 So Aristotle is not trying to answer the question, how are you morally justified? He doesn't really answer that question very much. Nor is he dealing with who's interest is the most important. Frankly, his view kinda doesn't really bring it up. It doesn't really bring it up. Rather, he's trying to answer the question. He's following up the curious here. He's trying to answer the question, what has moral worth? What's worth having in your life? What's worth pursuing in your life? And the answer to his question, for Aristotle, the answer to this question is happiness. Remember, Epicurus said pleasure. Aristotle's changed tactics, he says happiness. Now, this might seem like the same thing. Not so. Aristotle's doing something a little bit different than what we mean by happiness. Just like Epicurus meant something different by pleasure than what we think about pleasure. He thought it was tranquility. Aristotle is gonna say happiness. When we talk about happiness, it's different than what we mean. It's gonna be different than some fleeting feeling that causes you to smile. That's not what he's dealing with. Happiness, it's also translated as something like fulfillment or probably more appropriate, eudaimonia, which is good spirit. Well-being. So for Aristotle, what's worth having is happiness.