 So then the point is that will be rather rough this presentation and as I'm sure you will I will mainly discuss totally for an area that is the close of time to an interplanetary study in C3 during the late process. I am much depending on some books, for instance most of all these books about revitalized near part 3 by Jones and Colleges which has been a fixed point for all the research in the in southern Italy right now. This is instead the chronology by Ryan Hume and just to make sure that we can connect here. Sorry, it should not have been present here, but I can make sure that it works. Well thanks to the book by Jones-Satali we have a rather standard presentation of what the situation is. Across the vitality 3 and E and 3D in southern Italy between inputs from Greece and not a production of less nearby materials. And you see immediately that the distribution set in a part this point over here, sorry, this point over here in northern Italy which can be also distributed. The situation is that we have mainly local production already in the group of Taranto and in the area of the Union Sea. And we have a lot of inputs from different areas in the same area and also in C3 and southern Italy. When we go on we can see that in during late late 3D which is a very important period that will come back to its major in a short time. We again have this local production which is concentrated in the area of the group of Taranto and some production in the southern of Sardinia. And the wider diffusion of the inputs of the riverbines and the attributed inputs but again with the relevant in the port of Sardinia and the group of Taranto. And in 3D we have this fact that I remembered in the presentation of the session that is that Sicily almost lacks any input. We have some spots really without here provenance in Sicily indeed during the 3D but it has a dramatic fall in the number of the material of nice Indian materials while this will have in the Sardinian way and in the area that we described before. And we also have local production in Northern Italy, more widespread around but again the main concentration is still in the group of Taranto. So when I go further, what is the situation, the comparison of Sicily and Sardinia in terms of what the analysis have to say explicitly with the specific analysis is important over all the problems we use. So the numbers are not very high but the trend is very clear. You see from bottom to top that Sicily has this peak during the taxes period of 3A and 3A-B and Sardinia has a different pattern, somehow an opposite pattern. From 3B on and 3D-C we have 3B late, we have a lot of inputs and we also have local production. We almost have no local production in Sicily. So one of the points that I want to remind is that the Sardinian culture can also be that maybe also something existed in the late 3D, connecting the Sardinian world, the southern Sicilite hotel where we have Sardinian water, which is not imported and locally produced for most and we are hoping not the most un-based. So this is one of the possibilities for these connections and anyway it remains the fact that during 3C, Sicily almost disappears from the connections above the rest of its distribution. In Sardinia we have interesting sites that we really knew, new reflections about the old. We know very well, everybody of us knows very well, new dragon calling. It's strange to have a live position. It's very strange to have a dragon with a lot of But the recent find of a plain site, a site located in the plain without apparently new registered structures in the area behind the lagoon of Sardinia is very, very important and interesting for the future development. It has remains of huts, roads, totally of 3DC aspect, which is not yet attributed to local or imported materials. But this will maybe help us very much to understand more of what is happening in Sardinia that seems to be more and more important. So when we compare instead what happens in the south, we know the south of Italy, but maybe obviously in the Gulf of Taranto and the eastern areas, in comparison with Sardinia, we can see that we have all this abundant material about more or less the same late phases, but what is important is that we have the peak in the locally produced materials. So the kind of interaction that we have in the south of Italy is a little bit different from what happens in Sicily, where we have almost only imported materials and in Sardinia, but there is a balance that we will understand better with this larger space, but which seems to work in that such a way. What more about the Gulf of Taranto? In the Gulf of Taranto, there is the concentration also of the Aegean derivative, like the Great Silominion, that it has this distribution, this is largely doubtful, this is maybe one should. Recent excavations have put the D'Ambrone here in a laterally 3D context that showed absolutely no fragments of grain in India. So the distribution is very clear, there is a special interaction zone that we can define in this part of the south of Italy. This is also one of the parts where the derivation of the PTOA of a GM type, which go on as a tradition introduced in the Laetelati V8B up to the Iron Age in southern Italy, has this main concentricity distributed rather largely over southern Italy, but its main concentration is still again in the same area. So this is a special interaction. It was also advocated for the origin of some of the handmade products that have been found in the Aegean and Levantian periods, and also for some bronze materials that show communication, the southernmost point for the trilite knives found sometimes in the Aegean east, in Royal Italy. So now I hope that you have understood that, working in a very rough way, we can divide this kind of pattern that we see mainly in Sardinia and Sicily, which are connected by some indications like the D'Ambrone, the Roger Potring and the Tevo, and what happens mainly in this area, which has a mass of connections during this late phase of the life. I will go through this chart just to show you what is the evidence for a different area. This is the Adriatic Coast, and in the Adriatic Coast, local materials are apparently dominant, but we have also an inversion in Rocareca with a lot of inputs during 3D, for RISC, G is for RISC, and instead we have a reversal, but with some unclear facts on the Adriatic Coast. So the Adriatic Coast, which is very close to RISC obviously, which has a great connection across the passage of Alhanto, has a problem with submitting. You see the plane of Ciberis down here. In the plane of Ciberis we have a constant, setting apart this point at the very origin, domination of the locally produced pottery. What is very strange is what happens around the town. There are two side main sides, which are Porto Perone and Scoglioletolno, 10 kilometers apart, and Scoglioletolno is the place where most of the inputs are and still remain. So what to think and what to imagine about this property. You see the distribution of the sides that I have shown you. This is Brolyo and Torre Gordillo in the title. Ciberis, local production mainly. This is Scoglioletolno, mainly imports. This is Porto Perone, mainly local production. And this is a wind-windling situation in the reality coast, mainly in the southern most sides. Copa Neligata only has, mainly has, local production. So we can imagine something like having centers, which have more contacts, but straight contact like here and maybe in some places throughout Alhanto, and then some territory of some kind inside the southern Italy pattern. This is the distance between Scoglioletolno and Porto Perone, which are two harbour sides to both. So now I will skip over this part of my presentation, because it is too long. I want to show you that anyway, the quantity of materials that we have from in Quota is very high already early in this particular field of production. And then we happen to have some huts up to 30% of the materials. So we have a very high percentage, but locally produced. So what is the model that we have? And we developed the three possibilities for models. One is the normal center periphery, which should have a homogeneous distribution across the landscape. And this doesn't seem to appear at the local scale since autumn. The other one model is one of the gateway communities connected with other policies which are intended in a dear political direction. And the third one is the gateway communities with 30 centers of limited scope without a peer symbolic entertainment, but with derivatives lying from the center to the periphery. So it is rather complicated to understand what we think, but we don't think that a hierarchy center periphery model works because we have a gradient too quick between the side of a slightly closed border. But possibly we may have to do with a connection between gateway communities or in some period gateway communities and other independent policies which develop their own capacity of producing locally materials connected to the Mycenaean products but with a substantial independence. So the colonial model that has been sometimes invoked also for study of the tunnel and maybe for taxes which are in this image now in the discussion of the model may have or still some possibilities to be introduced for these connective centers. But what we think generally is that we also inside Southern Italy we have necessarily to think at differential ways of acquiring the products that can be up to now efficiently placed by the analysis and the local production for the distribution of key points. That's all that I have to say.