 Here I am going to discuss some issues which could arise while sharing the record of a child. With respect to general treatment situation, a patient or a guardian usually is the personal representative of a minor child. A healthcare provider is permitted to share clients' information with clients' personal representative under the Previci rule. In a situation where you have to provide certain information to the guardian and to the parent even then and in those situations, the Previci rules is there through which extent the information to be disclosed is present. There are several important exceptions to this general rule. A patient or a parent is not treated as a minor child's personal representative when now here we are talking about those situations where we are assuming that a child's representative will not be considered a parent or guardian like in a scenario when state or other laws does not require the consent of a parent as a situation where there is no need for a minor child and other person before a minor can obtain a particular health care services then where we feel that for that child we do not need any parent or guardian to give their consent then this can be abstained from that. The minor concerns to the health care services. In the health care service, we do not need a minor's consent because it is a basic need to be provided to the child. Whether it is an emergency situation or a regular situation, but access to basic health care facilities is right for that, there is no need for consent. The minor child has not requested the parents to be treated as a personal representative. The minor did not request that the parents would be my personal representative and it is necessary to take their consent in every situation. Parents agree to a confidential relationship between the minor and a health care provider. Parents themselves give consent that they are going to provide a psychotherapy service and they can work together as one-to-one parties. So they themselves volunteer for that. If parents are separated and each one of them is not willing to share the therapy with the other parents. In such a situation, parents will not be considered a personal stakeholder when they are in a situation where they are separated, then the child's record and access will not be given to the parents. For example, in some contentious custody cases, a court may appoint a lawyer for the child often called a guardian or a litem to represent the child's best interest. Here as well, we see such scenarios where the child gets a representative from Darul Aman or a representative from the child welfare department. Similarly, in different cultures and scenarios, the custody of the child is given to the stakeholders who appoint a representative, who can be called a lawyer or given any name. But that is the spokesperson of the child rather than the parents who are living in a separation status or the background of parents with any other problem. Depending on the case, the state and the court's order that the lawyer may get to determine whether and when parents can view information about mental health treatment. There is a child whom the parents have already left and they are living in their own setup and how much access to information is given to the parents about the child's mental health treatment. This decision cannot be made by parents. This decision can be made by a representative or appointed lawyer. When a court orders specifically, perhaps the parents from accessing the child's information. Now, another scenario where the parents are not going to access the record is when a court decides that the parent's mental health treatment record cannot be seen due to any reason because of being maybe unresponsible parents or the parents who have abandoned their child or any other reason. Even there, parents cannot see their own child's record. When a parent has lost or given up their parental rights, for example, the biological pairing of an adopted child would not typically have a right to treatment information like you gave your child for adoption and someone else adopted it. Now, biological parents cannot see the mental health treatment access and they have no right to study it and they can see what treatment their child is learning. When the child is emancipated, child emancipation is a minor become legally responsible for their own care before the age of 14. Now, in different cultures or different societies, this age can be different. For example, a 14-year-old child in Pakistan can give their own consent so the court can ask them who they want their child's right to information or their child's treatment details to be given to. In those scenarios, the child has the right and the parents do not have the right but this age could be varied across different countries. So these are some of the scenarios in which the access to child's record cannot be given to the parents and they need to be given to the specific individuals where the court is the decision authority, where the lawyer is a decision authority and in certain cases even a minor child is also having an access and information and he can decide who can see his records or not.