 Let's jump straight into it. Right, let's start integrating this. And no suggestions from GitHub. For the wavered denoising, the universal threshold is used here. 0.5 asterisk mp, sqrt, 2 asterisk mp.log, then egundascoredata. This is just one of many thresholding techniques you can use for denoising. You might want to adjust this or offer multiple options. That should be fine. The wavered used for decomposition, wavered transform, is directly obtained from the client request. You should ensure that this is a valid waver type supported by pywt, eg db1, db2, r, etc. This sounds legit, what else? While it's generating. The level parameter is also directly obtained from the client request. Again, you should ensure that this is a valid value. Too large a value might result in an error or undesired behavior. If you wish to use wavered coefficients for other analyses or visualizations, you can extend the code accordingly. The above example just applies denoising. Yeah, we also have the outputs. I'm sure it's the correct MID, yes. Right, so I want to do some error checking first. Absolutely. Validating the input is crucial. You can achieve this by checking if the provided wavered transform is in a list of wavered supported by pywt. If it's not, you can send an appropriate error response to the client. Let's pop this. Okay, we do get an error. This is not the type of error I was expecting. Do we get it? Even if I remove this? No. Okay, can we print out this list? Why copilot doesn't want to work? Is that doing something? All right. We can just do that, can you? Right, this is the list. Okay, we need to adjust this dropdown. Do they actually have names? Let's pop it back into GPT. The list you've provided appears to be the wavered name supported by pywt, and the log entry suggests that a request was made with an unsupported wavered transform value, uwt. Are any of them legit? No. Given this, it seems that the validation code is working correctly. So when provided with an unsupported wavered, uwt, the server responded with a 400 bad request. Yeah, that's fine. If you're looking to improve the error message for the client, you might want to include the list of valid wavers in your error response. Oh, but how do we take this HTML bit? And we update this. Wait a second. So those are actually the correct responses, isn't it? The wt, no. We want to update this with the valid wavelets. Let me create that. Run this. This is the valid wavelets. Shall you understand the context? Okay, updating the value, this value. It's not a valid value. Or is it okay? Okay, let's try this. It should be updated. It's not giving an error now. Okay, we might add more later. Should we do it now? Because we'll forget later, won't we? Okay, give me the DB3. Yeah, there's a good feeling of that. Okay, let's just add four. That should be enough. Okay, you know what to do, don't you? It's the same two. Yes. Right, it's enough. A buyer token, oh, come on, Github, co-pilot. Why aren't you doing it by yourself? Is this... Ah, there is no 1.2, so thank you for that. Yeah, there's 1.1, 1.3, 1.5. And 2.2. Okay, we'll leave it there for now. Oops, get this. We need another input for... Let me check. Let's make this one default HTML. Okay, how do we do this? Selfie. Yeah, Github, co-pilot. It's either I don't know how to use it or it's absolutely hopeless. Hey, one sec, what are we doing? I missed this one. Well, having a problem, can we make an option? Can't spell. Yeah, Github, co-pilot can learn from JGBT how to modify code. Yeah, just need to add the word selected there. So, now we have db1 as default. Obviously, this should change the signal. Okay, this stopped working. Okay, what's up? I think I had this error before. How to fix... Can you fix this? I saved this file as moment was the last change. So, this line is doing what? Yeah, what do I have to do? So, line 87 is not indicating any problem. Just restart the thing. It's working okay. When I hit wavelet in noise, I get this error only when selecting wavelet in noise is on. And this is the error. Can you give me more specific answer? Yeah, if wavelet in noise is over there, what's the problem? Yeah, it doesn't have an else function. Let's try co-pilot is doing something. Let's do some manual printing coefficients. Why? Okay, error handling is good. Okay, let's do some more error handling. Okay, so instead of... Oops, okay, right. Okay, now the app is having an error. Don't have else yet. Okay, so this is running. Okay, so this is running okay. Why is this not sending this... What am I doing wrong? What am I doing wrong? If wavelet in noise is just be reverse, multi-level discrete wavelet transform. Yeah, this doesn't make any sense. To fix a code. Sorry, no super long prompt. I'll probably get a timeout soon, but I'm just trying to understand what's going on. Okay, so we have this. Right, so this should come first. Yeah, I don't want any comments like that to... It's obvious that that's the continuation of the code. Where is if... Do we have if the trend? We do. Okay, now I'm really confused. Yeah, that's just checking for NANDs. So we should go e.g. data and the trend, if necessary, then removing check for NANDs. And then weather denoising rest of the code. Okay, let's try this. So we're starting the thing. It's refresh. This is working. Okay, that's working. And it's actually doing something. So it's removing some noise. This is actually only useful up to a very limited point. Okay, let's reduce the window size. Yeah, so you can see the noise reduction there. So yeah, check gpt4. It does know something about the e.g. It's a particularly noisy channel. This is the trending. This filter orders only. Yeah, we need to restructure the whole thing. We could actually just try this again. So on the larger screen, ideally everything will be set from left to right. On the smaller screen, on the tablet or phone. Yeah, it's obviously we'll have to go top to bottom. But otherwise it's actually working. It's actually doing something useful. So next thing we'll be patching it up a bit and publishing on the side. So it will go instead of this one here. We'll probably put it up top there. So it will eventually look at least as good as this one. If not, it should be much better. So hopefully you'll be able to test it yourself. Yes, this levels in html should be limited. Levels value should have a mean and max like that. It equal, well, would zero just be the same as having it off? Let's make it five and default about two. Yeah, there's not much difference between the different weather types. Now the other thing is when I change the frequency spectrum is updating as well. It's good. It's changing by the role. The question is this is working. Now with no errors. The effect of the wasting is not very clear. Let's see what it says. Maybe it knows way more than I do. Okay, that looks sounds very interesting. Can you give me the details? Should I have it as an input? Wow, you're so smart. Let's add a multiplier. We might continue this next time. But yes, we made quite a bit of progress. But you know, it actually works. I assume this number should be between zero and one. Yeah, the original thing was 0.5.