, but also social and economically just. The way that benefits both tourists and those who are employed in tourism. So if you want to ensure that tourists arrive to the islands in a sustainable way, the solution is to subsidize more and to boost national train operators instead of private bus operators. Finally, I would say that mobility should be addressed as a human right. Green technology and resources may be part of the solution for climate goals, but still we need to pay attention to how many people are and how many people will be able to use these resources. Sustainable is not just green, but it's also affordable, accessible and high quality mass transport, in my opinion, that really move from cars or at least make people less dependent on them.