 I think street epistemology is so important for the world right now, so how would you equate for me to understand better the Socratic method with street epistemology? Do you think that we'll try to just want to make sure we're working at the same definition? Yeah, yes. When you say Socratic method, I'm envisioning or I define that as a teaching method to teach people things by asking questions and letting them reach their conclusions. For SC, that's strictly for me a conversational tool to use among other conversational tools to help someone assess if the method that they use is real life. It's nuanced and there's a lot of people who say they're exactly the same thing. I've been doing it long enough where I'm like, I feel like they're not. I feel like I'm not trying to teach you that you're wrong. I'm trying to understand why you're right. And if we can't get there together, then that's something that SC is really good to show. Whereas Socratic is, I know what the answer is and I'm going to ask you questions so that you figure out the answer that I get. I see. And it's not necessarily just that.