 So I'm Rose Mulan for those of you who haven't met me before. There's quite a few young people in Melbourne, so I've really enjoyed the day. Thanks again to Leon and Tom. I'm sure Tom contributed lots to organising these, so I didn't really. And it's been lovely to see so many old friends and colleagues, many of whom I've spent time with before. And people have come to you far and wide, obviously, and that's a great tribute to Mike and a great delight for the day. I think we've had a very good combination of old talk, sorry, not old. Sorry if Mike's word and as well as some really cutting edge new things, including a soup and a lot of equations and some wonderful, wonderful, dung beetles and some stuff that I absolutely didn't understand. I was once made a physicist who enjoyed optics, but this is all completely beyond me. And then I became a psychologist, which is quite interesting. I think had Mike been carried with a brilliant job. I think he would have appreciated the new stuff and the old stuff. And I think he would have engaged with a lot of questions with everyone. So I'm probably going to get upset now, but I'm trying not to. One thing that's been commented on several times is that he was very minded in the science and basically curiosity driven and just looked at things in fresh eyes and had a lot of fun, fun thing where it's been used a lot. So I just going to read something that he wrote, which is in his autobiography, which I don't know what it was written for. I think it's probably was society, but it's at the end of his autobiography when he's talking about working with eyewitnesses and has become, you know, had quite a lot of interaction with theoretical psychologists who don't come out very well in this. So excuse that. I'm sorry for the bad first one. So he's talking about the eyewitnesses with the device. He says, so far we've used the system to study driving, playing ball games and sight reading music. Our ethological colleagues would like to take it to a disco to start studying many choices, but so far we have resisted this. The questions, interests revolve around the way we sample the world, given that our regional occupation is only about one degree across. Where do we need to look to get the information? We need to do things. Answers are emerging, but we get into trouble with some of our psychologist's points. But this is a curiosity driven essay. Where are the hypotheses? The trouble with hypothesis driven science is you never get to make a discovery. And that's the real buzz.