 Good evening, everyone. It's Monday evening, livestream time. I thought my door had opened there, but it hasn't. I hope you're all doing well. Thanks as always for joining me. Today, quite a significant day. We are being told, as I speak, of the roadmap out of lockdown. And from what I can see, we may be looking at the end of all this by the end of June and going back to normal. Let's see. I'm going to go through that in some detail in a short while. I've had a look on, with regard to the local elections, we're still not really clear what we're letting. This is what's on my mind pretty much all the time at the moment. We're still not really clear on what we're allowed to do and what we're not allowed to do in terms of campaigning for the local elections in May. I've just had a quick look on the local government association website. There's nothing on there yet. But I guess I'm maybe being a little bit impatient. We're only just being told about route out of lockdown at the moment. So perhaps I need to wait a little bit longer for information on that, but not too long, because we do need to know. And we need to know the sooner, the better so we can get campaigning. I would like to be ideally campaigning by now. But we're still none the wiser. OK, there's a couple of things I need to tell you about the Fulbrighton shop. The ad has been working very hard on the shop and the website and various changes are being made. I have a couple of messages here from Ed. And I know he's going to put some bits and bobs across the bottom of the screen. Let me just quickly have a look at what he's been telling me. So instead of Fulbrighton dot shop, it's now Fulbrighton slash shop. It's no longer a separate website, but incorporated into our own website. There is a 20% discount on everything. It will be until the end of February and people should use a code FBSHOP20 at the checkout to get that 20% discount. And do support us on that because it supports us as a party, but it also supports British manufacturing. And so everything on there is made in Britain. So it's now Fulbrighton slash shop rather than dot shop. And as I say, I just got it. There we go. Ed is posting things along the bottom of the screen as I speak. OK, before I get into too much detail on lockdown and the path out of lockdown, I want to talk a little bit about Twitter. And in the last few days, we've had our FB committee account closed on Twitter. And there's been a resisting hate. You'll have heard of resisting hate. If you haven't checked them out, Motley Crue, Rabble, the usual stuff, who seem to have been running a coordinated campaign to get what they call the FASH kicked off social media. And I don't think they're going to stop there. I'm going to do a book review this week on one of the most alarming books that I've read in a long time. And it's called Unmasked, the first radical plan to destroy America. And with it, the rest of the Western world. And I've read almost all of it this morning in one sitting. And it's actually chilling to me because I realize that I'm a target of these people. And reading about these people, I'll do a full book review of it on Friday. I want to finish it first. But reading about these people and the sort of chill that it gives me to realize that I'm one of their targets, these people are seriously, seriously nasty people. They are organized. And what comes up again and again and again through the book is the black media. They are just such poison. But these people are organized. And despite the media's constant insistence that there's no such thing as anti-fa, it's an idea rather than an organization. And they want this to be the impression that they give to the world. But they are very much an organized organization. They are trained in causing bodily injury to their opponents. They don't desire to kill yet because they know that that would bring them bad PR. Wouldn't be good for the image. They are, this won't surprise anyone, a large, as I say, organized and hugely effective, extreme left. They identify as various different things from Marxists, communists, to socialists. But their plan is very, very clear. And their plan is to destroy the Western world. And this book is by Andy Noe. I used to know Andy back when I was on Twitter. And he's a really, really nice guy. We used to talk quite a bit. He's a really nice guy. He's really very principled and he's very, very brave. And he himself has been beaten pretty badly by anti-fa in Portland and Oregon, which is where he's from. And he went into just a couple of snippets, just a couple of bits from the book. He went undercover into the autonomous zone in Seattle that the Black Lives Matter, who, by the way, are indistinguishable from anti-fa, the same people. And he went undercover into this autonomous zone and saw the propaganda and how well trained in propaganda they are, how polished they are at presenting one image to the world while covering up or attempting to cover up or at least disguising their full intentions and their real intentions and in disguising how organized they are, how deliberate they are, and the training in violence that they receive, including how to cause great pain and damage to people. They have threatened and intimidated bookshops who have said they would carry this book. There's a huge bookshop in Portland, which is actually a centre of anti-fa in the United States, Portland and Oregon. And they have intimidated and threatened this bookshop, which said that they were going to carry this book unmasked, now they're only selling it online. And this is a really unfortunate thing because people keep giving in to them. And people keep giving in to them because they are extremely violent. And this book is a catalogue of violence carried out by anti-fa. They are ruthless and merciless and they fully intend with a smile on their face to utterly destroy any opposition that they have. But perhaps what's most alarming about this book to me is the lack of police response to the violence that they commit. The police just won't respond. 911, as he put it, no longer is effective. He said in the book that if you had asked him, when he set about researching and writing this book, if you had asked him, is it possible for anti-fa to actually bring down the United States? A couple of years ago, he would have laughed at such an ocean. Now he's not laughing at it anymore. And one of the reasons he's not laughing at it anymore is the police are not doing anything. They've stood by and watched anti-fa engage in violence, rioting, burning. And the Black Lives Matter marches similar. They didn't do anything. And you can understand a little bit of why they don't do anything. Because there are police officers, and he goes into detail about some of these famous cases which led to riots across them from Ferguson to George Floyd and various other people. He goes into detail about these cases and what actually happened. And yet you have police officers facing first-degree model charges for firing their weapons, which is what they are in these circumstances allowed to do. But they end up facing first-degree model charges. And in America, that's a serious, serious charge. While nothing at all is done about these serious hardened criminals that are involved in these cases, it is genuinely terrifying to realize what anti-fa are. They're links with almost amalgamation with Black Lives Matter. The lack of police action across the US and as we know here in the UK, when these hardened left-wing anarchist groups commit crimes and the eagerness of the police to go after anyone who is seen to have victimized in any way or seen to have been an opponent in any way of these hardened left-wing groups. It is genuinely frightening to think that I am a target of them and I am. And I told you last week about what went on in my own house and I've seen since, I hope not hate laughing about this on Twitter, saying that it's things like I got my driving license back and I'm ungrateful that I'm still upset about it. I'm actually particularly upset about it. Everyone just bows down to this. This is the point. People are bowing down to this. And now we have another example with this resisting hate and they are targeting and targeting and targeting anyone who opposes them. And they are, every demand is met of these people. Every single demand is met. And while I'm on that, Twitter kicking us off yet again. I have in front of me and I wanna thank Alan for sending me this. It's a newspaper called The Light Paper. And I've had a quick glance through it. And again, as always, well I can't obviously share this on Twitter anymore but I'll share it on Gab afterwards and anything else that I look at this evening. It's got an article in here by Vernon Coleman which I would say I'm a big fan of. But while I'm on Twitter, there's an article in here and the headline is Twitter refused to remove child porn videos despite repeated requests by trafficking victim. A lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California by the victim and his mother alleges Twitter made money off the clips which showed a 13 year old engaged in sex acts under a form of child sexual abuse material or child porn, the suit states. According to the New York Post, the child who's now 17 and lives in Florida as identified only as John Doe and was between 13 and 14 years old and sex traffickers posing as a 16 year old female classmate started chatting with him on Snapchat. Doe and the traffickers allegedly exchanged nude photos before the conversation turned to blackmail. If he didn't share more sexually graphic photos and videos the explicit material he'd already sent would be shared with his parents, coach, pastor and others. Now this lawsuit is ongoing but the headline is enough. Where are resisting hate? Where is the concession? Where are there even the demands to take this stuff down? And this comes as no shock to me or shouldn't come to a shock to anyone else. There are appalling things on Twitter. There have been FGM adverts on Twitter but we are kicked off and we're kicked off solely at the behest of groups like resisting hate and hope not hate and other and anti-fair and Black Lives Matter and all these anarchist, Marxist, communist groups. And that's why Andy Nowe in his book is saying I wouldn't have thought in a million years that there was any possibility that we could actually see the end of the United States as we know it because of groups like this. But then you look at the complicity of major corporations, the actions of the police in both directions, the bias in favor of them and the refusal to come to the aid of the victims of them and of course our own police down on their knees to Black Lives Matter. Everything looks rather darker and rather different. So like I say, I'm gonna finish this book and I'm going to do a full review of it but I cannot recommend it enough. It is brilliantly written. He is very, very brave, very principled and it's taken a lot, a lot of courage to write this book. And anti-fat have gone out of their way in their usual method. Intimidation, threats of violence to stop people from reading this book. So for that reason alone, I can't recommend it enough. Again, it's called Unmasked and it's by Andy Nowe, N-G-O, his name is Spelt. And like I say, I knew him back some years ago before I got kicked off Twitter the first time. And he's a really great guy and he deserves a lot of support for his courage. And he has suffered physical effects. He had a bleed on his brain from an attack on him. And he is, I guess I'm extremely, extremely brave so do support him. Okay, some messages coming in, let me see. Send me in your questions please. I do have a question I was sent today by email on memberships. And actually on that, I've just had a message now from Ed saying the two new membership tiers, it is a 20 pound for under 25, so annual and veterans, five pound for life. Also to celebrate the new shop, a code for 20% discount which I've already given you which should be going across the screen. And all of that is going across on the screen. Okay, and I've just had an email from Colin that I want to tell you about immediately. Britain announces an amnesty for illegal immigrants. I'm not a surprise. Dear Amri, the detail of how the government is giving an amnesty to all three million illegal immigrants in Britain is explained in the last two minutes of the above video. If true, can we start a campaign to alert the British people and make it a point in our main 2021 local election campaign alert to alternative news media towns, et cetera. Absolutely, I haven't obviously haven't seen this video, it's literally just come in from Colin now. Three million illegal immigrants to be given amnesty according to this. I will obviously look into that in a bit more detail. This is exactly, exactly the kind of thing that the British public needs to know about. If you give amnesty to three million now, how many more million are going to come looking for that same amnesty? It's an invitation to the world and it's also proof as if we needed any more proof that the Tories are no better on immigration, including illegal immigration. We knew this already. They say all the right things, they do the exact opposite. Be it for me to say anything positive about Labour. Labour are loony left, dangerous, dark left and if they are basically the anti for Black Lives Matter movement, just like Joe Biden is a puppet for the anti for Black Lives Matter movement. The Tories are no better. Just to remind you, back when he was foreign secretary, Boris Johnson was saying the same thing. And then when Sajid Javed came in, he, on his first day in the Home Office, he wanted to get rid of Tories' amazed hostile environment, in other words, make it a pleasant environment for illegal immigrants. Now we have Boris Johnson and Downing Street and I'm being told that they are giving an amnesty to all three million illegal immigrants. I'll go through that. I'll go through that video and I'll make my own video about it to let you know exactly what's happening. One thing I want to do before I get on to anything else, can you see that photograph behind me? Isn't that beautiful? Let me just show you. And I want to thank Diane and Nigel again. It's a photograph of Winston Churchill. I finally got a frame for it guys. A photograph of Winston Churchill looking very, looking very, I don't know what's the word, human. Um, fantastic, fantastic gift. Thanks very much again, Nigel and Diane. Right, so let's talk a little bit then about lockdown and getting out of lockdown and what's been going on today. So we'll start with the path out and the dates. And I do think this is really significant. And I suppose, I mean, without being a gloom monger and I don't want to be a gloom monger. I suppose it's important that we don't count chickens before they hatch. But, and there is still a long way to go even after this, if this lockdown does end at the end of June and we do get to go back to some sort of semblance of normality. There is going to be still a very important aftermath to deal with. I think it's specifically of unemployment and the, because we don't know what that will be until the follow ends, the follow scheme ends. So we don't know what that's going to be. So there will still be an enormous aftermath. And I don't know why we have, we've heard about this throughout this whole scenario. We've been hearing about pressure on the NHS and what I'm thinking is, and again, I'm not going to be gloom monger about this. This is good news because you may have come to pass. We keep hearing about pressure on the NHS. I'm wondering about what kind of pressure will be on it when people start to go back to hospitals for all of the treatments that they haven't had in the last, how long have we been going through this now, year and a bit? But we'll have to wait and see what happens. Let's have a look in a bit more detail about what's been going on to what's been announced today. So Boris Johnson has revealed his four steps to easing England's lockdown for different parts of society and the economy. He hopes to be able to lift the majority of rules by the 21st of June, but this is dependent on cases, deaths and hospital admissions continuing to fall. So the dates are the earliest of any of the stated, the earliest, dates are the earliest, any of the stated rules could be lifted. So this is effectively the best case scenario. There will be no regional tier systems. England will be treated as one in the easing of lockdown. So the first step will be between the 8th of March and the 29th of March. All colleges and schools in England will reopen while all childcare can resume. Secondary school pupils will have to wear face masks initially while staff in all schools are advised to wear masks. Not great news, that one. I can now, yeah, I can't know. Not easy for pupils to have to wear masks, but I suppose going back to school is still a good news. So this is only, where are we now? What's the date to the 22nd of February? So we're talking about a couple of weeks away. All secondary and college pupils will be tested twice a week at school for the first two weeks, then at home. That's a bit cumbersome to say the least. All households with school children, members of their support and childcare bubbles and those in related occupations will be encouraged to test regularly. One person will be able to meet one other person from another household outside for recreation, not just exercise. This includes meeting in private gardens and will mean two people can meet for a picnic or sit on a bench with a coffee, but they cannot play tennis or golf. Okay. Care home residents will be allowed one named visitor. This one, particularly throughout all of this has been a bit of a heartbreaker for me. Care home, people in care homes not being allowed visitors. I've always found that probably the cruelest aspect of this, along with kids not being able to go to school and this still to me is a little bit dark and a little bit cruel that they'll have to wear face masks and teachers will have to wear face masks. But the cruelest thing to me, the most heartbreaking thing, other than that the deaths themselves has been people in care homes not being allowed to have visitors. So that apparently is going to stop from the 8th of March. So that will continue, that's the first step. So that's what's gonna happen on the 8th of March. That will continue until the 29th of March and assuming there are no big changes or no big catastrophes in terms of rates or hospital admissions. Then on the 29th of March, we'll be back to, not back to that, the rule of six, but something close to it. Up to six people from different households or a larger group from two households can meet outside, including in private gardens. Outdoor sports facilities can reopen and organized outdoor sports can take place for children and adults. From this point, the government will drop the stay at home message and will instead encourage people to stay local wherever they can. People will still have to work from home where possible and no overseas travel apart from necessary work will be allowed. This part, I was watching the comments today when Boris Johnson was making this announcement to the comments and it was actually Theresa May who questioned on holidays and international travel. And when would we know about this? So people need time to plan. And I think this one is still a little bit up in the air. So that will continue. And again, assuming nothing changes, assuming the numbers are going in the right direction. This is all from the government's perspective. This is what the government is saying. The next step after that will be on the 12th of April. At that point, non-essential retail, including hairdressers and beauty salons can reopen. I have to say I'm looking forward to hairdressers reopening. Libraries, museums, zoos, theme parks and gyms can open, but no indoor mixing of different households allowed. That seems a bit odd. I mean, surely within the libraries and museums there'll be people of different households. Okay, next one, outdoor hospitality can reopen including pubs and restaurants with the rule of six or a larger group from two households. Again, this makes no sense. With the rule of six or a larger group from two households. Customers will not have to buy a substantial meal to have an alcoholic drink and there will be no coffee, but people will have to be seated when ordering and eating or drinking. Self-catering holidays in the UK with your own household will be allowed. Funerals of up to 30 people, weddings and wakes of up to 15 people. 15 people at your wedding. Okay, so again, assuming there are no risers. And again, I said at the start, we shouldn't, and I don't want to be gloomonger, but we shouldn't be counting our chickens before they hatch. This is all subject to review. And there has always been the worry, at least for me, that when we ease these restrictions, we will get the message that this all-rate thing, that the whole thing is based on, we'll start going up again. Although I think people have changed and I'm not sure they will risk another lockdown. I've been reading a couple of reports and I'll go through a few, that it seems to me that the government are shifting this to us taking responsibility for this ourselves. So, but assuming everything goes in the direction that they like, then step three will take us to the 17th of May, which outdoors, most social contact rules will be lifted, but gatherings of more than 30 people will be illegal. Indoors, the rule of six or a larger group of up to two households will be allowed. I'm sorry, I'm a bit lost and there's no one to understand that one. So a group of, the rule of six or a larger group, are we assuming then that the rule of six will have to be from the same household? Indoor hospitality, next point. Indoor hospitality, pubs, restaurants, cinemas, theaters, concert halls, children's play areas, hotels, BMBs, indoor exercise classes will be allowed. But gatherings of more than 30 people will be illegal. I don't know quite what that means. Advice on social distancing between family and friends, including hugging, will be updated no later than the 17th of May. Large indoor performances and sporting events with a capacity of 1,000 people will be allowed. Outdoor large performances and sporting events will have a maximum capacity of 4,000 people or must be only half fall, whichever is lower. Bigger sports stadiums will be allowed 10,000 people or can only be a quarter fall, whichever is lower. Testing will be used to support these openings. Weddings, including receptions, wakes, funerals and Christmas will be allowed with 30 people. I am a little bit confused by some of that, I have to say. I mean, for allowed indoor exercise classes, presumably all of this is subject to the rule that gatherings of more than 30 people will be illegal. That's my assumption. So again, assuming all of that goes in the direction that they want it to, we will take, that will take us to step four, which is the 21st of June, which is when it is all supposed to stop. All legal limits on social contact will be removed. Government hopes to reopen nightclubs and lift restrictions on large events such as festivals. Testing could be used as a condition of entry. Ministers hope to remove restrictions on weddings. So what is yet to be decided? There are a few rules and issues that have not yet been agreed and will be subject to review during the easing of the lockdown. The one meter plus rule, mandatory face masks and working from home. The government hopes to conclude a review of this before step four. So before the 21st of June, we should know about whether or not the one meter plus rule, which I don't think anyone is actually adhering to anyway. Mandatory face masks and working from home will be lifted. So we won't know about that until for some time yet. Whether you can use, this is also what has to be decided. Whether you can use proof of having a COVID-19 vaccine to enter mass events. Now, I was just going to say actually a couple of things that are still left hanging in the air. Our international travel and vaccination and I was going to say masks as well. We've already covered that one. There are still people. This issue still isn't being resolved. There's nothing in the roadmap to resolve this. What about people who don't want to have this vaccination? We still have that issue and a very important issue of civil liberties of whether or not we will be forced and if not forced in name, forced in effect to have this thing. So the government hopes to set out the conclusion of a review prior to step four on whether a vaccine or test certificates could be used to reopen the rest of the economy. International travel, the government has said this will not resume before the 17th of May following a review that will be completed by the 12th of April and major events. The government has said testing could be used to ensure people can safely attend large events. Now, even with presuming this goes well and I know we all want to get back to normal but presuming this goes well and presuming we can take all this at face value. There are still major issues here. There's some major civil liberties issues. We still won't be the people we were beforehand. If we need to have a vaccination to enter mass events if we need a vaccination to travel internationally and if we are still required to wear face masks we still are going to be facing some conflict, some division and serious infringements on people's civil liberties. And particularly something I mentioned last week which is quite excited to be included in the new manifesto, medical liberties. And I talked a couple of weeks ago about our medical records and our privacy but also this is still an infringement on liberty to force people to have a vaccination if they don't want to have one. So a lot of questions are still left unanswered in all this. So just a little couple of words about unemployment and economic, for some businesses a collapse and one area of business which isn't going to be allowed back to normal until mid-April. So still quite a significant time. It's gyms and people have been talking a lot about gyms and for a lot of people gyms have been a lifeline and a way of keeping healthy, way of keeping fit but also of keeping fit up here. And an article that sort of jumped out on me when I was reviewing things this evening was a gym called a budget gym franchise, pure gym, which it said is losing hundreds of thousands of pounds a day. We are burning about half a million pound a day and that's the average over eight months of closure. It has meant that about 120 million of costs with no revenue for 275 gyms. Now they can't be alone in all of this and this isn't going to go away easily either. But like I say, let's not, I think it is good news assuming that we can go ahead but a few things jumping out. There's a picture of school kids wearing masks which is a little bit cruel, I think. But finally on this, just to address something that I said a short while ago about shifting responsibility and you get this feeling. I was out, for example, on Sunday in a village it's in Hartlepool but it's sort of on the outskirts, Seton Corough and it was a lovely, lovely mild day and the place was full and when the first lockdown happened there really wasn't anybody about. So I think that the government has sort of learned that even if they were to have another full lockdown that it's just not going to work. People are not complying with it in the way that they did the first time around. So they head on on this on my TV news and it says Johnson is shifting from government to us the responsibility for protecting ourselves from COVID-19. This isn't the prime minister's four step roadmap out of the lockdown. There will be a fundamental shift in the government's philosophical approach. You may not notice the shift over the din of airlines and pubs and clothing retailers complaining that the PM is taking too long to let them trade again or over the noise of teachers and their trade unions accusing him of putting them at risk from reopening all schools in a big bang on 8th of March. You may also be distracted by keen anticipation of being able to mix together with another five people out of doors. But for all Johnson's caution reopening the economy and society a caution driven by his visceral fear of a possible fourth lockdown, he will make clear that he believes the pace and efficacy of the vaccination program means the balance of economic and wellbeing risks is tilted permanently in favor of giving us much if not quite all of our old way of life back. This is perhaps a subtle point, but it is significant and I agree, I agree it is subtle but it also is significant. It is implicit in the four tests the government has set out for opening society and the economy at due dates in March, April, May and June. The point is that not one of these tests is exclusively about the rate of infection but instead they are and here are the tests that the government will apply between those stages that I've just set out. One whether the rollout of the vaccine remains on target and here we have the same issue the same civil liberties issue. What about people who don't want to take the vaccine? Two whether the vaccines are reducing hospitalizations and deaths, three whether there is a surge in infections that risks an associated surge in hospitalizations that would overwhelm the NHS and four whether new variants land or develop here that escape the efficacy of the vaccines. In other words, infections could start to rise but society and the economy would still be reopened so long as the vaccines are doing the job of keeping symptoms mild and suffer us out of hospital. One year on the government is saying we have to find a way to live with the permanent risk of the illness without shutting ourselves in our homes. If only they'd realized that some time ago. It is worth thinking about that policy change because make no mistake, there will be COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths for years to come. What matters as I am expecting the PM to concede tomorrow, I being Robert Peston he's the author of this. What matters as I am expecting the PM to concede is that even with completion of the vaccine program about half the population will not be protected. There's lack of immunity for half the population stems from an estimate that 20% of adults won't take it. The vaccines won't work on between 10 and 20% of us and the vaccines are not authorized for use on those under 18. Okay. Let's leave it there and go on to a few questions. But even with some questions still left unanswered, some significant questions still left unanswered, some serious issues around vaccination still hanging in the air, at least if we are to take this at face value, at least we may have some normality coming back. But we'll see, we'll see. Okay. Let me go on to some questions. That's quite a few. All right. Thanks everyone. Okay. This is Kira. My main question is, is supporting the far right, wrong or racist? I am 18, 19 in September and in the UK. I don't know what to believe. All I know is I hate the current political scene. Thank you. Okay. This is a really good question, Kira. It took, you know, first of all to address your question on the word racist. The word racist for a lot of people brings up images of the Ku Klux Klan. I mean, I know that's an extreme end of it. Or, you know, people who just dislike or won't have any involvement with or judge people on the basis of their race or ethnicity. It brings up images of the, for example, the segregation and rather appalling treatment of black people, for example, in the Southern US in particular. And I say this for a good reason, that this is the sort of images that it invokes. Is that wrong? Yes. I would say most definitely it is wrong. It is wrong, very wrong. In fact, for a government, for example, to have policies, whether direct or indirect, which treat one group, one racial group or ethnic group less favorably than another. The only answer to that is to ensure, as for Britain policy does, that everyone, every British citizen is equal. And they have all the same rights, all the same responsibilities, have are treated exactly the same way by the law. And to do otherwise, to treat black people less favorably in law is racist. To treat white people less favorably in law is racist. The only thing that isn't is that we are all treated exactly the same way in society and in law. That is what we as a party, what I believe in as a person and what we as a party are advocating. Equal treatment for all people regardless of race in our society. We're all equal British citizens. Anything else, to do anything else on the basis of race or ethnicity, to my mind, is racist. But I maintain, despite the open contempt for white people that is commonplace and mainstream. And by the way, I saw this on Titania McGrath. I mean, you actually learn a lot from Titania. It's not only hilarious, but you learn a lot. Coca-Cola are apparently doing training and propagandising and just horrifying intimidation, actually, of its employees and telling their employees to be less white. And this kind of stuff is really, really standard. The problem of whiteness. The, we all need to, we, for example, I'm whites and I'm being asked relentlessly to be ashamed of being whites. And I maintain that despite the propaganda that these treatment of white people in the way that we are treated is racist. And in order to avoid the application of racial discrimination laws, for example, being applied to white people and white people being protected by race discrimination laws, the hard left came up with this thing called white privilege and that white people couldn't be the victims of racism because we were so privileged and so powerful. And it was only people, the underprivileged black and non-whites who are apparently all underprivileged, regardless of how successful, personally successful they might be. This was the way of the left, carrying on anti-white, fierce anti-white sentiment and beyond, not just sentiment, while not being caught by racial discrimination laws. So treating people differently on the basis of their skin color, treating people unfavorably on the basis of their skin color is racist. And I would say, yes, it's wrong. But most of the people, and this is the crucial point, most of the people who are accused of racism are not racist at all. All you have to do now to be accused of racism and to emphasize on them, let's put emphasis on this, an accusation of racism is enough to destroy people's lives. People who can lose their jobs, they can be thrown off social media, they can be harassed, intimidated, unpersoned. I mean, you basically lose your fundamental rights. No one wants anything to do with you and just an accusation of racism is enough. Most of the people who are accused of racism in my experience are not actually racist at all. What they are is someone who won't buy in to the left wing bullying and intimidation of people who, for example, don't want massive uncontrolled immigration. That's not racist. There are various reasons why people don't want mass uncontrolled immigration. One of them is common sense and resources, and we don't have limitless resources to keep half the world here on this tiny island. So to object to that is not racist, but you will be called a racist for it. To want to preserve the culture, the heritage, the identity and the character of Britain is not racist. It's no more racist to want to protect the identity and character of Britain than it is to want to, for the Japanese people to want to protect the character of Japan. But you won't find Japanese people who do, by the way, protect their culture and character. You won't find them being called racist by the hard left because they're not white. The British majority is white. So if you are say that you want to protect the heritage, identity and character of Britain, which is majority white, you'll be accused of racism. There's nothing racist about it. If you want to protect our freedoms from the encroachment of cultures and ideals and philosophies that are being imported from around the world, which absolutely and fundamentally and often violently reject those freedoms, I'm talking mostly about, but not exclusively to be fair, mostly about Islam. If you reject the totalitarianism inherent in that religion, the lack of free speech, the lack of rights for women or Jews or gays or any lack of a liberal free society, if you reject that and you don't want it here and you object to the import of horrors like FGM or child marriage or the rape gangs that are roaming this country and raping young English girls with impunity, if you object to that and you point out the reality that you have imported this from a society which could not be more different from traditional normal British society, if you object to that, you'll be called a racist. There's nothing racist about it. So it really depends, Kira, on what you mean by racist. If you object to mass immigration or the import of horrible cultural practices or you want to protect British identity and character, no, that is not racist. It is perfectly legitimate and I would suggest actually perfectly moral. And I am 100% that is my belief in I want to protect British identity. I want to stop horrible cultures from coming here and I want to stop mass immigration. I believe that's a moral position because I believe it's in the best interests of the people of this country to take that position. Other countries can worry about their people. My worry is for the people of this country and there's nothing immoral or wrong about it. So it really depends. I hope I've in some way clarified what I believe to be racism, which is the ill treatment of or different treatment of people on the basis of their skin color or their ethnicity. I believe fundamentally and very strongly that all British citizens should be equal and should have the same rights and responsibilities. But I also believe in protecting British identity and character, protecting the freedoms of this country, acting in the best interest of the people of this country and to do that we must not and cannot have mass immigration or a appeasing attitude towards Islam. If you want to ask any further questions on that, Kira, please do and write to me. If you want to discuss this in any more detail, please do feel free to write to me because it's important and I don't think that you're the only 18, 19 year old who is struggling with this and you're right to hate the current political scene because it's appalling. Both big parties lie, they lie like they breathe. They have no intention, no, Labour hates and I'm not being alarmed, Labour hates this country, there's absolutely no doubt about it. They hate everything I've just talked about, the identity, character, heritage and they can't wait to change it and we can see that in their desire to get rid of monuments and street names and the fact that we have just this left wing bullying that means that some of the greatest heroes in the history of this country are being slandered and smeared, their monuments and memorials attacked and Labour can't wait to dismantle the heritage of this country and case in point is Sadiq Khan who sadly governs our capital city and I have no doubt at all, I very little doubt that he's gonna get re-elected sadly and I've no doubt at all that he will set about changing the face of London. London, as soon as he does, the Tories are no better, no better at all and I've read at the top of this hour how we're talking now about an amnesty to three million illegal immigrants and we know as well that during the lockdown illegal immigrants were coming in while we were locked in our houses, you're absolutely right to reject the current system and you're not the only one, you are not the only one. I think there are millions out there who are silently, quietly and disgusted and confused and appalled and are too afraid to say so because of the bullying of groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter and Coal. As I said last, please do write to me if you want to carry on this conversation, I'd love to hear from you. Okay, next question, I am now seeing the media most outlets all with almost exactly the same story with headlines ramping up bird flu. H5N8 bird flu detected in humans for the first time as Russian poultry farmers fall ill. Do the media want lockdowns to go on forever? I haven't actually seen that, I'm just have a very, very quick glance over some of the mainstream press here. Let me go to world, see if that makes any difference. I'm not seeing any on Sky. Let me have a quick, very, very quick look on the BBC. Can't see anything on there as yet. But I will have a look and that is interesting if they are starting to talk about other viruses already. I'll keep a close eye on that one. Okay, go back. Michael, hi, Michael. Oh, Michael, an answer to your question. I got those labels today and I do apologise for that. You'll know, Michael will know what I mean. Any news on the recent border in your house? Guess media didn't report we had an anti-fat attack on members of AFD, media were remarkably silent. They will be, and it goes back to what I was talking about at the start. The media are absolutely pointing at the politicians in the face of anti-for-violence and anti-for-intimidation of criminal behaviour by antifa. The politicians are as weak and pathetic as it is possible to be, but part of the reason that they are so weak and pathetic is that they're terrified of the media. And the media continues to sanitise Black Lives Matter, antifa and beyond, continues to present them as anti-fascists. And, you know, and if you call them anti-fascists, then you, by implication, call their opponents, the ones they are protesting against, for example, are by implication, fascists. And I, you know, reading in Andy Noe's book again today, you know, he was talking, it actually brought back quite a few memories because he was talking about he was due to give talks at various universities across the US and anti-for would be outside and they would not always be cancelled. And that brings me back to what I used to give talks at universities, and I used to do them quite successfully for a number of years. And when they started, when antifa started turning up, it was cancellation after cancellation after cancellation. And now I'm in the on-person category. People I had spent, you spend a lot of time with, now won't give me the time of day. And it is because of this kind of intimidation. So an answer to your question, no, there are some, I have to be careful really what I say because I think there are things I don't know. And I think there are things that are going on in my, the area that I live in, that I don't know, they worry me, but I do think, I have to be honest with you, I do think that there are some hardened leftists in my neighborhood who can see when I'm coming and going. I've seen some indications of this on social media, but there's very little I can do to prove anything. And I, the police, I'm sorry to say, I mean, initially on the initial day, I, you know, they were good and they came out a couple of times and which are very little, very little since then. It's ongoing. I do have to chase, I do have to chase it up, but I will say that my, the contents of my post, my work were showing up in parts of Hartley-Pearle, different parts of Hartley-Pearle, none of, not places I have never been to. It's, you know, it's not, I won't say it's easy. And I'm, it doesn't frighten me. It doesn't, I mean, certainly isn't going to change me in any way, I'm not going to get, I'm not going to think, you know, it's never going to deter me. I'm never going to tone it down or become something else or, you know, get too frightened to go outside. It's not going to work in that respect, but these people are, I mean, they're completely racist, but I think, if you know what I mean by the expression gaslighting, they try to intimidate and confuse and it is confusing. You think to yourself, how can this have happened in the space of 10 minutes? What's going on? And it's a police, the police said to me, this is, this is what, this is what they do. This is what it's all about. It's about messing, playing mind games is how the police put it. And it's, it does, it is indicative of the kind of people that we're dealing with. And that's probably the alarming part. The most alarming part to me is the kind of people that you're dealing with. No scruples, no morals, no limits to what they'll do or won't do. And you know, it's, and the book again, just to go back to this book because they're the same people. They really, there's no, the ends always justify the means. And they really, really believe that they are, that anyone who doesn't agree with them is a fascist. They're not prepared to listen. They're not prepared to debate. And that kind of blind hatred and the irony of it all is that. And in fact, again, last month, I promised of the book, it talks about their hatred and how much they hate America and they hate the stupid world that we live in. And they hate the capitalist system and they hate democracy and they hate, hate, hate, hate, hate. And that's the irony of it all. These people are filled with blind hatred and there aren't any limits. But I happen to think, I happen to think they're all cowards and I happen to think that standing up to, I'm one of the harsh realities of life to me is that bullying works and it does, but not to me it doesn't. You only, Rita Plano High says this so brilliantly. You know, cancel culture only happens with coward culture. Never apologize when you haven't done anything wrong. And she's absolutely right. And we've got to start standing up to bullies. So the idea that they will in any way intimidate me or in any way put me off or in any way stop me campaigning is ridiculous. So, but we are dealing with very, very nasty people, but I will let you know as much as I can as this goes on. It's very much not over yet, but I'll let you know how it goes on. What do you think to Bill Gates wanting which countries to only eat synthetic beef? I'm not sure. I've heard a little bit about burning red meat, et cetera. Perhaps I'll have a little bit of it. I mean, I've done quite a bit of coverage of Bill Gates. Bill Gates is, he wants to be rich. That's what he wants. He wants to be richer. That's what he wants. And since he went into the vaccination game, he's doubled his fortune from 50 to over $100 billion. That's what he wants. He wants, and this is what, you know, vaccination, vaccination, vaccination. They push, push, and push it. They just want, they want to be rich. He wants to be rich. He wants a lot of things actually. Politicians say, this is for Michael again. Politicians say that people who take the vaccine should be given back their civil liberties. Civil liberties, listen to that. They admit they've taken civil liberties away. Thought it's just a conspiracy to, well, they have taken, they've taken more than just civil liberties away. They've taken our basic daily freedoms away. And they know that, but it's not quite as simple. And there's a little bit of double speak in this, to my mind. We'll give you your civil liberties back if you take a vaccine. Well, I'm sorry, but that's an infringement on civil liberties in itself. A little bit of double speak going on there. Double speak is never good. Okay. Did you see the Merseyside police outside Asda? I did see that. Being offensive is an offence. They took it down. I saw that on Twitter and they actually deleted the tweet. Now, they may have deleted the tweet, but they were still standing outside with a big billboard behind them saying, being offensive is an offence, no it isn't. And the police don't seem to know what law and what isn't. And the reason the police don't know what's law and what isn't, and the reason they make up the laws they go along is because they're not trained police. They are trained as social workers, as social philosophers. They talk about what causes crime and what pushes people into committing crimes and what social issues and deprivation and marginalization and exclusion and all this has got nothing to do with the police. The reason the police are so bad at the law is because they're not trained in the law. Law enforcement seems to be the least important thing in police training. And when I was doing my report into the grooming gang some years ago, I found that out from the College of Policing. Actual legal enforcement was a tiny paragraph in a massive book about police and what policing is. Police are not law enforcers. They are political opinion, yeah, perhaps enforcers. I don't think enforcers are quite the right word, but political opinion shapers, they're more concerned about trans awareness day or whatever rubbish than they are with actual criminal offenses. So they have no idea what the law is and for them to say that causing offence, being offensive is an offence is actually shocking but not surprising. But they have actually deleted that from Twitter I saw. Okay. Okay, someone sent me through some articles on board flu. Yeah. This one BBC News, Russia detects first case of H5N8 board flu in humans. Workers have been infected at a poultry plant but there is no sign of transmission between humans. This one is from Sky News, Russia records first case of human infection with board flu strain. It should be fair, that is a pretty unbelievable. So the day we're told we're coming out of lockdown the media is at it again with their flu scare stories. Right, Stu, last question. Stu, what do you have in common with Margaret Thatcher if anything? I think that Margaret Thatcher was, whether or not you liked her, whether or not you agreed with her, I think she was the last truly, truly unapologetically pro-Britain Prime Minister. And I am also unapologetically pro-Britain. That's what I have in common with Margaret Thatcher. Okay, I shall finish it there. Thank you very much everyone for joining me. Spread the word about for Britain. It is really important. And if you, the common elections in May are also really, really important. And on my Sunday column yesterday I spoke about why local government is so important and the impact that they have on our lives. And also that local government, local elections can be really, they can really change the shape of neighborhoods and areas, cities and towns and boroughs. And people are, I think people are changing anyway in respect to the political scene. And I think Kira's message at the start, she's definitely not alone. I think a lot of people are disgusted and there's going to be more people. I'll go into this next week on my live stream. I'll have a look into this in some detail about the three million illegal immigrants who have been given amnesty. People are going to be disgusted by that. And I think these elections in May are a chance for some real change in local politics. And I think there will be a change in local politics. And I think that when it, for politics to change it is going to change locally first. So if you're thinking about it, if you're thinking about standing, if you're thinking about how you can support those who are standing, give me a shout. I will answer any questions and hopefully lay any fears or concerns. Finally, I've got my, we had our advert in the Hartlepool Mail on Saturday, just gone. I've had a lot of messages of support and encouragement and I'm really grateful for those. And I will be, I'm on Facebook. I've finally been dragged kicking and screaming onto Facebook. So I'm going to be using that to talk to people and I'm going to be doing a live, Hartlepool focused, Hartlepool based live stream on Facebook from next Wednesday on. And I'll be talking about various policies and such that we should have not just in Hartlepool but for local elections, generally. So it's Wednesday, the third of March will be the first one at 10 o'clock in the morning on Facebook.com AMW, just make sure, AMW, Hartlepool. So Facebook.com slash AMW, Hartlepool. Okay, that's it. Thanks very much everyone for joining me. I shall be back with an economics blog tomorrow. I'll be back this Thursday with a stream. I won't say actually too much about that stream for the moment because I still need to speak to the person involved, so sensitive subject. So I'll leave that one for the moment but I'll let you know on GAB. And don't forget to follow me on GAB by the way. At AMD Waters. Friday I'm going to do a follow book review of Andy Knows amazing, amazing book but do support Andy. He's a really great guy and it's a brilliant book and it'll send chills down your spine when you realise just how dangerous and how prominent anti-fat and their cohorts actually are. Okay, thanks very much everyone. Look after yourselves in the meantime and I'll see you again soon, bye.