 Thank you Anand. Such is the case with the interesting discussions you always go over time but I'm really encouraged by the number of participants we still have them with us. So thank you for your patience, all attendees and participants. We are moving on to our last session which is wave forward and wrap up. In this session we will have three excellent speakers who have a great international experience, who will share their insights on the whole process of CNI and more so on people and restoration and their association or how these relates to with international country level commitments and so on and so forth. In interest of saving time and my apologies to all esteemed speakers, I'm not going to introduce you individually, you are well known people and people can find more information about your work and your association on our website. But I'll invite first Maria Nutinen from FAO to share her insights and Pete Lenz monitoring in global context. Over to you, Maria. Thanks so much Rupesh and thank you for C4 colleagues always very inspiring, solid, very interesting sessions that we are having. Let me know if there's any problem with what you're seeing. I prefer presenting in this mode if that's possible. Yeah, so my, my name is Maria Nutinen. I am a lead thematic lead of FAO's work on Pete Lenz. And this presentation is a compilation a whole lot of people, in particular Adam Gerand who is today here also at the session. Elizabeth drums who is working and helping us to work on the indie work on in Indonesia and Laura Villegas in charge of monitoring aspects. Not everybody could be here today but this is indeed a group work. So just showing underlining the momentum and the advances that we are having at the moment worldwide. So there's of course increased recognition of Pete Lenz. This is well demonstrated by the presentation commitment on this. And one key aspect that I want to highlight here is a CBD process for the biodiversity indicator so let's not also forget about the biological diversity of the wetlands pieces that have been for example, reintroduced to the Pete Lenz. I just want to touch upon on the technical innovations. As you may know, our unit here is working on remote sensing aspects but this is not the only area where I think some advanced very rapidly so we're hopefully having a lot more tools within a few more years. The same applies to capacity development, as you may see in the whole movement around the around global Pete Lenz initiative, and also the development of capacity not only in Indonesia but worldwide is taking the knowledge and expertise also to a different level. And I want to hear, lift up the opportunity that the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration brings to us with also resources to develop this capacity. I will touch upon that a little bit more in the presentation. So here just to highlight that Pete Lenz is actually one of the key, let's say types of restoration that the UN Decade where it's focusing on. And the Decade can help us also globally establish these kind of baselines, looking at the success cases and for sure there's a lot of attention also to Indonesia, the different tools and approaches which have been developed by different partners because this is really an effort that is managed, it's coordinated by UNEP and FAO. However, it's a really group effort with a lot of partners and the units that are contributing, at least I think it's over 100 members to the UN Decade at the moment. So, for example, the Decade is supporting currently in defining the global indicators that will be monitored throughout the UN Decade, so the 2021 up to 2030, and then report it to the different countries who have requested this Decade to be happening. And just let me highlight also here the science-based target for the peatland restoration. So Indonesia has already won, but should there be also a global one, how much by when should it happen. So please have a look at that and how Indonesian efforts could contribute there, bringing the Decade to a next level. On this slide, there's too much text, but let me just highlight that we really want to emphasize what is also quite clear in this session that we need to build on science and solid information, but also the practitioners and field systems and bringing them together to support policy planning and decision making. The idea is also to do comprehensive monitoring and reporting systems. These are quite expensive to build, so synergies and bringing things together is really important. I also really much welcome this approach of building different communities of practice. And I invite also Indonesian stakeholders to collaborate not only within Indonesia but also with the international partners as a lot of the approaches that are being developed are actually applicable with different types of peatlands in different climate areas. And just as one first key resource that I wanted to highlight, here's a publication that also many of you actually contributed to this on publishing two years ago on peatland mapping and monitoring. So a lot of the key overview of what needs to be looked at and kind of tools also is also listed there in a quite short format. Then so I wanted to just highlight a few resources. These are from different members to the global peatlands initiative where we already 46 members. I think they believe this measurement that chamber measurement is from C4 actually here is a PhD tool developed for Indonesian peatland restoration and in general management also the account for an estimate greenhouse gas emissions. The IPCC guidelines which is the solid confirmed guidance for also greenhouse and climate climate estimates and for the reporting of those estimates. Here we see a tool, automatized tool, which is also developed for Indonesian context, very important that this is advancing rapidly and some manual deep wells for water table depth measurements which were also mentioned with biophysical monitoring. And then of course last but not least, just wanted to highlight the sepal platform which is developed by FAO and has for example high resolution imagery available for national actors for monitoring peatlands, both fires and soil moisture for example. Of course there are many other tools and platforms, this is just to bring to your attention the sepal tool or platform. Then what I thought also I think this might have come up before but this road to restoration tool on the call went a whole very long consultation process, which were managed by FAO and World Resources Institute. And there there is this kind of wheel of restoration with different indicators were listed and I was thinking during today's discussion that it might could be a useful tool especially when regarding the biodiversity aspects also economics, maybe things related to cultural monitoring and indicators. So just wanted to bring that to your attention. I can share the link also in the references of these presentations afterwards. Almost done here but one platform that I also wanted to bring to your attention is under development, but already has a major massive data sets money that countries are reporting to FAO and different partners are contributing. So this is the official platform for monitoring restoration advances during the UN decade on ecosystem restoration. I also just played around a little bit and inserted here. Something is ready to soil carbon for example, and I think it has also other data layers this one so you can also insert your data on different aspects by a physical socio economic and other other for example and practices or tools and and then develop your own kind of platform for reporting your, their own project level data for example I think this can deal will be in the future very interesting opportunity without having the need to invest a lot on the, your on their own platform development even of course we have also contributed to the prince platform development I found it extremely useful. Some main areas for future work that I want to highlight also from our coordination with different, between different technical partners working on a PITLA monitoring in different global context. Something that is advancing rapidly is agricultural monitoring, for example how the politic culture how sustainable management practices advancing and this is of course at the heart of Indonesia as well. Same for early warning early action systems that really you have to have the warning signs, for example for fires and then have the chain of command or chain of action what happens at different levels at the local level, regional national level, if there's for example a fire occurrence. All the governance system, there is a clear mandate as well. And finally I just want to highlight that a lot of data is being collected on the greenhouse gas emissions, sorry. There is the possibility to update the IPCC wetland guidelines with the best currently available guidance for greenhouse gas accounting on PITLA. And I wanted to also highlight here one other tool which is the IPCC atlas, which is helpful to looking at the current, the recent trends past trends and the projections in the future so we see for example for the region of Southeast Asia. It shows there's a high confidence of increased, increased heat of course, a bit same as today here in Rome. But that this will give it globally of course increase but it what it means to beat lands that's also something that we need to take into account so the urgency of reverting properly at the landscape level. And engaging with the social, social and economic tissue, the indigenous peoples, different groups of people into the process becomes even more important so that we avoid the issues that we have seen in the past. Some very brief takeaway messages from me. So what I was really happy to see there seems to be very broadly shared understanding of the status of restoration and what's actually needed that was very, very happy, happy discovery also that there's such a quite, quite good agreement on that. The social economic indicators and how we actually are collecting that data is a much, even much more challenging effort than the biophysical one, which is already quite a topic for a feedlands. I think we all partners need to put more emphasis on this. And what we what we really want to support countries is developing this holistic robust coordinated ecosystem monitoring systems that actually lead to more demonstrated better climate action, and also help countries therefore to access resources and upscale the activities that are already ongoing. And some key aspects for two development that was before just to not to forget, you would need to combine the remote sense because of the sheer scale of the task of monitoring feedlands with field measurements and monitor throughout the process cycle. That's often done, for example, by water or by once in dry or once in wet season, for example, but it has to be really regular and probably also last several years after the end of the interventions. Let me close here I'm really happy to answer questions if there's time I see a lot of comments in the chat and I go so right there my responses will share these slides with you with the references as well. Thank you so much. Thank you, my friend. Thank you for covering all the vast information which kind of ties together that are linked to each illustration, and also sharing with everyone the sort of global perspective and how different groups different organizations are working towards a common goal what are the synergies and how these collaboration and partnerships and as you say communities of practice can come together to achieve this goal. Thank you very much. We moved to our next presentation. This would be by Professor Mark Reed, he could not be attend be present personally so he recorded a small video for us, which is going to be his presentation it is about eight minutes long. We have colleague, Johan safe from UNEP with us today to answer any question or any follow-ups related to that presentation. So may I ask C for events team to present. Yes, please go ahead. Thank you. Thank you and thank you for the opportunity to present today. I'm here for the global people's initiative on behalf of Scotland's rural college one of many members of the initiative. Congratulations on the publication of your manual and for this important work. I'm going to transparently understand simple, practical and yet accurate criteria and indicators if we are going to monitor our world's people and understand how they're evolving how they're changing, especially in relation to restoration. So I'm going to summarize some of the work that the global people's initiative have been doing, and I will conclude with some work that I've been leading for the initiative on exactly this topic. So the initiative itself is broad, it's big, it's growing, we have now got 48 international partners working across four tropical people in countries in depth, but there are no geographical boundaries to this initiative. And this diversity is a real asset of the group. Together with our members, we are making progress on implementing the resolution for people that was adopted in 2019 during the fourth United Nations environment assembly on the conservation and sustainable management of people's And part of this is to do the world's first global assessment of people's this global people's assessment is going to provide an overview of people's trying to understand their extent, their condition, some of the threats and some of the things that we can do to make sure that we can serve to restore and sustainably manage those people's for future generations. We've got over 150 authors from around the world contributing to the 10 chapters. Now we have a first order chart drafts now of every chapter of the plan being that we launch at the next conference of the parties in Egypt later this year. So what we've been doing as a research as a GP I in fact is to facilitate a research working group so this is chaired by Diana Kaspersky and I we've got almost 200 researchers who are engaging in different ways with the research group, trying to share knowledge opportunities to combine forces whether that's data projects, or just new ideas so that we can operate at that global level, and working across both geographical and disciplinary boundaries. So come across some of this. I know a lot of you will have attended many of the sessions whether in person or online. We facilitate the first ever global people's pavilion at COP 26 in Glasgow. And then we can see some of the stuff on the screen here that we've done and the virtual pavilion that you can see here is still accessible and still growing some huge impacts that have come from this in terms of agreements collaborations new initiatives, and we're able to find out the long term impact and support that on an ongoing basis. But loads of things happening across the world that we are feeding into across the UN system in each of the four focal countries that we're working in as initiative, and much more broadly. One of the contributions that we're trying to make on this global level is to try and understand how we might better be able to coordinate what we do in this research space. We're collecting lots of different types of people in the data, but we're not doing this in a coordinated way and that's a problem for policy. On screen here you can see some of the work that we've done towards this. And I'm now going to visit a local Pete fog to tell you a bit more about this work and encourage you to have a look at our forthcoming paper. I think we are all increasingly aware of the importance of peatlands in the global carbon cycle and why it is so essential to protect, conserve, to sustainably manage, and when it is to restore these habitats so that we can keep the carbon locked in our peatlands in the soil where it belongs. And of course we want to base our policies and practices on evidence wherever we possibly can. But that is not about just taking the latest study that suggests we do one thing. Instead, responsible policymaking is about reviewing that body of evidence, including studies that say one thing versus another, depending on the time scale of which they were conducted, the context, the attitude, the peatland type, etc. And to get that sense of actually what the body of works as we need evidence synthesis. But that's a problem. Almost everyone who tries to do evidence synthesis in this area discovers that there are multiple studies out there, but they've all measured different things. And even where they have measured the same thing, they've measured it in different ways. And even if they measure the same thing in the same way, they may well have reported it in a very different way. They may even have reported it in the same way, but they haven't been reported all the contextual data in terms of, well, what was the peat depth? Where was it? What altitude was it at? What was the gradient it was on? The climate, all of that stuff, which you actually need to be able to interpret the findings of those studies and integrate it. So my colleagues and I set out in collaboration with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature's UK peatland program for the UK and then for tropical peatlands in collaboration with UNAP's Global Peatlands Initiative to try and reach agreement amongst the public policy practitioner community, but primarily experts who are out there collecting this data and get a consensus in what are the key things we should, wherever possible, be measuring. So to do this, we organised a consensus process where we brought together experts from the UK and from the tropics to try and agree on what are the core, the most important variables that wherever possible we should be trying to measure, whether that's a research project or a monitoring program, perhaps post-restoration. And we did that in four different categories. So we've got climatic variables, carbon accumulation rates, greenhouse gas fluxes and the like, hydrological variables, biodiversity variables, fire variables, especially in the tropics. And the idea is now that if we've got these core sets of variables to choose from, then if I'm a researcher, if I'm running a monitoring program of all the things I could measure, here are some guidance now on the key things that ideally we need to know about to inform policy and practice. And if I choose from these lists, then I increase the likelihood that I'm measuring the same things as other people, which then means that we are much more likely to be able to synthesise, integrate findings from across different studies and provide much better synthetic evidence to policy and practice. There is, of course, more work to be done. We might understand what the core variables are that we're all looking for, but we need to decide what methods are most appropriate to collect data for each of these variables. And we need to think about how we're going to report that data as well using tools like Pete Data Hub. Ultimately, this paper is a first step, but we hope an important first step towards standardising how we collect and can synthesise people and data around the world so that we can provide better evidence to policy and practice to protect these incredible habitats. Thank Mike for recording this presentation. And I think one of the key messages is very clear standardising the methods or standardising what we measure and how we measure so that it becomes a solid case or it becomes the evidence that can help in or that can influence the policy in the right direction. I do not see any specific question directed to this presentation, but people or participants are welcome to respond or give their feedback or ask a question in the chat box. I would move to our last and final speaker, Haruni, Dr. Haruni Krishnavati. She is also coordinator of ITPC, International Tropical Pete Center. Over to you, Dr. Haruni. Yes. Thank you, Rupesh. Good afternoon and good morning, colleagues. I'm the last one, but of course, it is my pleasure to be part of this workshop and appreciate both you for and partners for hosting this workshop and all speakers who have shared their presentation. I will not be giving any presentations, but based on what we have been discussing today, I acknowledge the efforts in the development of criteria and indicators for peatland restoration and also field testing, the criteria and indicators in several peatland restoration areas in Indonesia. And of course, I should also acknowledge the government of Indonesia commitments of peatland restoration and ongoing action including the development of the system to monitor peatland restoration, which is also being supported by some international partners. And we see that a lot of knowledge information on tropical peatland restoration has been available and some action has been conducted on the field to monitor the impact of restoration on vegetation and water balance as well as social and economic impacts. Ongoing action in the fields to restore and sustainable mental peatlands also exists, which could be scaled up as the best practice and develop standardized protocol for peatland restoration and monitoring and could contribute to the development of science based policy on peatland restoration and sustainable management. As a variety of knowledge products has been produced by various stakeholders and I think the synergy and cooperation is needed together, available information and knowledge and to develop further capacity to improve science based action for tropical peatland countries and provide right recommendation for policy decision. I think it regards to knowledge exchange and sharing. At DPC International Development Centre has been developing a knowledge platform, which can connect knowledge and research to people. And through this platform we can use as a tool to place for information on peatland ecosystem including those on peatland inventory, restoration mapping, monitoring and reporting. This can be used as a tool for knowledge exchange, for example on the strength and weakness and sharing the capacity building. And also we can use this to interconnect expert, peatland expert individuals to peatland expert directory and so can be used as a tool to synthesize knowledge on peatland restoration. The knowledge platform can also be used to facilitate unique peer to peer exchange or based practice in order to scale up and improve action for peatland restoration. And finally I would like to also emphasize that I think we need to coordinate interdisciplinary and science based national, regional and local response to strengthening the criteria and indicator to support global achievement on peatland and ecosystem restoration with particular reference for topical peatlands. I think this is all my comment that I could share in this session due to time limits. Thank you. Thank you for having me. And I'm sorry, the time was really short and being the last one you, you felt a little pinch but your inputs and your suggestions and your insights are very well taken, and it's it's valuable that we work together and we share and we use all the different tools we have at our disposal, whether it's websites, whether it's different platforms, where we can share this, this information which is coming from different sources and then it can be then taken upon to influence the policies or decision making where it has the most impact. So it is again my pleasure to thank everyone for participating in the event and contributing. A formal closing will be done by our MC ISCA, but I just want to recap and take one more minute of everyone's attention. That this workshop was very, very important because if you look at the running team we started on with just the importance of peatland restoration and it is well acknowledged, well realized that peatlands are important and the restoring peatlands is need of the hour. And as Bagusti was saying, it cannot be done overnight, it will take a consistent and concerted effort of a lot of people, a lot of actors, a lot of players, whether it's at the local scale, whether it's a national scale, whether it's a, it's even global scale, but all of these different entities, different stakeholders have to come together. And as Bahari was mentioning, the scale matters, not only for regulating but also who governs, who is making those rules, whether we are taking into consideration the local realities, whether the existing practices and history of the site is taking into consideration. So if we have to achieve a real impact, a successful restoration, all these things, all these different streams of information, data evidence have to come together. There is an element of standardization if we want to report it because doing something or achieving successes is not really a full success if it is, it cannot be replicated. If we cannot influence people, if we cannot convince others that this is the way and it is a successful way and this is how you can solve your problem. So this is all coming, this is all a step towards coming together, identifying what rules, what resources we have, whether it's financial resources, whether it's technical resources, whether it's capacity, and identifying those gaps and then try to address them. It will only happen with the concerted efforts, with the progress that we made together as a group, as team, we may be representing different organizations, different streams of maybe government or international organization or practitioners or maybe coming to members, but since we all are committed to the same goal, same objective, I think we can move forward. And I hope like all other existing tools and things in place criteria and indicators could certainly serve that tool which can help us to progress towards that goal, towards that objective. So I thank you everyone for these interesting discussions. I believe this will continue. This is not the end and we look forward to share the manual that we talked and discussed in detail after incorporating all your feedbacks, relevant suggestions and important insights. With that, I hand it over to our MC Iska to do the final closing and thanks all for your patience and staying long. Over to you Iska. Thank you Rupesh, Pada Nil and Baana for moderating this session and all of resource personnel for your presentation. We would like to announce that there will be a positive survey for evaluation of this workshop. We will share evaluation link in the chat box, and also via email. We request all attendees to complete this survey and provide your feedback. Thank you. Now as we conclude this exciting event, we would like to thank all resource persons, speakers and panel members, moderators, and engaged participants for your enthusiasm and active participation during this workshop. Today's presentation will be available on the event page of C4 website in the next few days. All of you apologize for any mistakes during the event. Thank you very much for all your support. Stay healthy and hope to see you in another time. Thank you. Thank you. Bye bye.