 We are talking about structural health monitoring here at Intel GU 2019 in Stuttgart with Diane Michelon and Peter Berger from Topcon Positioning. Thank you for being here today. Peter, what technologies exist to prevent the breakdown of existing infrastructures? Well, since many years a lot of different technologies have been available in the market already. Like specialist companies used laser scanning or UAVs or enhanced monitoring technologies to assess, inspect and monitor structures. For us it's important to point out that we now try to marry these different technologies to a consistent workflow in order to have an efficient and proper workflow in place which we call inspect, assess, monitor. Diane, what can be done to improve inspection processes? So the inspection is having findings of your defaults in your infrastructure that can pose risks in the future. The problem is that traditional methods are often costly and dangerous but we now have the technology at Topcon with the Intel Falcon 8 Plus which is a drone to acquire very accurate imaging both RGB and thermal of those defects. We also have the software solution that helps us create the 3D models and creates inspection reports in a software called Magnet Inspect of those findings to give to the guys on site to do the proper maintenance. What we are lacking in those developments is the ability to monitor throughout the time those findings to take the better decision for the infrastructure and their health. How could monitoring be enhanced? Well, as I mentioned before we have different technologies available in the market and monitoring companies use manual and automatic technologies to collect data. What we now try to introduce as part of this workflow is our delta solution which is a real-time automatic monitoring system that integrates total station and a control unit to control and measure constantly possible movement of bridges and that we get a reliable result of the structural integrity of the bridge, for example, or them and that we can use this data also to check these movements against trigger levels just to be able to mitigate the risk for the users of the infrastructure. Why is it so important to make these changes? We know that in Europe we have a problem with our infrastructure aging bridges, for example and we need to be able to take the proper decision. What do we maintain and repair now? What can be delayed? And it's important for safety accuracy of our infrastructure and citizens. What is being done to address and correct structural issues that are detected? Well, if we look at Germany there's from legal point of view we have to do every three years and every six years inspection of bridges, for example. But what we need to do and what we need to address is that we use these existing budgets that we have to renew or improve our infrastructure properly and efficiently. And if you look at Germany, more than 30% of all bridges are in a bad condition and the government just announced a program that they will invest in the future 1.3 billion per year in renewing bridges and aging infrastructure but with our help we can make it possible that infrastructure can belong in operation and this available money can be used just to really go to the critical structures. And I think this would give us a better, let's say, how we use the money that is available. So what are the potential consequences of failing infrastructure? Well, if we look at the situation out there, if a bridge collapses as we have seen more than a year ago at the Morandi Bridge in Genua that also causes more than 40 lives it is important to inspect properly, have this workflow in place, have the proper technology use it efficiently and monitor structure that is in risk because it is not only about losing the infrastructure having, of course, the costs that are associated to replace it but in the end it's also about human life, the people who use the infrastructure and we should not take that to risk and use what is available in the market. Diane and Peter, thanks for joining us.