 Yn y Llyfrgell Bwysig, y Llyfrgell Bwysig wedi'u gwneud y Cysylltu'r UK yn 36 yma, yn cael ei ddweud y cymdeithasol o'r ysgolau cymdeithasol, y llwyfodol cymdeithasol a'r ysgolau cymdeithasol, yma'r ysgolau ar y Maes Trichol i Llyfrgell Bwysig, ym mhwy o'r eu ddau eu Llyfrgell Pwysig, ac ydw i'w unigodd ymlaen o'r ddweud. Mae'r ddweud ffwrdd yna o'r ddweud, oherwydd i ddweud hynny, oherwydd ydw i'w ddweud y pethau yn ddweud o'r ddweud o'r sgiliau eroskeptic yn parlymyd, ond rydyn ni'n ddweud, byddai'r edrych eroskeptic i'r UK, na'n ymgyrchu Gweinwch a'r Fawr Fawr Fawr yn ymgyrchu. Bydd y bwysig ddaf yn fwy hwn yn da weddings a'r Fawr Fawr Fawr yn ddorol, felly wrth gael rydym wedi'u gwelliannol. A yma'n ddill pan fydd yn tygynnu'r llam sy'n byw yn ddill yn ddill yn fawr fel ddill yn ddill, ac hwn yn ni'n teimlo yn ddill yn ddill yn ddill. Felly mae'r paralu maen nhw'n ymgyrchu â'r Fawr Fawr ar gyfer i ar ym 35 o'r 130 o'r 135 of the 130 or so measures. It depends whether the UK succeeds in persuading the Commission of the Council to let it opt back in to the 35 measures on its opt back in wish list because if it succeeds in opting back into all of these, these are the ones which actually make a difference. They include, for example, the European arrest warrant. They include the Europol decision. They include the Eurojust decision. Actually all the ones which practically impact upon cooperation between the UK and other member states, including of course the Republic of Ireland. So if things go as the government hopes they'll go, I think at the end of the day there will be no real practical difference in the way things work in criminal justice matters between the Republic and the United Kingdom. There are two problems, two bad problems with the European arrest warrant. Problem number one is its excessive use by certain countries in cases that are trivial or stale or both. It's quite an extreme measure to uproot somebody from the place where they live and send them off to another country for trial. And there have been complaints about the unfairness to those involved and also complaints about the waste of resources in the criminal justice systems of, in this case, the UK in having to find these people and send them back. And the UK government, it seeks to amend the UK's implementing legislation by clauses in a bill that present before Parliament to introduce a proportionality test which would give our courts the right to refuse to exercise a European arrest warrant, to execute a European arrest warrant if it was disproportionate. The other part of the problem is that the European arrest warrant sometimes causes people to be sent back for trial in other countries which are then very dilatory in actually dealing with a person concerned and sometimes hold them in pretrial custody for a long period when there's no particular reason to do so. The UK government has a further amendment to our implementing legislation up its sleeve which is to provide a bar to executing an arrest warrant where the state that is after the person hasn't yet decided to charge or try them. But what really lies behind this is the fact that the legal systems of some member states, happily not the Republic of Ireland, are very bad about making people stay in prison a long time before trial and very slow in bringing cases to trial. Since 2009 there has been a move at EU level to produce further legislation trying to raise the standards of the treatment of suspects and defendants in European criminal justice systems and ultimately if we keep the European arrest warrant it's to be hoped that this roadmap of measures is carried through and achieves a good result.