 Hi, I'm Judith Bansaby from DOHA and I'm here with my colleague Clara over there. So I'm hoping that everyone by now knows what DOHA is. We've been around for 15 years and we index only gold open access journals, but not just in science everywhere. And we try and have a global coverage which is a bit of this gives you a bit of an idea of where our usage is around the world. A lot in the US, but in countries like Indonesia and Brazil that have really government-mandated open access programs and pretty much everywhere around the world. So we fit in by trying to help readers and authors, libraries, funders and publishers. So we have kind of multi-stranded aims, but I'll cut to the chase. We've got about 12,000 general records and 3.3 million links to article metadata. That metadata is very open to anybody in a number of ways and is integrated in lots of search services and library catalogs. And we realize that lots of people want to use the data and unfortunately, timing-wise for the hack day is we will have a full data export for our entire database, but it's not available on Wednesday, which is a bit of a shame. But it will be available in the future. So if anyone wants to work with that data that they can. So in the interest of transparency, I thought I'd just highlight what we don't include. Because we don't cover the entire open access. How much all the articles that are published. We don't have hybrid journals and we don't have ones that are so-called bronze, i.e. free journals that are not fitting our idea of what open access is. We don't have stuff that's not peer reviewed. We don't have stuff that hasn't stopped publishing and there are some journals that have simply never applied. But I think something that I'd like to collaborate with them people is that we have 25% of our journals that are in the system. We don't have any article metadata. I know coming from a metadata background that our format is not easy to work with. I would like to investigate some collaborations to see how we can improve that. And this is just a little guide of other reasons why we don't have everything. We have many, many, many more applications than we accept. And lots of these are either because they're very poor quality journals or in some cases looking at the Indian one. That's where a lot of the so-called predatory journals come from. So there's lots of stuff we don't have. Our roadmap is that we want to include more good quality journals. So we are actively soliciting applications from journals that people in their subject areas know that are good. We're looking to update and clean up our old data. We want to increase the metadata ingest from those publishers who are not currently able to supply us with data. We've got some system work to do and we want to collaborate. We have several services that we are already looking at working with that hopefully this will lead to some more. Thank you.