 I welcome members to the third meeting in 2018 of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee. Agenda item 1 is proposed that the committee takes item 5 consideration of the Planning Scotland Bill in private. Does the committee agree to take the item in private? Agenda item 2 is consideration of instruments subject to the affirmative procedure and no points have been raised on the draft representation of the people Scotland amendment regulations 2018 and the draft continuing care Scotland amendment order 2018. Is the committee content with these instruments? Agenda item 3 is consideration of an instrument subject to negative procedure. It's the Animal Feed Basic Safety Standards Scotland Regulations 2018 SSI 2018-15. The instrument provides for an offence where a person deliberately adds a radioactive substance in the production of animal feed. It's also an offence if a person imports or exports any feed to which a radioactive substance has been intentionally added during production. The regulations were laid before the Parliament on 16 January and come into fourth on 6 February. This does not respect the requirement that at least 28 days should elaps between the laying of an instrument, which is subject to the negative procedure and the coming into force of that instrument. The committee may wish to find the failure to comply with section 28 to be acceptable in the circumstances. The reasons for not complying are outlined in the letter from the Scottish Government legal services directorate to the presiding officer dated 16 January, supplemented by the written response to the committee on the regulations. Does the committee agree to draw the regulations to the attention of the Parliament on reporting ground J as they fail to comply with the requirements of section 28-2 of the Interpretation and Legislative Reform Scotland Act 2010? Does the committee also agree to find the failure to comply with section 28 to be acceptable in the circumstances, as outlined in the correspondence from the Government contained within our papers? Gender item 4 is consideration of an instrument not subject to any parliamentary procedure. It is the Education Listed Body Scotland Order 2018-SSI-2018-7. The Scottish Government is required to make orders listing all UK bodies which are authorised to offer degree-level programmes for validation by a recognised body, as is the UK Government and the other devolved administrations. The Scottish Government has acknowledged that two of the bodies listed are not correctly described, so they are the Mary Hair Grammar School, grammar spelled wrong incidentally, and St Philip's Centre should be described as limited companies, Mary Hair and St Philip's Centre limited. The Scottish Government has undertaken to amend the errors in the next amending instrument, or in other words, in the next order, which updates the list of bodies. The last amendment was made in 2009. Does the committee agree to draw the order to the attention of the Parliament on the general reporting ground, as two of the bodies listed in part 1 of the schedule of the order are incorrectly described? Secondly, does the committee agree to recommend to the Scottish Government that the description of the two bodies should be amended promptly, given that part 1 of the schedule of the order confirms those bodies which are authorised to provide courses in preparation for a degree? Okay, and now move the meeting into private session.