 My name is James Cameron and I'm Chairman of the ODI, which is I think our leading think tank on development issues. I was founder of Climate Change Capital, an investment business focused on that issue. I'm also Chairman of Agriculture and Agriculture Development Business in East Africa, and I'm on the board of Eco-Imagination and GE Eco-Imagination. I'm interested in how the landscape's concept, the framing of the multiple issues that are contained within the landscape's idea can bring together climate concerns, access to water, productive land, food security, biodiversity, ways in which land can be managed to deliver multiple benefits and further the public good in having rich, productive, prosperous, diverse systems. And those systems are going to have to be resilient to climate change. So, in a way, climate change is a meta-theme that covers everything. It's part of its problem. It's all about everything. And it needs to be broken up into parts that are manageable. And it needs to be connected to people's ordinary everyday experience of living. And we haven't always done that very well. We have often had conversations about the climate that is too remote from human experience, too disconnected from a vast majority of human civilization that has either never heard of the problem, probably four in ten people on the planet have never heard of climate change, or can't access the problem via something more immediate. And so it's the job of people who know, politicians, academics, practitioners, business people, to find ways of connecting ordinary everyday experience to the climate change issue. And that can happen in very precise and individual investment calculations. If I make an investment in this building, I'm doing it for a financial return. Can I make that investment in a way that allows greenhouse gases to be reduced? If I invest in this farm in order to produce this essential good, maybe rice, can I do that in a way that is resilient to climate change? Can I cope with the scarcity of water, for example? Can I do it with sustainable energy? Can I do it in a way that actually might increase the capacity of the economy to grow sustainably? These are all the kind of questions that are being asked here that I've spent years working on. Yes, I feel as if it's entirely possible to bring the objectives of sustainable development and economic prosperity together. In fact, I think ultimately they will be their own definition. And that ultimately is a critical word because there's a time dimension to this. A lot of investments are far too short term to be able to connect with long term planning about the unfolding of the climate change problem in the landscape. People on the whole don't have incentives to think that long term. And yet climate change is a fact of life today. It is a present reality. So pretending it is a future problem is already miscalculating, making a wrong assessment of risk. It's also true that many of the kinds of investments that we think will make more productive and more efficient use of resources will produce economic benefits, even without very specific incentives associated with the carbon value or the sustainability value of the investment. So we think there's plenty of experience now of how new technologies can be combined in order to produce really, really good economic results for whole economies. For example, the convergence between renewable energy storage and demand side management. We think it's entirely possible to build sustainable agriculture at scale now that we know a lot more about how the soils can be made more capable of sequestering a carbon more capable of holding more diverse species more productive. So I think many of the calculations that we make about what to do about our landscape can now be infused with experience of real investments producing real returns in both private gain and public good. We learned in Tanzania that first of all it's possible to acquire quite large tracts of land to produce a staple crop in an environmentally sustainable way using renewable energy, keeping the small holders on the land so that there is some community development for those that were there before, often those who had no land rise before but who now can be given land to work alongside and now worked with because although they don't have to sell to us, they can and we will collect their rice and we can mill it and we can dry it and we can market it if they want or we can just pay them for the paddy. All of that provides a more healthy economic system for the small holder of value in the region and it's brought in, let's face it, finance, fertilize and appropriate mechanization that wouldn't be there but for us. So those synergies are very encouraging. We've now learned a lot about what you do. We also learned that plenty of things you can't fix on your own. There's still large-scale political risk. There's still poor infrastructure. It's very expensive to do something from scratch. There are no near neighbors who can fix your vehicles and can share knowledge about what happens when your pivot irrigation attracts a stem borer disease and you lose your crop. These things have to be learned expensively for the first time but we are learning them and when we're done we will have something to pass on or to replicate or to scale up in a bigger business.