 We are in the month of Christmas, but that is also the last month of 2017, so we're thinking towards 2018 and the things that are going to be landing in browsers or things we'll be thinking about in that year. So I want you to spend the next two minutes introducing a subject. You can quiz me about it and we'll see if we can come up with something that we can actually publish on YouTube. Right, here we go, two minutes. I want to talk about weightless CSS. Weightless? That is one of the words I said, the other one is CSS. So CSS without weight? Yes, that is a good reversal of what I said. What is weight? OK, so when you write a CSS selector, it has specificity. That is correct. Yes, which if I could call weight if I didn't want to risk trying to pronounce specificity again. Oh, so you mean specificity less CSS? Specificity less CSS is exactly. Can you see now why I went for weightless CSS? Yes. So this is a proposal that was agreed on in TPAC. 2017. In 2017. And Leveru was telling me about it. And the idea is they haven't settled on a name yet. But it would be something like it is in the same way that you would use. Oh, like colon is then function. Yes, exactly that. And inside you could put like a simple selector. Oh. Like dot foo. So that would make a selector make match without increasing its specificity. Exactly that. So you'd be able to use all of the stuff that you can use outside is or whatever it's called. But it would have like, yeah. Why? Specificity. Because this is the CSS working groups attempt to meet people halfway that don't enjoy the cascade so much. Oh, I see. So one of the things that, you know, the complaint. So one of the reasons they've seen people go to CSS and JavaScript is that this whole. Just attach it to the element directly. Exactly. I see. Because then the model is a lot simpler. So can they bring that to regular style sheets as an option where just things will be done sequentially? Can I use child selectors in the is thing? I don't think so. Because I was one of the long standing things that people wanted to do that if you contain a thing of that type then style me the other way around or something. No, it would just be simple selectors but no specificity. Spits. We're out of time. Out of time? It's the template proposal from Apple. Oh, Apple template proposal. The Apple template proposal. So what have they proposed?