 I want to comment on the hysteria around Twitter not linking to the New York Post. Now, I don't know why Twitter didn't link to New York Post. Maybe because they're politically biased. Maybe because they thought it was a bad article and it wasn't sourced properly. Maybe because there was some privacy concerns. I don't know. Probably a bad mistake for Twitter. Probably bad PR. Probably not a good business decision for them. Probably shouldn't be doing stuff like that, trying to figure out whether my links to my posts in Twitter that link to articles are OK articles and not OK articles. I mean, they have to have some standards, but you think they have better standards than this. But it's their platform. They can do whatever the hell they want. They can ban me from Twitter tomorrow if they want. It's their platform. It's their right. If we don't acknowledge that, then we don't stand for property rights anymore. We suddenly don't stand for free speech because it is government that violates our free speech. You don't own a government that can sense it in the sense of use force to stop speech. And if the government starts regulating Twitter, that's exactly what they will be doing. They will be regulating speech, which is a violation of free speech. You don't like Twitter. You don't like their decision. Go to Paula. Paula Paula's booming. I hear, you know, Amy Peacock is like is is is has a senior position over there. So go and go and support Paula instead of Twitter. And yeah, absolutely, we should criticize them. We should criticize them on bad decisions. We should criticize them on not having a clear policy of what they will allow and what they won't allow, that their policy is too vague and too ambiguous. We can criticize them for having political bias. That's great. We should we should criticize. Do all of that. But to call it censorship, to call for government regulations as. You know, many of your favorite senator Ted Cruz did. That's just that's just absurd, wrong, anti-capitalist, anti free market, anti property rights, anti free speech. Anti free speech. And by the way, I find it interesting. So I'm on YouTube. We're on YouTube right now, YouTube right now. You can see mine and I I I don't monetize these long shows because I don't want them to have a bunch of commercials in them. So when you guys watch the tape show, I don't want you to have to go through the commercials, but I do monetize the short videos, right? All my short videos get monetized and it's interesting that some of my short so one of the accusations get YouTube is that they are politically biased and that they don't like the right. And as a consequence, they don't monetize kind of right wing videos, right? So they don't monetize certain people. And this is Prager's complaint against YouTube that some of his videos are not monetized. Now, some of my videos are not monetized, but I find it really interesting which ones are not monetized. Like in recent weeks, the only two videos that were not monetized. Were two videos I did on abortion. Now, I think you all know that I'm pro-abortion. Yes, I said pro-abortion and yet they didn't monetize those videos. You think that if they had a clear left wing agenda, if their agenda was just to silence the right and to go full throttle with the left, they would have monetized the two videos about abortion where they agree with me supposedly. Other videos that haven't been monetized. Some of them when I deal with race, but some that I've dealt with race, were monetized. Some of my anti-racist is racism videos. Some of my white, what was it, white fragility videos. Some of those were monetized, which shocked me, really surprised me. Other stuff isn't for no apparent reason that I can tell. By the way, generally when I talk about sex, they won't monetize it. So I don't know what the criteria is, but at least for me, and I'm not speaking for other people on YouTube, it doesn't seem to be based on a left or right wing overall thing. There's certain issues that they don't like. And yeah, they're right. I mean, I love it. YouTube actually, I put up videos. I put up videos, right? YouTube sends their minions out to find advertisers. So advertise on my video. They get a cut, I get a cut. I do no work other than click a button that I wanted monetized. Why wouldn't I say, hey, if you can find people to monetize it, great if you can't. Yeah, if you don't want to, that's OK too. Your platform, your choice. So really, really, I'm defending Twitter on the basis of property rights. I'm defending YouTube on the basis of property rights. And on the basis of free speech, by the way. They have a right as part of their free speech rights to have said whatever they want on their platform. If somebody comes into your house, let's say you're a big Trump supporter, if I come to your house and I start spouting anti-Trump stuff, you can tell me to leave. You can tell me, I don't want anti-Trump stuff in my house. And that's what's in your rights. You're not suppressing my speech. You're confirming your right to your speech. What we need today, what I call the new intellectual, would be any man or woman who is willing to think. Meaning, any man or woman who knows that man's life must be guided by reason, by the intellect, not by feelings, wishes, whims or mystic revelations. Any man or woman who values his life and who does not want to give in to today's cult of the stare, cynicism, and impotence, and does not intend to give up the world to the dark ages and to the role of the collectivist brought. All right, before we go on, reminder, please like the show. We've got 163 live listeners right now, 30 likes. That should be at least 100. I figure at least 100 of you actually like the show. Maybe they're like 60 of the Matthews out there who hate it, but at least the people who are liking it, you know, I want to see a thumbs up. There you go. Start liking it. I want to see that go to 100. All it takes is a click of a thing, whether you're looking at this. And you know the likes matter. It's not an issue of my ego. It's an issue of the algorithm. The more you like something, the more the algorithm likes it. So, you know, and if you don't like the show, give it a thumbs down. Let's see your actual views being reflected in the likes. But if you like it, don't just sit there, help get the show promoted. Of course, you should also share. And you can support the show at your own book show dot com slash support on Patreon or subscribe star or locals and show you support for the work, for the value, hopefully you're receiving from this. And of course, don't forget, if you're not a subscriber, even if you just come here to troll, or even if you're here like Matthew to defend Marx, then you should subscribe because that way you'll know when to show up. You'll know what shows are on, when they're on. You'll get notified, right? So, yes. Like, share, subscribe, support. Like, share, subscribe, support. There you go. Easy. Do one or all of those, please.