 Well, I think it'd be children really knowing this stuff and I think it would be children actually showing me rather than give me an answer. I mean we're always looking for right or wrong, yes or no, but you want more than that. My favourite thing is saying why or can you show me. Then I know where I got a good idea that they understand something. I think it's more of a long, longer time period. I think you can teach the initial objective of the lesson but then something that has to be revised and revisited and continued on with in order for them to really have deep understanding. Deep learning for me is all about students being able to demonstrate their understanding through problem solving and reasoning. Problem solving and reasoning being one of these strain curriculum proficiencies and being the hardest for kids to attack. To me deep learning is children making connections, not just the surface learning. So if I can give you an example of comprehension and reading, like the taxonomy of comprehension. So a child might have literal understanding where it's right there in the book. But to me the deep learning is for them to be able to infer or to be able to evaluate what they're reading. They're bringing connections from a lot of different other sources.