 O! Unwydd~! O rofn ni! Ar fyddiw! Felly i인 rwy'n eu ddweud hwn. Felly rwy'n gallu'r ddweud o hynny. Io hynny mae'r ddweud hynny'n mynd gwell ei gwasanae neu'r gwasanae chi'n gwneud, ond rwy'n gallu'r ddweud wneud. Mae'r ddweud yn iawn, ac mae'n chof i'r ddweud. Mae'r ddweud y naes hwn o'r cyfrom o hynny. Maen nhw mae'n gobeithas, mae'r ddweud hwn o'r ddweud. Rydyn ni wedi credu i'n gw brawdyd ond yma mae'n gwnaeth gyda chi eich gwirionedd? Mae'n gweldiau i'r gwirionedd, ac mae'n gweldiau i'ch gwirionedd. Mae gennym eu dyn nhw'n gwirionedd lle yn gweithio'r gallu bod yn gallu ddargiadau sy'n dwybod. Rwy'n chweil. Na'n ôl beth, mae'n gweithio petad o'r gwirionedd lle i gwrth promod yma yn agawr. Rwy'n chweithio'n gwirionedd ei bod ydy o'r gyflawn i'ch chefau. A bod yn gennym o'r cyflwyno? Mae'r cyflwyno, yn gweithio, mae'n cyflwyno, o'n cyflwno, mae'r cyflwyno, i wneud i'r ymdegwyr, mae'r cyflwyno yn y ddweud. Ac mae'n gweithio. Mae'r gweithio ar y ddweud, os yw'r gwybod ymlaen o'r ffordd, mae'r gwybod ar gyfer. A'n gweithio, mae'n gweithio'r gwybod o'i cyflwyno, rwy'n gweithio. Rwy'n gweithio'r adeilad gwyddo, I'm not a big fan of this. You don't have to be. I'm going to say do you like any better now? Nope. Now do you switch to the other? We use the same tube balls to try and keep some consistency. They're both TP-5s. One's got a pattern on it, but they both are TP-5s. A lot smaller. When you put them next to each other, you know they're actually... That's a huge difference inside. That's not a huge difference, but this one visually doesn't know whether it's the black round the outside or anything, but for me it would be definitely more appealing. Definitely more appealing down there as well. But my question is really more about when you strike that putter and you compare it to the oversized or oversized, the mallet style traditionally as we know in terms of size. I don't feel as though I'm really in control of that. Right. What I'm doing here doesn't relate to what's going on down there, whereas with this one, the feed back's a lot better. I feel as though the ball does what I want it to do, whether that's right or wrong. We don't hold everything, do we? With that one, I think it's for the... I can see why they've done it, and I know why they've done it. They've moved the weight back. Do you think it would help poor or putters the bigger mallet, in other words? I don't think the forgiveness in it takes away so much from the feed back that actually a poorer putter would... It would paper over the cracks if it was good, but actually with this one, you know exactly what's happened. So you know whether you've made a good stroke, you know whether it's been a good strike, and I would go, isn't that a positive for every golfer? I understand the figure inside of that, but I don't think it makes you a better putter, and I don't think it really has a bearing on getting the ball closer. I like the sort of alignment. It's interesting the way they brought this, cut out this back element, and he threw it into the front, but it was the ball really well. And I think it's sort of stability in the head. I can understand how that would appeal to a lot of golfers. I want to switch straight out to this putter, which has got me a little bit confused. It's the only difference in its overall weight, or at least it seems to be. But it definitely, even looking at the rotations on the ball itself, it definitely seems to promote a more forward roll. And you said earlier on the other clip on the basis that the ball definitely seems to fire out there a bit quicker, and I suppose it's an obvious statement with that weight being planted at the front. But there is a... The thing I think about technology and putters or whatever they bring out, and I said I brought the truss out, is if something changes, something new comes out, I want to be able to see it in performance. So that one, referring to the old spider, is not necessarily bad. This one's not good. There's no right or wrong, but you as an individual want to go into a golf shop and you've got a decision to make. There's a truss putter, there's the traditional mallet, and there's that, and there's three very different putters. So what we're saying is, for us, the logic of the... Technology? The logic of the big one would probably make people go in, go and buy it, it's forgiving, I'm struggling with putting, I'm going to get a big headed, weight at the back, but actually, you should try for me, that's the one people should be trying, because that's very, very different to anything. Well I think it just goes to show, it's that same old thing again, people, there's a complaint about products being released and the logic behind it being released. All I'm saying is, there is three different prototypes there, they're all very, very different, and I think you could line 20 people up and they could all choose a different one of these putters. For me, that's the only thing that matters is that it's another putter on a shelf, whether you like it or not is irrelevant. The point is, it does something different in terms of its current setup than what is out there, certainly in the tailor made range. And I'm a fan of it as you know, I like it. I like the trus putter, Dustin liked it for one reason. Always, what I like with it again is always, and I said about that weight forward, it's that forward roll. The revolutions of the ball are just so, you can just see that ball spinning over, it just literally puts on topspin on the ball or promotes that forward roll, getting the ball rolling at the hole. So last one, Llew, I brought the trus along, cos I know you've not really tried this. I know we've had a few rolls on a couple of greens. And the reason I brought it is because again, to me there is, I mentioned it on the previous old, tailor made have done what they do quite often. They've covered all the bases. And the putters are no different really at the minute. There's a huge amount of choice on board. I couldn't agree more. They're trying to find forward CG, let's see what that does. Blade putter with the stability of the mallet, let's see what that does. Weight at the back. The way I look at it, I suppose it's similar to what I said on the previous thing for me. I don't think that's a negative though. They're trying to cover all the bases for all the golfers, which is, I think like I said, the one thing for me, particularly this morning, bringing these three different putter styles out, is that it's that same old thing. It's all about getting custom fit and even for putters for me now. Either get custom fit or make sure you don't dismiss any of the options based on your traditional choice and give them all a roll and you'll without doubt see a noticeable difference between all of them.