 You've been part of peeree for a year – could you tell us about this new initiative? Yes, a peeree is a European Union funded project, it's a formal foundation公åd on the EU as part of their Corporation in Science and Technology Action and it runs for four years from 2014 to 2018. Over 30 member countries are involved in it, represented in the action and the theme y gwaith ymddych chi'n gweld y newydd yng ngyfnwyr i'r gyfnod ymgyrch. Felly, mae ar gwleidio'r wneud yn cyfnod am yr oedd y website. Mae'r cyfnod ymlaen i'r cyfnod. Mae'r cyfnod arall. Mae'n cael y clywed o'r cyfnod ymgyrch yn cael ei ddechrau. Mae'n cael ei ddechrau yn cyfnod ymgyrch, maen nhw'n cyfnod ymgyrch yn ei ddulltwynt, maen nhw'n cyfnod ymgyrch yn cyfnod ymgyrch yn cyfnod ymgyrch. ac yn ymdangos i gydigau i adeiladau ac mae'n adeiladau gydigol iawn. Mae'r gyrsau a chyfodd yn ymddi o'ch mynd i gydigodd gyrfa'i adeiladau gyrsau, mae'r fanhwyshodol i'r proses, ac mae'n gwybod. Mae'n gwybod i'r adeiladau i'r adeiladau gyrsau, mae'n gwybod i'r adeiladau ar y prosiect, felly'r adeiladau i'r adeiladau i'r adeiladau ar y prosiect amdano ddaeth hyn yn gwneud o gweld ynnallus, yn ymgyrchau cyngor fel yw amgylchedd, felly ond ei fvân o goll mwybylch, ac yn lu, mae'r problemau o amgylchedd yn ymgyrch o'r perawag maol yn ym mwynhau cyngor yn ôl i'r rhaglau sydd yn ymgylchedd yma yn cael eu gwybod am ddod o informaethau i ei diddur iawn, oherwydd ei ddweud o hyd yn cael eu ddod o'r gwaith, ac mae'n menthau ymgylchedd yma yw i'r rai newydd, rydym nhw'n ddweud ar gfer o'r anodd y cyfnodau o'r cyfnodau. Rwy'n dweud i mhwych ar y prosiectau yw'r anodd y ddweud. Yn nhw'n amddangos y cwrs o'r anodd cyfnodau o'r anodd cyfnodau yn ymgyrch, o'r anodd cyfnodau, o'r anodd cyfnodau. Mae'r anodd cyfnodau o'r anodd cyfnodau, a chynydd yn ymweld i ddweud i'r anodd cyfnodau. Ymwych ar anodd cyfnodau o'r anodd cyfnodau, gydy中wennol o'i gwybwys i'r rhwfawr i'w c restra yn dyno? Cyrdwyr arnos am y dyma'r gweithio, dyma'r dyma'r gweithio ar ymgwrs ond mae'n dweud sefydliadau arch ymgyrchu cerolygiadau, ac yn y rhai gwlaethau gwybwys o'r llyfr yw'r rhaid, ac mae'n cofnod i'w postud digwydd ynddangos ar gyfer osolog nhw, a ydydd yn y ceisio cyhoi'n cymryd iawn, oherwydd i ni'w fod y ddrwn is behind a peer reviewer and how does that inform the choices we make about how we decide or how we encourage people to do a peer review. So if a peer reviewer is driven primarily let's be really crass and safe for financial gain, they're probably not going to get much from it because there isn't much financial gain in peer review. So the question is, do you make some financial gain to try and get peer reviewers to do it? There's a fairly theoretical approach but it's an interesting question what motivates a peer reviewer to review and I think that at the moment there's a lot more, there's rather more information and data and research about why reviewers decline to review than what makes them review. Perhaps that's not quite the case but that's how it strikes me and I think we need both sides of the equation. One of the big issues about peer review is the assumption that peer review is in crisis because we don't have enough reviewers so that leads people to ask why are reviewers not reviewing. So the flip side of that is why do we make peer reviewers review, what incentives are there to make them review and that goes back to what we were talking about earlier about recognition for example. For you what has been your biggest takeaway or your learning experience working on this initiative for the past year? For me personally I think one of the most exciting things is working with a group of researchers who've come from all sorts of different backgrounds and different contexts so there's good representation in terms of discipline, a lot of economics, a lot of sociology but also by medicine, mathematics and all across Europe but all interested in this question of peer review and are there valid ways of improving peer review. So I think often in my day to day job I can get fairly focused on one or two particular journals but actually this is a global phenomenon and this is of interest to people globally. So I'm seeing that on a European scale and it's actually been really interesting for me personally to get the perspective of researchers and editors in chief outside of the areas that I normally work in so that's been very beneficial actually.