 Welcome everybody. I see some people are still joining, but I suggest we start so we can get going and we can send Ergibeth on our holiday afterwards if that's okay. So welcome to this first webinar in the Open Access Week webinar series, organized by OpenAir. And so we're very happy to have today this collaboration with Daria. And Ergibeth Tocifra and Miriam Balioni will present OpenAir Daria Community Gateway, a way to make your research more visible and more connected. Before we start, just some minor housekeeping rules. So if you're using social media, please open, please use the hashtags OpenAir underscore EU and Daria open. As a participant you are standardly muted and you cannot show your video. So don't, if you try it and it doesn't work, it's because it's disabled, it's disabled at the back end. That's just because you're there too many of you and it cannot, it would be chaotic if everybody could talk and show their video. But if you have a question during the presentation, I would suggest that you use the Q&A box, which is at the bottom of the screen. You will see it if you hover over the bottom of the window. You see a Q&A box and you can actually enter a question there and you can also see what other people or other people are asking. And so that will, you can also comment on other people's questions and you can upvote them. And that will allow the presenters to deal with your question during Q&A time like an organized matter. So they know which questions are more popular and they can deal with all your questions and move them to the answer category once they have provided an answer. If you have technical issues, if you want to say hello, if you have a question that is not directly related to the content of the presentation, please use the chat box. So questions about the presentation, questions for the presenters, please use the Q&A box. We will make the recordings and slides of this webinar available ASAP. This will probably be hopefully tomorrow. Depends on how quickly we can process the recording. It will be available via the OpenAir YouTube channel via Zenodo. Also on the OpenAir Open Access Week overview page on the dedicated webinar pages. I assume also on the Daria website. And please keep an eye on our social media. We will announce it there at the moment, the moment of presentations and recordings already. So with this being said, please enjoy this webinar and as with Miriam, the floor is yours. Okay, hello everyone and welcome at the webinar. Let me start with the compulsory gesture of sharing my screen. Just give me a second. There we are. You should be able to see my screen, but of course, shout out loud if you have any technical problems. So welcome everyone again. My name is Eje Beto-Cifra from Daria Euro. And so first of all, what to expect today? We are going to start with the challenges first. So what kind of challenges we are aiming to tackle with the Daria OpenAir Research Community Dashboard. Then my colleague Miriam is going to introduce OpenAir to you and the OpenAir Research Graph on the top of which the Community Dashboard is built. Then we're going to see what's inside and how you can interact with the dashboard. And then in the second half of the webinar, we are going to take the dashboard together to a trace drive and see how it works for your research, how it works for your discovery routine. And of course, then we're going to conclude with a Q&A session. So let's get started. And as I promised you, we're going to start with the problems. Here are two main questions to put you in the mood a little bit and, you know, also distract you from your emails if you happen to do emails in the background. So the first question we had in mind when teaming up with OpenAir to develop this dashboard is how to align units of scholarly communication and workflows of scholarly communication with our increasingly diverse digital scholarly workflows. In other words, how to go beyond the very 17th century of scholarly publication that is restricted to paper-based content forms. And in closely related to this, the another question that governed the development of the dashboard was what are the scholarly entities that are completely invisible from our publication records that are totally unrewarded in our tenure and promotion from our tenure and propulsion guideline? What is the kind of the scholarly work that remain invisible from the official reward criteria? And I want you to give me a little bit of an, let's kick off the webinar with giving me a little bit of an input. We're going to use the good old mentor for this purpose. So I would like to ask you to think about this question. What is the kind of scholarly work that is invisible from your rewarding systems? Or even more importantly, what are the content types that you are not rewarded for by your institution? Do you work with data? Do you develop tools? Do you spend a lot of time with editing stuff, peer reviewing stuff, developing websites, blogging, whatever? Go to mentimeter.com, use the code of 7533811, and we are going to take a look at your answers, okay? Should I, oh yeah, I should keep sharing my screen, but then... Yes, maybe you can copy the information in the chat. Oh yeah, true. Like the thing is that I can either share my screen or I can copy the information to the chat. So I'm not sure whether maybe you or Miriam could do that, because then the code will not be visible for the attendees, because I stopped sharing my screen. Yeah, I cannot copy from your presentation. Just copy from the presentation, yeah, and then save code, and then people can see that, and then you can show the results page. Okay, okay, so let me just copy it for a second. Okay, so hey, and I can see the answers coming in the meantime, so it's good. Let me just give a couple of more minutes for you. You're drunk, regarding your question. Here is the voting link. I think this should work as well. Let's see what your input says. Developing website, curating research data, very important, software, okay, digital... Can you share that page? Just if you go to share screen, you can share this page as well. Of course, if we want, we can take a look together, can you? Exactly, yeah. So it's quite interesting. People also mentioned social media, yes, data curation, tools and software development, website management, all digital stuff, audio samples. I would also claim the musicologist example under data curation, indexing data, metadata curation, very much. Yeah, interesting results. So I will keep it open, and if you have time or if you have ideas after the webinar, we can continue the discussion, and we are going to collect your input as well. But so what is pretty apparent from your answers is that there is a lot of digital work that remains invisible from our tenure promotion guidelines. Another problem that we kept in mind when I started to think about the dashboard is that the arts and humanities domain, and if you're a humanist, I think you are well aware of this, there is an especially... We have an especially diverse publication landscape, which means that on the one hand, the richness of local contexts and formats in which our scholarship is embedded, like linguistic different multilingual contexts, disciplinary contexts, local geographical contexts, is recognized as a key value in a humanities scholarship. But on the other hand, this leads to a very fragmented publication landscape. And if you think about it, we don't have our own PubMed, we don't have our own archive. So the lack of domain-specific databases that are coming from global really strong coverage and such discovery tools are completely lacking. And so it's very difficult to find and access and connect and reuse digital content from the arts and humanities scholarship. If you think about it, if you have experiences with working large-scale collaborative projects, European one, or national one, an international one, even if you think about in the context of just one project, the research result can result in like, you know, can end up in very different corners of the web, right? Like some of them land in a classic publication, book chapter research paper, some of them will end in a data repository, institutional, or thematic, or generic one like Zenodo. Some of the information will end in the project website or blogs. And also let's be honest, some of the stuff will remain on your hard drives. So this is the first problem, scattered publication landscape, not easy to get an overview even in the context of one single project. The second thing that we reflected already in the mentor meter is that let's be honest, like research research publications that cannot be placed on a bookshelf are pretty much invisible from our rewarding criteria. So this is especially a problem in the context of digital humanities when we are talking about humanities. And so there is a huge like, you know, there is a vicious circle because in many cases institutions that we are in favor of rewarding and recognizing the work that happens below the tip of the iceberg of a classic publication. But unfortunately, we don't have information management systems that are able to accommodate these digital scholarly content types, like research data or software or digital editions or other research outputs. So we really need such discovery systems, such information management systems, which are inclusive with these content types and very importantly, which have been developed and will remain in public hands. So, you know, as severe clarity rate analytics, getting hands on your research data is probably not the optimal scenario in this respect. So the public ownership is also really important. Let's talk about let's like take steps towards the solutions. First of all, for those who are not familiar with Daria, the first collaborating party in this webinar, Daria is a European Research Infrastructure Consortium for Arts and Humanities Research, which means that all the major disciplines have such a research infrastructure consortium to provide research support across Europe, across institutions, across countries. And so Daria's mission is to empower arts and humanities research communities with digital tools, digital know-how to create, connect, and share knowledge about culture and society. So we have 16 members and 11 cooperating partners. You can visit our website, Daria.eu, and importantly, you can also follow and tag us on Twitter as well. If you visit our website, you will find information about our activities that I won't talk about today, which is really important that if you think about the idea of research infrastructure consortium that is transnational and is based on institutions, researchers, research communities, disciplines, collaborative work, this is very much in line with what we call open access or open science. So Daria is strongly committed to the open research culture from its very beginning. It's in our DNA and it's really a strategic priority for us to build a strong open agenda that actually works for the arts and humanities research, to fill those gaps between the principles of open research and the realities of arts and humanities research. So we have support structures and we do a lot of open access, open science advocacy. We have a strong open access policy within Daria. And so we have all kinds of tools and services to make this transition to the open research culture easier specifically for humanists. But importantly, we are not only preaching about open research culture, but as a research infrastructure consortium, you realize the very infrastructure is there. So we also provide infrastructural components for researchers to actually realize these practices. We have repository part of the French national hard repository where we store the Daria and collect the Daria publications. It's open to the whole Daria, all the Daria communities. Everybody can deposit your research there. And of course, we also have a Zenado community where people can self-publish, share preprints, share presentations, share their research. And a last thing is that we also find it important to connect our communities with fair open access players. So as examples, you can see open edition here, which is an electronic publication platform for open access journals, books, and blogs. This is also a Daria affiliated service. And below you can find epic sciences.org, which is also affiliated and associated with Daria. This is an interesting infrastructure built on the top of the hard repository for overlay journals. So we have connections with publication innovators as well. But we also have data repositories affiliated with Daria. The interesting thing is that like in contrast to many other European research infrastructure, consortia, if you know others, you will recognize this diversity of arts and humanities, research contexts, and this fragmentation is also reflected in our data repository landscape. So the repositories and data services that are associated with Daria are very heterogeneous, and we decided not to federate them, not to centralize them. So you will find the different disciplinary local contexts reflected in our repository landscape as well. I put here a couple of examples. The French social sciences and humanities repository in Arcalo. We are going to talk about this. The German text grid, which is part of a whole virtual research environment. It's a repository for critical digital editions. We are going to talk about that as well. The Daria repository, the digital repository of Ireland, which might be familiar to many of you, and two Polish repositories for examples. The one is the repository for, open repository for historical sciences in Poland, and the second one is for Slavic studies. So, but these are just examples. And if you want to learn more about the repository landscape affiliated with Daria and the other research infrastructures working in a field of social sciences and humanities, you can find the shortened links that I put here. There is a task force within the social sciences and humanities open cloud projects who are landscaping these repositories and analyzing them and makes recommendations to their certification, improvement, whatever. So, this is a little bit of an extra for you to explore maybe after the webinar. So, I think at this point, it must be clear who we are, who is Daria. It must also be clear why we sort of value in the research community dashboard. And I think at this point, I am going to give the floor to Miriam, who is going to introduce the another cooperating partner to you, OpenAir, and the Opener Research Graph and the Community Gateway. So, Miriam, the floor is yours. I stop sharing my screen now. Thanks, but can you see my screen? I hope you can. Hi, everyone. I am Miriam Ballioni from CNR, and I will talk a bit about OpenAir and how to select the part of the information that it provides to populate the OpenAir Research Gateway for Daria. OpenAir started in 209 to implement the FP7 open access pilot for publication, trying to search links between publication and EC-funded projects. Then it was funded again, and the access was, the accent was on the links to all the European funders, not just EC, and we tried to find links also to the data set. In 217, we had the open access data by default, and you had the opt-out option, so all the funded projects by the EC should publish their data in open access. And with the advent of the European open science cloud, the attention shift from open access to open science. OpenAir became a legal entity, and in 2021, with Horizon Europe, open science will be the modest operandi. So what is OpenAir? OpenAir is the European infrastructure for open science. It promotes open science and open science publishing principle. How does it do it? By exploiting repealers of action. It develops and promotes the adoption of global standards and interoperability guidelines to realize a scholarly communication ecosystem that will be open to all the stakeholders and that will be sustainable, participatory, and trusted. Thanks to the network of national open access desk, it supports the implementation of open science at the local level, at the national level, by helping researchers, project coordinators, but also funders with training and support activity like workshops and webinars. Last but not least, it provides many services. We have different services for all the different stakeholders in the scholarly communication ecosystem that range from researchers, content providers, but also research infrastructure, funders, and small-medium enterprises. Many of these services are based on the OpenAir research graph. What is a graph? A graph is a model to describe a domain. The domain that we search to describe is the scholarly communication one. The nodes in the graph will be the stakeholders and the arcs will be the relationship that bind them together. How can we grow this graph? We collect from many different repositories and from funded databases. We collect what? We collect metadata and we ask them to follow the guidelines that we provided. Once we have collected this data, we transform them in our internal data model and every once in a while, we take a picture of the transformer data and we start building the graph. The first step that we do during the building of the graph is a step of the duplication. Why we do this? Because collecting information from many different data sources makes us collect metadata from different points but related to the same research product. We need to recognize these metadata that are relevant and are related to the same product and put them together and produce just one representative that hopefully will be richer than the native ones. Then we do a step of enrichment. We do not just collect metadata, we collect also PDF of the open access publication and we apply mining in this full text. Why we do this? To enrich the graph by adding links between research products and funders and projects and research products and research infrastructure. We also have another step of enrichment that we call propagation. It exploits native information of the entities and the semantics of the relationship that binds to node to infer new information in the form of links that can be added to the graph. This is the automatic stuff that OpenERD does to build the graph but there is also the work that the end user can do because the graph is participatory, is everyone's graph. So if you go and search in OpenERD and you find that something that should be linked is not, you can add this link. You can also grow the graph by adding products that are not there by searching them in Datasite, Crossref or Oracle. If you want to discover more, you can go at graph.opener.eu to have more comprehensive information about the OpenERD research graph. Just to give you an idea, we collect metadata, links and full text from more than 2k sources worldwide to materialize a graph where entities of the research lifecycle are linked to each other. We collect metadata from PubMed. We collect data repository that are registered to Retreat Data. We collect links from Skoll Explorer. We collect information about organization from Grid. We collect all orchids and summing up we have more than 400 million harvested records, 500 million bilateral links and more than 13 million full text on which can apply mining. These are the set of services that can be built on top of the graph and now we are concentrating on the OpenERD Connect one. What is the OpenERD research community dashboard? It is a service that allows us to deploy gateways to research communities, research infrastructure and research initiatives. Why did we want to provide this service? Because as I said before, data are a lot, are scattered all over and it is really, really difficult for a researcher to find something that is interesting for him. But it's also difficult to let the other find the research that he has done to let them know which is the service of this research infrastructure that has used. It is difficult to publish following the open science publishing principle and it is also difficult if you are the manager of a research infrastructure to compute the importance of your research infrastructure to find which are the relevant pieces of information that can help you to measure your impact. The gateway can be an answer to all these questions. The gateway aims to be a single entry point for all the research products that can be related to a research community or research infrastructure. In this kind, in this, in this, now it is for Daria. But how can we choose among all the products that are present in OpenERD, those that are relevant for a given gateway? This is mainly due to the work of the gateway curator. It is up to the curator to provide us a list that allow us to link some products to the gateway. The curator should provide us with a list of projects funding the infrastructure and we can, thanks to the association between the results and the projects, add the results to the, to the gateway. The curator should select some data sources that are relevant for this community, as well as the Zenodo community. And then it should also ask the mining team to implement a mining algorithm specific for the research infrastructure that searches in the full text of the open access publications that we have downloaded, those that are relevant for the, for the infrastructure. Also, the researchers can have, can play a role in growing the information related to the gateway. They can do it by manually linking missing research products to the gateway, thanks to the link functionality that we will see later on. But also providing a list of DOI in bulk and we will get this list and everything that is in there for which we have a DOI can be associated to the dashboard. And then OpenERD helps also by applying what we thought before, propagation that exploit strong semantic link between two products. For example, if I know that the publication is related to the area and that is also supplemented by a data source that is not related to the area, thanks to the strong semantic relationship I can take, let me say take this, the data source and bring it in the data gateway. Connect.OpenERD.U is the entry point for all the gateways that we have so far and you will find also the access to the data one. And if you want to build on the results that are within a gateway, you can do it in two ways. You can use the API that OpenERD provides to collect all the results that are associated to a gateway. Or you can download the dump of the research community or infrastructure you are interested in that is published in Zenodo. And then I will leave the floor to Asbet again that will show which are the information that she has provided us to populate the dashboard. Asbet, the floor is yours. Thank you Miriam. Okay. And hold on participants, we are going to stop talking soon and start a practical part. Wait, maybe I should share my screen again. Okay. Okay. Just let me put it to presentation mode. So we are going to have a very quick look at how we populated the dashboard so far, but please keep in mind that this is an ongoing effort. So first of all, it was super important to identify the already existing area communities. And I already mentioned this French national repository for you, which is a primary information hub for Daria. Here, the mining rule is that every each record that contains Daria in any of their metadata fields should automatically be added to the Daria OpenERD research community dashboard. And we also identified the Daria relevant Zenodo communities and added them to the dashboard. But of course, and like from how you mainly have publications. If you're familiar with Zenodo, you know that Zenodo is pretty much everything. So you will find your research data publications, presentation slides, software, whatever everything, all kinds of content types in the Daria community. And so we also found it's super important to add Daria affiliated data services to the dashboard. And to make their work visible in a shared European horizon. And so to this end, we selected two of the flagship Daria data services, the French SSH social science and humanities repository NACA. And the German repository text grid, which is an end stage of a cool virtual research environment where humanities scholars can create encoded digital critical editions of literary work or music. And they have a repository that we also selected for this exercise. Unfortunately, the text grid content is not yet part of the Daria dashboard. So you won't find content from text grid, but stay tuned. It will land in our dashboard in a couple of days really or a week or so. And so the task in order to, like the challenge was here to develop interoperability frameworks between these two data services that are operating on a national level and has their domain specific flavors of metadata standards. So in practice, it meant that the developers of these services had to set up metadata crosswalks between their own standards, data site or DC terms with the open air, sorry, doubling core or instance with the open air standards based on data site. So it was Nicola Larus and Juan Morambil who did the NACA part. So the reason why you are able to find NACA content and NACA data in the Daria dashboard is thanks to them. And as a second step, we also selected, we were quite strict with the curation policy, we selected only subset of content found in these data repositories that are really strongly associated with Daria, either from the national Daria institutions or projects that have been founded directly by Daria. And finally, we also wanted to include the publications to the dashboard that are publications in a classic sense that are published by academic publishers and it's out of our control, you know, in terms of metadata and standards and everything. To this end, we curate a Zotero library with underlying Google scholar query. So it works like if a publication record lands or starts to be indexed by Google scholar that contains the word Daria, then it should be automatically landed in this Zotero collection where we manually discard or approve them. And so it, yet it takes at this point a lot of manual curation to, you know, fish from this Zotero library to select only those records and add them to the Daria dashboard that are truly affiliated with Daria. So entries where Daria is just mentioned or Daria services just mentioned will not end here, but descriptions of Daria services, reflections on them, publications from Daria affiliated authors will land in a Daria dashboard. So we started adding them and it's an ongoing work. We are proceeding in a retroactive basis from 2020 on. So soon you will find the whole coverage, but now we can find only entries from, or mainly from 2020. We can save the lessons learned for later, I guess, for during the Q&A if we will have time for this. And it's more important to touch upon very quickly what's in there for you, like why it's an interesting thing for you to interact with the dashboard. For researchers it's pretty obvious it's a discovery tool where they can find not only publications, but also data and software. They can explore links between the different content types and they can also connect their own research to the dashboard and like, you know, affiliated with Daria and increase its visibility. For content providers you will see that like, if you really invest into this metadata crosswalks, then it has quite an impact in terms of visibility because the content of your service will be visible, will be part of the open air research graph and of course will be featured in the Daria dashboard if it's Daria service. And for institutions it's pretty much the same advantage is present. So you can showcase your work, you can showcase your institution's work, you can showcase all the advancement you make, all the scholarship you have on a local level, you can lift it up to the European horizon. So I think we are now at the handsome part. Before we start our little scavenger hunt exercises, I think Miriam is going to give us a brief feature tutorial, right Miriam? Yeah. Okay, so I stopped sharing my screen, I already stopped it. It was just a very, very quick demo of the dashboard. You should stop sharing your screen. You should be able to share your screen, Miriam. Yes, just a moment. As I said before, this is the entry point for the gateways and you can enter one, in this case we have selected the Daria one. In the home page you can see the summary, what is the gateway about, who is the curator, how many publications, how many research data, how much soft, how many software and how many other research products it contains, which are the projects. Sorry Miriam, I think we are looking at your slides and not your screen. I'm sorry, let me try it again. Can you see it? Yes, now we can see everything pretty much. Aha, yes. Can you see the Daria? Yes. Okay, so you will see a description of the dashboard with which are the supporting organization, in this case it's Daria. You can go and see which are the most, the five recent publications that you can find in the gateway. If you click on it, you will have a summary, a description of the publication with the summary where you can go and download it, which are the funded projects, which are the communities that are related, in this case also the digital humanities and cultural heritage. You have the search functionality, if you click on it, you will have a sort of filters that can be used to refine your search. The open access one will be added by default, but you can remove it. You can also use the advanced search. You can choose among many, many fields to be used to search, for example, for an author. I don't know if I wrote it right. You can add the rule. You can add as many rules as you like and with the end or not logic operators. Then you can click the search and see nothing to display, but maybe it is because I wrote your name in the incorrect way. Then we have functionality to deposit your research in the research, in the institutional repository of your organization, or if you do not want to deposit it, you can use the related Zenodo communities that are associated to the dashboard. Clicking by new upload, you will be redirected to the Zenodo upload feature and it will make you upload the data on the dashboard in Zenodo, on the community in Zenodo. Then we also provide the link functionality to link. You must sign in because we need to know who is making the linking. Once you are signed in, you can search, for example, let me try Alessia Bardi because I know how to write it. You can find all the information related to this search in OpenAir, in Crossref, in Datasite and also in Orchid. The first result that is shown in Orchid is not the one we want, so we can go and search for the others and then we are shown all the publications that are published by Alessia and we can select one or more to be linked to a product. In this case, we're linked to an entity. In this case, we select a community. Daria is selected by default, but we can select also others, for example, digital humanities and cultural heritage. Then if I click finish linking, these two sources will be linked to Daria and to digital humanities and cultural heritage. I will not do it because I do not want to. Once I link, the manager of the gateway will be asked to verify the link and it can approve or remove it. This is more or less everything, very quickly because then you will go to have the end zone with IceBat. So IceBat, the floor is yours. Okay, thanks Miriam. We received a comment on the chat saying that it was a bit too small for screen. Sorry for that, but don't worry because we are going to go through the same features together step by step. You will have your chance to get engaged pretty much now. So now I would like to ask you to prepare your keyboards and so let me just leave the instructions here. So you are invited to visit the dashboard in your own browser. So go to Daria.openair.eu and please try to login. There are many login options. You can use your ORPK, you can use your institutional one, you can use social media. It's really up to you. Just go there, take a test, try to login and if you are friends with Daria or interested in digital humanities you are also very welcome to subscribe to the gateway. So I give you a couple of. So Daria.openair.eu, Daria.openair.eu, sorry. Oh yeah, thanks Gwen for putting it to the chat. So the first question I want to ask you because it's super important especially for the open air team to gain feedback of your experiences, how much the infrastructure, the discovery environment is resonating with you. Is that are you happy with the signing options? I don't think we need to open up the mentor that I prepared for this purpose. I would like to just ask you to put your opinion in the chat. Okay, it can be also silent yes but it can also be a suggestion if you have anything in mind, whether you found it convenient, whether you could use the federated login with your ORPK or Facebook or what have you and you are also very welcome to raise your hand and speak up at this point. Okay, not everyone knows the institutions are behind EDU gain, that's a point, yeah. Okay, if you have no other specific feedback, please also feel free to raise your hand or just put into the chat if you have problems accessing with the dashboard because we are going to play around with the search functionalities in the coming minutes. So we should stay on the same page also literally because the second exercise will be that we can take a step forward if you are able to, if you're able to sign in. Here you can see the mentor meter that we skipped but here you can also see the signing options, ORPK, Facebook, Google, whatever, social media. So now let's go to the search facilities. Okay, try a single click on a search and I think let's start with the project. Okay, so if you click on one of the attributes, for instance project name, you can try the ZIR, Humanities at Scale or Cendari, these are the Darya projects that are visible in the dashboard and you can include them to the search and see what kind of information you found about this project. Let me stop my, let me also go to the, I see ORKID worked, cool. Okay, let me also go to the dashboard myself and so research outcomes, projects is here and let me also reshare my screen with you. Okay, so if you click on, here you can see the projects associated with Darya. It was, it was quite a decision, you know, we decided that the bigger projects in which we are just one, which are not Darya dominant, we just one have one and we are just one of the contributors, we decide like part annals or the social sciences and humanities open cloud or EURMEOS or many of these highly collaborative EUR projects. We decided not to claim as Darya projects because their ownership is essentially shared across many research infrastructures and institutions, but so you can find quite an information about the EUR projects associated with Darya and what is more important, you will find the publications, no research data in the case of this year, but the software as well. Okay, so what I mentioned to you how easily project outputs can get scattered on the web, this is certainly a tool that goes against this. Do you have any questions so far? Please feel free to raise your hand if you have or just speak up or put your remarks to the chat. If not, then we can take, we can go even one degree. Yes, sorry to interrupt, so people cannot speak up themselves. That's what I said at the beginning, so I didn't put it in the chat. Sorry, I forgot about that. So there are two questions in the Q&A. Yeah, okay. Maybe you can just take a look at those. Of course, we can always do that. To compliment, in fact, it's working but depending on spelling for me, yes or probably the search facilities are case sensitive. If I can say something on the first question, in OpenL it is not possible to display or publish the work from one researcher, but only the work is referred as the corresponding author. It is not the case because we do not have authors as entities in OpenL, not for the moment at least. And when we search for an author, we search in an index. So you can find your information and also the information of the other authors that match the query, the result of the query. Thanks a lot for this update, Miriam. And I think we are also going to have a search exercise where we are going to use the author field in the faceted search. So I think we can move to this point. So our second exercise has to do with the advanced search capabilities of the dashboard. So yeah, project name this we did. So you can play around with it also on your own, later on after the webinar. And advanced search. So as you can see, I put together quite a query for you. So you can see it on my screen just below the big blue search button. You can see advanced search and you can search along different facets if you click on it. So I would invite you to try advanced search, select publications or you can just skip this part. And let's try to combine different facets. So I was trying to put together a search query for you that is very typical of Doria. And so DEI, the Text and Coding Initiative is quite a good candidate for that because there is a lot of discussion and lots of work in Doria going on around the Text and Coding Initiative. So put DEI in a free text search or you can search it also as subject area. Okay. And then with the plus button that you can find in the advanced search, you also have the possibility to search words of individual authors. So I picked the previous director slash founder of Doria, Lauren Romery to attribute his work a little bit. Also on this occasion, so try to search DEI plus select the Altair field in the advanced search possibilities and fill it with Lauren Romery. You can find the exact spelling here. And we can see what we find. Now I stop sharing my screen and we'll switch to the dashboard myself. In the meantime, you can complete your search query on your own, in your own browser. So search advanced, share my screen with you. Okay. So you can see here is this link. I hope the size of the screen is okay now. You can add the rule. You can select from the many fields, title, author, orchid ID, if you want to make it sure, description, subject, publisher, access mode, community, la, la, la, la, many things. I select author, type in Lauren, hopefully without typos. And let's see what we have. So it's really interesting to see like on the left side, you can see the facets. So you can see that there are actually many content types, reports, conference objects, preprints, book chapters, many things that are brought together from many places. You can see how many of them are added to communities. This COVID-19 is especially interesting to explore, but I will stay disciplined and not check it. You can see the content providers. So indeed, we are bringing together content from many resources and countries. And so I think the format won't allow us to interact that much or explore things live on your own. But what I want you to see also is that if you click on one record that I randomly selected here, Miriam was talking about interlinking, really relevant content types. So on the landing page of a record, which is a research article from 2015, in this case, you can see citing possibilities. You can see sharing possibilities on the top. But what is even more exciting, at least to me, is that if you click on related research, you will see, in this case, a software interlinked with this publication. So you know our long-awaited dream of being able to permanently ring datasets, code, other research outputs with our publications and keep all this package together is possible via this research community gateway. I think it's a really important feature. And so if you want to do this on your own with your own publications or publications of somebody who trusts you, you can click on this linking feature and then you can play around with that. Let me have a... Can I add one thing? Of course, always. It shows you the related research result shows you that it has been added to the gateway because it was inferred by OpenAir, the link. So you also have an idea why it is there. So it doesn't come by surprise. Yeah, thanks for this extra information, this developer background. So I don't see any questions so far. I really hope that you are still with me. Now, as a first step, I would like to invite you to go and hunt for your own institutional repository or synodal communities and look at ways how you can plug them into the Daria dashboard or any other dashboard. You can do this with the bigger digital humanities and culture heritage collection, many others. So let me just share you how to do this and then on your own, you can go and take a look at your own repositories that you have in mind. So if you click on Deposit, in the Deposit tab, then it will land on this blue-colored landing page of depositing research that Miriam already showed you. And so the question you might have in mind is that, okay, let's see whether my institutional repository is here. So the repository I have in mind is an Irish one, for instance, where my boss Jennifer Edmond is obliged to deposit her publications. So I just started typing Trinity College. I'm not sure whether... So you can see I find the Trinity College Digital Repository here. I find the D-space instance of Trinity and many other smaller repositories that are associated with Trinity. But of course, you can do this with your institution, whatever you have, whether it's a thematic one, national one, institutional one. And if you go to Visit Repository to Deposit, it connects you, it makes the handshake or makes the step from one space to another. And you can put your research there. And then once it's harvested by open air again, it will land in the respective community. So let me again zoom out a little bit. You are very welcome to put in the chat what you found. Did you find your institutional repository? Did you find what you're looking for? Or is it a repository that you're actually missing from the repository? Cool. And of course, you can do the same thing where you can do the same thing with Zanado communities. So if you scroll down, you can see find an institutional repository or use related Zanado communities. And you can see that for Daria, we selected two communities, the major master Daria collection. And we also have a, we have many working groups at Daria. And one of them has their own dedicated space on Zanado. And since it's highly affiliated with Daria, we added the community, the Zanado community of this working group as well. The last thing I want to show you as kind of a hands-on exercise is the linking functionality of the dashboard. And you're very welcome to give it a try with your own name. You know, we are academics, try to perform such exercises with our very identity first or a researcher who you read, who you like, who you respect. And so to make your own work visible in the open research graph in general and in the Daria gateway in particular, you have many options to do this. So I will going to do the exercise with the aforementioned boss of mine, Jennifer Edmond, and see what are her options to add her publications and other research work to the dashboard. So you can see, I just click on, just include her name. And so you can see what we find, book reviews, collaborative publications, project deliverables, and the like that are already present in the open air system. You can import data from crossref, but let's I don't know what I did wrong. You can import data from data site. And you can also import data from an orchid. I think the reason why the system found Jennifer's orchid and no publications must be a question of permissions, you know, like it's super, I think it's super important to push through this information to all users of orchid. If you want your publications to be visible, not only for people, but also for systems like this one. It's super important to reflect it in your privacy settings of your orchid profile. So I think that's it. And then as Miriam already showed it to you, you can select the publications. You can see some automatic information even here. And then you can link to the publication to the real dashboard or the dashboard or community that you have in mind. So I think that was my quick, you know, test drive found with you. I hope that like, now it's a bit of a pity that we are online and we cannot, you know, freely interact face to face. But don't worry because I'm going to come back to my presentation and we are not going to start the Q&A session before we do a Google Mentimeter before. So I hope my hands-on hints were not too quick. I hope it was easy to follow. I hope you had a good time like exploring the research community dashboard or the open and discovery framework in general on your own. I would like to ask you to, again, go to mentimeter.com and use the code that you can see here. I'm going to, you know what, I'm going to do the same as I did. I'm going to just copy the link that you can directly access the Mentimeter and then you just need to click on it. Just give me a second. You can take a, you can take a breath in the meantime. Or Miriam, if you have anything to add to this, you are very welcome to comment on the feature over here. Maybe just the orchid that wasn't found. Maybe it wasn't the orchid you were searching for. Maybe it was another Edmond. Yeah, you know, it's nice to be Ejibet Totsifra because there are not many people running around with this name. But on the other hand with this name, it was, for me, it was pretty obvious the values of orchid and the value of disambiguation, you know. So yeah, okay. So I found the link to the Torlust Mentimeter, the feedback Mentimeter in the meantime. You can simply click on it and you can share how did you like the discovery experience on the dashboard, whether it's clear to you, whether you could find your own publications easily, whether you found something surprising that you didn't mean to, like that looked a little bit odd. Or any kinds of experiences you are very welcome to share with us. And this is going to be a nice, you know, transition to the Q&A session. Let me know if you have any problems with accessing the Mentimeter poll. While you are typing, I'm sharing my screen with the results page, okay, which is, which is yet empty. Of course, if you don't want to play around with the Mentimeter, or you are not in favor of, you know, using multiple tools and multitasking, you are also very welcome to put your feedback to the Q&A or to the chat. Uh-huh. Handle case sensitive things in the search box. This is a, this is a super useful feedback. Thanks a lot. Whoever submitted it. Yes, every kind of feedback is very, very important for us to make the service better because we want the community user to use the services. Mm-hmm. So every feedback is precious. Thanks. I can see in the meantime that people are putting stuff in the chat as well. Miriam, can you read out those? I think the Mentimeter page is showing only for panelists, but not to attend these. The link, I mean. Oh, okay. Ah, sorry for that. Let me just copy the voting link once again and also the digit code. Maybe it's easier if I copy the digit code. That was the reason of the silence there. Okay, sorry for my mistake. Now you can, I go back to the, come back to the chat and we'll panelists and attendees. And here you can find the digit code. So go Mentimeter.com or Menti.com and enter these digits. And now it should work for everyone. And I come back to the result page. More Doria affiliated repositories included. Yes, this is a, this is a super important remark. As I told you, currently under the research data content types, you can only find data from two sources. First from the Doria Zotero Zanado community, data that is shared there. And second from the French Nakala repository. In the coming days, we are going to add tax grid also as data source. And honestly, I love the vote of displaying digital critical additions as research data because it's a super important but very domain specific data type in the arts and humanities. So this is more to come. But in order to make it more diverse, also linguistically, also disciplinary, I would really love to see more data service providers from across Doria contacting us that, hey, hey, I want to include my service. How can I do this? And we will be very happy to help you out. But basically, in order to do that, you will need to build the same metadata crosswalk, as I mentioned, from your standards to the open, to the open standards. I tried it quickly, but linking wasn't so easy. To import publication from Orchid. Okay. Yes, the linking part is the more difficult to manage. But if you write in the chat or whatever you prefer, which was the problem that you get, we can try and see if we can handle it in some ways. Maybe the person who wrote this can raise their hands and then I can allow you to talk. It might be easier now. If they wish. If they wish. If they don't just. Also, the more functionalities in managing search results. What do you mean by more functionalities? Yes, it would be nice to elaborate. Okay, so it was your drug. The drug, okay. Yes. What I had in mind is to be able to sort search results, to be able to export search results in different formats, to be able to do export import in some other system easily. And actually, also, I prefer more condensed, but this is a matter of design. I prefer more condensed display. So you need to scroll for you. You have only two or three references on your screen, then you need to scroll to see more. I see. So it's, but this is design issue. And but what is important is really to be, yes, also sorting by relevance. That's always interesting. And information is missing how you count the relevance, you know, by frequency of appearance of the term or yes. But but in short, I would like to see more sort options by authors, by alphabetically. Okay, thank you very much. First or titles or or whatever. So it's but export import options are also important and especially offering a different format. You can download. Yes. Sorry, maybe I missed something. Yes, of course, because we did very, very quickly. But you can download the result of the search. You can see it in my screen at Ranka. So you can download in there. Can you see it? Yes. Okay, you can download the search results in a CSV. And my also my comment is that so I think it was a super important remark from you like transparency in this sort by relevance because it's always a mystery to researchers with regarding the others. I would also recommend to play around with the facets on the left. So you can tick, like if you want to have just articles, you can tick one. If you want to, if it's a multilingual search results set, then you can. So you can play around with all these facets on the left content provider country, whatever. And then you can always filter the search results along these facets. So this is also something maybe. Yes. And the last comment related to search results. It's what I really like with Google Scholar. And I find it really very often very useful is this citation. So very often I use Google Scholar only to be able just to very quickly copy and paste the reference in different formats, APA or Harvard or Thanks. Oh, yeah, it's so it's so right. Yes. And you know, like if you click on a result, like you click on side this research product. Yes. Then you can change from a couple of like APA and Harvard and MLA and like so this you can do, but you need to click one click further for this on the result page like you cannot. I don't know Miriam. Maybe we should. We should ask. That's okay. Thank you for that. I didn't realize this earlier. Maybe it is not so understandable and we should, I don't know, make it more clear that you can have this kind of issues. My idea is that is that maybe like I don't know whether it's possible Miriam, but maybe like indicating this on the search result landing page on the record level like in addition to the tags like maybe, I don't know, like you could link. I can write it down and ask. Yeah, you can link to like export citation or site as or something like that. Yeah. Okay, let me go back to the to the Mentimeter results. We discussed the more functionalities. We discussed the difficulties with ORCID. We discussed more Daria services. Yes. This is the biggest yes. And the case sensitivity. So I think if you, yes. That is a question in the question and answers. Okay. Yeah. So in the meantime, I'm closing the Mentimeter. I'm stop sharing my screen for the time being to see the questions. And so I leave the Mentimeter open. If you play around with the with the dashboard later after the webinar, you're very welcome to also leave your feedback later. As I said before, it will be super important for us to have all kinds of feedback that you would like to to share with us everything. So Johan has a question on in the Q&A who says that when the application fails, merging the fight them that should not be merged. What can be done to fix it? Hi, this is a this is quite an aggregation oriented question. The application is a complex matter that can fail. It can merge items that shouldn't be merged and it cannot merge item that should be merged. So what can we do when we realize that this kind of things have happened? We try to understand why and we try to refine our the duplication algorithm to avoid this kind of situation in the future. It's all we can do. Yeah, I know it's a it's a different it's it's a difficult matter like finding a balance in in in the emerging policies. And I also see a question from yes from since Yana, maybe my my pronunciation might be wrong, who said that she's connected, they are connected a screen without a microphone or camera capacity. And so they tried to link important article from our kids but remained hanging between the two platforms possibly with more attempts it would work out. Yes, I suppose it is a problem not not not viewed to the to the gateway. It's always a it's always a question of alignment between different systems, right? Like a question of translation in a computational sense. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. We still have like one or two minutes for last minute feedback, last minute questions. Or if you don't have any more questions than maybe I would like I would like to to to share my email address or yours or the email of both of us. In case they have questions or feedback to give us or Yeah, Miriam, do you want more? I should prepare the thank you slide and maybe I have it somewhere but probably the easier is if you could put your email address to the chat and then people can save it. There's also someone Harry Dimitropoulos who raised their hand so I'm going to allow him to talk. Oh, okay. Yeah, Harry. Please go ahead. Hello, actually, no, it was a mistake that I raised the hand. I'm going to send an email. It's something beyond the webinar. I vote so but it's nice to have you here, Harry, anyway. So it's nice to have experts as well present. Yeah. Okay. I will share my screen. It should be the right one. Yes. So and maybe you can also put it to the chat and then people can just copy paste it. I do not remind your email. It's okay. It's okay. I can also I can also put it to the chat. You are very welcome to contact me, especially if you are from around area, how to make the dashboard research, the dashboard work for your research, for your service, for your institution, for your Darya in kind contribution, you know. So thanks a lot to everybody. I think we can wrap it up and say goodbye to each other. As a concluding remark, so I think what we learned as like the Darya team working on this dashboard is first of all, it's super important to make our services and the scholarship they are curating and publishing making available visible because we need to because it's a super important step to get appropriately valued and get our scholarship visible and valued enough. And by building the crosswalks, what I think it's important to highlight that it's always a question of translation as you could as you could see. Wrong email. Okay. I can correct it. Yes, sorry. So it's super important that building metadata crosswalk is not one directional work. It's never as easy that the service providers do this on their end and end of the story. Since it's translation, since it's bridging different systems, it's necessary to have support structure available on both ends of the system. So we are super grateful for the opener team for your continuous and intensive support. Thanks a lot. It would have been much more difficult to do this alone. But yes, I think that's it. I corrected my email address in the meantime and yes, now you know where to find us with your additional remarks. Thanks for your attention. Okay. Thank you very much. A little bit in the medium for very interesting showcase and thank you everybody for attending and for your questions. So like I said at the beginning, this has been recorded and voter recordings and the slides will be made available by other usual channels.