 For the big story, GE CEO Jeff Immelt stepping down, Jim, what was your reaction? Well, look, I think that there was a lot of pressure on the board that it was time. I know that GE is saying, listen, for 2013, they had always prepared a secession. But the underperformance and the last straw really was that last meeting where he just said, listen, the $2 number, that's the high end. There was a belief, let's say among Tryon, Tryon had a big position, that this wasn't going to happen, that the big cuts were going to occur, and that the $2 number was going to be out there. But the two things that I think doomed Jeff, the first one was the negative cash flow in the first quarter, which was just kind of out of the blue. And the second one was there was great conviviality with Tryon. Now, Tryon's not big enough to be able to move the needle for GE. But there was great conviviality in a meeting that I went to with Nelson Peltz and Jeff Vimal. And I've been with them together. And there was a kind of a big letdown that it looked like the numbers were coming through, and then the numbers slipped everywhere. But you have to ask yourself, would Jeff have left before the consummation and then the, let's say, next year or two with Baker Hughes? Because that combination is so, so important. So I'd say there was a lot of pressure. And the board felt it had to act because the stock has been the worst performer in the doubt during the period that Jeff's been in there. And that does matter. And I know the company is very adamant that the dividend is safe. I think there are people like the Deutsche Bank analysts who are saying that it's not the case. I'm looking for upgrades. I'm looking for people to cut numbers, perhaps to a buck. Maybe well short of two bucks. But say that Flannery is not going to let you down here. My friends who know Flannery are adamant that he's a Jack guy. He's a Jack Welsh guy. And that means firing people. That means taking costs out. That means reshuffling the portfolio. It does not mean breaking the company up. And GE is an actualer's plus name. It's an actualer's plus name. And we talked last week about how we wanted to sell it. But we feared that there would be a move within the next few weeks. To change the CEO, we were prescient. I've done a lot of work behind the scenes. And I know that there were people who were really saying Jeff stayed too long, 16 years. I think from the press conference, it did seem like Jeff felt that it was time to move on. But I looked for the Baker-U's deal. They did not cut and run when oil went down. I think that's important. I think the Baker-U's deal that they're doing consumates at the end of the month. You're going to see some acquisitions done by that. Remember, rate count is going up. GE has both offshore and onshore. Onshore is very good right now. We own slumberjave for action alerts. And they're more offshore. And they have not done as well as Baker-U's. Remember, Baker-U's was going to merge with Halbert and F.L. Parts of Baker-U's merging with GE. It will be very interesting to see what Bornstein, who's vice chairman now, did not get the top job. I know Tryon really liked him. When I speak with Tryon, Tryon would not talk today. But when I've spoken to Tryon, if you remember, we had Ed Garden last week at our corporate governance. Ed Garden is key man in Tryon with Nelson Peltz. I know that when I asked him about GE, it was like, whoa. Kind of not happy. So a lot of my insight comes from the fact that we did have Ed at the corporate governance conference, which was really a fabulous conference. And I know that you cringed when, people cringed when I mentioned ML at the conference. Because Ed was just total no comment. And then, obviously, no comment meaning real unhappy.