 All right, we'll get afternoon, everyone. Just a few things here at the top. We'll get right to your questions. This morning, Secretary Austin had his first engagement with Admiral Dong Jun, Minister of National Defense of the People's Republic of China via teleconference from here at the Pentagon. The two leaders discussed US-PRC defense relations and regional and global security issues. During the discussion, Secretary Austin emphasized the importance of continuing to open lines of military-to-military communication between the US and the People's Republic of China. He also underscored the importance of respect for high-seas freedom of navigation guaranteed under international law, especially in the South China Sea, and reiterated that the United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate safely and responsibly wherever international law allows. Secretary Austin also discussed Russia's unprovoked war against Ukraine and expressed concerns about recent provocations from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. In addition, the Secretary reiterated that the United States remains committed to our longstanding One China policy, which is guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, the three US-China Joint Communicays, and the six assurances, and he reaffirmed the importance of peace and stability across the Strait. The Department will continue to engage in active discussions with PRC counterparts about future engagements between defense and military officials at multiple levels, as agreed to by President Biden and PRC President Jingjie Ping in November 2023. A full readout of today's call is available on defense.gov. Switching gears, Secretary Austin spoke with Israeli Minister of Defense Yav Galant last night to discuss the aftermath of Iran's unprecedented April 13 attacks, which, as you know, US-Israeli and partner forces thwarted in a combined defensive operation. During the call, the Secretary reiterated steadfast US support for Israel's defense and reaffirmed the strategic goal of regional stability. As you saw from our call readouts posted yesterday, Secretary Austin continues to communicate with leaders throughout the Middle East region and beyond to emphasize that while the United States does not seek escalation, we will continue to defend Israel and US personnel. Separately, Secretary Austin also spoke with Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustam Umarov earlier today to discuss the situation on the ground and reaffirm our unwavering commitment to Ukraine's defense capabilities and fight for freedom from Russian aggression. A full readout will be posted today on the DOD website. And then finally, looking ahead to tomorrow, Secretary Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General C. Q. Brown, Jr., Jr. will provide testimony before the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee at 10 a.m. on Capitol Hill regarding the fiscal year 2025 DOD budget request. With that, I'll be happy to take your questions. I'll go to A.P. Lita. Thanks, Pat. The Secretary's been speaking to Mr. Galant quite frequently. Has he spoken to him again today or are there plans to do another call today? He's not spoken with him today. And I don't have a call to readout. Of course, we'll keep you updated. And can you describe in any way what the Secretary leaves is whether or not the Israelis and Mr. Galant are heeding U.S. and treaties to not trigger a wider conflict in the Middle East? Is there a sense that Israel is listening to that message? Well, I appreciate the question, Lita. I don't want to speak for Israel, of course. You know, the Secretary's been very clear in his conversations with Minister Galant per our readouts that we will firmly support Israel's defense. But you've also heard us say that we do not want to see a wider regional conflict. And I'll just leave it there, Liz. Is it expected that Israel would give the USA heads up if it does a counterattack and give the U.S. any formal warning? As I'm sure you can appreciate, I can't go into specific diplomatic discussions. Again, we maintain frequent contact not only with our Israeli partners, but our partners throughout the region. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Thank you, General. So according to the readout and what you just stated, that the Secretary reaffirmed the strategic goal of regional stability. In light of this call, is Secretary Austin more or less hopeful that this goal can be achieved? Well, look, I'm not going to characterize the Secretary's sermon other than to say what we've put out there. We've been working very hard for many months to prevent a wider regional conflict in the region, and we'll continue to work toward that. Does the Secretary see a way to achieve this option if Israel decides to strike Iran? Well, again, without getting into hypotheticals, I guess much will depend on what happens exactly and how Iran might respond. So again, as you've heard us say, while we don't seek to escalate, we don't seek escalation in the region, we will continue to support Israel's defense. We will continue to defend our personnel. And you've also heard us say, as I just mentioned, that we don't want to see this spiral into a wider regional war, nor do we seek conflict with Iran. So again, we'll continue to work toward that. Can you follow up on this? It's interesting that you said this depends on how Iran reacts. Doesn't it depend as well on how Israel reacts? I appreciate you commenting on my commentary being interesting. But I mean, my words speak for themselves, right? I mean, you're asking if Israel does something, how will the U.S. respond? Well, a lot will depend on what happens. And as you know, right now nothing has happened so we'll have to see. Thanks, Clara. Thank you. Do you speak generally about how long it takes to set up jailots once they arrive? Like typically what kind of timeframe are we looking at? Yeah, so a lot of the components are already in the theater. And as I'm sure you can appreciate, there's sort of a sequencing that will take place to construct and implement jailots. Based on the information that I have right now, we're still on track to have jailots achieve operating capability by the end of the month or early May. And so what you will probably see in the next two to three weeks is components of jailots starting to be constructed. But again, planners are working through those details and will certainly provide you much more information as we get closer to. Has that IOC date shifted though? Cause originally it was third week of April, then it was end of April, now it's maybe early May. I'm telling you that there's IOC and there's FOC. Right now we're tracking that it will be operational, which means it will have some initial operating capability by the end of the month or early May. What we said when we announced it was that it would be operational within 60 days and we're still on track for that. Thanks, Chris. In the secretary's call along with PRC minister today, did he bring up the issue of the air intercepts with American aircraft? And he pressed for an explanation of why those occurred and what the Chinese reasoning was for those. Yeah, thanks, Chris. I'm really not gonna have much more to provide beyond what we included in our readout. As I mentioned, there was a discussion about the fact that the United States will continue to fly, sail and operate safely and responsibly, wherever international law allows. Jimmy. Thank you, General Iran and Israel. Iran and North Korea are working together to pursue the performance of nuclear weapons and the ballistic missiles. And is it possible that these weapons was used to attack Israel? I can't speculate, Jimmy, certainly. When it comes to threats posed by the DPRK and Iran, something that we take very seriously, which should be obvious, but again, just for the sake of restating it, we will continue to work very closely with our partners both in the Middle East region as well as in the Indo-Pacific region to address potential threats to our peoples and work very hard towards regional security and stability. And on that front, when it comes to the Indo-Pacific region, just to make clear, similar to our ironclad defense of Israel, our relationship and our alliance with the Republic of Korea and Japan are also ironclad. And we will stand beside them to work together towards security and stability throughout the region. One more. Do you predict that Israel or Iran might use nuclear weapons in the future? You know, again, I can't get into predicting the future, Janie, other than we're going to work very hard again to ensure security and stability and prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Oran. Two different questions. One, is there any more clarity or information on whether there was or wasn't a 50% failure rate from Iranian ballistic missiles? And second, in the call between Secretary Austin and Minister Umarov on the unwavering commitment, we're still unclear if Congress is going to pass a supplemental. And it looks like that commitment is very much wavering. What did Secretary Austin tell Minister Umarov on that? And does the Secretary believe the supplemental will pass? Yeah. So on the 50% number, I don't have anything new for you, Oran, other than to say, as I highlighted yesterday, that the air threats that Iran launched toward Israel, the vast majority of those were taken down. And clearly, Iran failed to achieve their objective of causing destruction within Israel, very minimal damage on the ground. When it comes to the unwavering commitment of the United States for Israel, I think it's important. First of all, as you highlight, I'm sorry. So many countries to talk about today. The unwavering support of the United States for Ukraine, you know, look, we absolutely need the supplemental. But I think it's also important to look at what the United States is doing with many other countries to support Ukraine. In fact, I mean, we're about to conduct the 21st Ukraine Defense Contact Group. And two years after Russia's invasion, you have a coalition of nearly 50 nations that have worked together for over two years to support Ukraine. And the United States continues to provide a significant leadership role when it comes to working with those partners to ensure Ukraine has the capabilities it needs, as well as helping with the capability coalitions that looks at not only the near-term requirements, but also the long-term defense requirements that Ukraine will have. And so we absolutely are committed to Ukraine's defense, and we'll continue to work closely with Congress to get the resources we need to support them. Tom. Pat, getting back to Jay-Law, has the security arrangements been worked out about who will secure the aid once it gets into Gaza, presumably the idea. But any other countries would expect to get involved in that as well. And also, as far as who will be driving the aid in, is that USAID doing that in contracting out? Do we have any details on the way ahead? Yeah, Tom. We'll certainly have much more to provide in the near future. Right now, what I would tell you is, again, we're making progress on that front. When it comes to security, again, with the important point here that there will be no US forces on the ground in Gaza, Israel has signed up to provide security. And so we're obviously working through with USAID who is going to receive that aid, how it's going to be offloaded onto land and then distributed throughout Gaza. So again, I'm not in a position right now to go into much more detail than that, other than progress continues to be made. And like I said, we're on track right now for a late April, early May initial operating capability. Let me go to Karla, and then I'll come to Consti. Pat, is Sankam commander General Eric Carrillo still in the region? And is he still working to coordinate a potential defense for any future attacks? I'd refer you to Sankam on his specific whereabouts. I do know that he's traveling right now overseas, but I'd refer you to them for the specifics. And then on the video call, did Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin mention the surge in sales that you confirmed yesterday that China has been doing supporting Russia's war against Ukraine? Did he mention that at all? And did he ask China to stop? Again, as I highlighted in the topper, the secretary did raise Russian aggression in Ukraine. But beyond that, I'm not going to be able to provide any further details. Thank you. I'll start Constantine, then I'll come to you, Rob. Thanks. Just a quick follow up on Tom's question. Has any decision been made in terms of security being provided at sea, so Navy ships or other security arrangements for the seaward component of J-Lots? Yeah. So first, let me just say that when it comes to J-Lots and when it comes to US forces supporting this effort, it's important to understand that safety of our forces is paramount. So that is something that is being taken into consideration throughout this planning process. And so in addition to some Israeli support when it comes to the maritime aspect of security, certainly you know within Sixth Fleet we have capabilities there as well. And as I understand it, the J-Lots vessels and personnel have organic force protection capability as well. So again, not going to go into the specifics on that. But that is something that is fundamental to the entire planning of this operation. I'll go to Rio, and then I'll go to the phone real quick. I have a follow-up on the Secretary's call with the Chinese Defense Minister this morning. And during the call, did the Secretary receive any explanations or any commitment from the Chinese side regarding the recent tensions in the Second Thomas show in the South China Sea? Yeah, I appreciate the question. I'll let the PRC speak for themselves again. I'd refer you to the readout in terms of what was discussed in our positions. Thank you. All right, let me go to the phone here real quick. JJ from WTOP. General, thank you for the chance to do this. Two quick questions. Israel, it seems, is planning a limited response to Iran's attack. The Pentagon has said it doesn't want a wider war. How do Israel's plans impact the Pentagon's plans in the region? Yeah, again, you know, seeing those reports and certainly would refer you to the Israelis, JJ, when it comes to anything they might do, which of course is an Israeli decision. You know, as I've highlighted, we do not seek escalation in the region. But we will not hesitate to defend Israel and protect our personnel. Again, we do not want to see a wider regional war. We don't see conflict with Iran. But we won't hesitate to take necessary actions to protect our forces. What did Iran and Russia have developed? I'm sorry, JJ, I can't hear you. Yeah, Iran and Russia have developed a military partnership, which may be to Iran's benefit as Israel prepares for whatever response it's going to give. Iran also helps Russia in its war with Ukraine. So how does that partnership impact the Pentagon's view and plans for dealing with both of those countries? Well, you raise a really good point. And I think it's often forgotten about the fact that Iran has been providing Russia with capabilities to include one-way attack drones, as you know, to conduct its illegal war inside Ukraine. And so while you see the United States and other international partners working together to promote regional security and stability and deliver humanitarian assistance, you see countries like Iran exporting terror and destruction. Thank you, Eunice. Thank you, all right, General. This administration has been calling for one thing since last day, and that is de-escalation, which sounds like the perfectly reasonable thing for hundreds of millions of people in the region. But you're also saying that we're not going to hesitate to defend Israel. So doesn't that give enough freedom to the Netanyahu government to escalate this as much as they'd like? Because the US is going to be there on the any circumstances to defend them. Well, again, certainly, we don't, you know, the bottom line up front, we don't want to see a wider regional war. And we've been working very hard toward that end ever since the Hamas-Israel conflict, as you know, kicked off back in October. And when it comes to a potential Israeli response, again, that is a sovereign decision for Israel to make. They were attacked by Iran in an unprecedented attack, over 300 air threats. So that is their decision. But again, we've been very clear that we don't want to see things escalate. What I'm saying is that if Iran were to conduct an attack, another attack against Israel, just to be crystal clear, the United States will support the defense of Israel just as we did this last weekend. So wouldn't that make a potential Israeli government decision binding for the Pentagon? Again, look, I'm not going to get into the Israeli decision-making. I'd refer you to them. I think we've been very clear that we don't want to see escalation, that we don't want to see a wider regional war. And we'll just leave it at that. Thank you. So China has continued to become more aggressive towards the Philippines. And in the past, MMCA, a US official, stated that will continue to press the PRC on those issues. Did Austin press him on this particular issue? Well, again, I'd refer you back to the readout the Secretary, as I highlighted, made clear in the discussion that it is important to respect the high seas freedom of navigation that is guaranteed under international law, especially in the South China Sea, and that the United States will continue to fly, sail, and operate safely and responsibly wherever international law allows. Correct. But did he press him on Thomas Scholl, like the Philippines, not just the South China Sea? Yeah, I appreciate the question. I'd refer you back to the readout. That's about the extent of what I can provide today. Liz and then go to the floor. So you've said several times that the US does not seek a wider regional war. Is that a message to Iran or a message to Israel? I think it's just a statement of fact. Carla. Thank you, Pat. The IDF is now saying that an Israeli airstrike killed a Hezbollah commander in Lebanon today. Can you confirm was the secretary given any sort of notification in his call with his Israeli counterpart yesterday? That's news to me, Carlite. I don't have to refer you to the Israelis to talk about that. Let me go to the phone here, Jeff Schogel, task and purpose. Thank you. Just two quick questions. Has there been any change to the US military's footprint in Niger? And also there was a fire at the Army's ammunition plant in Scranton yesterday at the risk of invoking Billy Joel. Do we know who started the fire? On Niger, Jeff, no change in the US force posture at this time. On the fire, I'd have to refer you to the Army, because we didn't start the fire. Yes, ma'am. Just to clarify and a follow-up. So is the message that no matter what Israel does, if it reacts, the US will defend it regardless? Well, look, I think the president and the secretary have been clear that the United States and our support for Israel's defense is ironclad. So doesn't that take away any leverage you might have had to try to influence the Israeli decision? Look, Israel lives in a dangerous neighborhood. And again, I think it's important to take a step back here and look at the US-Israel defense relationship, the multi-decades long relationship that we have with Israel. And understand, again, that the United States recognizes the neighborhood that Israel lives in, the threats to regional security and stability that exist if Israel is not able to defend itself. And so I'll just leave it there. But doesn't that give them carte blanche then just to go as big as they want? I'm not going to get in the hypotheticals. Like I said, whether or not Israel responds is an Israeli decision. We don't want to see a wider regional conflict. You see the Department of Defense and the broader US government working hard to de-escalate tensions in the region. You can see that in all the readouts that the Secretary's had with his counterparts throughout the Middle East region. And I'll just leave it there. All right, let me go, Heather, from USNI. Thank you so much. Just wanted to check in on what we're seeing right now with the Houthis. It seems like they're getting quieter. Do you think that's related to what happened over the weekend with Iran or are we expecting to see more? I don't have any updates to provide, Heather, as it relates to the Houthis clearly. You know, we continue to have forces there that work together as part of Prosperity Guardian to deter and disrupt and degrade Houthi capability. But I'd refer you to Sencom. They may have more. And Heather, while I have you on the phone here, too, and the group, I just want to clarify a question you asked yesterday. You asked about whether or not air-based or, excuse me, land-based, sea-based fighter aircraft. I don't think you said fighter. I think you just said aircraft participated in the taking down of or in the action yesterday. What I thought you were asking was, were sea-based aircraft part of the capabilities we had that were supporting this overall effort? That is true. But just to clarify, the fighter aircraft that were participating in the operation to take down drones were land-based aircraft, not sea-based aircraft. So just to clarify that. All right. Any other questions? Last question, yes, sir. Just thanks, Pat. I didn't think you were the first time. Upon a clarification on the ease, there'd be Israeli support for the maritime aspect to security on J-Lots. Does that include aerial support for those ships, such as monitoring for threats, et cetera? You don't want to get into the specifics in terms of air coverage. I mean, clearly the United States is going to do what we need to do to protect our forces. You know, as I understand it, Israel has signed up to provide maritime security and land-based security. So just leave it there. Okay. Thanks very much, everybody. Appreciate it.