 call our meeting to order. I note that we have a quorum. We have Marcus, Trey, Jim, Roberta, and me. Welcome Roberta. And if you will mute your microphones, wonderful. Welcome everyone. I hope you're as hot as I am. Jesus, Peter. If we could have a motion to approve our minutes of August 17th. Do I have such a motion? Move to approve. And a second. Any questions, concerns, additions? Hearing none, I'll go into the stage. Hi. Hi. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. Let's move on then to 3.1, which is a claim from Constance Oldenburg regarding damages to her basement. Chuck. This one has been denied and so it's reported to you that it has been denied. Basically, this was the way we're back up related to a huge storm, active God, so no liability on the part of the city. We need a motion to file. Are there, well, let me ask first, are there any questions for Chuck? If not, could I have a motion to file? All right, I'm going to let whoever is taking the minutes pick that out. I'll take the second. Okay, it's very good. Hearing no other discussions, all of the favor of the motion, state aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. Motion passes. Next, we have 3.2, which is a claim from Progressive Insurance for damages to their insured when his car was struck by a city-owned vehicle. Chuck. This is also a report of a denial that we're asked, just asking that the matter be filed. The reason we mentioned this one is that the claim did not mean the statutory requirements came in late and is not actionable. Oh, interesting. All right, so then we have a, I would ask for a motion to file. Motion to file. Second, Marcus. And Marcus second, Jim and Marcus. Is there any further discussions? Hearing none, all in favor, state aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. All right, let's go on to 3.3, which is a resolution authorizing the appropriate city officials to execute a pilot agreement between the city and Regency JS LLC with regards to the apartment projects located at 919 Wisconsin Avenue. Chuck, you want to take that or someone else? I can. So quite frankly, this is pretty simple because Regency approach us said that as a good neighbor, they felt that it was appropriate that they pay a payment in lieu of taxes for the services that they received despite the fact that they are non-taxable. They, we didn't meet with them and understand how they calculated the pilot, but given that, you know, this is one of those that didn't come in with us necessarily having a hooked on it. It was just them voluntarily choosing to pay a pilot. I think it's entirely appropriate as is. And we are recommending that the pilot be approved. Questions for Chuck? I have a question. Yes, Carolyn. Chuck, I noticed in reading over the agreement that there is really no inflation factor built into the pilot. I understand where after, you know, after the second year, it's going to just continue to be a flat amount. Have we done any inflation fact that we figured in inflation with any of our other pilots that we've done over the year? We have. We actually talked to them about this, you know, just sort of brought up the issue. And they thought it was pretty appropriate the way they drafted it. And, you know, this is one of these that were, you know, again, and we could ask them for it. And we did bring it up and talk about it. But, you know, they're sort of voluntarily jumping in and paying it. So I think we're, you know, we can't look at getting forced in the mouth, I guess. There you go. Roberta, did you have a question? I have a question. Yes. Does this happen often that people voluntarily decide to pay for our services? Or every day. No, not really. I mean, it's not the first time it's ever, ever happened. But typically when we're getting pilots paid to us, it's because we have some kind of hook. They need something less. We want to pilot from them. It doesn't mean it's completely, I mean, the housing authority is paying a pilot that is fairly voluntary. There was for a while an agreement that seems to have gone by the board for visit to Oregon to pay a pilot. You know, that's not happening anymore. It sounds like. But, you know, they do, they do occasionally improtest. Perfect. Thank you. And we note that, unfortunately, pilots do not necessarily put us very far ahead of the game financially. Is that correct, Chuck? That's true. In this particular case, I think the numbers reflect at least early on, probably about what we might see on the city side, if it were taxed. Obviously, as Alderman Boren has pointed out, you know, there's not the inflationary or the, you know, increase in taxes factor. So it's not always going to be there, but it did start at, you know, reasonably close to what we might have expected to see if it's for taxable building. Good. And of course, this reduces our levy ability or levy, not limit, levy rate. It does have an impact because it goes into that calculation. Yeah. So no good deed goes unpunished is kind of what we're looking at. So do we have a motion to authorize the pilot agreement with Regency Apartments? So moved, Boren. Second, Marcus. All right. We have a motion and second. Is there any other discussion? Hearing none, all in favor, state aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. All right. Let me get my agenda back up here. All right. So 3.4 is a resolution authorizing the execution of an updated agreement between the city of Sheboygan and the village of Kohler for the operation of the municipal court. Chuck, is that yours? I don't know. Is Judge Torrey on the line? Yes, I am. If there's anything you'd like. 4.01, I think. Go ahead. Thank you. So we have had a contract in place ever since the court was created, which was first in 2005 and the court was created to be established in 2006. And the contract called to be updated or at least reviewed every two years and has not happened until this past year. So the new proposal then updates some of the language. It reflects software that we actually use. But then more importantly, we took out the way that the fee that Kohler would pay was calculated instead of taking into account all of the forfeitures that were paid from both Sheboygan and Kohler and then subtracting those from the court costs and then applying a percentage, there would be now a flat rate. So Kohler would pay $5,000 as well as the $33 per citation amount that we retain. And so it just makes it more manageable in terms of Kohler knows exactly what they're going to pay out of their pocket every year. And it takes a lot of the pressure off the finance to hurry up and get some numbers calculated, which can take a while to get done each year. So it would be a flat amount and it would be more fair because Kohler wouldn't pay depending upon how well or how much forfeiture Sheboygan collected. And so that was approved by Kohler last month at their Village Board meeting. Is my understanding. Good. That was my question. Chuck, is there anything you'd like to add? No, I think we covered everything. We looked at a number of different factors and find the fairness issue that she's talked about. There was some expense every year to the finance department trying to make these calculations and we'll save that as well. Very good. Questions or comments from committee members? Bert? This is Bert. Do we have a built in we visit this every two years or not? Well, now we will because I'm aware of it. So it was just a matter of, you know, citywide we're trying to do better at finding contracts and then keeping track of them. And so this was one that's now found. And I do expect yes, but every every two years or now would be a year and a half from now I would start looking at it and making sure that it was appropriate. Perfect. Thank you. Madam Chair, I have a question. Yes. Go ahead. Thank you. What was the amount that Kohler was paying in the past in terms of real dollars? It varied. So one thing that's not captured clearly right now is we retain $33 in court cost for every citation that the Kohler issues and then the defendant pays. So that when it comes in is just put in as a court collection or revenue. Last year that amount was somewhere around 15,000. But the amount that they built were billed to pay in addition to that was like 1600. And the reason that that was so and previous years that it would range anywhere from you know, 5500, 3,600 and it always fluctuated because the amount of revenues for both Sheboygan and Kohler were subtracted from the court cost and then 10% was applied. So they would pay 10% of what was left. So then you could have a scenario where if Sheboygan had a great year of revenue collection, then a forfeiture collection Kohler could have paid nothing for that amount. And so it just didn't really make sense the way that it was set up. So now this will be a set amount that everyone, you know, can know, okay, this is what you can budget for. This is what we can expect to receive. So then we won't have delays where bill isn't being issued. So I had this, I believe it was for 2018 where the bill wasn't sent in time. So then technically we received nothing for that whole calendar year because it didn't come out until like April. So we won't have any issues like that. Fantastic. Thank you. Any other questions, comments? Well, excellent that this has gotten taken care of. So we need a motion to approve the agreement. Second. All right, we have a motion and second. Any further discussions? Hearing none, all in favor, state aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Any opposed? Chair votes aye. Thank you, Judge Tory. Thank you. Thank you. I toggle back and forth. It's never as fast as I would like. 4.1 and 4.2 are second quarter benchmarks. 4.1 is from information technology. And Eric, are you in the chamber or yes, there you are. Thank you. Okay. For information technology, second quarter year to date, the average close time of critical or high tickets was at 2.85 with 95% of those being closed within five days. The maintained core server network current firmware at the current level or one release back is at 99%. Under workload, percentage of computer is installed with four to gate client is 100%. Number of legacy applications retired is one that was the fuel usage application off the AS 400. Number of security audits perform zero. We do have one scheduled for October of this year and system availability was at 99%. Are there any questions? I have a couple questions related to your department, Eric, Alderman Bourne. Eric, at the end of the year, we had several of the city computers that were still running the old Windows 7. And I guess one of the goals was to get all of the city computers running Windows 10. Has that been completed? Great question. And actually, as of last Friday, August 21st, all the computers with the exception of the police squad and DCs have been converted to Windows 10. We made a decision on the squads to finish out the year under Windows 7. We have a capital improvements project for 2021 to replace all these squads. So I believe that's around $75,000 to replace those mobile data computers. The reason we pulled back on that is we had spent 40, 50 hours trying to get those mobile data units to work and we're running into problems with the drivers. They're a very specialized piece of hardware. So we worked with the PD and came to the conclusion that rather than throwing more time at this, we would just wait until 2021. That's good news. I have one more question, Eric. Eric, is there a new update coming out on our Munis software? And then as part of that question, are we using, have we been keeping up on recent Munis updates or are we behind on that? We are behind on the Munis updates. So one of the projects that we're looking at and Todd has been working with us on is when are we going to upgrade to the next level of Munis and we are shooting for at this time, sometime probably late of the third quarter of 2021. We did upgrade two products that are from Tyler. One was the Tyler content management system. We upgraded that earlier this year to the latest release and also the ticketing system, Tyler incident management system we are in the process of upgrading right now. So we are, I believe the last time we upgraded Jim was back in 2017 or 18. I see. So what you're saying then hopefully by the third quarter of next year that we'll be using all the departments will be up to date in using the latest update with Munis? Yes, the department said use Munis would be using the latest versions of Munis. The plan going forward then is also to get a better cadence. So we're not waiting two or three years to upgrade. We would look at upgrading anywhere from every six months to a year. Thanks for the information. You're welcome. I guess I would call on Todd if you're still in the chamber. Any comments you want to make with respect to I couldn't let a meeting go by without you getting a chance to chime in. Anything that you want to add with respect to our transition from Munis? Sure. Thank you, chair. One of the things that we've started is that we are identifying our super users throughout the city in all departments and Eric and his team will be working with them to help us with the Munis transition. This project is, you know, even though we have about a year and a half before this version is supposedly shut off, we have a lot of work ahead of us. So right now we are working with DPW and getting off of the AS 400 and that is kind of our walking steps in getting things ready and prepared for the transition on Munis, the updates. So we're getting all of the different departments together as far as what's on AS 400 as an example and we're also going to be looking at the transition to the upgrades on Munis and finance is also one of them that's going to be heavily affected. So we're trying to determine how that's going to affect us and get the resources in place. Thank you. If there aren't any other questions we will go on to hang on. 4.2 of WSPS Table TV. Eric, you want to take that away? Yes, thank you. So once again this is reporting through the end of the second quarter. For the number of programs produced we're at 314 with a goal of 500. The number of public service announcements produced we're at 6 with a goal of 9 for the year. The number of televised common council and committee of the whole meetings we successfully broadcast 18. We had technical problems with one of those meetings. I believe it was the March 2nd meeting where we had sound and some video issues which we learned more things from and continue to improve on that. So under effectiveness on-demand viewing was at 2,173 views. On-demand unique visitors was at 1,909. And the number of film awards won this year is at 8. Any questions? Does anyone have any questions for Eric on the TV station? Chair? Todd, go ahead. Thank you. I just want to kind of toot Eric's horn a little bit and just point out that their team has done a fantastic job in my opinion. If we look at the technology that we had to roll out this year and the activity and the level of complexity I think that the IT team has done a great job whether it's rolling out laptops and troubleshooting things because we've gone through months of people working from home and introducing Zoom meetings and team meetings and I just I think that everybody needs to realize that there's a high level of professionalism that they've produced in the last I mean they're just getting better and better year over year so even the W just even the format of the WSCS we've we've had our little hiccups but nothing like we did years ago. Thank you. I would just like to add one more comment I'd like to thank Scott Mila for the WSCS program director he's done a fantastic job in stepping up to the plate and broadcasting all the committee meetings that we have so thank you Scott. You're here. So if there are no other questions I think we are ready to adjourn our next meeting is September 14th do we have any forum issues? Of course not because we're all here all the time. Why would anyone be missing a meeting? I would ask for a motion to adjourn. Move to adjourn. Second. All right. All in favor state aye. Aye. Opposed chair votes aye. We are adjourned. Thank you all. Good meeting. Appreciate it.