 Alright, Marios asks, what is your opinion of Norway and its current government? We have a system where children have free health care and school, can welfare for kids be good? No, I mean, I'm against the whole system in Norway. I actually have a talk that you can find on my YouTube channel, just look under Scandinavian welfare state. I have a talk that I gave in Bergen in Norway on the evils of the Scandinavian welfare state and I talked a lot about Norway. I think Norwegian culture ultimately is in decline, productivity is in decline, life is in some sense is too easy in Norway because of the oil, so it can afford to do stupid things and not really pay the consequences. But look, Norway has a mixed economy that is maybe more redistributive than Sweden and Denmark because of the oil, I think that would be true, but is relatively, less regulations than most, so it's capitalist in many essential characteristics, but I think the free health care, the schooling is bad, I think it's low quality, again, maybe it's better than the U.S., but that's not exactly a good standard. I think it's immoral to provide free health care or government health care and government schooling. I think you need competition in both realms and you need a real industry, you need innovation, you need entrepreneurs, you need builders and creators and makers and yeah, all right. Finally, I want to say something about the harm I think that the welfare does to those who receive welfare, particularly to the poorest who receive welfare. So I believe, now I'll elaborate just in a little bit more, but I believe that one of the ways, one of the most important ways in which we attain happiness as human beings is by tainting self-esteem, is by tainting a certain sense of confidence in our own ability to live, to be productive, to take care of ourselves, to be in this world and know, I mean, I get a lot of sense of knowing I'm feeding my family, I'm working and I'm feeding my family, they are not going to go hang hungry because I can take care of myself. That gives me an enormous sense of self-esteem, of self-confidence and ultimately I'm happy because of that because I know that in this world, I'm competent enough to survive. This is not a hostile world to me. I can do pretty well there. What happens when you take somebody and you give them a check and another check and another check and you tell them, don't work, don't produce, don't take care of your family, we're taking care of them, so don't worry about it. What they're telling them is that they're useless. What they're telling them is that they're incompetent and they shouldn't have self-esteem because they never will have self-esteem because they'll never have that sense of taking care of themselves. They are dependent and they know it and it destroys them. Now in the United States this is evidence because what we've done in the United States through this welfare system is created a class of poor people who are always poor, not because they're not evil, not because they can't produce, not because they can't create, not because they can't become rich, but because we've made them dependent. Why should they try when they keep getting a check? And what we've done is not just institutionalize them into poverty, which is horrific enough. What we've done is institutionalize them into unhappiness. We've institutionalized them into low self-esteem. We institutionalized them into a horrific way of life. And that's what happens when you keep handing a check to people. I mean this is parents who know this, and I don't know how your parents are, but at some point you've got to tell your child, go and make it for yourself, and if you don't then they'll never gain the self-esteem and happiness and success that a human being is possible to a human being is capable of, a human being is capable of. So to me the fact that we deny a class, a whole class of our fellow citizens, a fellow man and women, the ability to work and produce and create for themselves is a noisier to them. It's a crime against them, and in my view the biggest victims of the welfare state, the biggest victims of the welfare state, are the ambitious poor who will never live up to their ambition, who will never have the opportunity to exercise their ambition, who will never have the opportunity to make something of their lives because they've been institutionalized into this process of getting checks from Uncle Sam, or whatever you call it, on to Norway. So let me end by talking about an alternative, my alternative, we started lately. Okay, so my alternative goes to morality because that's where the action is, that's what's important. People do what they think is right, what they think is noble, what they think is good. And my question is this, it's a simple question, why should I live for other people? Why should I be selfless? Why is sacrifice a good thing? Why is sacrifice noble? Why are other people's lives more important than mine? Why is it okay to break my legs? Why should I volunteer to have my big legs broken, which is what happens every day? Why is in my life mine? And in my view, ethics has got everything upside down, morality should be about, and this was the view of Aristotle, way back, morality should be about how do we make an individual's life the best that it can be for him, or how do he make it that way? What are the principles to guide human beings towards happiness, prosperity, success? How do we make individual lives the best that they can be? What are the principles that allow for that? What we need in my view is a new morality, a new ethic, because this one is corrupt and destroying us, and the more we practice it, the more we'll destroy it. What we need is an ethic of rational self-interest, of a will of guiding our lives to maximize our flourishing as human beings.