 ...and unelected technocrats in the United Nations. Roi! New Zealand has consistently been in the top five economically most three countries for many years. An agreement that seeks to quote, harmonise migration policy with corrupt dictatorships will be disastrous for our country. I could safely speculate that if all nations of the world were to implement this compact we will not see record-setting waves of migration to Belarus or the Democratic Republic of Congo. The PAC supporters say there's no need to be concerned about this agreement because it is non-binding. In that case, why sign a harmless piece of window dressing at all? This is a democratic country, governments change, and who can know whether a future government will shrug off this pact as being non-binding or incorporate it as a paramount part of their foreign policy? I will not be part of handing a revolver straight back at me to future governments. Now there are several of the 23 objectives of this agreement that have been drawn up in the usual aspirational warm fuzzy diplomatic language of the UN that do not survive an educated reading between the lines. Objective 15 is called Provide Access to Basic Services for Migrants. Now currently you have to be a resident or a citizen to access taxpayer-funded services from our government. For example, if you're not a resident and you need to use a public hospital, you pay for the service. That is completely reasonable. Now if you're like me, you welcome immigrants because they will usually take a dependent initiative to come here for a better life and they'll use their own resources to make their lives better themselves. Objective 15 tips us on its head, giving public health care all levels of public education and wraparound assistance by the government to access these services. When Michael Joseph Savage implemented cradle to grave welfare state, he would never have imagined that it would become an international welfare system airport to airport for any person that shows up on our doorstep. Objective 16 is a title empower migrants of societies to realise full inclusion and social cohesion. We'll have a glance across those details, we'll get a paraphrase because I don't have the attention, I can't hold enough attention to read all this diplomatic language but we've got promote mutual respect for the cultures, traditions, customs and communities of destination and of migrants including on ways to promote acceptance of diversity and facilitate social cohesion and inclusion. Next we've got established comprehensive and needs-based pre-departure and post-arrival programs that may include rights and obligations of basic language training. Now that's something that I would expect migrants to have already undertaken for themselves if they're planning on moving to a new country to make a better life for themselves. Next we've got support multicultural activities through sports, music, art, culinary festivals, volunteering and other social events that will facilitate mutual understanding. Now the Auckland Council through AT's and local boards already spend multi-millions of dollars on these activities while failing to provide the basic infrastructure that is essential to the functioning of our city. Council needs to return to the basics instead of increasing funding of UN-mendated nice-to-habs. Next we've got promote school environments that are welcoming and safe well who can argue with that. Incorporating evidence-based information about migration into education curricula and dedicating targeted resources to schools with a high concentration of migrant children for integration activities in order to promote respect for diversity and inclusion and to prevent all forms of discrimination excluding racism, xenophobia and intolerance. God that was a mouthful. Well it's hard to argue against evidence-based information, isn't it? Until you ask the questions about what evidence, whose evidence, the contents of that information and why does it need to be delivered into our schools. Then we get to Objective 17, eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration. This is the biggie. It's full of large words that no decent person could ever publicly oppose for the fear of being labelled a bigot, which is what makes Objective 17 the most dangerous one of all. Here we go with a bit of diplomatic language again. Bear with me please. Enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes towards migrants. Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets including internet-based information including by sensitising and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance. Followed up by engaged migrants, political religious and community leaders as well as educators and service providers to detect and prevent incidents of intolerance, racism, xenophobia and other forms of discrimination and getting to it. Activities that promote mutual respect including in the context of election campaigns. That's the UN effectively sticking their noses straight into our democracy and that is not acceptable. This goes to the next party that is the only parliamentary party to have consistently defended free speech especially when unpopular speech which is when it really matters. Whether it be Lawrence Southern, Nigel Farage, Dom Brash or the hideous Clementine, all men must die forward, frees we have stuck up for every one of them. Free speech is all empowering and no oppressed people in history has ever improved their position without it. Free speech is self-regulating. Whatever good or horrendous thing one person may have to say everybody else has the ability to endorse or condemn it. Free speech is illuminating. Banning the expression of some opinions does not make them go away. It drives them underground where they confess to building resentment unseen until they eventually explode. The media are a powerful watchdog against government corruption and tyranny. Sometimes they get it wrong, sometimes they produce tabloid nonsense, sometimes they take about way issues you and I couldn't care less about and blow it all out of proportion but for all the flaws a free press may have there is no better alternative. Government programs to sensitise media and control messages in electoral campaigns are a hideous proposition and as a Liberal I find the very idea that our government still hasn't decided whether to sign up a few days out deeply frightening. Pass laws preventing hate speech. Who is going to regulate that? Who is going to define it? I can tell you the answer to that, the very last people you would ever want to. Russia it's Vladimir Putin using hate speech laws to jail gay activists. In Saudi Arabia it's the medieval religious dictatorship who whips and decapitates atheists. Who will it be in New Zealand? Probably the nastiest stupid regressive left who placed fake bombs in theatres with Jewish audiences, make violence threats against their news featuring controversial speakers and form gauntlets of venomous abuse outside events of which they disapprove. People like that to regulate how I may think, feel and speak. Freedom of speech is essential to maintaining a western liberal democracy. We do not regulate free speech, we do not compromise free speech, we do not negotiate free speech and that's why the ACT party will never support this UN migration pact. Thank you very much. Here at the UN protest by Aliette. Hey, so that was Stephen Berry from the ACT party at the protest against the UN migration pact. Haven't done a head cap but we've got well over 100 here, probably getting up to the 150 near 200s. So that was, we're just waiting a minute for Aliette Kele from the new Conservative party to come up and give his speech and we'll be recording the whole thing. We didn't miss the start of Stephen Berry's speech but I believe someone else got it. All right, we'll go back in, we'll go through the crowd and we'll listen to Aliette's speech. There are two tenets, two is the idea of ancient Greek democracy, the style of representation that we have and on the other hand we have Judeo-Christian values, principles and underpinnings in those regards to keep such democracy in check, to keep a parameter of the value of life, the guidance of principles, the acceptance of individualism being a positive thing for our families, the idea of reward coming from work, from effort. These are the two pillars that we have in our system today, our society. What we have seen this year historically and verifiably are restrictions of free speech. We saw the mononote and the southern area be shut down, be restricted from public. We saw Don Rash be removed from the speaking elements of a public institute. We saw him being restricted from his free speech rights that we pay for. We have seen along the way the various restrictions of free speech and their growing day by day. So we have seen now this pact, this contract being signed, there's nothing less than an assault on the very nature of sovereignty itself. That is what we've seen in this pact, charging hundreds and thousands of dollars to our Judeo-Christian institutes, those who engage in soup kitchens, those who engage in feeding the homeless, looking after the prostitutes, hundreds of charitable events throughout the year that many of us don't even know about. We see Auckland City now pushing to charge that. We also saw that the lambor speaker, sorry, the unbiased independent speaker, Trigga Mallard, removing from the crowd the very core gift of morality, culture and our society. This is happening this year alone. And what we can see now, migration pact that is being signed, there's nothing less than a wiping out of one culture to be replaced by a culture that is coming from an organisation who don't even have the decency to have their own land. The UN does not rule us here. We rule us here. So it's actually not replacing our sovereignty, you're just private vests and we are standing in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in France who the mainstream media also happen to be saying, oh no, no, they're just whining about taxes. They're not whining about taxes. They're whining about the slow gradual removal of their way of life, their value systems, the very culture that they fought and died for. The same is us. The same is us. Every single day I remember the sacrifice of our grandparents, our parents, those who have laid their lives down on the battlefield for us, standing together again. Media of you will know that most of my work has been with at-risk youth, those who have been raped, those who have had suicidal ideation. What I see going on reminds me very much of what I see when a child is being groomed. I believe that we are being groomed to accept this. We're whispering sweet nothings in our ear. Oh no, no problem, lots of money for you some money. Well I'm sorry, our funds go to fund our government rules that have taken us and our funds go to fund the UN who has taken us as well. That's our money. The UN get their money from governments, the governments get their money from us, from you. That's who it is that we're dealing with right now. And our country's leaders did not even have the decency to come and discuss it with us. Be very quiet, very quiet. My last point before I turn on too long is this. First I'm going to virtue signal. Sorry. New Conservative were the first political party to stand up publicly and oppose this pact and oppose everything about it. When Southern and Molinu were kicked out, we were the first to publicly stand up now. If you could, please just have a look at those people who will let that right around you. Please have a look at the eyes. We were not the first. No political party was the first. The only ones who were the first were you. And it is our absolute privilege. When I said it at the start of privilege, I meant it. It was our privilege and our honour to stand up for what you have told us about. And so, in my last part, God bless you and God bless this nation of New Zealand. Alia Lekile from the New Conservative Party. We're here at the protest against the UN Migration Pact. The eroding of New Zealand sovereignty over our own immigration policies. The restriction of free speech with the calling in to have hate speech for those who criticise immigration. And of course, the overall problem with this pact that, as an immigrant, I could say it's insulting to see people push the idea that nations need to change for the immigrants. No, people who immigrate to other nations need to become more like those nations. You move to New Zealand to become more like New Zealand, to live in New Zealand, to make that your home, and not to change it to look like the place that you left. So we'll go back into the next speech now. They flew the Chinese flag on their national day of significance because a Chinese ambassador was there to the exclusion of every other flag. What does that say about this country when one of our territories flies the flag of a foreign, I would say, hostile power, and we're doing nothing about it? We talk about open borders. The border is already open. It is already a free role for all the people that come in. 130,000 people buzz because statistics New Zealand realise they were counting the figures wrong. That's the reality, the situation. We talk about illegal immigration. The National Party says this migration pact is bad because it allows for illegal immigration. Ladies and gentlemen, 10,000 overstayers in this country because they weren't fun to immigration in Z and enough resources to send them back. That's the reality. So yes, this is a symbolic victory for the globalists, but don't let it slip your minds what's been going on in this country for the past 10 years. Now for me, it's not about being anti-migrant or anti-immigration. For me, it's about one simple thing. It's about democracy and what we find about migration policy and what we find about the UN is every single time when the most important decisions about how we live our lives come, they never asked us. We were never asked. There was no memo. There were no minutes. We missed the notice for the AGM. Ladies and gentlemen, we were treated as if we were asleep, but they took our taxpayer money to do it anyway. But this is where history becomes important. This isn't the first time this has happened. 30 years ago, the National Government introduced a bill before Parliament of the 1991 Immigration Amendment Act and what that did is it unleashed this floodgate of immigration that we now see today. Labour had their part to play as well by no means am I letting them off the hook. But what happened there? Well, the bill went before Parliament and there were 75 submissions and 73 of those submissions were absolutely unequivocally opposed because of the lack of thinking and foresight in this bill. Two were in favour and those two submissions in favour were both from immigration consultants. How about that? How about that? Once again, immigration policy is not the preserve of the people. It's the preserve of the tiny, small, plastered away elite living in Wellington and now because of this migration compact all the way in Manhattan, New York and it's wrong. It's absolutely wrong. When you look at the document itself, you're looking what we're looking for. We're looking for the word democracy. It doesn't feature. We're looking for the word consultation. Consultation appears four times across 38 pages and every time it appears it is not talking about consultation with the people. It is not talking about consultation with democracies or for elections. It is talking about consultation through migration advocacy groups or remittance groups to make sure that the migrants money goes back to where they came from. But nowhere in that document does it talk about, hey, we're going to sign up to these people to this new agreement. Are we going to ask them about it? Are we going to get their opinion? But most dangerous thing about this compact is not what it says because it pays lip service to many things. It says we believe in free speech but at the same time we want to eliminate racism, xenophobia and discrimination against all migrants and refugees. The first, the first organisation to achieve that in human history. Good luck to them. But in the process we lose freedom of speech. In the process in the Mac, Westbrook, Toki and Perfect Society, we lose freedom of expression and we lose freedom of association. It talks about respecting sovereignty but at the same time it's promoting regular migration which is a code word for legal as opposed to irregular which is code word for illegal. It says it respects the sovereignty of nations but who is the first to criticise those countries who stand up and say, yes, borders matter. It's the UN, it's the EU and it's every globalist institution where it's the international Catholic networks or wherever it's the global investors, every single time. So at once they say, yeah, we're going to let you have a democracy and we're going to let you to make your own decisions unless they're the wrong decisions. What happened after the last US election? They said democracy was under attack. No, democracy happened and sometimes you don't always get the results you want but that's exactly what this contact is about. It's about insurance, it's about insurance for the globalists because they understand that their establishment and their consensus is breaking. People are waking up, they're starting to realise that all the lies they told them, we need migration for skills. Excuse my French, that's nonsense, nonsense. Because the fact of the matter is people coming into this country are not skilled, 60% of the migrants coming here on visas are not on the essential skills list. When you look at the people coming in, he addresses restaurant managers and gas station attendants. Tell that to the 79,000 young theories who are not in education, employment or training. How about that? They say that immigration was going to give us jobs, it was going to give us jobs. We have more migration than ever but unemployment has never gone down 150,000 in this country since the 1990s. There was a day in this country when we were here, job and you were ready to work, we'd give you that job and then throughout the 80s it reached 300,000. What happened? The 300,000 Kiwis who built this country into one of the most richest places in the OECD, give up and lose their work in a government night, is that what happened? Are you serious? Do you really believe this nonsense? They said that it would grow our economy but we look at it today. Growth per capita per hours worked has never been lower. We're actually doing worse than some countries like Slovenia to Slovakia. We're doing worse and growing worse than countries that have emerged from communism. What does that tell you? What does that tell you about what's going on in this country? If you're going to take away one message from today, it's this. This migration compact is just the beginning and just that. After this comes the conferences and all the airplane rides, after this comes the forums and the conferences, after it comes to the working groups and the reviews. What this is about is entrenching the idea of migration as a human right into legislation and into political discourse. I remember as a young person growing up in these schools and first we told we were a bicultural country and then I got to high school and we were a multicultural country. Once we were diverse, now we're hyper diverse. Ah, I just can't keep up. I don't know if it's me or if it's them or the speed at which they're going through but eventually I just woke up and realised they don't know what they're talking about. They are undermining the idea of what it is to be a New Zealander by making the very name redundant. They are making the idea of nationhood utterly redundant by stripping out of everything that makes it meaningful. We respect sovereignty but you can't make your own laws. We respect nations but you can't be proud of who you are. We respect borders unless you enforce them. How about that? The key takeaway is this, we have enough trouble with our own domestic politicians holding them to account for the promises they make to us. In the 1990s National said there's a day eluja but we're going to come in and we have to stop it and then they came and then Labour said there's an absolute flood of people coming in and we have to stop it and it goes back and forth. We have to see past this two party system that is cheating the people of New Zealand of their sovereignty, of their aspirations and of their opportunities especially for our young people. At the end of the day we have enough trouble holding our own politicians to account. Why would we get responsibility for making migration policy to a bunch of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats living all the way in Manhattan, New York with their villas in Tuscany and their bank account in the British Virgin Isles? I say policy made by Kiwis, for Kiwis in the name of Kiwis and ever and always banking of Kiwis. Thank you everybody. For safe, orderly and regular migrations, so I'm leader of the One New Zealand party and the One New Zealand party believes that New Zealanders are best placed. We find it morally repugnant that Coalition One would advocate their responsibility for decision-making to the authority of a third party international such as the United Nations. Let's be absolutely honest here. This is not about refugees leaving or fleeing from war-torn countries. This is solely about an outright attack on nation-state sovereignty by the United Nations. It's not just New Zealand. So while we're being honest, let's be honest about the track record of the UN. They've never managed to resolve a single conflict in the Middle East or anywhere else on this earth. Since its inception over 70 years ago, it has an appalling track record when it comes to lifting people out of poverty. People all nations have failed on every count. In fact, it's fair to say that wherever the United Nations has got involved in international affairs, it has failed miserably. The One New Zealand party formally rejects the United Global Compact for Migration and we make public our strong opposition to any of the Coalition Government members signing such a document on our behalf. Our Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Labour's Enlie's Galloway has slunk off to Morocco to sign this document without so much as any form of public consultation and the parties being New Zealand First and the Greens, they're just letting them. In fact, they are complicit by their lack of a voice on this subject and they are enabling Labour by not withdrawing their support publicly. And believe me, National is not much better. In fact, it was National's leader John Key that signed and adopted the UN New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants just two years ago in 2016. So the UN Global Compact for Migration is an expansion of the United Nations 2030 agenda, which again is an expansion of the 2021 agenda. It's also a suspension for the Sustainable Development and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. So this is not a new thing, this is actually the fifth stage and the sixth stage process for the United Nations and the result will be borderless countries. So this particular PEP has been designed to protect the lives of migrants and it has come about mainly because of the number of migrants that have migrated illegally en masse to Europe in the last five years. So it demands that every UN state, including New Zealand, opens their borders and not only makes it even easier for illegal migrants and refugees to enter our countries, but also for us as New Zealand tax players to fund their legal defence to then stay here. The US is demanding that all member states actually assist these people to illegally enter our countries. To give these illegal immigrants, well actually the term is actually now a regular, illegal is a little bit too harsh. So it actually gives these irregular migrants assistance to find work, integrate it to the New Zealand populace and oh yes that's right for the New Zealand citizens to understand these irregular migrants cultures, religions and languages. It doesn't say anything about helping them to become New Zealanders. The UN are effectively endangering the lives of these migrant people by inviting irregular and illegal refugees and migrants to undertake treacherous journeys and making it the responsibility of the destination country to actually make and keep those migrants safe. The UN is also inadvertently putting children at risk by actually promoting illegal migration channels for these children because then it becomes yours and my as New Zealand citizens responsibility to repatriate and reunite these families here in New Zealand. The United Nations Global Compact for Migration claims to promote the protection of human rights yet there are some cultures that do not want to coexist peacefully in a free manner in any country. The cultures they know are ones of violent religious tyranny. In recent years NATO US-led interventions such as the UN sanction 2011 regime change initiative in Olivia have rather than helped in fact further the spread of ISIS anti-hardism into those countries thereby exacerbating not only the refugee problem but also the anti-west sentiment of those refugees. Some of these people bring that tyranny and violence into the countries they illegally migrate to and the UN had completely disregarded the rights, the health, the safety of the people in those destination countries in Europe and in UK in particular and to think that it cannot happen here it's not just naive it's actually stupid and dangerous thinking. One of the UN's clauses and the commitment from the New York declaration was to and I quote support those countries rescuing receiving and hosting large nations of refugees and migrants well we'll see how well that works in Europe and the UK and Italy and all those other countries haven't we. So the one New Zealand party demands that the New Zealand government do not sign the UN global combat for migration. Member states the categories one is a nation of origin one is a nation of transit and one is a nation of destination so what countries are not signing these this pact we've got the USA we've got Australia Israel Hungary Australia the Czech Republic Slovakia Switzerland Croatia Latvia Italy Bulgarian Belgium all of these countries who are not signing this document fondly enough fall into the country of destination category all of those countries that fall into the origin the category of the country of origin they're all for the other ones that are queuing up to sign it so my last point is that the job of our elected representatives and government is to look after our best interests to keep the citizens of New Zealand safe. Peters and Lee and Lee's Galloway's by signing this document on behalf of the coalition government is nothing short of an act of treason a nice and silly hope and bonus remember this she is banned tool she hasn't posted anything to the community standards now this is what happened to everybody so essential that we actually keep posting um and spread it they can't they can't ban us all i just want you to keep on sharing sharing sharing just keep on sharing of security they think because we haven't got land borders then you know we really say hasn't got land borders Australia what's happening there believe me we are not safe we're not safe at all so we need to all do our best and encourage everyone to come on board and because i can't post until this thing is signed next Tuesday i need you all to do the work for me so thank you very much everyone you've been great the uh last speaker there was was carol she's the one who initiated the petition the parliamentary petition against the migration pact and we've actually shared that on right minds and we just found out that she's been banned from facebook for violating community standards in sharing a petition against the or starting the petition against the un migration pact i mean she's banned until about midnight on monday which is when the pact is due to be signed so that's a very very convenient ban and of course it's no surprise to see that opposing un migration is against the facebook community standards i think we've got one more speech so i'll go back in and we'll go listen to that why not start the problem and pretend you're fixing it then they pass it on and this particular one is a product of all of them down there unfortunately they're all involved in it so now we know the behaviour and the thinking and the outcome so we're we will treasure your your email contacts and send you information to help keep this thing moving forward we want to educate but also to organise and organising means people who want to do something taking an initiative and will resource and support you we put out the fliers today provide the speakers and welcome the leader from jisman mirror you richard richard ha richard widely he was the gentleman who at short notice brought the same to court i'd like you to give a round of applause for him and the team is going to that's a long way this is an announcement coming through hold on is it for you jill hi everyone i was just talking to carol and she's done an amazing job but it's just an idea that i wanted to suggest um someone haven't quite decided who but someone announced a group for crowd for put up a crowd funding uh for a full page in the herald okay on the on-league content it will be up there please dig deeper to your pockets if we can get this out the herald apparently well i was talking to someone a few days ago said it is you know they can't really stop it it's legal there's nothing illegal about it so please bear that in mind and if we all contribute just a little bit we can get this out to the whole of new Zealand thank you thanks jill that was quite a good honor can we get on here so just you wondering speak to the truth we're here every third night on saturdays speaking and practicing free speech because it's one of those things that if you don't exercise it and use it it just fades away as a memory and so as practitioners of free speech we're so grateful to to your author coming you might have noticed that all the speakers had free access to communicate and all we need to do is keep this ball rolling the un global is a focus issue but there are others which are connected with it and you're probably aware of that so i would think it's now time for us to wrap it up unless there are any more announcements coming through what's that man yeah this lady saying keep pressure on the MPs okay that's um the end of the uh the speeches very nice we had uh i think three three different political parties represented there uh perhaps more in the audience and keep the pressure on keep signing those those petitions contact your MPs send them email send them letters and you know we have a couple of days left before this is due to be signed and there's still still an opportunity to make sure it doesn't it doesn't get signed of course either way this is only the beginning if they pass it or if we hold them back it's just one one step and of course they'll try again so we must remain we must remain vigilant and that's the end of this live stream i enjoy the rest of your day and until next time