 Mae rhywbeth eich cyfnod am y Gymraed, archweddoliadau'r cyfnod rwy'n ei gwaith yn yr hynny, yn gyd, nad yw'n gweithio gael ddrif內fodol wedi'i gweithio eu cyfnod amnaldu'r cyfnod , ac nid i gael dweud y cyfnod amddirectu'n cyfnod fel y cyfnod hefyd hefyd. If we add a functioning legislature, it would actually be doing yourself, and that's to rein in the ambitions of the politicians and to shrink what is defined as public policy. Do you suggest that democracy is more radical and direct democracy is not the way forward? Felly, mae'n rhaid i'r strategi hynny yn ddechrau'r ffordd. Felly, mae'r cyfrifio ar y cyfrifio yw'r rhaglen. Mae'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio. Mae'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio yw'r cyfrifio gyfrifio. Y maeh, everyone is livres for the 6th of the majority! Any group that you have, you are always going to be able to carve out a majority that's going to screw the minority. And what is the ultimate minority? The ultimate minority is the individual. The whole idea of governance to prevent that, is to prevent any gang or group of going after the individual. It's to protect individual rights and they're full Ieithaf, doeddwn ydech chi'n orio cywbeth a'r ffordd, a rhaid i'n ffordd o rhan yn gofyn a'i ddaeth i'r rol yn y US. Rhaid i'r rhan o wneud ydych chi'n rhan o'r hoffodol i'r wyrs. Y rhan o'r hoffodol yn y US yn wleisio y beth gwaith cymdeithasol a gynnig i'ch cyfwilio ar y cyfwil. yn y gleiddaraeth i o'r bwynt cofannol fach yn y stym ddim yn dda i mwyn i'r oed iweithio'r board. Dwi'n credu chi'n cael ei wneud o'r dŵn, i'r ddeudol i'r dŵn eich eu dŵn, i'r dŵn i'r rŵn o'r fysg, i'r dŵn i'r dŵn o'r PŽ, i'r dŵn i'r dŵn o'r dŵn i'r dŵn. But The amount of lobbying' and taking out city council members, the lunchers. The corruption just becomes more intimate with people who are going to be upset about their corruption now becausethe next time they want something They'll use the same tool. So i think it's inherently corrupting in size just makes that corruption more intimate. But it doesn't really change the nature of the corruption. I think you give up a huge amount. You give up a principle. You're giving up the principle of individualism. You're giving up the principle of individualism. You're accepting the notion that what matters is a majority. The size of the majority, the size of the voting group shouldn't matter. What's important is individual. What's important is, are his rights being protected or are they not being protected? Can he use his land any way he chooses to or not? I think that the size of the group that is violating his rights is irrelevant. And plays into the hands of the socialists who can also organize on the local level and probably get as much influence on local politics. I think in our culture they have them all high ground because our culture has adopted their ethics and therefore they have much more influence on people than we do.