 We've been talking quite a bit as so many have about a lawsuit, a class action lawsuit, if you will, against Buffalo Wild Wings for allegedly having boneless wings that are not supposed to be boneless. But is there any merit to this? Let's bring in local patent attorney, John Rizvi, joining us live. Hey, John, good morning. How are you? Yeah, good. Good. Always a pleasure to be here. We're glad you are. So I actually have two suits in mind that I want to talk to you about, but let's see how we do on time. Let's start with this one. So this Buffalo Wild Wings lawsuit, you're the lawyer, set it up for us for folks who may not be aware, then let us know what you're thinking about the legitimacy of this. Yeah. So under the Lanham Act, there's liability for false advertising. So basically you claim a product is either source produced or endorsed by a party that had no involvement. So that's the basis of this lawsuit is that the Buffalo Wild Wings sells boneless chicken wings, and the meat does not come from the wing of the chicken. It comes from the chicken breast. And the class action lawsuit is claiming that that's misleading. And the harm is that the consumers are claiming they would have paid less had they known that it was breast meat and not wing meat. I mean, what's reality? Does, I mean, is there, that's going to say are there legs here, but I probably don't want to say that. So is there any merit to this? So it's going to come down to what the reasonably the consumer of average intelligence, education and knowledge, what they believe. And there's, there's other examples, like, for example, like a hot dog. Nobody thinks that it's dog meat that, you know, and you can't bring a lawsuit saying, oh, I thought I was eating dog meat. A hamburger, it's known it's not ham French fries are, are, you know, are American and they're not they're not from imported from France. And that's the worry. And the question is, does this fall in the same category, like, do consumers know that boneless chicken wings are not wing meat? And this particular plaintiff argues that it's that it's false advertising that he would have ordered chicken nuggets. And essentially that the chain is profiting by calling the boneless chicken wings when they're actually essentially chicken nuggets, dipped in sauce, and that's that's the crux of the argument. John, if you were on this case, if you were the lawyer on this case, which side would you want to be on? I would not want to be the plaintiff in this case. I mean, clearly, there's a tweet by Buffalo Wildlings that it's, you know, the public and the court of public opinion is certainly on the side of the restaurant chain. And that's why the chain put out a tweet saying it's true. Our boneless wings are all white chicken meat. Our hamburgers contain no ham. And our Buffalo wings are 0% Buffalo. So it's kind of a tongue-in-cheek, a humorous tweet that they put out a little bit risky because there's clearly admissions in that I don't know if as a lawyer, I would advise a client to be publicly tweeting something like this. It comes across as really arrogant and cocky as if the plaintiff had like no case as if it's a frivolous lawsuit. But the reality is from a PR standpoint, that's probably how most people view this as a frivolous lawsuit. And if that's the case, that means most consumers know that boneless chicken wings are not really wing meat. They hope it's chicken meat, but they don't necessarily think it's wing meat. And if most consumers already know that, then it's got a really low chance of this case going anywhere. Yeah. And that's kind of what I was thinking. It's interesting that you mentioned the tweet thing because I was thinking to myself as a non-lawyer, this was either very, very lawyered or a very, very big risk by whatever PR person put out that tweet because that seemed to be real questionable. The other one that I loved is somebody had put out that a Chick-fil-A, the waffle fries are not made out of waffle batter and nobody thinks that they are. So all right, we'll see how this one plays out. John, always a pleasure. We'll talk to you again soon. That's local patent attorney, Coral Springs, John Rizvi joining us live.