 Welcome to the Knuckleheads of Liberty. What better to talk about than all of this crazy leaking at the Supreme Court? Sort of the mother of all leaks, I guess, at the Supreme Court on abortion. So the Roe vs. Wade is coming. Maybe we could get a visual on this. Roe vs. Wade is coming up and at first time ever this topic has been or a decision that has in draft form has been leaked to the press. And so that's never happened before. And so everybody's speculating it's probably a left activist because it is the decision is going to strike down Roe, it sounds like, which means that's what it sounds like from what's been leaked to the press. And of course, it was kind of odd the leak happened and suddenly all these different media outlets had it and there was a mob outside the Supreme Court right away. So it's almost like it was orchestrated, you might say. But anyways, this apparently is going to send it back to the state. So every state will be able to put their own ideas onto this. And so two sort of big issues on this, both the idea that there was this crazy leak that could potentially, because this isn't a final decision yet, right? So maybe there will be pressure on justices now, which has never happened to try and change their opinions before they actually give their final signature on these things, I guess. And so there's that. And then the idea that now we're going to have all this activity in the States on figuring out what abortion rights to be. But before you start saying, hey, isn't this just a bunch of guys talking about abortion? We don't need to hear that again. But fortunately, the left has given us an end so that now all of us can talk. All of us have a voice on abortion. This may not have been the case five years ago, but today this is the norm, apparently, with the left. So we all get to have our voice. But anyways, let me throw it to you guys and there's just an image of the justice this year to give a little flavor to all this. What do you guys think of all this? You know, the hypocrisy involved in all of this is so amazing and stunning. It's unbelievable. On one hand, we have a Supreme Court justice soon to be who could not define woman. But yet when this thing was leaked and everybody knew it's apparent that the Supreme Court will now strike down Robo-Sissouade and also strike down Casey, which was one of the supplemental decisions that bolstered the ruling in Robo-Sissouade. All of a sudden, now, they have justice covered that there's something called woman. Before, we didn't know. We couldn't define it. It's a Supreme Court justice. She will be there soon. She couldn't define woman because she's not a biologist. But suddenly, when they find out that Robo-Sissouade may be struck down, all of a sudden we found out that this is going to be an infringement upon the rights of women. How amazing that this turnaround occurred in a matter of weeks that suddenly we know who a woman is. This is truly, truly amazing. But the leak, though, the leak, though, is something very serious, very, very serious in the sense that this is a breach of trust because all of the employees there within the Supreme Court, all the clerks and everybody else, they have taken Asalaam out to hold all of their stuff confidential until the Supreme Court issues a finalization. But yet, someone who want to have it their way, her, he, or she, I don't know. Maybe it's a multitude of them who did this. I don't know. But they are trying to influence a court in a way that they think is the just outcome. And we cannot have this. So I hope this is investigated. I do not know what laws have been broken if there are any. But if there are any laws broken, I hope someone is prosecuted or some bodies are prosecuted for the breach of trust that occurred by leaking this draft decision written by Samuel Alito. Yeah, I agree too. I think that's the most serious one. I, you know, I don't even at this point want to talk about, you know, the Roe v. Wade thing. No, it's just the whole the leak like Leon says. I mean, it's super serious. Yeah, they should be prosecuted. Yeah, everything Leon said, I agree with. And and so there's that facet and then there's the facet of these protests. Now, apparently because of the leak, now they are politicizing like they try to politicize everything, politicize your, you know, your pork chops you're having for dinner or your spaghetti. I mean, they got to politicize everything. They can't leave anything alone. So even then, you know, of course, the Supreme Court, same thing. Can't can't leave it alone. Got to politicize and got to try to influence it politically with these protests and all this other nonsense. Well, you know, sorry, that's not how it's supposed to be. And yeah, this is this. Hopefully the Supreme Court will, you know, take the higher ground here and not give into any of this pressure and just rule the way they normally rule which is based on their interpretation of constitutional law, the law of the land and that's it. Sorry, folks. It doesn't matter how many, you know, it's not democratic. Sorry, it was just based on the Constitution. At this point, it's not democratic. Yeah, according to what we learned from the leak, right now, there's a five to three decision. I think journalists have not yet decided where he's going to fall on this, but there's a five to three decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Now, if that do not turn out to be the case, that means someone of the justices would have changed his or her mind. Now, it is normal. A justice may change your mind, you know, from time to time. It does happen, okay? But if a justice now changed his or her mind because of the leak or make it appear that it changed because of the leak, then these things are going to happen in the future. That as soon as a decision is coming out that somebody don't agree with or somebody find, oh my goodness gracious, this is an attack on women, attack on blacks, and attack on whoever, they're going to start leaking these decisions. And sooner or later... Don't forget that. Oh my God, they're going to rule in favor of gun control. It's a close tie. We better leak this one. There you go. Exactly, exactly. So it will encourage if the justices give into this in any way, shape, or form, or even appear to give into this. Is this going to incentivize more leaks? Well, this is almost incentivizing an insurrection, you might say, because after all, this was a government body that was getting ready to essentially set constitutional or clarify constitutional law for the nation. And if the intent was to get a mob of people out there to violently protest to change... Oh my God, that's right. That sounds like it's insurrection to me. No doubt. I don't know what it is. Also, aside from that, it's a coup. It's another coup, you know, because they're talking about this. So, you know, all these liberal idiots that I, you know, that I see talking here, there, everywhere, they're talking about the coup. There's a coup that happened on January 6th. So I looked up on... First of all, I had to look up, okay, now what, I think I know what a coup means, but let me look it up. Okay, a coup d'etat, coup for short. French, by the way, COUP. And so I looked up and in the course of looking, of course the definition is nothing like what happened on the 6th. Maybe that's why Wikipedia in its list of all coups going back historically, for some reason they left out the January 6th coup I can't figure out why. If it was such a horrible coup, you would think that Wikipedia would have put it into their adjusted it because, you know, they've had plenty of time to adjust and put in the coup that occurred on January 6th. But no. And so why... Yeah, it's beyond, it's beyond human intelligence to figure that one out, Tim. Really it is, really it is. I've got to say too, on this, you know, I think some of us have different ideas on abortion, but I mean, I'm saying that this is something that this person, if they get caught, whoever leaked this, should be treated rather harshly, you know, as the law will allow. And yet, you know, I am actually for somebody who is more on the pro-choice side of things on this. It's not necessary because I want to see abortions happen. I just don't want the government to have the birth police running around after looking under every lady's skirt. So, I mean, that's kind of, you know, at least where I'm kind of coming from. So, it's not that you can be principled on this and be pro-choice and still be against what happened in this particular, you know, circumstance. So, anyways. Well, are you saying this person, if they bite them, that should be aborted? Yeah. Post-pregnancy abortion. Yeah, yeah. Worked before that? I lose it. I literally use their freedom. Their freedom should be aborted, yes. Alrighty. Thank you for listening to the Knuckleheads of Liberty Podcast.