 A fact, that and whom, the three most misconceived words in English grammar. Grammar is the whole system of language. It includes a set of rules known as syntax. Occasionally when working on the computer you may get a message error syntax, code 141 this means you have typed into the computer something that did not fit into the rules. This is not allowed and the computer will reject it and force you to obey the rules. When speaking English we have no restrictions on the structure or form in no computer monitoring us to stop us from speaking incorrectly. We can say anything anyway we choose, well spoken or poorly spoken. There are some common words which are frequently misused. They are, affect, that, and whom. Accessa will look at each of these in an effort to clarify their use. However since language is a living thing it is in a constant state of change, and these three words are one the forefront of change. Effect versus effect. Effect slash effect slash has a great confusion with effect slash effect, and quite rightly when we pronounce both words the same way. In the common vernacular they are both pronounced effect slash effect slash. Many online dictionaries list the pronunciation for both word as the same. Merriam-Webster lists the pronunciations given here. This is the underlying root of the problem, when a speaker cannot hear a difference the meaning is derived from the context of the sentence. In the spoken sentence, the violence he saw has affected him to the core. We understand this to mean he was emotionally shaken to the core. Effect is a verb. In this sentence, the damaging effects of the sun has ruined his skin. Effect is a noun. It is a causative word. We understand this to mean the sun has caused the damage. In these sentences both words are used correctly. But if we incorrectly substitute effect for effect the sentence, the damaging effects of the sun has ruined his skin. The meaning is still deduced to be the sun has caused the damage. In the colloquial the mispronunciation of these two words, usually both pronounced effect slash effect slash, has moved these words to become homophones. They sound alike but have different meanings and different spellings. It could be debated, these two words, effect and effect have become synonyms and now mean the same thing. That Many characteristic of speech find their way into the written language. One such word is that. When we speak we often add filler words which fill pauses, mm, um, and, yeah, you, you know, like and that. These words fill time voids and speaking while our mind seeks the next set of words to use. In the following sentence, it could be debated that these two words, effect and effect have become synonyms and mean the same thing. The word that is just a filler word. That is a pronoun as is the word these. Removing this filler word does not change the meaning and improves the flow and corrects the error of having a singular and plural pronoun for the same noun. As a test we can try the sentence emitting the word that whenever we come across it. If the sentence does not flow then it is needed. Whom vs who? Whom is a dying word? Its usage, in a tightening orbit with who, will soon be lost and who will be the survivor? Who and whom are both pronouns? Who refers to the subject, while whom refers to the verb? In this correct sentence, who made this awful mess? The sentence sounds correct to the ear, it flows naturally. It naturally flow from repetitious use. We have become accustomed to it. We have become accustomed to the way it sounds. If we replace it with whom in this sentence, whom made this awful mess? This is incorrect and it sounds wrong to the ear. Subject verb, singular pronoun, adjective vertical bar noun who, made, this, awful, mess. When trying to decide between who or whom you can substitute he or she, for who, and him and her, for whom? In the sentence, he made this awful mess. This sound flows naturally so who is the correct usage? In the sentence, him made this awful mess. This sound incorrect to the ear, so whom can not be used here? We have been taught to hear the correct sound through repetition and constant correction. Who is conning who? You can replace this with he is conning her, but not he is conning she invites first to him is conning she does not work at all. So the correct sentence should be who is conning whom? At issue here is the incorrect sentence, who is conning who? Which also sounds correct and is almost exclusively used in spoken speech. This is evident in Aretha Franklin's hit song, who's zoom in who? Correctly it should be who's zoom in whom? Since who sounds correct all the time society will naturally do away with whom being consumed by who? Are you ready to teach abroad? These are difficult concepts to grasp by the native English speaker because the meaning, pronunciation and spelling are so close, as a foreign student learning English such concepts may be difficult to master. Especially with effect, that, and whom the mastery is in audio, hearing, process as much as it is a written process. Both are learned by repetition and correction of errors by society, other speakers. When teaching English as a foreign language the instructor must use every opportunity for correctly using these three words and correcting these common errors often. Speak with an ITTT advisor today to put together your personal plan for teaching English abroad. Send us an email or call us toll free at 1-800-490-0531 to speak with an ITTT advisor today.