 Rwyf i, cyfnodd, i ni ddim i gilydd y maes arall i ni i gilydd yma i gyfryd gyda y cyfrannid a fron y hollwyd. Rwyf i, rwyf i gilydd y maes argylchedd. Nifrwng y trofnwchiau iddo o'r bwysig yma eich cyfrannidOD. I Anghrainol, mae'n bwysig fydd yn dd料u'r cwm wneud i chi, fyddwch i'n fwy pastorig, nid i atgrifennu hyfforddiant, i'r bobl o'r clartau i wneud y cwm fyddai na'n ac mae'n hynny ar yr chuulio cysylltu. James Dornan To ask the Scottish Government what engagement it has had with Police Scotland and Rangers Football Club regarding the reported Covid-19 regulations, but each has incidences of vandalism, violence and anti-catholic bigotry in Glasgow City Centre and at Ibrokes Stadium on 5 May. Felly, rydw i chi'n iawn i chi'n ddod o'i'r post, ond rydw i'n credu i mi ddigon. Rwyf i'n gwneud i James Arnaud y cwestiwn, rwyf i'n gwneud i'n cymdeithasol gyda'r Ffliolol. Felly, ac i ddwynt mae'r cyfnod ysgolio yn Glasgow. Rydw i, maen nhw'n cyddiol i'r ddweud i'r ddechrau i ddechrau i rwyf i'n cyfrannu Those of who suffered injuries have gone about their job. The assault on our officers is simply unacceptable. I am disappointed on many levels with the selfishness of the Covid beaches, but I am disappointed also with perhaps the violence and vandalism that we saw in George Square and with the anti-Catholic bigotry that we saw on display. Since the weekend, my officials and I have continued to liaise with Police Scotland, engage with Rangers Football Club directly to discuss the fallout and consider next steps. added team online portal to investigate the George Strength Incidents. I envisage that arrests will follow in the days and weeks ahead. Rangers are working closely withmniej Scotland to identify any supporters who are involved in criminal activity. I urge rangers to take strong action against any fan who has found to have broken the law. Mae'r sglaenau oedd ymddangos yma yn ymddangos, a mae'n debydd o'r rhan o'r fan yn y gweithio ar y law. Ysbytyd yma i gydag yng nghymru i'r Cysylltiadau Cysylltiadau Cysylltiadau Cysylltiadau Yn gyfnod o'r Gweithio Llywodraeth i'r Rhaen i'r cynhyrch i'r rhaglen i'r cyfnod oedd yn bach yma. ysgolwyd hwn yn y cy modo yw yn lle'r arsigolwyr ar gweithio gan'r fan iawn, ond y syrgyng-in hefyd wedi'i arwydno i gael leidio i gael gilydd y gilydd hefyd ac y syrgyng-in hefyd i gael gwasanaeth yr IE. Rwy'n credu cyfaint o hyd yn cael ei anghydiadol ac, bydd y dyma o ddysgu yma, rydych chi'n braw o arli, iawn yn gwneud cyfaint nag a ddysgu unrhyw ag y gallai syrgyn i Llywodraeth a Llywodraeth. Ar ddysgu'r IE? I was thinking James Dorrney probably expresses the anger that many citizens of Glasgow, but I suspect even those right across the country feel. What I will say in relation to Rangers Football Club is in fairness to the club. They have engaged for a number of weeks with Police Scotland, with the Scottish Government, with Glasgow City Council and they have released a statement asking their fans, pleading with their fans, to respect the Covid guidelines. What I would say is that I would have liked that messaging to have been probably more explicit and stronger ond ond that messaging is coming forth. I think that James Dornan hits on an important point here, that as much as people may, and I think that legitimately of course I asked could government have done more, could police have done more, could the club have done more, let's not forget that the responsibility for those scenes that we saw, those dreadful scenes, lies on the shoulders of those individuals who took part in that disorder. There must be personal responsibility for those who don't need government to tell them, don't need police to tell them, don't need a clwp pwysig, a gweldwch eich gwaddig i resistiwn i gael i'r pan-demicus. Pwysig wedi gaud y ddychydigau o'ch cymdeithas, a chyesnodd ddych chi'n cwrdd ddiwedd i chi i gael i'ch ei ddefnyddio gyda'r yr pan-dìl drawdd d cases yng Ngll Black, ac mae allwn o'n gyfrifio amser i chi i gael ei hefyd. Os ydi, mae'n cycryd y pwysig i chi i chi i gael ei wcfyrdd, na wnaeth hynny eich ddych chi gael ei ddychydigau i chi i gael ei ddychydigau i chi i chi i chi gael i chi i chi i anty-Catholic ac anty-Irish bigotry. It is disgusting. It is disgraceful. I have zero tolerance for it. I don't doubt for a second that it will be part of the investigations that Police Scotland have committed to following up, and every single one of us has a responsibility to call it out and call it what it is. James Dornan. Okay, and I do thank Police Scotland, welcome Police Scotland, establishing a dedicated inquiry team to investigate the carnage at George Square. However, we also need to take steps from preventing these abhorrent scenes in the first place. As the Cabinet Secretary is well aware, I've been pushing strict liability for the years whereby clubs are held responsible for the actions of their fans, and whilst I do accept that personal responsibility is at the core of this, over the years I've been met with denial by football authorities in clubs and had death threats from Rangers fans. Can I ask the Cabinet Secretary if he'll speak with Rangers to ask them to reflect on what more they could have done as a club, what they can do in the future to dampen this climate of hate and intimidation? Will he consider legislating to introduce strict liability, or even better, work with the SFA and SPFL with a view of implementing it to ensure that scenes such as Saturday are never seen in the streets of Glasgow again from so-called football fans? I certainly am happy to take that conversation forward, or indeed, of course, after tomorrow's events, whoever is in post is the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, working alongside any minister that has responsibility for sport. It is important to engage with the clubs. It is important to try to bring the clubs forward with us in this journey as opposed to trying to impose measures on them. Ultimately, that is what we may have to do. If the clubs are unwilling to acknowledge, accept or confront the fact that there is a problem among some fans, we may have to work together, as a chamber or as a Parliament, to find a solution that is appropriate. I urge parliamentarians to work collaboratively together, many here, right across the chamber, are football fans of various clubs. We have a responsibility to work together to try to find a solution and a long-standing lasting solution to that. I am happy to, in my role, and I am sure that whoever is the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, I will be happy to work with James Dornan, because he has championed this issue. Strict liability is one of those options that should remain firmly on the table. I will take Pauline McNeill to be followed by Patrick Harvie. Given that Glasgow witness disorder and violence by some range of supporters in George Square only a few months previously, why did we not learn from this? In relation to the obscene anti-Catholic bigotry and anti-Irish racism, which I am pleased the First Minister and Justice Secretary rightly called out, does the First Minister acknowledge that the Catholic community is sick and tired of this? We need everyone to work together, including the football organisations, and they need to take a much tougher stance than they have done previously, with zero tolerances to bigotry wherever it is found, football and beyond. I absolutely agree with Pauline McNeill's articulation on the problem. On her first question, what have we learned in relation to the disorder that we saw in March, I would say to Pauline McNeill, which is extended to any other member, that having spoken to Police Scotland, they are willing to speak to any member of the Parliament to explain to them why the operational decisions were taken as they were taken. There is not an easy answer to that. I am not suggesting that Pauline McNeill is suggesting that, but if people think that we can just throw 10,000 people in the back of a police van or in custody suites overnight, that cannot be done. Therefore, ensuring that that disorder did not take place in the very heart of our communities was one of the very difficult decisions that Police Scotland had to try to take. Those operational questions are very legitimate for Pauline McNeill and other members to ask. Having spoken to Police Scotland, they have said to me that they are absolutely willing to do that. On the substance of her question about anti-Catholic hatred and anti-Irish hatred, I am disgusted by it. I think that she is absolutely correct to say that the Irish community and members of the Catholic community have faced this for far too long. Perhaps, collectively as the Parliament, we have not done enough to call it out and accept that from my own Government perspective. I woke up this morning to two rabid anti-Catholic messages that I have reported to Police Scotland. I am neither a Catholic nor an Irish, but that hatred was directed towards me. I am intending to call out, and I have reported it already to the police this morning. On that issue, I suspect that we will have support, we will have collaboration, and I am happy to work with any member right across the chamber on calling out hatred and bigotry of any kind. To reinforce James Dornan's point, given that so many thousands of fans are clearly unwilling or incapable of listening to encouragement and appeals for civilised behaviour, is it not abundantly clear that we are only going to see significant change when every fan of every club knows that any hint of vandalism, violence, anti-social behaviour or bigotry will bring not only criminal sanctions for themselves as an individual, but immediate and severe sanctions for the club that they follow, whether through the law or through the football authorities? Patrick Harvie makes a strong point, as did James Dornan. Strict liability should be on the table. Other suggestions that I have heard that should be on the table include potentially an independent regulator, as has been discussed for the English Games. Therefore, if football is unable to regulate itself, then perhaps somebody independent to look at that should be considered. The clubs could also take stronger action. I have referenced in my opening answer that Rangers Football Club has committed to work with Police Scotland. I hope that any supporter, fan or anybody involved in Rangers Football Club that has been found guilty of being involved in anti-catholic bigotry or vandalism or disorder will get a lifetime ban from the club. That is a punishment that probably fans would fear the most. I think that Patrick Harvie's points are well made and, as I said, this Government will work cross-party to come to some, I hope, solution, and hopefully we can bring the clubs with us on this journey. Liam Kerr, to be followed by Co-Cab Stewart. The scenes that we saw at the weekend were disgraceful. The attacks on our excellent police officers were particularly reprehensible. Crucially, coronavirus and the public health advice do not distinguish between reasons for gatherings, noting only that the risk of transmission is increased where they occur. Does the cabinet secretary agree with me that, to avoid public confusion, it is very important to ensure consistency of public health messaging by advising against all gatherings? That absolutely is important. I get the point that Liam Kerr is trying to make. I stood here on Friday to take an urgent question, and it was Alex Cole-Hamilton who asked me a supplementary question. I made it abundantly clear that any gatherings of any sort should not happen. We have said that from the podium of daily briefings. In this chamber, I have said, the First Minister has said that, if it was not for Covid regulations, we would have been, for example, at Kenmore Street, but we did not go, because any gathering of any sort is not something that we would encourage because of the public health emergency. However, I would say to Liam Kerr very genuinely that we did not see thuggish, loutish behaviour in Kenmore Street. We did not see disorder. We did not see protesters punching police officers. We did not see protesters uninating in public. We did not hear anti-catholic bigotry on Kenmore Street or, indeed, in some of the other gatherings. When it comes to the public health emergency, he is absolutely right. It does not distinguish. However, let us not think that there is an absolute equivalence between what we saw at the weekend—those scenes of disorder—and what we saw in Pollock Shields or, indeed, in some other gatherings over the weekend. I will continue to do what is important and necessary in the public health interest, and I hope that we can get the support of other parties in that endeavour. As the MSP for Glasgow Kelvin constituency that covers George Square, I have been contacted by numerous residents who live in the city centre and, along with myself, are appalled and disgusted by the behaviour of, frankly, a mob in the guise of football fans. Will the minister agree that my constituents in Glasgow Kelvin should not have to listen to such bigotry and racism and witness such disgusting violence and vandalism in their streets? What steps is the minister taking to prevent a repeat of those shameful events? First of all, I welcome Cokab Stewart to the chamber. I am delighted that she has been elected. I do not know whether that is her first intervention, but I suspect that it may well be. It is not a surprise to me that she has hit the ground running asking questions on behalf of our constituents within the first of her week of parliamentary business. To answer her question directly, I will ensure that Police Scotland speaks to her and debrief her as the local constituency MSP. I know that she has made that request. It is important that people can ask Police Scotland. I support the actions taken by Police Scotland over the weekend, but it is important that people ask those questions on behalf of their constituents about those operational matters. We will do our best to stop gatherings like that from taking place and disorder from taking place. Police Scotland will always do that in the best interests of public order and public safety. I go back to the point that I made to James Dornan at the beginning of this question exchange. People must accept personal responsibility. You do not need the Government, nor police, nor football clubs to tell you that assaulting police officers is wrong, or that running a mock and creating disorder or vandalism in our city centre is wrong, or that uniting in public is wrong, or that engaging in anti-catholic bigotry is wrong. You should know that they are growing men and women taking part in those scenes that we saw over the weekend. Co-cab strip has my absolute commitment that we will work closely with any stakeholder, clubs, city council, police to ensure that we can prevent these things in the future. However, we must be absolutely emphatic in saying that people hold personal responsibility here for their actions, and that is why Police Scotland will follow up in the coming weeks. We now move on to the second urgent question from Sandesh Gulhane, who is joining us remotely. To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on rising Covid-19 cases in Glasgow and parts of the greater Glasgow area. May I welcome Dr Gulhane to Parliament on the occasion of his first question to ministers? In her statement to Parliament on Friday 14 May, the First Minister outlined the latest status of the outbreaks in both Murray and Glasgow City, highlighting the public health response and plans to engage with local leaders, including around a package of support for the community and those affected. In the course of the last few days, there has been a significant expansion of the testing programme and capacity within the communities, most directly affected by the increase in cases. That has also been supported by an expansion of the vaccination programme. The First Minister committed to reviewing the situation again at the end of this week. That will include a review of any further areas where concerns emerge and the formulation of an appropriate response to any such developments. Mr Gulhane? As a GP and coming from Indian heritage, I am aware of the hesitancy of vaccine updates by members of ethnic minorities, and they are at greater risk of a bad outcome. I would like to ask what measures will the Scottish Government provide to ensure that we appeal to and convince those who are hesitant to take up the vaccine? I think that this is a very significant issue that has been raised by Dr Gulhane, and I give him the assurance that the approaches taken in relation to the deployment and delivery of the vaccination programme have been specifically designed to address the very issue that he raises by ensuring that communication and messages around the advantages of the vaccination programme are delivered within the communities that are affected, that we identify and encourage members of the community to exercise a role in communicating the advantages of taking forward the vaccination programme, and to ensure that all individuals who have been eligible and will be in the future are supported by particular messaging of encouragement to take up the vaccination. Obviously, there are challenges in trying to reach some of the affected communities, but I assure Dr Gulhane of the specific communication measures that have been taken to make sure that that is in fact the case, and we will sustain those during this very critical period ahead. Glasgow businesses thrive on people visiting the city from other parts of their country to shop to go to its restaurants and pubs and are hard hit by the current non-essential travel restrictions in force. At what assessment has the Scottish Government undertaken to ensure that the £750 that they are receiving is sufficient to support effective businesses through the continued restrictions? There is obviously a necessity for us in these circumstances to take action, which none of us would ordinarily want to take, which essentially restricts movement because of the need to address the public health challenge that is before us. The conditions that are being applied in the city of Glasgow we would prefer not to have to put in place, but we have to do so because of the public health imperative. The financial support that has been made available is regularly reviewed to determine its effectiveness and its appropriateness. It is consistent with the approaches that we have taken in other parts of the country and in other similar circumstances, and we hope that those restrictions will only have to last for as short a period as possible, but during that period we will continue to review and engage with the business community around the detail and the substance of the financial support that is available. There is a great deal of interest in those questions, as you would expect. I am going to take Paul O'Kane to be followed by Pam Gossel. Thank you, Presiding Officer, and on my first contribution in this chamber, I congratulate you on being elected to the chair. We are now in a race against time between new variants spreading and the number of people vaccinated. That is particularly true in places such as Eastround for Shire in my region and indeed in Midlothian, where numbers are rising. Many local people in businesses I have spoken to are extremely anxious given speculation that Eastround for Shire may move backwards to level 3 restrictions just a matter of days after moving to level 2, and past experience has shown us what is required to get outbreaks of the virus under control, and early evidence suggests that vaccines remain effective against the so-called endane variant. It is imperative that businesses are able to plan as far ahead as possible in the face of spikes such as the ones that we are seeing in Eastround for Shire, particularly given that many staff in businesses have been taken on in anticipation of restrictions easing and are not covered by UK furlough schemes. Does the Deputy First Minister agree that the Government needs to urgently prioritise an action plan for affected areas, which will ramp up vaccinations and testing and ensure proper measures for supporting local business to survive any changes and restrictions, putting place at short notice? First of all, I welcome Mr Cain to Parliament and wish him well in representing his constituents. He raises a number of very significant issues, and what I would assure him about is that we are carefully monitoring on a daily basis the progress of virus levels in every part of the country to ensure that we are able to signal where we may have to take action in due course. I am sure that Mr Cain will accept, as I am sure that Parliament will accept, that some of those circumstances can change quite dramatically over a relatively short space period of time. We are reviewing that information and where we need to take action we will do so. Having said that, I also accept the very clear view that I have heard from the business community that it wishes to avoid situations in which there is volatility in level settings. We all agree that that is an undesirable situation to be in. We were keen to move as a whole country down the levels last week. That had been our intention, but for understandable reasons in Murray and Glasgow, we were unable to make the change from level 3 to level 2, but we will be trying to minimise the degree of volatility in those judgments that are made at any stage. The last point that I would make is that there will be a need for on-going dialogue with the business community around the measures that are necessary to support recovery during these uncertain times. I give Mr Cain and Parliament the assurance that ministers will be engaged in that dialogue on an on-going basis to make sure that we support Covid recovery in every respect in our communities and that we try to manage our way through those challenging times. Obviously, the more there is public compliance with the measures that are in place, the quicker we can get those outbreaks under control and I would encourage such an approach to be taken in due course. I thank you, Presiding Officer, and I would also like to extend my congratulations to you. To ask the Scottish Government what actions the Government has taken to encourage people from the ethnic minority communities with lower vaccination uptake to make an appointment with their first dose as soon as possible, given the potential risks from the new Indian variant. First of all, I welcome Pam Gosselff to Parliament and wish her well in representing her constituents. I covered a number of those points in my response to Sandesh Gulhane and my earlier answers, but it is important that, as members of Parliament, we all have a role here where we can encourage members of different communities to take up the vaccination. It is clear from all of the available data that vaccination provides a substantial level of protection to any individual from the virus. On the early evidence so far—I stress that it is early evidence—that the existing vaccinations are providing a very robust protection against the so-called Indian variant. My message is reinforced by the Government's communication work and the public health work that is undertaken of the advantages of vaccination for every member of our community, as it offers a higher degree of protection in all circumstances. We have taken steps over the past few days to reinforce that message, particularly given the intensity of the outbreak in the south-side area of Glasgow. We will continue to do so in the coming weeks. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde is writing to all those in the G41 and G42 postcode sectors to ask them to get tested. We know that surge testing works best when you go door to door. Any medical intervention should always be voluntary, but uptake is greatly heightened when the opportunity for a test appears on your doorstep. What consideration is the Government giving to that measure? In addition to the written correspondence to which Mr Cole-Hamilton refers, there are a number of steps that have been taken to deploy various aspects of testing capacity right into the heart of those communities. Lateral flow devices for self-testing are available from the Glasgow central mosque and seven other sites at mosques and Islamic education centres in Glasgow. As of Friday, more than 3,000 boxes of seven-pack test kits had been distributed through those channels. Eleven local test sites in Glasgow have been adapted to operate as dual PCR and lateral flow device sites all day from Saturday—across the working hours, eight in the morning to eight at night. There have been mobile testing units deployed in a number of locations. We are also working with Glasgow City Council and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to deliver lateral flow devices to more than 30,000 households earlier this week, and we will have 40,000 packs in Glasgow in the course of this week. There are a number of steps that have been taken to directly distribute lateral flow tests directly to households, and we will continue to review all possible steps to make sure that we maximise uptake to minimise the spread of the virus by maximising testing capability within individual households. I apologise to those members who have been unable to take. I move on to question 3, and I call Monica Lennon. I refer to my register of interests as a member of Unite the Union and the GMB. To ask the Scottish Government further to green-sil capital entering administration what action it is taking to mitigate the risks to jobs, vital industries and public finances in Scotland. Cabinet Secretary Fiona Hyslop. I also welcome you to your role. In answer to Monica Lennon, on 24 March, the cabinet secretary for the rural economy and tourism, Fergus Ewing, gave a statement to Parliament outlining the potential impacts of green-sil capital UK limiters entering into administration on Scottish businesses. In particular, his statement focused on the potential impacts to the Lochaber aluminium smelter and the DL steelworks. The Scottish Government's priority is to support Scotland's steel and aluminium sectors and the highly skilled jobs that they provide. A ministerial task group and officials have been active throughout the election period, engaging with local management at Lochaber steel and Lochaber smelter, union representatives, the STUC, GFG and the UK Government. The cabinet secretary for rural economy and tourism met MSPs and MPs across the parties in April to provide an update on the GFG alliance situation and we will continue to update parties across the Parliament. Monica Lennon. I thank the cabinet secretary for her response. When the cabinet secretary for rural economy gave that update to Parliament, he gave the impression that the GFG alliance only needed to refinance. However, with the reported collapse of rescue deal talks, the situation is increasingly worrying for workers in local communities such as those at Clydebridge and at DL in my own parliamentary region. At least 340 jobs in Scotland are at risk, and Scottish Government deals that have promised more jobs in the future are now looking doubtful. We welcome the engagement that is on-going. Can I have a question, Ms Lennon? Can the cabinet secretary explain what are the contingency plans in place to protect those vital jobs and industries? If the GFG alliance fails to refinance, will the Government bring the Lochaber smelter under public ownership? As the member will be aware, and as would have been relayed to her at the time of refinancing, she understands that it is a sensitive commercial matter for the GFG alliance. We need to be careful not to prejudice or undermine that process. However, I think that the member was alluding to the fact that this is a potentially changing situation. Clearly, the ministerial task group, which has been involved in two ministers and two cabinet secretaries regularly threatened this period, has been ensuring that we have clarity and understanding of what, as you can understand, is a very complex situation. So, our current plans are not to take into public ownership any of the sites. However, as we did when we intervened to save the sites previously, we will look at all options as required when those situations present themselves. However, as of now, we are monitoring the situation. We are keeping vehicles contact as should be aware with the management and the workforce and the unions in both sites. It is important that, as they will have relayed to her and us, that we have confidence in those sites, that we recognise the skills in those sites and that we recognise the strategic assets that those sites present. I now call Clare Adamson to be followed by Maurice Golden. Thank you, Presiding Officer. I also welcome you to your new role. Cabinet Secretary, you talked about the skills of the workforce at DLN Clyde Bridge, and as someone who served on the steel task force last time, I recognise that it is their skill and dedication that has secured production over the last five years. Can I ask how we can now engage, given the collegiate nature of the last steel task force, how elected members can engage with the Government in support of their efforts, and how will you keep us informed of any developments in a timuous manner? The local constituency member is right to emphasise the need to work collaboratively and collegially across the chamber, and that is what we have been doing and we continue to do. It is also important that we recognise that we have had assurances that the group's aluminium and steel operations here in Scotland are performing well and benefiting from strong order books and rising prices. Together with the experience and skills that she refers to in the workforce, those are important foundations on which we can build as we chart a way forward when things become clearer. I think that the point about keeping members informed is really important, and that is why my colleague Fyreys Ewing has done that in recent weeks, and we are committed to doing so indeed at our last meeting only two days ago. We were discussing when that might be the appropriate point and recognising that although I welcome you back because you are in your constituency capacity, there are many new members from different parties, and it is important that we make sure that they are properly briefed as well and that we will take an early opportunity to do that. Maurice Golden, to be followed by Daniel Johnson. Simple question, exactly how much is the Scottish taxpayer potentially liable for? As the Parliament would expect, we have taken a series of securities over the assets of the GFG Alliance at Locaba. We have not published details, so you can understand some of the commercial confidential issues involved in that. However, the full details of the total exposure and the securities were shared with the Scottish Parliaments Finance and Constitution Committee in 2016, when they approved the guarantee. We recently updated the finance committee with GFG's business plans, and that correspondence is publicly available. Thank you, Presiding Officer, and I, too, welcome you to your position. I wrote to the Auditor General at the beginning of April asking him to look into those matters. He confirmed that, in the last consolidated audits, he expressed concern about the lack of a clear framework regarding the Scottish Government's interventions into private companies. Does the cabinet secretary share that concern? What actions has the Scottish Government taken to correct that, since those consolidated accounts were provided in December 2020? The member may be aware, but the permanent secretary has given evidence. I think that it may have been to the Audit Committee, but I am happy to correct that, if that is not the case, setting out how the Scottish Government would approach situations in the future. Indeed, the advice from that and from the Auditor General has been taken on board. Indeed, I have ensured that, in the operation of the ministerial task force to date, we have been carrying out the principles and practice as recommended in that and has been set out by the permanent secretary in her evidence. Thank you. That concludes urgent questions. It is now time to move on to the next item of business. The next item of business is consideration of business motion 00045, in the name of Graham Day, on behalf of Parliamentary Bureau, setting out a business programme for Thursday. Any member who wishes to speak against the motion should press their request to speak button now. I call on Graham Day to move the motion. Against the motion, the question is that motion 00045 be agreed, are we all agreed? For agreed, and that concludes business for today, and I conclude this meeting of Parliament.