 Very good. So good afternoon and thanks for joining us today. And again, thanks for your patience as you listen through these briefs next slide, please This afternoon, I will be providing a brief overview of the Department of the Navy FY 15 budget submission This submission continues to be grounded in the strategic foundation highlighted here It builds on the quadrennial defense review which builds on the defense strategic guidance as was talked about earlier today So we use those documents and those strategies in concert with the secretaries the chief of naval operations and the Commodance priorities to guide the hard choices that we're going to be talking about today. I Think it's important to note that consistent across the full scope of all that strategic guidance You see up there the President's capability and readiness of the Navy Marine Corps team has never been more essential to the strategy Next slide This is the Navy Marine Corps today shown here is the output of decisions made to balance requirements and resources in prior years in the current year's budget These are the investments that generated the President's the capability and the readiness that you see today So very briefly around the world. We have 42,000 sailors and almost 5,000 Marines underway deployed on over 100 ships To carrier strike groups to amphibious readiness groups with the associated marine expeditionary units There's an additional 30,000 sailors and 35,000 Marines forward around the world including 6,000 Marines currently serving in Afghanistan and 25,000 Marines in the Pacific area of responsibility Consistent with the QDR and the DSG you'll see that there's 49 ships in the Pacific and 32 ships assigned and deployed to the Middle East So these are the forces that over the past year Gave the President options banning combat credible forces that influence the options for diplomacy in Iran and Syria To the immediate response to the typhoon Hyann and Philippines by the GW strike group as well as by marine C-130s and V-22s This is a Navy Marine Corps mandate here to be where it matters when it matters Next slide This is the funding input in constant year dollars that resources in the Navy Marine Corps going forward So as you can see from the FY 10 peak to the end of this fit up FY 19 In real terms the resources are down by over a fifth And that's with the additional funding that undersecretary Hale discussed earlier today above the sequestered BCA levels If continued to the BCA levels shown here out to 2023 the department's resources would be down by about a quarter Even if you assumed a notional level of OCO out in FY 19 The reduction would still be in FY 19 from the PB plus a notional OCO about 19 to 20 percent So this is the very challenging fiscal environment in at the same time that we're dealing with a dynamic and still very dangerous security environment that The department dealt with the programmatic priorities shown here were applied to achieve a balance force Aligned to a consistent strategic foundation that we talked about next slide Bringing that display now into then your dollars is shown here and if you do the first build please So what this is showing in the gray box is is the reduction from the PB 14 level That this is in this year's submission You'll see that it's 38 billion dollars less for the department of the Navy over the fit up and 15 billion of that is in the first year Balancing that reduction is what? Required hard choices that required some innovative solutions and approaches and required strong stewardship initiatives that we'll be talking about in the upcoming slides next build If the department were returned to the sequestered levels of funding which is shown approximately by that red arrow That would be an additional fit of production for the for the department of the Navy of 39 billion dollars That's testified by the service chiefs in November The department would not be able to execute all of the department the defense strategic admissions at that level We estimate those reductions to accommodate that level of funding would require inactivation of a carrier Decommissioning of an air wing decreasing the size of the Marine Corps to 175,000 Removing six surface combatants from service and eliminating the plan fit of procurements of three DDGs a submarine and for TATF axis Those reductions will also further impact the readiness accounts decreasing presence and surge capacity Next slide So the next few slides will briefly cover each appropriation in detail and I'll highlight the major changes from the PB 14 submission This slide serves to provide an overview of how all the appropriations balance and I'll talk a little bit about how they change in Proportion of the budget from the prior year enacted level So starting with the mill per's which is in the lower left in red This appropriation is 31% of the FY 15 request It's up from 30% in FY 14 and 29% in FY 13 That reflects a top line coming down while end strength essentially has been remaining flat The operations and maintenance account in blue funds the elements needed to operate the force This account was 29% last year in the FY 14 omnibus enacted level Which was a decrease from 32% the year before reflecting the additional oco funding that congress Applied in the omnibus appropriation in the PB 15 submission. This level returns to the 32% of the base budget The procurement account in green Has declined from 28% in FY 13 and 26% in FY 14 to 25% in this submission Reflecting the fiscally driven reductions in procurement Particularly in aircraft and weapons procurement Research and development has grown slightly from 10% the last two years to 11% and that reflects the priority given to developing key capabilities for the future And finally new infrastructure investment as a share of the budget declines from 2% to 1% Reflecting the overall fiscal pressure on the navy and marine corps accounts Next slide In mill perrs. You see two services on slightly different paths the same as last year The navy is ending a decade of plan to end strength reductions and stabilizing the force to improve manning at sea To improve seashore rotation and to increase cyber capabilities The FY 15 budget specifically targets improved fit and fill metrics And fit as the percent of sailors assigned to a billet with the required skill code the nc classification Fill as a percent of authorized billets filled This budget targets fit and fill metrics of 92 and 95 respectively an improvement from last year's target of 90 and 90 percent The marines continue to downsize and so you see an fy 15 base funded level here of 1827 That includes the first 600 of an eventual 1000 increase in the marine corps embassy security guards The marine corps also has okofunded temporary end strength expected to end in fy 16 As under secretary hail discussed earlier today The decreased manning levels that you see in these slides outside the budget year i.e. in fy 16 through 19 In both the navy and marine corps cases largely reflect planning levels pending the decisions to be made In the fy 16 budget submission regarding marine corps steady state and strength and the retention of 11 aircraft carriers and 10 carrier airwings It's important to note that no personnel changes will be made until there's a final decision in particular on the carrier and the airwings Under secretary hail also discussed today the compensation and benefits changes proposed in the budget for the navy and marine corps The savings from slowing the rate of growth of military paying benefits benefits are being invested to improve the quality of service of sailor marines these investments include training enhancements such as improved training ranges and simulation capabilities To include small arms training as well as increased travel funding for training investments in spare parts and enhancements in surface ship maintenance More broadly this budget also funds increases in career see pay and career see pay premium that recognize and reward Sailors and marines that are spending time at sea It funds a high deployment allowance that compensates for the rigors of extended deployments And it presures critical skills bonuses to retain our most highly skilled sailors Next slide In the civilian personnel accounting, you'll see a slight increase in fy 15 and a steady decrease across the full fit up navy fy 15 increase of about 1500 full-time equivalents reflects A continued priority on getting ship maintenance right with additional mandates for overhauls and availabilities at our regional maintenance centers It also reflects increases to critical programs such as sexual assault prevention response and cyber US marine corps growth of 800 full-time equivalents is consistent with the level that is being executed in fy 14 And also reflects again increases for specific items such as increased cyber capability and the increases in the marine corps embassy security guards These increases are partially offset By headquarters reductions that start in fy 15 and reduce headquarters personnel over the fit up by 20% As well as some other reductions that were taken based on affordability Overall these levels reflect the essential contributions of our civilian personnel throughout the force both in washington dc And more broadly over 90 percent of our civilian personnel are contributing to the Force outside of dc training our people fixing our gear and managing our infrastructure next slide The department's readiness counts are tightly focused on the op tempo that our combatant commanders are requesting Properly sustaining our ships and aircraft to reach their expected service lives and properly training our people The fy 15 base budget metrics are funded to the historic levels You see here As under secretary tail indicated earlier today The department anticipates submitting an fy 15 okko request later this year that includes reading this funding that improves these metrics Very briefly overview as with the fy 14 requests this budget funds ship ops to 45 days underway per quarter when deployed 20 days underway when non-deployed flight hours to the Historic standard metrics of t 2.5 and t 2.0 for navy and marine corps respectively Ship and aviation depot main is 80 percent in the base Marine corps ground equipment at the same level as last year with much of the remaining Okko reset of the equipment and facility sustainment funding which decreases from fy 14 to 70 percent in fy 15 for the navy And 75 percent for the marine corps In fy 16 and out however The sustainment funding improved to 83 percent and 90 percent respectively for the navy and marine corps Next slide The second half's goal is to achieve stability in shipbuilding To affordably meet our warfighting requirements and you will see that this budget has prioritized shipbuilding to meet that goal This program buys 44 ships in the fit up compared to 41 in the fit up last year 14 to 18 And 43 in the 15 to 19 columns of last year shipbuilding plan Two destroyers and two submarines are purchased every year across the fit up There was one less lcs purchased in fy 15 than last year three versus four Reflecting that 15 billion dollar top line reduction. I talked about at the beginning. We bought what we could afford In accordance with secretary Hegel's lcs decision The lcs program continues as shown through fy 18 to a total of 32 ships buying 12 in the fit up The two units shown here in fy 19 reflect the prior program As directed the navy will provide small surface combatant proposals in next year's budget As well as regular updates of lcs testing and deployment experience Other changes from pb 14 include the addition of one afloat forward staging base in fy 17 that delivers in fy 20 Sliding lx r one year uh with advanced procurement now in fy 19 and full funding in fy 20 due to fiscal constraints Also due to a top line reduction pv 15 aligns delivery of canady cv n 79 from the latter part of fy 22 to fy 23 In the rcoh line refueling complex overhaul as secretary of defense hegel also announced The department will make a final determination on refueling the george washington and the fy 16 budget submission Pending that decision this budget funds planning for the defueling required Overall in fy 15 eight ships are delivered and 13 are retired bringing the fy 15 battle force count to 283 Going forward the battle force grows to 309 ships by 2019 with this plan Finally as secretary of defense hegel also mentioned given pressing resource constraints the pb 15 submission Proposes to place in a special status special category and induct into phase maintenance 11 cruisers starting in fy 15 This approach is driven by affordability But it provides substantial cost savings while modernizing the ships to the latest capability and extending their service lives A similar program has also been proposed for three lsds on a rolling basis modernizing one at a time Next slide In the aircraft procurement appropriation overall reductions of 111 aircrafts and nine billion dollars are taken from pb 14 level Reflecting the fiscal pressure the resource pressure. We talked about Fy 15 reductions include four f 35 charlie carry variant jsf aircraft 10 e2d's and 10 p8's The initial operational capability ios ioc dates for the f 35 charlie and e2d remain unchanged with these profile changes In 2019 and 2014 respectively and the p8 has already achieved its ioc And the super hornet and growler line those fleets are transitioning from production to sustain it Key super hornet modification programs are funded in this budget to include the new infrared search and track pods In the uav section the u-class the unmanned carrier launch surveillance and strike system Remains on a path to achieve early operational capability by 2020 with a contract award projected for fy 15 And finally the trident mq4 has been refazed as shown in this profile to account for a delay in development Of note the fy 15 opportunity growth and security initiative that under secretary hale talked about Has a design focus on readiness and modernization And the department of the navy request for that includes eight p8s and one e2d among other aircraft required Next slide In weapons procurement Fitup investment was reduced by 2.8 billion from the pb 14 level Reflecting a combination of resource pressure and emittories reaching requirements Fy 15 is the last year of the tactical tomahawk procurement as that program transitions to sustain it with a recertification depo line And modifications that are going to keep that weapon as a premier attack weapon Over the course of its service life while we develop the next generation land attack weapon In other lines i'll highlight consistent with qdr guidance to rebalance for a broad spectrum of conflict This budget funds key capabilities such as restart of the mark 48 heavyweight torpedo line With procurement starting in fy 16 and procurement of the long range anti service Missile the lorazum starting in fy 17 In aircraft weapons, we take a one-year pause in amram while operational testing completes and then ramp up production Next slide The marine corps procurement the base budget funding decreases by 275 million from the fy 14 level reflecting fiscal constraints A few major efforts i'll highlight in 15 include improvements to the light armored vehicle With funding to modernize the legacy turret and the tow missile system There's funding to begin procurement of the humvee sustainment modification kits Development and testing of the joint light tactical vehicle, which is a the newer vehicle provides improved performance and protection Compared to the current humvee fleet fy funding supports production of seven l rip vehicles And the budget also supports the procurements of additional low rate initial production Ground air task-oriented radars radars, which is an expeditionary radar designed to detect rockets missiles and artillery next slide In the r&d account science and technology funding declines 2 in fy 15 and then remains steady over the balance of the fit up A few major systems i'll highlight f35 charlie funding fully funds the system development and demonstration to maintain the stovill ioc in 2015 And the carrier variant ioc in 2019 ch 53 k is refazed due to affordability to a path that puts it on Track for a milestone charlie In the third quarter of fy 16 The executive helo starts system development and demonstration this year with milestone c scared in fy 19 In shipbuilding the navy's top programmatic priority the wahail replacement program continues on track For a lead ship construction starting in fy 21 In the amphibious combat vehicle program the marine corps has refined its strategy and restructured the program to provide a phased incremental approach This budget will fund the manufacture and testing of the first increments prototype vehicles As well as continued tech development for later increments On the slide you'll see the electromagnetic rail gun highlighted This gun is a key future capability that's under development And it's funded for an at sea demonstration aboard a joint high speed vessel in 2016 Finally an important element of the stewardship initiatives that i'll highlight at the beginning beyond the 20 management headquarters We already talked about It's a three billion dollar per year initiative to reduce the cost of business across our acquisition enterprise Spanning r&d o&m and procurement accounts This includes actions to reduce contracted services And partly that's being done through requirement review boards also known as contract courts To reduce cost growth with increased competition consolidation of multiple service contracts use of Should-cost management as well as eliminating lower priority and lower return of investment tasks Next slide The navy and we core have pressurized fy 15 milkan supporting the department's most pressing needs with 41 construction projects fy 15 milkan supports the introduction of new weapon systems With projects such as the ohio replacement program Power and propulsion facility in philadelphia an air wing training facility in fallon nevada that supports jsf milkan also supports priorities such as nuclear weapons security Completing the last year of explosive handling warf in washington Enhancing global posture with a wing and support squadron facility in guam And quality of life with the beq in yorktown virginia In family housing the navy request supports operation leads lease and maintenance of 10 000 units worldwide and the marine corps requests 1300 units worldwide No new public private ventures were funded in family housing construction The 16 million shown funds revitalization of 44 units at marine corps air station iwakuni next slide As under secretary hail discussed today The president's budget proposes an opportunity growth and security initiative focused on readiness modernization and improving facilities The department the navy share of this initiative is nine billion dollars and features items such as those shown here Next slide So overall i'll wrap it up here The real takeaway is in this period of fiscal austerity The department has put together a budget at a time of continued very high co-con demand For naval forces that balances investment in presence and capability and in readiness It's laser focused on ensuring force wholeness and sustaining our war fighting the edge in alignment with the strategy that we started the brief with subject to your questions yes The decision on the cruisers how much exactly will that save and is that the first step towards Decreasing the size of the cruiser ultimately decreasing the size of the cruiser fleet. All right, so we estimate that That approach will save about four billion dollars over the fit up And it is not the first step to decreasing the cruisers. There is an acknowledged enduring need worldwide need for the cruisers These are the air defense commander core vessels That are required to Sale with our carrier strike groups So the department's absolutely committed to modernizing these ships over the long term It's a very well thought out plan and as I acknowledged in the brief it's driven by affordability concerns But we think this is an innovative way to keep these ships in the force to modernize them to the most current capability And to sustain their lives Can you break out the marine core part of the budget and the navy part of the budget in terms of the top line? Excluding okoh and kind of compare this year's request to the fy 14 Request and the enacted right so we'll get the numbers here, but I mean yeah overall Just from 14 enacted to the 15 the department of the navy request goes from 149.8 to 148 So even in then year dollars, let alone real real terms the the top line is decreasing and Mary, you know that probably actually is a question better for us to take We just give you those figures at the appropriation level of that split Yes, ma'am Can you say a couple of words about the ch 53 k refasing and then also I just want to ask you about the If you could help me understand the Oh the osg fund or initiative a little bit better So like you know you go from 16 p 8 and 14 to 8 and 15 in the base budget And then you get eight in the osg All right So the ch 53 k obviously is the marine corps heavy left aircraft that is absolutely An imperative for their mission and as a former Expeditionary strike group commander in fifth fleet. I can tell you that You the Affirmious readiness groups and the marine x-barry units I had had the full scope of the new aircraft the new Yankees and zulus had the v 22s And we absolutely relied on the 453s typically employing them on the lpd so very important capability Fiscal reality is a hard thing and so as we balanced again made some hard choices The 53 k was seen as one where we could slide that a year based on the existing inventory and still get to where We needed to go with recapitalizing that part of the the marine expeditionary unit Um I'm sorry, I mean when when will that program like so just gets delayed by one year, right exactly right The opportunity growth and security initiative under secretary hale talked a little bit so You know i'll defer a little to some extent to the osd talking points on it, but essentially it is a It's not part of the budget submission. It's an administration-wide Initiative that's broader than do d. There's a domestic Government piece of it as well And it is designed again to focus on some fairly specific things on readiness on modernization So you will see for example No force structure across these requests And improving facilities so in the department of navy one it's again. It's one year only it's fy 15 There were investments spanning the things that highlighted on the slide but to include sustainment Funding that brings the department from the 70 and 75 respectively almost a full sustainment funding To your question on p8. So um, there are eight in the base budget based on again The choices that were made and how to balance those elements of presence capability and readiness That were made um And because it was fiscally driven the and it was you know modernization The balance of that eight were requested in the ogsi fund Tony Can you try the uh, the george washington decision again to clarify it? This budget basically just funds a 10 carrier force contingent on a potentially Refueling decisions next year for the george washington. Is that accurate? Right? So Starting in fy 15 this budget fully funds the gw and its air wing. So the gw In fy 15 in the budget year it fully funds the gw is in japan obviously it returns to norfolk in The latter part of fy 15 actually in december of 15. So that would be fy 16 So it's fully funded for operations and it fully funds it to return here So in fy 15 the budget year. There's no issue. So what secretary of uh, under secretary head was referring to an fy 16 and out in next year's budget A decision will be made based on the factors he talked about About whether to refuel that ship or to Not refuel it and inactivate it based on the the discussion he talked about In terms of the conversation with the congress If you're forced to refuel the ship and keep it in in the inventory Is that about a six to seven billion dollar increase over the fit of the navy has to find correct Aircraft question. I was matching the fit of last year with this year on the joint strike part of the sea model Last year you were asking for 69 now. You're asking for 36 So you've maxed out 33 correct Reason being affordability Not tail hook issues or anything. So, I mean we're working through those issues and we see a steady path forward on those But this was a fiscally driven Decision and what's important is it still gets at the ioc So the what the requirement is to have the 3f software have this aircraft ioc and fy 19 We're selling a path for that but in terms of the affordability That's the decision was made here Like the aviation week. You mentioned in the budget documents this kind of passing reference to Improvement programs for super hornets and things like that for the mods and everything give me an idea of how much that's going to be at least in fiscal 15 For the specific mod line for f18 And we'll we'll get you that data Secretary haig will use the term reduced operating status for the 11 cruisers Will they be kept in commission with reduced cruise or how how is that going to work out? Right, so they're going to be in a special status With reduced cruise and that analysis is still being done right now And I think I can talk to at a high level that but we'll also have additional detail on exactly how that works But those 11 cruisers will start their phase modern as modernization in fy 15 I'll go into the special status I'll go with reduced cruise and then they were going to start going into the combat systems mods and phase Availability's likely starting in the fy 17 time frame Sir, um, I'm appreciate your helpful seat power. Uh, oh, there's an alternative local package In the DOD budget. All right. You have an idea what the navy part of that He and most of that go for the core or What's the native version of local? All right. Thanks. Um So his undersecretary Hale described that he said it's a placeholder It's a placeholder level of 79 billion and the reason he said again is because we don't know what the enduring presence In afghanistan will be which would inform so much of that analysis I will say for the navy's case a lot of what we have funded inoko in terms of ship maintenance and steaming days Is going to be in continuing for a number of Years after You know oef Essentially ends or we get to the steady state and that's because of what has been talked about I think in in other forums As the department has surged surface ships and deferred maintenance That's all maintenance and work that needs to essentially be recovered over time all those services have said You know upon completion of major combat ops or whatever that the determined endpoint for oku is that for a Number of years we're going to have to reset the force and use oku So to answer your question more specifically We have not done The specific analysis on But across the the marine core And the navy and what the elements other than more broadly what I talked about in some of the readiness accounts Where we again will bring those up to 100 percent in in the readiness funding You haven't done on the elements Any concept of how much of that 75 bill Don which part of the navy would get All right, so I'm going to decline to speculate on what that percentage might be again as we decide what As a nation as the president makes a decision on what the enduring presence is In afghanistan that will inform marine core rotations that will inform The naval support of that and another point that is sometimes Subtle in the oku accounts is even as ground forces come out of afghanistan and out of that region As long as there's a requirement for overwatch and what remains that drives naval presence That drives our aircraft carriers and drives our operations to be available to support even a smaller footprint there Maintenance for their ships, but the marine core has a big reset for its ground equipment Is that you envision you envision that going on after we have absolutely Yes, ma'am hi mega next time with defense daily um So for f y 15 you have no unmanned aerial vehicles and across the fit of you have no mq 8 It was wondering what the reasons for that was and kind of what that does to the overall capability for the Right, so the apartment is very committed to unmanned air systems And so I talked about u-class in particular And and u-cast being a demonstration that continues on in f y 15 as well In mq 8 due to affordability the department made a decision to phase the mq 8 procurements to the lcs and there was in prior years a specific notion of procuring mq 8 specifically dedicated to soft And that is a decision now that the department will handle Through the global forest management allocation process, which is to say we have an mq 8 on an lcs and a command and command commander needs support for a specific soft operation But that's the way we'll handle that. Um, so that's that's what's going on in that line. Yes, sir John ember here from flight global could you quickly recap the ch 53k? I didn't quite catch what the decrease in funding was Or what the change was right, right? So we essentially slipped it a year or we phased it a year So if you look at the profile In aircraft procurement And I should actually say that's in the r and d line Yeah, so you have to go to the r and d slide And show that we we phased it and so essentially what we did is now milestone c is scheduled for the third quarter of f y 16 yes, ma'am Marine Corps times I'm wondering what elements of the Marine Corps Pacific rebalancing strategy are funded in this year's budget request And if that strategy Has been amended at all I've seen in the request maybe you could be a little more specific for me Between udp to deployments to australia To resettling on on right so at the levels that we're talking about the marine corps has continued to execute that plan There's been no, you know Large deviation away from that and in particular as you talked about with the rotational deployments to australia And what three meff does in terms of you know the pacific presence Really no changes to that In terms of anything you would see in the budget in terms of their funding for operations in terms of their funding for their end strength levels Again at 182 7 In this budget You know that's that's on a solid vector I already asked you so any yes, sir. Yeah, hi, uh, sam mcgrown with the naval institute Uh, just to follow up on megan's question. Does that mean that the navy isn't going to pursue the sea model of the fire scout for the mq8 line? Ed, do you have any insight on I don't yeah, I'll get that Budgeting in for the the change order taking the ddg-51 to the flight three variant and when when's that coming in So the flight three ddg is scheduled to be the second ship purchased in the fy 16 And then from that point forward, uh, we put your flight three ddgs Is there a change order built into the budget because that's that's a a lot of work to upgrade You know the two-way model to be able to handle the amdr It's that funding profile is supported that I just described in the budget in the corner Um, yes, sarah. We'll skew the news. Um in the qdr It says that by 2020 60 of navy assets will be stationed in the pacific including enhancements to presence in japan I was wondering if you could elaborate on what the enhanced presence in japan will be So let me speak to the the broader topic first And then the specifics of what might change in japan. I think we'll have to give some some data But the rebounce of the pacific was absolutely focused not only the qdr, but this budget So starting with the presence as you talked about by 2020 we'll have 60 percent of our battle force inventory assigned to the pacific In terms of actual presence in the slide we showed today the navy today You saw about 49 50 ships in terms of deployments there and we expect by 2020 that would be up around 65 In terms of the rebalance With the capability So you see the navy preferentially sending the most advanced And the most capable platforms and payloads to the pacific So the f35c the e2d the p8 the triton amram missile And in terms of the ships, uh, we see the zemalt the flight three ddgs The fourth ssn going to glom and f515 We've got the rotational marine forces in australia As well as the ongoing work with three mef there. So You see a very strong focus overall and support in this budget for that shift to the pacific And so we'll give you some data on specifically any sort of changes within japan Yes, ma'am In the opportunity growth and security initiative slide You have future force key modernization and it lists a few aircraft programs f35 is not listed Does that mean even if you all did have the funding you would not increase the numbers across the fit up on that buy Since you cut so many Right Right, it's not yeah, exactly. It's not part of that funding. Why is that if it was an affordability decision and not a capability Yeah, um You know, I would I would really have to say we'd have to look at more broadly what's in that that initiative Um So, um Yeah, so I would have to get back to you on that. Yes. Thank you. Um The marine core embassy augmentation program There have been some question about where those bodies would come from whether would be an additional You know additional force structure added onto the marine core or whether they were just going to have to find it Out of their existing size The slide that said 182 7 implied that they would get some extra people But not the full thousand that I believe congress is going to require Right. So the 182 7 is the f y 15 number which reflects the 600 additional that are are being brought in f y 15 as we ramp up To the higher number If sequestrations held off somewhere in the neighborhood of 183 at the end of the day so I think the Non sequestered number that the secretary has alluded to is 182 182 1 is a marine core number What's the 182 7 then that's the f y 15 level. So in terms of a steady state level what is being talked about is 182 1 follow up the The 600 additional maybe 900 additional for uh embassy 900 So, um We'll get you a specific number. It's either high 900 a thousand. It's it's in that time at that area Do you have a cost estimate for that? I um I'm sure we we will give you us. We'll get you a specific dollar figure for that end strength The overall the overall marine core budget does 22 billion sound like is that is that the number? We're talking about and that's about 1.8 billion down from last year So I think that's part of the earlier question and do you have that data? Okay, yes, ma'am I was wondering if you could highlight a little bit of the lcs mission modules. What what is f y 15 funding and what's There's one shift that's being pushed to the right All right, so that's a great question. I think I'm going to ask Lee ask uh Say what Okay, so give you that level of detail on specifically what the the testing is and how they're projecting We'll uh, we'll get that to you Sir Um, has there been any actual work done on that or a bushing for that program? So Okay, so an r&d line starting in f y 15 Again, so that's kind of managing that transition from from the tomahawk going to sustainment and to the initial r&d on that Uh, the tomahawk is going to be a viable weapon and well into the the late 20s So that's that's kind of how that phase is being done. Alrighty. Appreciate it. Thanks for your time today