 Good morning. You've got a fair dose of modeling data and context, I think, so I can move quite quickly. Also, the moderator has cut me down to three to five minutes, so I'm going to go quite far. And I keep on asking for a minute in between, but nevertheless. So, you know, you've got a good sense of the background. I was just emphasizing some of these things. Perhaps the point here is that I'm presenting the National Development Plan as developed by the Planning Commission. This is an advisory body set up by the President two years ago and asked, really, to address the various challenges facing South Africa, including climate change, but poverty, inequality, education. So it's quite an all-encompassing plan. There's a specific chapter in this plan on the environment and climate change, and this is important. There were some debates about where we should discuss climate change and environmental issues, and as you suspect, it could be a cross-cutter cutting across everything, and it could have also been lost, but we have a specific chapter on it. The chapter started off talking about a transition to a low-carbon economy. The final chapter, really, is much broader, and this reflects the debate in the society and reflects what we want to say about it, to include environmental sustainability, climate resilience, and a transition to a low-carbon economy. They're separate issues for us. So what are some of the recommendations that the Planning Commission, which, by the way, has been accepted by the South African Cabinet as a basis for future planning in government departments? What does the plan really say? Well, the plan is of the view that we should use our mineral and natural resources to fund the transition. We understand the many challenges we have, including education, health, poverty, and inequality, and our approach to the economy and our growth model is really to use our existing resources to create a more diverse and inclusive economy. We're also of the view that we should address our development challenges that ensures environmental sustainability and build climate resilience, and this really addresses the debate about adaptation, mitigation, and development. This is the order in which we see things. Also, the issue about the use of mineral resources to fund the transition. The point really here is that this is going to affect the rate of transition in South Africa. It's going to be a debate. The peak plateau might take a bit longer. So there is an issue about the rate of transition, if that's the way we're going. We also are not underestimating the skills, technology, and institutional capacity needed to transition to a low-carbon economy. There are new mechanisms, new institutions will be required, new skills required, and this is a big issue and focus for us. You've heard about the carbon tax, just to say that we're supportive of the carbon pricing mechanisms, and we're of the view that they should be implemented within a wider suite of mitigation policy instruments. We also talk about green development and green products. Our belief is, given South Africa's context, that we will engage in developing technologies, green products, and services, but these would be mostly niche markets. We are not about to compete with major players in the major market segments. In terms of public infrastructure, just quite quickly, we're also saying the obvious road to rail movement, increasing public transport, and we have an additional challenge, which is really our historical legacy of our spatial arrangements. We had quite a few dormitories of labor who lived in these dormitories and worked very far from their places, so we have a particular spatial challenges and we really say moving people closer. This is a big focus of our infrastructure and transport systems. We're also quite keen on investigating the regional energy solutions. If you think about food, energy, and water security in our country nationally and if you think about it in a regional context, it just changes the questions and it changes the solutions quite dramatically, so we are really keen on thinking through regional energy solutions. The important thing perhaps is just an issue of data that we lack sufficient and there is a debate about the data and the credibility of the data and one of the big proposals in the plan really is about taking the issue of data quite seriously. So I'd stop there and thank you.