 Let's get going. So, two parts basically. I'll say a few introductory bits and pieces and then hand over to Joel to do the scary live demo for your interpretation about live demos, but it's gonna work, it's gonna be great. So, bit of background. Once again, we're talking about research for Capularist Australia, okay, RVA. I think most on the call are familiar with that. If not, please have a look and give it a go. We've been building this now for, gosh, a long time, four years, something like that. And we realized that a certain amount of the functionality is a good first attempt and we've been progressively rebuilding some of the features. And over the last few months, we've been particularly focused on search. So, one of our, the ARDC phrases that we, terms that we put around is nation of fair and we encouraging our partners to produce fair data and the findable fair is all about discovery, being able to find things. So, we realized and we acknowledged and we based on feedback that we've been receiving, both comments that have been emailed to us and through the RVA consultation that we had earlier in the year that our users really do want and enhance search capabilities. So, we've spent a bit of time trying to make it a lot better. And I think to a certain extent, please, we've been successful, but as always, we do work on your feedback and please do get in touch, let us know what you think. So, a couple of example, feedback comments that we've received from the consultation and discovering a term with a single query would be nice. It took me 30 minutes to find a term, or even if one existed. And one of the more honest feedback, a piece of feedback that we got, you get a list of sets as vocabularies and now you have to look into each one to actually find a potential term, tedious and useless. That's really great feedback. That sort of gave us a real challenge and input us to really do something good. So, we hope we've been able to make a new search with capability that's useful and helps you to find the concepts that you're after. So, a certain amount of that is about finding concepts, terms within vocabularies, but we haven't just worked on that. That is a major new piece of functionality, but we've also been adding other little tweaks and features to the existing vocabulary search, which is a search of the vocabulary metadata and we'll see some of that as well. Couple of slides to recap from the previous talk about RVA that we gave earlier in the year, I think it was March. So, we were talking about, for example, the subscription system and just another plug for that on the view page. Indeed, if you had subscribed to notifications about the GCMD vocabularies, you would have got a notification that we put out version nine when it's basically the same day that it came out from NASA. And so, that's in there. So, another plug for the subscribe function that's there on every view page. And now, this is again another slide from the presentation earlier in the year that I put up because it shows you what search looked like back in those days. So, this is the before screenshot. It's a search functionality on the vocabulary metadata and also to a certain extent on concept metadata. So, we do get, you will get hits against concept labels and you see also on the left-hand side, the facets, subject publisher, et cetera. Anyway, we've completely, well, almost completely redone this page. And so, here's the after. And this, looking at this prompted me to think, oh, let's go back to those sort of classic puzzles where you spot the difference. So, I've sort of done that and put some boxes around the main differences that you'll see here. I'll just very quickly go through some of these and you'll see these again in the demo. I'll just go through them as they're numbered. So, we've put in a link to some help. So, we do have a dedicated search help page about search. And that's, I think, very helpful. Lots of details about that because just realistically speaking, not everything that you see on this search page is crystal clear. There are a few things that you might need a bit of help understanding. Have you been to the Clayton campus? Yep. Hello, I've got a few people on, not muted. So, that's point one, point two, and number three. These are some additional filtering options. You can change the sort order of your results. You didn't used to be able to do that at all. And now you can. You had some options, including health medical search. And you can also change the number of results per page. On the left-hand side, we've got what apparently is in the industry is called a bread box. It's a list of all of the filters that you've got on your current search. At point five, we now have for the facets where there are typically a large number of values, which is subject and publisher. We now have a little text area where you can filter down to limit the number of subjects and publishers that are displayed. Number six, some, well, let's call them quirky, additional facet count indicators with checkboxes. And we'll see how that works in the demo. So this is, you can either, well, I would say give it a go and see what you think. This is a compliment to the facet counts on the right-hand side, which show you the results in your current search. Anyway, we'll see that in the demo. Number seven, we just made highlighting of the search results just a little bit more clear, I think. The highlighting was just bold. Now we've got, also, we've made it, we put in the background color, so the highlighting stands out just a little bit more. And number eight is a tiny little thing, but it's a big deal. This is now showing that you have a tab interface on the search results. This is, and there's a little bit of a tease showing you there that you can now get results that are concepts. And I won't show any more of that now, but you'll see that in the demo. So that's the concept search is a major, major addition. Having said that, your feedback on any of this is, any or all of this is welcome and as usual, please do get in contact with us. And now I hand over to Joel for the demo. Thanks for the treat. Hopefully you can see the homepage for RBA now. Put in a chat if you can't. I think we are sharing this whole screen. So I'm gonna repeat a little bit of what Richard said, but I'll go into a little bit more detail and show how things work. In terms of the homepage, we can see underneath the search bar, we have a link to the help and we've also added a link to browser concepts. So the browser vocabularies was there previously and now we've added one concepts where you can click and it will take you directly to the concepts tab within the search. In terms of searching, we've stuck with a single search box and this was one of the aims that we wanted to have was to allow sort of a single entry point to the search so that new users and even existing users coming to the site didn't get confused between two different search boxes for two different search types. So we tried to leave sort of enable a single entry point which was quite easy to understand. So conducting a search from the single search box will end you up on the search page which Richard has just shown. And we now have a few new elements to the page. So as Richard indicated, we have these tabs which sort of separates the two searches that are conducted when you enter a query term or query terms in search. It actually fires two searches. So they're separated by the tabs. So a bit of vocabulary tab which is the default tab and then we have a concepts and et cetera tab. Now this is a little bit of tongue-in-cheek humor from Richard. We had a few long lengthy discussions around what to call it because it's not just concepts. We also include other resources and manual top concepts within those search results. So there's things like Scottish collections and concept schemes that will come up in that search as well. In terms of the interface, I'll just go through some of the things that Richard's highlighted already. One of the biggest challenges we had was sort of the separation between the two searches. So we've got a single search box. The terms that you put in the search box are shared between the two different searches. So if I, for example, put in, let's say, market, I get search results for vocabularies and also for concepts. Now they're two separate searches. The interface, there's a few little things to note. The query term is obviously shared between the two searches. The sort option is shared between the two searches and the show option is also shared between the two searches. Everything else is basically search independent. So all the filters that apply down the left-hand side at the moment, because I'm on the vocabularies tab, are applicable only to the vocabularies search. And then if I flipped over to the concepts tab, all the filters down the left-hand side are applicable only to the concept search. So it's sort of a little bit of a balancing act between having that single entry point with a one search box and then having two searches that are sort of running together in parallel. The bread box, as Richard pointed out, I think we put out the first sort of sprint that we did earlier this year and the bread box came with that. So that allows you to see all the filters that you've applied to your search. And again, there is a bit of a mix there in terms of the query term is shared, but any of the filters that you apply will be specific to the search, vocabularies or concepts, et cetera, and I'll show in here. So for example, if I cleared market at the moment, it will clear for both tabs. Whereas if I've got, say, a subject selected on the vocabularies tab, it will not apply to the concepts tab in bread box. Oh, sorry, other way around, I'm on the concepts tab. So I'll put a subject in the concepts search. It won't apply in the vocabularies search. So I won't see it in the bread box to clear, but clearing that query term will actually clear it for both searches. In terms of the filters, we had some issues in the, I guess, the initial sort of search page where we had subjects and publishers that were really, really long lists of filters. So you'd get to sort of, I think, there's 15 or 20 items down the list and then there'd be a view more link and you'd expand it out and you might get 50 to 100. So we've tried to clean that up by having a scrollable filter section for each of the really long lists within the filters. And we've also added a filter to the facets to filter your filters, which works simply by adding text in. So I can just put in any text and it'll quickly filter that and I can clear those as well. One thing to note with the filters, you may have applied several. So I can put in ends in here and I can put in address in here, for example, any time you make a selection or you update your search. So I've got some of the addresses here. It will actually clear both those filter boxes and you'll sort of get back your results and the applicable filters for those results. So that's the scrollable section. In terms of the counts that Richard indicated before, the counts that you see down the right-hand side of the filters represent the results in your current search. So in our current search, we have one vocabulary with the subject of address. Then when we actually select an item within a filter category, so if I select an interesting one here, built environment within subject, you'll see once I select a single item within that category, I get additional counts that show up for the other filters that I haven't selected. So we get a combination of counts here. We get the counts of the items within your search down the right-hand side. So we can see there's no AWRA subject within our current search, but there is one still in the index that we can add to our current search. So if I click that, I'll get both those subjects selected and I'll get any vocabularies that contain the AWRA subject within my search. So it takes a little bit of getting used to, I guess, those counts, but I think they're pretty handy when we go through how the filters are actually combined. I might do that now, actually. So it might make a little bit more sense. I'll pop into the help guide because there's a little image in here which is probably easier to understand than me trying to explain it. Let's kind of scroll. Everyone can see that picture. So this is the way that the filters that you apply are added to your search. So any of the options that you select within a filter category, connected with an AWRA statement, any of the filters across categories are selected with an AND statement. So basically this means that within each category, anything that you're searching for has to have at least one of the options within that category for it to match the search. And this obviously comes into play when we start looking at those counts within the filters. Further on down, I'll actually show it on the concept tab. It might make a little bit more sense to the concepts tab. One thing to note with the concept search is that we've implemented something that we're calling collapsing. And this basically groups results into a single search result where we've got either the same IRI within one vocabulary or the same IRI across vocabularies. So you can, by default, we collapse based on the IRI within a single vocabulary. So I'll put in, I might just clear this and put in the example that I'm looking for, switch over to concepts. So I've just done a concept search. And basically the collapsing is currently applied to the same IRI within the same vocabulary. So I'll just scroll down so I can see one. So if we're looking here at the base of middle Jurassic, we can see at the bottom of the search result there is view other versions. Now if I click that little box, we'll see that all the other versions where this concept is contained in is being collapsed into this single result. And we've done this basically to prevent having the same concept show multiple times within the search results. So we may have a vocab that has say 50 versions where the concept has existed throughout those 50 versions and you would basically see base of middle Jurassic 50 times within the search results which is not necessarily useful to an end user. So by default we're collapsing within the single vocabulary and across those versions. And you can actually access each of the details for that concept. So it may have changed over time that the label may have changed or there may have been descriptions added. And you can go in and view the resource details at those certain points in time. And I will go into that in a little bit. But just to finish off the collapsing mode and there's more details obviously in the help. I'm not explaining it clearly. You can switch to collapsing mode. So down the very bottom of the concepts search tab and it's only available on the concepts search. There is an option to change from the default collapsing mode which is within the same vocabulary to don't collapse at all. So then you will see 50 of those Jurassic concepts across the search. Or you can just collapse results with the same IRI. So what that will do is I'll select that one. And we can see in I think this second result here. So the same IRI or the same concept has been used in several vocabularies. So by selecting the option of just collapse on IRI, I'm collapsing not just within the versions of the vocabulary but across vocabularies as well. So that's down the bottom of the result. We can see the other versions of where this result has come from. So the geological time scale vocabulary. But we can also see there's another option to the right here which is view other vocabularies. And we can see the other vocabularies that this concept is contained within and has been grouped into this search result. And again, you can go in and view the details of that concept within that vocabulary as well. Now to start with, we have defaulted to collapsing on IRI within a single vocabulary because we think that's probably the most common use case at the moment where across multiple versions we have the same concept coming up. But we may find in the future as concepts are mapped across different vocabularies and shared across vocabularies that we may need to switch it to collapsing across vocabularies based on IRI. And we're happy to hear your feedback if you would prefer that method and everyone agrees then we can easily change that option. Okay, so that's collapsing. In terms of the search itself, so we've made some pretty significant tweaks, I think, to the search, I'll just reset this one. So Rich has done a really great job. I asked him to implement a Google style search where I could do exact phrase searches and Boolean searches. And he went away and thought long and hard about it and he found something very useful and implemented it. And now it works really well. So we can combine exact phrase searches just by simply putting our query terms within double quotes just like Google. So I can hit market and then if we wanted to find the regulation, I can narrow it down that way with the exact phrase search. One thing to note is any of your query terms they're case insensitive. So as the search is executed, we lower case or the query terms. So you don't have to worry about case. Nice feature. We can obviously if I go back one, I can combine exact phrases with your standard query terms and also with Boolean. So I can put a minus sign in to say now I don't actually want regulation. Regulation, yes, thank you. And that will basically exclude anything with regulation in it, but exactly match market. So this is I think a really great improvement to the search. There's obviously in the using help guide there's some more information about sort of the advanced search options that you can use within the search box. In terms of other improvements to the search that Richard sort of highlighted more highlighting. So I'll just put that in again. We had some comments back within, I think probably within the review process and I think even before that that the highlighting didn't always show for the search results. So you weren't actually sure why the result was coming back. So we've addressed that issue and now you should always see highlighting at least one highlighting snippet within your search results. So it's really clear on why that item's coming back. The other changes that we made to the search, they're not really visible, but behind the scenes we've made some adjustments to the search ranking to try and make the results a little bit more accurate in terms of what you're searching for. I don't have a real good example for that. Some other good features that have gone in are the ability to navigate back through your search history. So in the previous version of the search page if you hit back it would sort of sit there and do nothing and you can hit a few times and it ended up somewhere that you didn't want to be. So now the navigation buttons on the browser. So if I click back, I can actually navigate forward and backwards through my search history which is really nice. If you're sort of narrowing down you end up with zero results, you can go back one and then obviously change the search parameters that we've been using for your search. The other feature just to mention quickly is scroll history. So this works if you navigate away from a search results page to a page that isn't a search. We try our best to restore your scroll position within the search results. So if I scroll down the bottom of the page and I flick off to the platform category vocabulary. When I click back on the browser I'll actually be navigated back to that point within the search results. And that's a really handy thing if you're sort of navigating through the results and reviewing the results and flicking back and forth between say the vocabulary view and the search results we'll try and leave you back where you started in the search results. Okay, onto the concepts tab. I will just go into a little bit more detail at the bottom for each of the concepts or resources I should say it's not just concepts. For each of your concept results we have generated or not generated we've picked a display label. This is obviously we've got some business rules depending on the type of resource that it is. So we try and get an English SCOS prep label for the concepts. And then we work our way through sort of DC titles and things until we can get a display label for the search. The link for the concept result actually takes you to the view page. And there was obviously a balancing act there between some vocabularies that are published and we could take you to say the CISFOP link data API sort of view of things and then other vocabularies which aren't published and all we have is the view page. So for safety and consistency we've just had a link which goes directly to the view page for the vocabulary. And that's obviously not gonna be super useful for a lot of people because if I did click on it's less than 20% it's just gonna take the view page and I don't have any information about the concept to evaluate that concept. Unless I go down to the browse tree if it's there and try and find the concept within there. So what we've done is we've put in a button down the bottom which allows you to view the resource details for that result. And I can click on that and it'll give me a pop out and give me more information about that concept or resource. If it's available in CISFOP there'll also be a link within this pop out to go and view that resource within the link data API. So I'll scroll down and see if we've got one in here. Here's an example. There's also a link obviously here directly straight to the link data API. But again, once I'm in that view the details with the concept or resource there's a link at the top where I can go and find that within the structure of the vocabulary. I think that's most important. God. Okay. One last thing is the quirkiness with the counts. So with the implementation of collapsing so the grouping within a single search result there is some interesting behavior that happens with the filter counts. Now to demonstrate this I'll clear this search and scroll down to the bottom. Sorry. I'm going to go around a bit clear to go back to the default tab which is the quirkiness. So I'm on the concept tab now and I'm down the bottom in the filters where we can see version status. And there's a little eye here which basically gives you a little bit of information about the filter counts and how they might be a little bit off in terms of the user expected behavior. So at the moment we have the default collapsing which collapses all the results within a single vocabulary with the same IRA. And what happens is that we take preference to the concept within the current search which means all the superseded versions are grouped into a single result for that concept. So at the moment we can see that we've got 41,000 concepts within our search which have a status of current. And we have 4,026 superseded within the search. Now if I select current for example or I can select superseded, it'll basically tell me that there are 34,000 superseded concepts within my search and there are 41,800 odd current concepts within the index that aren't currently in my search. Now if we add those two numbers together we should get a nice even result of what was it, 70 odd thousand. But what we actually get is 45,000 results and that's because collapsing is at play. So when we add the current concepts into the search yes there are currently 41,000 within the index that aren't in our search and there are 34,000 within our search superseded but when we combine the two and the collapsing takes effect the numbers actually are reduced within the search results. So it's a little bit confusing and I probably didn't explain that the best because it is confusing but there is obviously some information in the help again with a little diagram that kind of explains how the collapsing of results can affect the search result counts. Yeah, so there's a little bit of descriptive information there that you can go and refer to which might explain it a little bit better than I just did. Now I think that's it. How do I miss that? Just acknowledge our debt to basically everybody who's done a faceted search before in terms of the design. We've tried to make it as much as possible. What you expect from having used other websites and in particular the pop up for the resource details we have ruthlessly stolen from BioPortal. So if you use BioPortal and use the pop ups that they have you'll see, aha, that's where we got that from. So not all of this is freshly invented but we've tried to follow the good ideas that other people have had in terms of implementing a search interface. And I think that is good.