 Thank you very much R 순간, it's a very entertaining and very illuminating discussion. I mean to talk about Emperor Penguins for One Second, and Rotten Fish for the Next Second, it takes a few questions, but the comparisons you were drawing there between James Watt and the steam engine and the patent, and the effect that that had on clamping innovation. The burst of innovation that came after crossing for that of the software market. Let's move on to our final speaker. He's also from the world of academia, and Yoshé Benkler is from Harvard. He's a faculty co-director of the Berkman Centre for Internet and Society. He's also an author and his book, The Wealth of Networks, not The Wealth of Nations, won awards. He's now going to give us a talk that explains a little bit of the thing, if I've understood your summary, right? The advantages of innovation at the bridge, and how the new paradigm is really not centralized innovation, but innovation occurring at the edges. Let's see what I can actually see. So it's great to be here. I'll try to go through a few things fairly quickly. The core point is that a core common infrastructure open for everyone to use and freely available for freedom to operate drives innovation just as much as it drives democratic participation, cultural creativity. And this openness is necessary at every given layer of critical resources necessary for the process of innovation. Eleven years ago a book came out by two fantastic economists who shall remain unnamed. We'll see why in the next couple of slides I'll say. And their opening chapter was that this is the new big thing. It would take this business model and it would put it out of business because you could actually combine lots of different things and do new and fascinating things. And in fact, Britannica did have to drop from several thousand dollars to five hundred dollars and then eventually shame of shame on bycheapsoftr.com only 29.95. But of course this was not at all what was the core innovation in Encyclopedia. It was something that had you in February 2001 said to any room of people this in four or five years would be treated by nature as possibly no worse than Britannica. Because there is not hundred stubs in anybody.