 You don't want instability in this region, you want stability, and the only way you're going to have stability is if you've got the same kind of key players that have been dealing with this kind of thing from the very beginning, and that's what we have. And so if you remove the United States out of that, that's not going to make it more secure or more stable, in fact it will be just the opposite. Now, that is subject to all kinds of political types of debate, but that's nice, but you need calm heads like the United States, like China, like Russia or whatever, when it comes to nuclear weapons that have the safeguards there, that have demonstrated for decades a willingness to talk if things got too close to being stupid. And we've been exercising that from the very beginning. My first look at the Korean Peninsula was over a pair of jump boots before I landed in a peanut field in Yeoju, South Korea, on a team spirit in the late 1980s, and that's just my experience. We've been there a long time. My dad's regiment, 179th Infantry, served in Korea in 1953. We've had an environment like this for a long time, but the commitment since our initial cross signals in the late 40s have been very, very consistent ever since, and for us to remove that would not create stability. My argument is that it would destabilize on a scale that perhaps we could not control.