 We are here at WICIC 2012 in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates and I am pleased to be joined by Ms Magdalena Gaj who is president of the National Regulatory Authority of Poland. Magdalena Gaj, thank you for being with us today. Thank you for your invitation. Hello. Hello and very good to see you again. I would just like to start off by talking about this conference. In your opinion, what is the most important issue discussed at this conference? You know, the treaty is quite old, so I think that we should adjust its regulation to the technical reality, which is developing very quickly. But in the same moment we cannot broaden its scope on the issue connected with the internet governance. It is very important, I think, for this conference. This conference should deal with the technical issue connected with the telecommunication infrastructure. Because, as you know, the modern telecommunication is very important for us. It gives us the freedom and we should put any limitation on it. The young people from place around the world, from a small village, can use the telecommunication, modern telecommunication, the internet to study in Great Britain, in France, anywhere where they want to develop their patience and enjoy communication in other people. And, of course, for the country, the rapid development of the telecommunication increase on GDP helps us. And, of course, the new modern telecommunication helps us in a fight against poverty or unemployment, because it is very important when we are talking about the internet. You can work, the e-work is very important. So I think that this issue, we must go with the time, because the treaty is very old, but we can broaden its scope to the internet governance. Now, there's been a lot of attention to the detail of the wording that's been going into this treaty. And, in fact, last week there was a particular sticking point. I just wanted to ask you, why was Poland so keen on adding a reference to the human rights protection in the ITR's preamble? You know, simply we can say that today the technology determines the communication. So, therefore, even this technical issue can have human rights implications. It is very important. What I mentioned before, yes, when we are thinking about modern telecommunication, about the internet, we always should have in mind human rights, because the freedom is very important. And what means our proposal? We would like to put in the preamble the sentence that all member states should take into account when they will implement the ITR's human rights, because, you know, many countries, the democracy is different in many parts of the world. So we are thinking about all citizens who won't have access, full access to the internet. It is very important. And I think that this sentence, it is the voice for our observers, yes, because before the conference there was many rumours about this conference that it will be the some two internets, the national internet and the global internet. And I think that it can be this signal which could save this conference. So it is very important for us. I'd like to ask you in your opinion, what's the European view on the revision of the ITR's? What are the regional priorities and needs when it comes to revision of the ITR's? And will Europe, do you think, be willing to make a good compromise on them? You know, EU member states have their own harmonised regulation in the area of the telecommunication. Therefore, we don't need the all ITR's regulation. And it is the reason why sometimes somebody can say that European are very tough and don't want to go ahead. Yes, it is not true. We don't need this regulation because we have it. But we understand the needs of another region when we are talking about the telecommunication. That they won't have the same, for example, the regulation of the roaming. We have it from five years. It is very good for our citizens. And I understand that another country from around the world would like to have the same regulation about the roaming because it is very expensive for our citizens. The same quality of service, disables, the multi-mate telecommunication. It is very important. And I understand this, all European countries understand this situation. And I think that in this area we will have compromise because if we don't need it, it is not the same that another region don't need. And we understand it. It is clear for Europe. But of course, we have red lines. This internet government's fragment of the internet, the national internet and the global internet and the freedom in the internet. For the Europe, very important yes, that we would like to have the ITR respecting the privacy rules and freedom of communication. And it is our goal. Thank you very much. Thank you very much.