 Max Weber is another big name in the field of political sociology because he has given his new concepts regarding the struggle, regarding the class system in the society. Max Weber was interested in establishing sociology as an academic discipline. According to the basic thinking and thought of Max Weber, political sociology is an academic discipline. What is an academic discipline? It is a subject in which every time there is a scientific debate. We all know that there is only a scientific debate and the growth of the subject when the situation is included in it. That is, any subject, in a scientific sense, will be considered complete or important only when such questions are raised in it. There is such a debate in which we all have a connection, we all have benefits, we all have a better relationship. So, very easily, we can believe that Max Weber wants to see political sociology as such a subject in which an academic debate is possible. He stressed that a researcher should study other aspects too and should not only focus on the economic level only. That is, it is not enough to only talk to the expert and debate with the expert. And if we look at it, then this is a common belief that Max Weber has presented, because only economic issues cannot comprehend the prevailing situation in any society. Because economic situations are interlinked with the political development, economic issues are interlinked in context of their implications with the social setup also. So, every society is unique. No doubt we all agree with Max Weber because one needs to study the history, economy and culture of that society in order to completely understand the working of the society. Because Max Weber's argument is that any society is not only based on the society, it is the history of every society, it is the context of every society, in which the minds of the people, the culture and the history of the society are all important. And the society is capable of working with these people. So, in the end, we can understand the philosophy of Max Weber that he talks about a comprehensive kind of society. And the society in which the changes that come in the ways of the minds of the people, how the political system takes them, how it sees the changes, and how the future generations can continue. These are all the developments. So, according to Karl Marx's rationalization, that is very much important. What is rationalization? The developments in reality are very logical. For example, if there are criminals, their natural desire is that they have the resources. Now, if some people have more resources, their lives will be different in comparison to those who have less resources or those who are busy in the struggle to get those resources. So, on the basis of rationalization, we can say that in every part of the society, there is a special capability in it, there are some limitations. For example, we have separate resources, our facilities are separate. When we work, the things that come in our part, it is very possible that they are according to our facilities. For example, you and I are trying to understand the philosophy of Max Weber in the context of political sociology. If I am talking to you, it means that I have learned these things a little earlier. And if you are trying to understand this by listening to me, it means that your role is this. So, the basic philosophy of Max Weber is that it is actually related to the role of individuals. That each of us has a role of an individual, okay? How does he perform his role? In his part, there is a time limit, that is the thing that he performs according to which he performs. So, we can say that if there is a downfall of industrial societies, then definitely that downfall can be converted into the that when a state is ruled by a rational legal authority like overwhelming bureaucracy would arise and life would become purposeless unless the bureaucracy is controlled by strong politicians. That means, Max Weber thinks that in every society, some people, some authorities are the ones who have a connection with their traditions, okay? They can be elite, they can be elite to feudal, they can be elite to religious, that is, in terms of traditions, some individuals have more importance in their role. But if at some point that individual cannot give their role as an individual, then in every society, it turns out that some legal, rational authorities rise there. These legal, rational authorities are usually known as bureaucracy. That is, those people who have knowledge, who are educated, who are usually educated. And such criminals, if at some point they feel that they are coming out of their limits, then who should be controlled by them? The politicians of that country at that time should be controlled by them. And it is their responsibility to take that bureaucracy with them and make it work in such a way that it can benefit the common people and the society. That is, as far as Max Weber is concerned, there is a chain that is going on, which should be passed on to the end of the century, but the actual duty of working is those people who are trained in their profession, who are educated, and they are the best servants of that society. That is, those who are called bureaucracy. So, in short, we can say that, close to Max Weber, the political sociology is relevant to all the societies of that society, through which the societies are passed, and are directed towards their final destination, in which different societies come. Max Weber talks about those societies through his philosophy, not only because of his thoughts, but also because of his contributions to the political system, which is why his contributions are considered to be very important.