 Fy hoffi am y cwrsdyn nhw am yr ydydd y 19 ar y Proses Cymru, y Comitee ac roedd y rhai i'r cymdeithasol yng nghymru yng Nghymru. Rwy'n gweld bod yn y cymdeithasol yng nghymru yn y Gyrnodol Cymru yn y Cyfraffi'r ystafell. Rwy'n gweld yn gweld y cymdeithasol o'r cymdeithasol o'r cymdeithasol. Rwy'n gweld bod yn cymdeithasol yng nghymru yn gŷlio ar y cyfieithi ein cyffredinol. No points have been raised on the draft, public appointments and public bodies, etc. Scotland Act 2003, treatment of south of Scotland enterprise, as specified authority order 2019. Is the committee content with this instrument? Item 3, considering instruments subject to the negative procedure and the first one is the non-domestic rates relief for new and improved properties Scotland amendment regulations, SSI 2019-116. The regulations were laid before the Parliament on 22 March and came into force on 31 March. This does not respect the requirement that at least 28 days should elaps between the laying of an instrument subject to the negative procedure and the coming into force of that instrument. The reasons for the breach are set out in correspondence with the Presiding Officer, which is available in our published papers. Standing orders require the committee to draw to the Parliament's attention any failure to respect the 28 day laying requirement. Does the committee wish to draw the regulations to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground J as the regulations fail to comply with the requirements of section 28.2 of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform Scotland Act 2010? Is the committee content that the failure to comply with section 28 is acceptable in the circumstances? The next instrument is the TSE Scotland amendment regulations, SSI 2019-118. Before the committee jumps in, I'm going to have a stab at what TSE actually means. Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy. Got it. The instrument amends the 2010 regulations to align them with an EC regulation on rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain types of the disease prior to EU exit. The instrument contains an error in relation to the failure to follow proper drafting practice when referring to an EU instrument in the preamble. Does the committee wish to draw the instrument to the attention of the Parliament on the general ground, as there has been a failure to follow proper drafting practice in the preamble? No points have been raised on SSIs 2019-121 and 133, so is the committee content with these instruments. Gender item 4, considering instruments not subject to any parliamentary procedures, no points have been raised on SSIs 2019-122, 123 and 134. Is the committee content with these? Okay. Okay. Gender item 5, considering the Scottish Government's response to our stage 1 report on the Transport Bill, the Government agreed to look at some of our recommendations. I'm sure we'll look at the bill again following any amendments at stage 2. Does the committee wish to note the Government's response to our stage 1 report on the Transport Bill? Okay. And agenda item 6, considering the Government's response to our stage 1 report on the climate change emissions reduction targets bill, we made only one recommendation at stage 1, which can be read in the accompanying paper that the Government has agreed to. It will therefore seek to amend the bill in line with the committee's recommendation at stage 2. Does the committee wish to welcome the Government's response to our stage 1 report on the climate change bill? Thank you and I'll move the meeting into private.