 Everybody welcome back. Um, thanks for watching. Uh, as the title implies, we're going to be talking tonight about, uh, Vivek Ramaswamy and what he said at the end of the Republican debate yesterday or yesterday. And, um, just generally, uh, he said a lot of things, but we're going to focus on January 6th and he said it's a setup, which is something, you know, I personally believe, you know, when I first saw it unravel, I didn't realize that, but, um, you know, based on the news reports, but over time, as I've seen stuff, I've come to that conclusion just like he has and a lot of other people have. So we're going to debate that. I think we have some opposition here who disagree. So that should be interesting. Um, I'm going to go ahead and bring in my team here and then worked through it. And I just talked to my wife recently and I was like, I don't think we're, our relationships going anywhere at this point. We've reached this plateau where it's just like, there's no upsets. It's all out. It's like you said, it's all out in the open. And it's like, you know what the other person's thinking and all that, that the, all the, the bullshit's been dealt with or whatever. Right. You can laugh, you can laugh at each other, you know, and like, you know, for example, I've been, I tested positive for COVID today, but I feel fine for the most part. Um, but like, I've been feeling a little under the weather and like a few days ago I said to my wife, I said, you know, it's been good being under the weather because you haven't been bitching at me to get everything done around here. You've been going easy on me. She said, yeah, you're right. You know, so like, then she laughed, you know, it's like, count your days. Exactly, bro. Exactly. Yes. Okay. We are live right now. I'm going to share a video here real quick. One second. You probably got two days and then you're going to have to do all the pruning and raking. So enjoy that, Steve. Yeah, exactly. Okay. This should be working. Sorry, everybody. I'm getting it right now. I think it's going to work out. Okay. Come on, man. Come on. Our fans are waiting. There we go. So now, now everybody can see, I'm going to make it the main, you guys can join. If you join my stream and discord, you can see the video so we can watch it all together. This is going to be what the debate is basically based on this and the interview he did afterwards, which I'd like to play just because he kind of outlined some of the things I want to talk about in this debate or discussion, whatever it's going to be. So yeah, I'll go ahead and play that. Everybody ready? Yes. No, I'm good to go. Can anybody hear it? No. Me neither. What is going on? Hold on. Speak. Yeah, it should be working. Why isn't it working? Okay, hold on one second. I have another option here. Rather than that, let's just do this. All right, this should work. Is all three of them have been licking Donald Trump's boots for years for money and endorsements. Ron DeSantis, you've been a great governor, but you would have never been one without actually begging Donald Trump for that endorsement. And you attacked him in your book a year ago. Same thing with Chris Christie as a lobbyist begging them for COVID money for his special interests in New Jersey, prepping him for the debates last time around. These people are now Monday morning quarterbacking some decision he made. I think the real enemy is not Donald Trump. It's not even Joe Biden. It is the deep state that at least Donald Trump attempted to take on. And if you want somebody who's going to speak truth to power, then vote for somebody who's going to speak the truth to you. Why am I the only person on the stage at least who can say that January 6th now does look like it was an inside job, that the government lied to us for 20 years about Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9-11, that the great replacement theory is not some grand right wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic Party's platform that the 2020 election was indeed stolen by Big Tech, that the 2016 election, the one that Trump won for sure, was also one that was stolen from him by the National Security Establishment that actually put out the Trump-Russia collusion hopes that they knew was false. There's a reason why I'm the only person on the stage who can say these things. That's what it's going to take now people who are looking his boots one time and now Monday morning quarterbacking and criticizing when it's convenient. Governor Christie. I said good day sir. I said good day sir. Yeah, so there was that. Okay, so then afterwards he did an interview with Dana Bash. Is she on News Nation? I thought she was seeing it maybe. Okay, anyway. I know it was seeing it. Okay, here we go. January 6th. Sure. There is no evidence that it is an inside job. It was a fringe conspiracy theory that the Trump appointed FBI Director Chris LeRae has said explicitly over and over is just not true. So let me appreciate the opportunity to address it. I was an anti-woke crusader leaving the business world and if you had asked me three years ago, is there some chance January 6th is an inside job, I would have said that was crazy talk. I would say looking at the facts of the video footage that have come out, Dana, it is shocking that you still haven't gotten a clear answer of how many federal agents were in the field that day. Look at now the video footage of actually throwing explosives and rubber bullets into what was a peaceful crowd then releasing to the public what came in response to that. But now look at the video footage that was released and I'm glad we're talking about it because viewers deserve to look at that footage. Capitol police literally letting people in who were then now prosecuted some of them have gone on to commit suicide because of what the government's doing. That is a case of entrapment and I think the government has not been transparent about this, which is why I then brought up another case where the government now 20 years later with declassified documents tells us that they lied to us at the time. 850 people. So I do think we have a government that's consistently lied to its people. But an inside job suggests that everybody who attacked the Capitol was part of something. I didn't say that but I was saying that there is a case of entrapment going on. There's entrapment going on and it looks like a case of entrapment and if you look at even over the last day. What do you mean by entrapment? Entrapment means that the police goaded people to do something. What do you mean really? What do you mean it's one thing? And then they arrest them for actually doing it. And you don't think it was actually the former president who was trying to get people? Well I think that was the media narrative. Now look at actually a hard case. We heard him with our own speakers. We're going to ask you about a case and see what you think about this right. You guys said this for a long time about the Gretchen Wittner kidnapping plot. Suddenly gone silent after it comes out of trial that absolutely that was a case of entrapment which is why two of those people were acquitted. So I'm saying this as somebody who on the other side of this as a biotech CEO, somebody who was even anti-woke. But if I was looking at this I would have said a lot of this is crazy talk. But if you actually get into the details I think it is startling how much the government has systematically lied. And I think it's both both parties over the course of the last 25 years. But on the January 6th which is the most which is the most aggressive offensive attack on the US Capitol and on democracy itself that we have seen in our lifetime and in many many lifetimes. What many many lifetimes? To say without evidence that it was an insideshop. I'm not saying it without evidence. I think that what we're seeing now is the video footage that's come out. I was in a different place before a lot of that evidence came out. But you have to respond to the evidence. What is your response or what is anybody else in CNN's response to the video footage that was released of Capitol Police literally just peacefully allowing people into the Capitol. What we know is that 850 people have been convicted of crimes. But the reality is many of them were convicted before that information was released. I do think that former President Trump had to do with this. Because you're bringing up a really good point in your audience and everybody deserves to know the truth about this. Normally there's a rule in constitutional law. It's called the Brady Rule. You have to turn over exculpatory evidence to the other side. In this case it wasn't turned over because the DOJ said Congress was sitting on it. It looks like somebody just walked over your grave. Yeah I mean I don't know about you but like did you see her long swallows there? She had these like really deep swallows a couple times. Like I'm just gonna repeat. Like I know R.W. he he watched this and he said something like basically they're just both saying narratives which is true to some extent. But like what Ramaswamy is saying here is not something that gets talked about at all in the mainstream. Right? I'm not used to hearing the fact or the challenge that it was an inside job spoken of on mainstream media. Right at all. I don't know. So what I'll say is I'm working on a video about this so I hate to late. But yeah like so much what she said was just crap. Like her response to what he's saying about you know we got one side of the story here which was purposely pushed by both the media and the Capitol Police you know of this very one-sided they make it look like the entire group was like super violent when it was really like a pretty small group of people. I went on the high end. I think it was like around 300 350 something like that that actually got charged with like violence. Although if you watch it's not even that many that are actually involved in any sort of like violence. It's very small amount anyway. Most of the people that got charged and convicted it's like trespassing and things like that which is crap anyway because we can go into at some point here but you know the left the Democrats rioted there for five years because they didn't they couldn't handle losing an election and most of those riots were incited by the media and Democrats and they were it was based on lies because the police shootings that they got all those riled up with that was like the pretext right it was really just a cost chaos during the Trump years and those were legitimate police shootings but the media made it look like it was like this racist these racist white cops who were emboldened by Trump were hunting down black men you know and um you know this whole January 6 thing is no different I mean and anyway I'm rambling but uh has it been stated before that there was rubber bullets and and um yeah crowd control stuff thrown into the crowd to incite the crowd or you know like to uh push him or what was it called do you guys want to see it I haven't seen that video yet I wouldn't mind okay yeah yeah the crowd is peaceful and they literally just start like pepper spraying people and like grenade him stun grenades when saying no fuck wasn't Vivek saying it in a way that they did that on purpose to push to somehow make them want to go into the White House and do stuff like I feel like that was the vibe he was pushing well he was saying that so he obviously he didn't have enough time to get into it all because I could like fill in all the holes where he's talking about me I've talked about a million times but basically that entire thing was allowed to happen so Trump told people to go march peacefully and you can say whatever you want about you got to fight for your democracy or for your country and all that Democrats talk like that all the time okay so that's you can't if you're going to hold him that standard that we got a real problem if he goes to prison for that uh and so he told people to march peacefully 120,000 people went there that day like the vast majority of them that's exactly what they did and then you had a small group 300 who who rioted and then you had the another like thousand people are close to it who like walked around went in and Vivek was talking about you know the police let them in it's true we have video of it and video that the media they love to say that like Tucker Carlson and these people cherry-picked video but like the truth is like they cherry-picked video that's the truth right and um you know that's all he's saying is that the government knew what they did but purposely put forward his false story I mean remember the whole you know multiple police were killed that to this day they're still saying that crap but it's a total lie you know and so yeah his whole thing is like one it was entrapment and two they're supposed to provide like all the evidence uh in these cases and they didn't this footage uh the um the uh uh shaman guy is didn't he get like a stay of sentence or something happened because of that footage coming out showing the police like escorting him around yes that's that well he didn't get out because of that he got out because of the Brady rule that you were talking about right exactly right yeah exactly yeah yeah they didn't provide everything here I'm gonna show uh this video the stung grenade thing so I'm gonna play that that'll get me to monetize but it's okay yeah I haven't seen that so here we go oh just had a camera and they sprayed him right and there there's other there's not just that I've seen some other video that's from further back where you can really see how like nothing I'll see if I can find that but you can see nothing was happening and then they just started blasting these people and like just I just remember back when um they were attacking the White House in June of 2020 they injured like 60 uh secret service agents all that uh the next day uh the National Guard used tear gas remember to clear the crowd and the media uh Democrats got together made up that whole lie about that he cleared it for that whole photo op and all that but it turned out after investigation that was not true uh but you remember the big deal they made about that and yet this happens and they actually helped to cover it up the one cop that shot the the uh grenade launcher or whatever you call those things is a heavier set cop he didn't seem too fussed about what he was doing he shot it off and he looked on his face was like look he's like judging his his uh how effective his efforts were right here check this one out listen to what this guy says this cop this Capitol officer duh yeah I mean Aaron I'm gonna find that in the face and he got angry at us I don't get it I don't understand what do we do punch more in the face okay it does speak to their they're not working to purposefully incite the crowd they noticed what they were doing and said we gotta stop doing this nice got a point there anyway there's a ton of footage of this of that kind of stuff um then there's the footage of him get what was the other footage we're gonna look at uh the footage of him being let in I've seen peaceful tours well I mean we've all seen that stuff but yeah I mean it seems to me it's pretty clear that so you have all that right and then you have reyeps of course okay and they want to dismiss that like it's nothing which is just weird right and uh like the uh the um and culture interview that I talked about the other day uh that's so weird like when she talked about the fact that reyeps uh was telling people to enter the Capitol the night before she rolled her eyes like that was no big deal that's so weird to me and like now we know he was actually telling people to storm the Capitol those words right isn't that odd that that's exactly the words that the the media and everybody used after that so like and he's on video doing it so like I and people have uh have said to me that's that's not what happened uh because there's no way this one guy just going out there and saying that was able to get all that you know and it's like no but that's the thing it was a small group of people that actually rioted you know it was a pretty small group so he didn't have to do that much really I know that looks like a bunch of people but it's not really it compared especially with the standard of mostly peaceful which I know it only that standard only works one way just like them all all the standards but I'm just saying does it ever um what do you think about the fact that we've been talking about this for so long now and we're almost at the next the next one the possibility of of the next January 6th event right I mean what's funny is that if Trump wins they've already set up like all the justification the left and Democrats will need to do whatever man like who knows what they'll do but it'll be treated like completely different which it's just like you feel powerless to do anything about that like all you can do is just try to open people's eyes up to what's like what they're doing and and just hope that you know they see through it the propaganda efforts that will follow but we know that you know good chunk of the country will go along with it I mean they're trying right now like all we hear about is how dangerous to democracy like Republicans are and like our mass media who are supposed to be this check on power are just you know propagating that message and now they're trying to imprison the main opponent ahead of the election and you know they're talking about getting the FBI tracking like Trump supporter Twitter posts social media posts and you know I have no you hear the about these people getting a ridiculous sentences for memes and it's always like right-leaning memes I don't know if any like left-leaning memers have been since it just doesn't look good I feel like we're clearly on this path you know and it's just crazy that like the people who are most like like Dana Bash here oh a day it was the greatest attack in our lifetime or many lifetimes on our democracy like just that whole like line just from these people I don't know who did that um I was I was thinking in my head you know if this were to happen again thinking oh man if they just had really good video footage from all their phones this happening and I'm like wait the last time on January 6 there was tons of video tons of video on the internet and they can still push a narrative that shows only cherry-picked video to push a line of narrative and it's like there is all of that out there if we just go and look for it I mean where you draw the line where something's conspiracy and bullshit and something's true I mean so be it but that's why they want to give it an X so bad enough information that shows still acting on the government's part easily well that not just that so then we have the capital off the capital police chief the guy you know in charge of it all the capital police and he thinks it was a setup because for him he's been interviewed on this you know goat but he said that you know he said that uh there was all these warning signs and they knew something was coming and literally like just purposely did nothing about it and I pointed out to people that you know during Trump's inauguration there were there was a mass democrat riot and these dudes were like dressed in like ISIS a full black like mass uniforms and shit like way more menacing right but they blocked off the capital so they couldn't get in there same thing when bush the bush people are writing same thing but they let them in for this and they purposely just did not and then you know that we know they instigated it and then let the people in and then called it the greatest attack since the civil war what do you think Hovex effort to push the narrative of it being an inside job based on the videos released by whatever his name was um do you think that will now make a change because there's a ton we're not the only one's talking about it confident in that do you think that it's going to actually make a difference one way or another or they're just going to bury it with more bullshit yeah let's just bury it I mean I hope there there's a change and we need some sort of major overton window shift I mean it seems like there is a bit I mean the vague Rama Swami just you know a national televised debate brought up replacement theory so that seems like a pretty big overton window shift so I got some pushback that I've been writing down here a little bit on the 911 or the 1 6th thing okay Freudian cool so first yeah that was Freudian yeah sorry what percentage of the crowd do you think we're federal agents or people working with the feds or helping trying to incite the riot let's say not the whole crowd let's say the approximate 2000 people that were involved in trespassing picketing on illegal grounds rioting destruction of property the whole shebang from top to bottom what percent were feds do you think I don't know we have no idea because nobody will say anything about it in the government but uh who knows it would be a complete shot in the dark uh the Capitol police chiefs thinks quite a bit uh let me find what he said uh can I ask a question to your question even though you're trying to make a point with the answer what percentage of a crowd would have to would it have to be to make a difference with the Gretchen Whitmer thing it was about 50 percent of the people involved in the kidnapping plan were federal officers so I'd say that's probably too many and for all those people to get off of that is probably justified based on the limited knowledge I have of that so I would say that's more than enough but if we're talking like three to five percent of the crowd where people trying to incite a riot I don't think that wipes away the actions of the people that actually were there supporting Trump rioting I don't think there's enough there they could have incited them they could have provoked them but those people's actions are on them it's like a child's uh predator stand when uh you have like a police officer role playing as a child you're not technically entrapping somebody that's going and trying to do something they were going to do anyway by pretending to be their next victim so if these people were like just coaxing them on when they were going to do it anyway that wouldn't technically be entrapment it would more just be you know like a successful sting operation well I would okay well I would say that I would say that the fact that withheld footage purposely and only released footage that conformed to their propagandized version of events shows some uh intent to deceive and that that intent to do that I think would probably point to that they knew they were not doing that they were doing wrong that's that's kind of the job that's kind of a failure of Speaker McCarthy in a way so when that January 6 commission got put out Speaker McCarthy demanded a certain certain people to be on it and one of them was Jim Jordan the commission itself said they would not allow anyone on it that I don't remember what it was either worked with Trump on jim that was involved in the interaction yeah in any way shape or form so Jim Jordan was one of the people they were saying no to and instead of just you know putting someone else there republican said fine we're not going to put anybody on they let democrats run that hearing from the top to bottom and really that's like if you had republicans in there using their narrative the exact same way you wouldn't have noticed a difference between that january 6 hearing and any other but since it was all there were republicans on that committee yeah but they were just not the republicans they liked yeah they weren't on the republican side though like if they had actual people on trump's side on the committee actively lied and deceived the american public I've been silent this whole time I've been silent this whole time let me get my two cents man I didn't even know you were there okay so but first of all uh to my point uh there were republicans on that committee uh did just because they're republicans that uh that maga don't like doesn't matter the left doesn't like them either they weren't on shut up shut the fuck up let me get my two cents when you say when you say that uh that those republicans were not on republican side that doesn't that doesn't mean anything to me because they weren't on a side they were on the side of trying to get the truth and that's very rare that's very rare for a fucking republican no they actively spread lies second of all second of all uh my next point is that I totally agree with you that january 6 was an inside job because uh trump was the president january 6 the riot portion was uh was a um it was supposed to have been a reason for him to be able to call in the military to be able to take over the uh the count uh once they had ushered uh the vice president into a motorcade where he was never going to be seen again uh and then they would be able to to blame that on democrats and and you know pull out the insurrection act called this sounds like a conspiracy theory uh dude you're you're throwing up conspiracy theory that it was an inside job this is this is my this is my conspiracy about why it's an inside job can you address because donald trump was the job donald trump was the president can you address anything that we brought up can you can you address everything i'm addressing everything you've addressed nothing uh so uh i'm addressing everything so like i said donald trump was the sitting president at the time who said it wasn't an inside job because donald trump designed the whole thing to go to go along with the fake election scheme uh which was concocted by steve bannon and peter navarro which is all laid out in peter navarro's book on how they broke the law and how exactly they planned to steal the election um and and the riot portion was part of that the riot portion was part of that and even that uh it really screwed them over that pence didn't get into the motorcade that was supposed to kill him uh when you know when he did because that was supposed to be their whole reason for calling in the military and setting the whole thing out uh so yeah there's there's your inside job for january 6th and then donald trump donald tronk uh took over the limo he punched out the driver took over the limo remember that that that was part of the j6 committee remember that has to do with the interactive things the the alternate elector theory was not thought up by peter navarro and steve bannon steve bannon wasn't even in contact with donald trump at the time they had a falling out publicly the elected the alternate elector theory was using an election in the 1960 it was also tried in arizona in 1994 long before donald okay wait a minute wait a minute so he said they found a falling out publicly but what about but but what about their shit privately because trump did because trump did go to go on to uh uh like give steve bannon a pardon which i'm sure steve bannon paid for because we all know that people were paying for their pardons when donald trump was leaving office it doesn't negate what i said like the point is they had a falling out they weren't working together yeah you said you said publicly you said publicly but he's still but he's still pardoned that motherfucker so politically it doesn't really matter what they were pretending to do privately he was still inside the inner circle he was still inside the inner circle long ago you just filibustered for 10 minute could you let me talk a whole sentence before cutting me off you said something factually inaccurate the alternate elector theory has been around for about 60 to 70 years when it was tried by the supreme court in arizona the supreme court of the united states voted five four against it because it was a democrat supreme court it was very reasonable for the trump administration to think with a six three court in their favor that they could have won a legal argument with the alternate elector theory it's not okay and my rebuttal my rebuttal you keep you you keep doing republicans a favor by calling it the alternate elector theory it wasn't an alternate elector theory it was a fake elector theory okay they said themselves they were fake electors okay it had nothing to do with alternate electors alternate electors is legal but they're not connected no no they're it's not actually not not when they go against uh what the the state's votes if the elector goes against what the state voted for that's not legal yes that's called that's called an unfaithful elector it's it's completely it's a completely no it's not because the people who cooked up the scheme in hollywood no there's an i have well i don't know for a fact because i'm not like a legal scholar but there is an interview with michael more on msnbc who is one of the guys him and some lawyers cooked up uh the scheme uh the and 2016 when they were trying to get the electors to change their votes and part of it was that they would pay their legal fees afterwards okay the drone's hat listen to what you said in 2016 they were trying to get electors to change their votes in 2020 Trump secretly had fake people who were not electors sign off that they were electors in uh in like the fucking basements of fucking uh courthouses so that they would be able to fucking go and say oh yeah i'm an elector that is a fake elector scheme that is illegal that is not an also uh that is not also a elector and that is not a uh unfaithful elector those people were not electors this is the legal theory that they use it was challenged in the supreme court arizona 2015 that was the legal theory that they use it's older than peter navarro and donald trump's presidency i don't know what else to tell you here when i'm looking on the law of this too here i'll put it in the chat okay but the problem was that they called them fake electors that's the reason why none of this shit works because it's been spun differently by the state media when did they call them fake electors was it in a private phone call one time and you're smearing them how are they smearing them if it was in a private phone call even one time phone call but they didn't say that publicly that wasn't their official statement then no actually as peter navarro's book about the fake electors he calls them fake electors okay so here we go a majority of states when he went on fucking tv to say it all the fake electors he said fake electors real quick uh he said it was not illegal to do that to do faithless electors because he's trying to he's trying to rationalize it in his head is different when his side does it as usual and i'm just here to tell you that in a majority of states a majority of states have laws on the books that require electors to pledge to cast their votes for the party's nominee for president and vice president or wait that's not that's something different isn't it oh wait no no no that's right that's right that says nominees but uh i guess it just means you know voting for the guy who's running i see nothing here quoting peter navarro saying fake electors from his book or anything i'm googling it yeah he's just repeating he's just repeating the he said he said he can quote him though oh no i'm i saw peter navarro on the fucking news bragging about his book in which it says that they were fucking talking about them as fake electors they also uh they also had the uh they had brought up during the uh hearing i believe the jan sick the january sixth hearing that uh that they had been talking calling them fake electors the jay nowhere you are you aware of all the lies which i know doesn't believe anything that's right in the january sixth hearing i didn't say anything but i'm suspect i mean yeah there's no cross examination hearings about uh hillary clinton which was which was completely told uh like upfront that we're doing these hearings on daily clinton so that we can uh heard her chances of becoming president i'm still looking what do you think going on right now dang what do you think's going on right now that's real though right it's real when it's happening what do you mean what do you mean what i think is going on right now you mean that you mean where don't trump was uh was like found guilty by a uh a judge that he did incite the january sixth riot that's bullshit i don't care that's unconstitutional and it's a lie but even though he uh he was found guilty and and uh uh and participating in a an insurrection they still said that he was allowed to be on the ballot so where exactly is the uh two tiered justice system there would you just say there was no insurrection for one uh so that's just purely political narrative and two he didn't incite anything uh 120,000 people march peacefully why didn't they riot dude if he incited them i just showed it was stunger it was stunger days to stand by and stand uh uh that was days before that was like way before uh that was like weeks before yeah that was days before man right what did the proud boys do they didn't do shit yeah they did like they were one of the one of the organizations that were hiding weapons outside the county hiding weapons this is another uh yeah no i'm sorry that first of all that was never proven there was never any weapons stashes found or i'm sorry i'm sorry i'm sorry second second the police radio chatter that was that was it brought into the hearing where police was saying yeah they have weapons what do we do with them right people are legally allowed to have weapons first of all right now they're watching in dc they're not right that's why they weren't in washington dc correct they were stat they they kept them somewhere else no the police chatter was in washington dc yes it was the capital police and these people have weapons no i what do we do with them no i if i remember correctly and i'll look it up but i'm pretty sure they were out of dc and that's why supposedly so first of all yeah so first of they have no proof whatsoever there was two people who were loosely associated with the group who said that they were collecting guns to uh from people so before they went into dc literally loosely associated with the group they had two guys no listen you didn't listen what i just said you didn't listen what i just said two guys loosely who didn't really know them very well this is the testimony what you're talking about hinged on okay they just got caught listen to what i'm telling you do you know what they said do you even know what they said they said that the guy that those guys were collecting weapons from members that were going to dc there so they wouldn't take them into dc yep so anyway so no weapons came to dc it was flagpoles and shit with which a couple people had their sidearms that they legally had which like you said they weren't supposed to have them there but it's not they weren't used the only person who shot was an armed trump supporter yeah still doesn't negate the police chatter where they were saying these people have weapons what do we do and the reports what does that mean i don't know what that means what weapons the reports around trump was saying that trump was saying well they're not here to hurt me let them through with the weapons i don't even know what that means i don't know the context you love like just spouting like lines that you've heard a lot he does have some truth to that one there were i want to say a couple over a hundred people arrested with weapons some of them being deadly weapons like a fork with three prongs instead of four i'll let you come to the yeah i don't deadly weapons like when people every time i hear people list off it's like flagpoles and knives and stuff like pite bombs who had pite bombs yeah they found pite they found pite bombs right they did find pite bombs didn't they yeah do you know anything about that you find anything about a weird part no i don't find it i'll find anything weird that they found pite bombs around a right wing fucking process no i don't where they were where they were trying to overthrow the capital no i don't find that bro i can show you videos of sustained riots in portland where they were throwing bombs at federal buildings wait just real quick did the pipe bombs have caps on both end or was it hollow pipe i don't fucking know do not they don't know anything about it because they don't talk about it because i don't know you need to ask more questions dank especially about this i blame i blame lows so dank doesn't okay so um did you've never addressed any of the points that like vivek brought up or me i was gonna get to that i have some questions yeah okay so go for it tell you all right so we were talking about what percentage of the crowd were fed because i was going to push back against the entrapment claim if there were feds that i could even grant you 10 percent of the crowd i still think that what they did even if they did provoke to a degree even if they did yell go into the capital the actions of the people that did the storming are their own the onus is on that it looks like about four to five hundred people have been arrested for destruction of property or things like that out of 2000 most of which were just trespassing and picketing on grounds that they didn't have permission for so all those people i just want to take them out of the equation and focus on the 400 or so that did bad thing even again if a hundred of them were fed 300 people still went in and riot broke several laws a lot of them did some pretty bad shit some of them stole things there was poop smeared at one point all those people even if they were provoked are guilty all right but we were told for five years that property crime is no big deal by these same people now say it's worse than the civil war you're you're grumpy you're glooping a lot of democrats together i am more interested probably than you are getting progressive socialists i don't believe in property rights out of the party they're ruining the left wing for me and seeing people well and also the mostly mostly peaceful standard i don't know i i just once again it's you know there there's a whole glomming of things there's the kind of um exaggeration of what happened i'm not downplaying when i saw it happen live i'm like great they're gonna use this for years against us so you know when i was watching it uh but you know and then years later i see what the actual footage i find out about reyeps i find out about the capital police officer and it just looks like yeah i agree with you the people the 400 or whatever it was that got they deserve whatever happens to them but like the book being thrown at everybody who was like in the vicinity being hunted down by the FBI it being used as propaganda against their the one party's opposition for forever you know and and that's wrong now that's right or blaming trump i don't think trump is to blame that's completely right dude if you if you try to if you try to overthrow the government yeah that's gonna be nobody was overthrowing any government the rest of your fucking life all right all right so did joe bine when joe bine said that we don't need our air 15s because we could never fight the government with their air 15s because they have nukes and f16s but you're trying to tell me right now that 300 people with flagpoles were gonna somehow take over the government how does that work that was their fucking plan dude that right that was their plan maybe they had a plan to take over the whole universe like what so who had that plan who's plan was that a lot of them stupidly thought that the capital police were gonna turn around let them in the building and go they did let them in the building they did let them in the building after they were told to stand the fuck down because they were being beaten with flagpoles oh flagpoles they went i don't i don't understand what like for years police were getting beaten with all kinds of stuff bombs thrown at them like years we we went through that and we were told they'll start shooting that fucking mega people but they immediately start shooting left-wing protesters no left-wing protesters got shot trump supporter did though well it is police tactic when you're chasing somebody let's say through a busy neighborhood and a car chase is going too fast the uh they'll pull you off for that chase for public safety reasons for the life of the police reason they will tell you to stop pursuing and go find the person later we have their address their license plate etc so it is kind of police tactic for the police are going to endanger themselves by doing their job they will step back until uh some sort of backup gets there that backup didn't come for like an hour well there was no need for it like people weren't violent after that yeah i'm just saying like that's a lot of the reason why there was no need for it if people were just beating them they walked around and then left they literally walked around and left in a sense could you say maybe the police not resisting them anymore could have maybe cut down on the violence the police are look that video i showed you heavily implies that the police probably are the ones that got started in those two videos one where it was peaceful videos that you showed us those videos that you showed us was fucking bullshit there's no timeline there's no there's like no fucking you can see there's no violence i'll get more oh yeah so the cop the police officer saying that they were pissing off the crowd it's like a GoPro camera on like one person the uh no it was like a dozen videos but um it was like a dozen videos put into one but the officer said he's like we're pissing off he's like most of them are peaceful but we're pissing him off by hitting him with stung grenades but yeah we watched we watched police like the uh being uh like a seven or eight foot tall uh old guy was fucking uh police but uh but times during a a goddamn thing to them what i don't know i didn't catch that you cut out sorry man i can i just say though that like the the leftists doing this are hurting the democratic party way more than you think and a lot of like you can see it in fast time if you look at the support for black lives matter versus the opposition at one point like 73 percent of the united states was in support of black lives matter and now it's like 43 percent it dropped even a good chunk of democrats are against them because of the actions right and that's fine but look there's no accountability and like you have people like uh dank here who no doubt supported them i don't know maybe you didn't did you but there's no accountability the people no look the people who did that for years are now like you're an insurrection you hate police and all this shit it's like i can't i can't take that like i'm not going to like these people in one year injured 60 000 police with their riots based on bullshit it was a lot and it was a lot more damn i mean i support the message they do have some points to it i agree with the message too the police like i am on board with like the police have become a problem i'm on board with that 100 percent you'll never like that's what's funny is like dank i don't know if you realize that but that's definitely my position like i'm so tired of seeing police who don't know that so it's a bunch of dumbasses who don't know the laws don't know the constitution don't know case law uh current case law or pass or any and then they go out and they go out there and they do dumb shit and then they have uh you know multiple tiers above them of idiots who also don't know anything it's it's a problem for sure there needs to be way more training police need to be like almost lawyers i think they do actually skirt the law that they know better my buddy got busted driving five pound out of florida into georgia and they took his phone and they were trying to wave it in front of his face so he could open it with his face and he kept like sticking his tongue out and shit so they couldn't do it they'll purposely bend the law to their favor and as long as i think he's watching this come back oh yeah dude i watched this video today i i i love like audit videos and those things but uh i was watching a video today about maybe we can get back on topic maybe we'll change topic but it was take other guests don't take take other guests i'll oh wait do we have people here trying to get in one second let me see no he's no he's saying that he doesn't like brandon so he wants you to take oh whatever whatever i think it's just me and brandon here brandon's brandon's part of the family so i saw this yeah i saw this video that was like 10 years old it's been a while but it was multiple news reports and then um some uh independent auditors going around to police stations just going inside and asking for complaint forms and then recording what happened and it's wild like cops threatening people like that to make them like if they're trying to make complaint and then demanding their id and then when they uh say they're not going to give it they're like oh well maybe we'll arrest you for denying identification and they try to make something of it and uh fox news and abc and a few others this from like 2010 or something sent their own people in same thing happened in that wild now i think you're not going to see as much of that these days because of all the uh activism in that direction but it's still i mean these auditors still every day there's new videos of auditors getting like with these police who have no idea what the law is i real quick i want to say well i watched a deposition about a guy um who he was just he had a sign that said fuck the police or something on the road and somebody called and complained so the police came and literally came up just like knocked his sign out of his hand and then uh demand his id when he denied it they were like you're under arrest and he fell to the ground when they said that and they said that he attacked the officer by doing that and so like eventually the charge got dropped but he sued the police and the police arresting officers and the expert police expert all had to testify none of them had any clue about anything like having to do with the constitution first amendment case law like the the police expert was saying how like oh yeah case law should be whatever case law is is the law and yet couldn't explain like reese's suspicion of this guy what he did that broke the law or any of these things like it it's just wild to me that these experts don't even know these things well going back to the you're fine you're good because i watch all that should i just want to go back to where brandon cut me off there we were talking about January 6th here um the democrats really controlled that they let only two republicans on kissinger and uh cheney because they agree with the mess republicans did have the chance to put their people and i watch a lot of hearings especially the uh i'm really caught up on the hunter biden stuff right now um democrats are on the back foot because they're not calling the hearing but they at least have a chance to get almost half the people in and deliver their message republicans really drop the ball by just storming out of there taking their ball and going home because yeah i mean so i would really blame mccarthy for the january six hearings being as big of a shit show for republicans as they were um they had a chance yeah it's right fine that and and you're right about that i don't deny that at all but like the media has not played their part as an objective arbiter and they've taken aside and that's a problem like for democracy here whatever you want to call it because what you're going to see happen is what's happening it's like it's just like one side can't get a fair shake at all what i was told is that's the reason why fox news exists in the first place is because in the 70s or it was really leaning hard democrat and so people wanted an alternative source of news and that's where fox was in sept i think we have enough fragmented news right now that if you want to get a well balanced media diet you can watch three or four shows and kind of get all the perspectives pretty easily hey uh tyler you made a statement paraphrasing earlier um that you believe the january six narrative from the left is is harming them do you have is that correct not particularly that well sort of yet because when they do things like that they turn people's hypersensitivity on to these things so when mayor eric adams there was a big fuck up in the new york new york primary and mayor eric adams challenged people were calling him donald trump they were saying don't question elections etc etc going after turns out he was right and he actually won that primary and because he complained they went back and recounted and figured out there was a big error in counting the vote so yeah it turns on their hypersensitivity when they notice if they notice their own side doing and they're going to turn on their own side as well because they've been woken up to that specific thing is there so you you pull a lot of polling statistics is there any polling you can pull that shows a shift since january six away from the left party that would be able to relate it towards that coverage of it and it really works to make trump look bad what i can say is where you see the shift is like republicans that trump did not endorse had about a five point bump in voter versus republicans trump did endure in georgia it was like eight hirsha walker lost or tied and then lost his vote were camp crushed abram by like eight point so the fact that a trump endorsey versus a someone that trump doesn't like and openly talks about that he doesn't like had such a huge split in republican turnout kind of shows me that it kind of worked to turn off some republicans to trump so until he's no longer the leader of the party i think that sacks gonna work as soon as they shift if it's nicky hailey for whatever reason that gets the nomination all that trump stuff goes completely out the window i mean i believe you i i feel like the importance of information can can turn off in a day and my last relation to that experience was when we were dealing with the ukraine warke constantly in the news and hamos happens he's no longer like they just switched out work as soon as they shift if a mix nicky hailey for whatever reason against the nomination all that trump stuff goes completely out the window hey that's me oh welcome welcome to the party akili exactly uh i like uh hey that's new we also have to set up in your phone so that it's pushed to talk because all we're all were you know, it comes down to a simple point. Are you going to be one who sits back? One. Hey, you gotta you gotta turn on push. Enough is enough. You don't stop. And this is only going to get worse for you. You know, the main problem is is we have become very docile in our. All right, I muted him. Sorry, I had to. I can't I can't hear anything. Yeah, I'll message him and get response and then we'll try again. So there's four other things Vivek brought up. We just haven't gotten to yet, but it was the government lied about Saudi Arabia doing not a lot. 2020 was stolen by big tech. You're not going to hear much complaints about that one for me. I believe that. Yeah. Russia was rushing collusion, stole two years of Trump's presidency, kind of agree there as well. The real enemy is the deep state and Trump attempted attempted to take him. So that one, the Trump in the deep state and the government lied about Saudi Arabia. I'll take those two. I'm going to get to him, but yeah, let's talk about what do you think, Dank? Do you think, do you think that the 2016 election, do you think that there was an attempt to overturn the results or was there, do you think there was an operation launched against Trump or as a disgraced FBI agent, Peter Shrock said, an insurance policy. Oh, and surprise years years before Trump even ran for president. There was a guy that was writing a book or a story or something on him. He was hanging out with Trump's sons and both of them told them they get all their money from Russia. So I mean, I really don't give a damn about anything else with the Russia collusion bullshit. He was paid off by Russia to launder money for years from Russian oligarchs. That much has been proven and Robert Reich even said, and when he was the Treasury Secretary under Reagan, that if it wasn't for Russia, Trump would have been like, he would have been like sued for fraud or something like that. Well, Robert Reich is a, Robert Reich's a total hack, first of all, but it was proven, you say, that he laundered money for Russian oligarchs. Was that in the, was that in the report? Yeah, there's enough evidence, there's enough evidence there that he's been, he said there was no evidence. The Mueller report. There was no evidence. No, this is, he was talking about, yeah, I don't really care about the Mueller report, dude. Yeah, he's talking about prior to Trump being coming in president. Okay. Well, if it's proven, then where is the charges? I'm not saying it's not true. Maybe it is. I don't know. Like I said, Robert, Robert Reich said that if it wasn't for Russia, saving his ass, he wouldn't have been brought up on fraud charges for his taxes. Okay. Well, Robert Reich is a raving moron and he's an idiot and. Yeah, well, I mean, anybody that disagrees with you, you would say. No, that's not true. That's true. You disagree with me and I don't think you're a raving moron. I've seen Robert right. Be right on a lot of things. He's wrong about a lot of things. And he contradicts himself all the time, which constantly pointed out. He's just a hack, dude. Like Robert Reich, an old one at that. From the 80s, there's allegations that Trump worked with Russian gangsters and sold them tens of million dollars worth of condos and shit. It was decades before he ran for president. But this, everything he's saying about that is. Are you saying he likes Russia more than America and he would screw America over for Russia? No, it's been pretty proven that Hillary Clinton's campaign cooked up the Trump Russia thing. Right. Now they did. Do you know about that, Dank, about the fact that. Yeah, well, I know that. I know that Trump's Republican, like enemies or his Republican, the people he was running against in the Republican primary in 2016, they were the ones that started. That's not true. That's not true. That's not true. That's not true at all. Nope. Hey, there was one donor. That's so. So hold on real quick. It was thought it was cooked up, paid for by the killer campaign. The FBI knew this. The FBI knew that they were planning to drop this after Trump won. And the FBI went along with it, knowing it was bullshit. And you think that's cool? Yeah. Hillary Clinton's Hillary Clinton's campaign picked it up after the Republicans like dropped it because they all bowed down at Trump's feet. But yeah, it was started off by Republican Alpha research. Yeah. It's not. Prove it. Show me. John Tech, real quick. Do you keep your VODs on your YouTube? My videos? What? Yeah. Do you keep like the long form, the non-edited, the VODs? Do you keep those when you delete them? You're saying like just my raw footage? How about this stuff? Yeah. What you're doing right now? Is there a way I can get access to everything that happened in this conversation? Because I really, really want to break down your all. Sure. Yeah. It'll be. It'll just be posted. It'll just be posted on your YouTube or? Yeah. YouTube. Okay. Cool. I'm not even on YouTube. Because like I just got home and shower and ate and everything. And I was listening to the first part of this while I was in the shower and holy crap. The things that was said, I really want to debate like any of you guys on. Let's do it. So yeah, I'm going to go through it. I'm going to go through the VOD. How about J6 being the setup? Yeah. Oh, so are you going to address any of the points made? Can you address any of the points that have been made about why we think it's a setup? Yes, of course I can. Like when you play that video. Because Dave does it. He's just like, Donald Trump's a Russian oligarch. When you played that video of that guy, that Capitol Police talking about how when they hit one, 10 more get angry and try to make it out like that was them like admitting their plan. That was no, no, no. I didn't say that. I didn't say it was a plan. I don't remember. I don't know who but somebody. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. You misunderstood. You misunderstood. All I said was that the officer acknowledged that they were pissing people off by firing those and there was no real, there was no reason to. But hold on. He didn't say there was no reason to. Yeah, he did. He said that there was because the wind was blowing towards them one and two that they were pissing people off with it. And so there was no point. It wasn't driving the crowd back. So like the effect of them firing is different than there's no reason to fire into the crowd. Well, like the crowd was giving them a reason. The crowd by being there, but by just being there. They weren't fighting yet. They weren't writing these videos that you are posting of them shooting into the crowd after the break. At least from what I've seen. They're all behind the fence. They were actually finally trying to disperse the crowd. No, our government. From the people. Like we're in the middle of talking. Why did you start talking? We'll give you a chance in a second. If you see in that video, that one particular video, they're all behind. They could easily go through those barricades. If they wanted, they didn't and they were still getting fired on. Yeah, this was after the break in though. This was after like chaos broke it loose. It's just weird to me because so if I can find a video of you have to prove that. I don't know. That's true. You have to prove it and it still doesn't make sense to me why they would fire on these peaceful people because they were trying to disperse the crowds all together. It became a thing where you just can't be there because of all the shit that went down. It's kind of like when there's plenty of videos of BLM protesters. Where there was right. Right. And it was always a big controversy that they had this stuff fired at them. Remember in June of 2020 that it was a big deal that National Guard used tear gas against them. It was never a big deal, right? No, I'm saying that. No, I didn't think it was. You're right. I didn't. It was never a big deal. I didn't. But guess what? Everyone else did. The media did. Democrats said they made a big deal. So are you going to stay consistent or are you going to be as bad as you always are railing against? I'm trying to stay consistent with the standards that are enforced. If I'm consistent, what does that matter? If I'm consistent, it means nothing. I'm debating you. I'm not debating MSNBC or CNN. Okay. Well, I'm debating that. No, look, you're trying to hold me to the standards they enforce and I'm not, I'm not going to do that. Sorry. I'm trying to hold you to a higher standard than the media that you hate. I don't give a shit. Like I'm not. I don't care about. I do have high standards, but in this case, I'm going to sound like it. No. In this case, I'm going to say they set the standard. That's the standard we should abide by, but we never do. And I just, I'm so sick of that shit. All right. Well, if you want to be as bad as the people you hate, then go ahead. That's fine. I'm actually going to go to bed now, but yeah, I do look forward to this. Actually, the actual thing to go to bed. Yes. I was up all night last night debating before and I had to get up early for work and I haven't been able to sleep. All right. Damn it. He makes a good point, though, of that video, that first video that I decided with did come after the crowd dispersion order was given and people still weren't leaving. Well, we have to see that. I'm not seeing that. I guess it would change it a little bit, but I'm still. All right, let's give Achilles his chance to have his window. I'm going to pull his mic back on and then give him his bit. Here to listen to you guys, man. I just kind of joined to watch you guys on Discord. You can go now. Yeah, man. Just go ahead and say your better. Hey, how's it going guys? Good. Man, this stuff with the government is really crazy. I'm just lost for words on everything that's going on. It's just crazy. I'm handicapped. So, you know, me looking at this stuff is just like, oh, wow. And there's really nothing I can do about it, you know. Sucks. You feel like you have less rights as a handicap person or you feel like you can't get out in protest? Like, what does that mean? Just the, you know, just the fact that it's, you know, there's so much going on right now and trying to be at one place or another is just so hard for me anyways. So it is, it just feels like I can't do nothing, you know. You feel like you have a voice like on the internet or in any other way, shape or form? Do you feel like you have a voice? Not really, no. No, not really. It is pretty much snow and void, which is really crazy. Tyler's pretty much handicapped now too. So Hey RW, I'm going to take a quick break here. I'll be right back if you can just kind of I got you, bro. Thanks. Yeah, I just came in here to listen to you guys, man. Right back, everybody. Tyler made a point earlier where we showed the video of the one police talking to the other police officer saying, we're just pissing them off when we're doing these tactics. We're hitting innocent civilians and then they're getting mad too. So, you know what? I've seen those dang videos, man. Cops have really lost control and are very uneducated in the laws that are in the books as they stand. I don't think one of them has ever read the Constitution. I mean, that's an extreme statement, but the point that I'm trying to make for what Tyler said is that by those cops saying that to each other, they're admitting that they're not trying to do it to pull the crowd into the building. The narrative or the conversation they would have had would have been very different if they were trying to get them to excite and push in. The capital of the capital. Yeah. If they were really trying to incite the crowd, I mean, there's a thin line that you have to draw when you're doing that because in order to keep the crowd under control, you can only push them so far. Otherwise, they're going to freaking explode. I mean, they're just going to go crazy and they're not going to care. And it doesn't matter how many cops you have there. It's not going to stop them. And when others hear about it, they're going to get mad and they're going to come and see what's going on. And they're going to see this and they're going to get mad. And then you've got a whole quagmire of, you know, just people jumping left and right, people getting hurt, people getting shot. And then that's what almost happened. And the crazy thing about it is how they want to secure and spin this in the way that they are. And I've sat here and watched this over and over and over again. And I can tell you stories about Biden. I can tell you stories about Pelosi, but it's not going to change the fact of any lefty or anybody like that. They're in their ways. They're not going to change. They seem to think that they know it all, but they're not really looking at the basic fact that these people are corrupt. They have been corrupt for years. They will do anything they can to push a narrative to make you think that everything is going to crap, which is really bad. Let me test that theory that when you talk to someone on the left that everything's set. So Brandon and me have been friends for a while now. And we've talked for quite a while. Is all the conversations we've ever had with each other been a waste of time? Or do you feel like some aspect of knowledge has been gained? Oh, no. Knowledge has been gained. Heck, yeah. I mean, I've learned a lot. I tell you over the past, I want to say 20 years of just listening and then coming on here and listening over the past, I don't know, five, seven, maybe eight years. I've learned a heck of a lot more because I've started to notice a lot more things happening, a lot more corruption unfolding in front of my eyes that I really didn't notice in the beginning, because the wool was pulled over my eyes, watching MSNBC, watching CNN, thinking that all this crap is going wrong when in the back in the back door, somebody else is coming in, you know, and it's not cool. It's really not cool. And I have watched our government do this for years and years and years and years. And you try to tell people about this. And they look at you like you're crazy. They look at you like you're completely nuts. But then when it happens, they're so brainwashed that they don't want to realize what's really happening in front of their face. They don't want to realize it because they don't want to be wrong. They just don't want to be wrong. What do you think is going to come and happen next that that they're going to ignore? Do you do you feel like something's coming and it's going to happen and it's just going to be oh, I have I have I want to say it, but then I get it. I don't want to get people banned on here. I really don't. Because um, no, no, I don't think it's going to be a race war. I think we're going to see some assassinations. And I don't that's really nothing to smile about. I don't think because at the simple fact that there is going to be people that are going to be dying. Don't you think that that would have already been happening in the United States of America? No, because people haven't been pushed far enough yet. I don't think people have been pushed far enough yet. Hey guys, I have to go ahead and roll out. This is going to be like my last Thursday. I'll be able to attend. I'm going to try and set something up on Sundays eventually. But I'll like let you guys know whenever I'm able to like get that like in the works. Do you want to have space here for that event or do you want to create it in your own space? I don't know. I'll talk to you like, you know, over text and whatnot in the chat to figure all that out. Yeah, I look forward to it. I'm not quite sure what my Sundays are going to look like yet. So yeah, I'm cool for that. Sounds good. More the merrier. All righty. I appreciate y'all. Y'all have a good one. Hey man, take care. Later, Brandon. I think that the the next event that's going to push society is the next election. I don't know which direction it will go in. But yeah, I believe no matter which direction it goes in, there's going to be much more unrest than we've experienced so far. Oh, yeah. I don't I think we see the end of I think I don't I don't I don't think we've seen the end of it because if you see what's going on in New York and Chicago and some of these other places, do you see what these people are taking? No Jewish Jewish people are taking getting kicked out of their houses. These people are taking getting kicked out of other places for illegal immigrants to come in and take it over. What happened to Dank? Is he coming back? He had to go for the night. He's going to work on some Sunday activities because he's got a new job and so he's can't be with the crew for Thursdays now. But we'll get to work around and we'll get some time with them in a different different day. Before we get off stream, I still want to argue the Ashley bad that shoot was a good shoot. All right, that's cool. Yeah, I don't want to interrupt this. Well, just real quick, Theresa be kind and chat said now they are threatening sending our kids to Ukraine to fight if we don't send another $60 million. I have not seen that. I'm not sure where the source for that is, but yeah, curvy. That happens. I've actually I've actually seen someone that that Biden wants to commit some more troops. It don't quote me because I mean, it's what it is. Definitely do not quote me on it. But I think I saw something that he wants to commit more troops. And that's one of the reasons that's one of the reasons why you saw what's his name come out and say we will give immunity to those who want to join the military and go fight for the government. And I think that's one of the reasons he he came out and said that because Biden wants to send more troops over to Ukraine and he wants to send more troops into Israel. Was that immunity from January 6 or what? No, that's just immunity from being deported. Right now, the legislation that they're working on right now, the House Speaker is kind of going back and forth with Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden, mostly Joe Biden because Chuck Schumer is just kind of a standard. But what they're arguing about right now is Biden wants to give $61 billion to Ukraine. He wants to give about 20 billion to Israel. I don't see anywhere mentioning boots on the ground at all. Okay, we do commit sometimes, but it wouldn't be in a military war. We often train that's why I said don't vote me, man. Can we just tag them? All of our warships are right there next to Israel. Can we tag him from there and just save time and money? They're being used right now. I was actually just going to bring that up right now. Our warships got moved into a certain bay in it's near they're fighting Hezbollah right now. The US is in direct conflict with Hezbollah and Hezbollah and the Houthis in Yemen. So all that talk about the genocide in Yemen and the Houthis were innocent, blah, blah, blah. All bullshit. They're an Iranian proxy. They're launching attacks at Israel. The United States is directly blowing up their facilities in Yemen, Syria. We're also in what was the country? Oh, fuck. I can't remember right now that Hezbollah is an Iranian back terrorists. Yes. Hezbollah is right to the north of Israel. You want to know the messed up part about that is? I think it's Africa. It's north of there, right? No. We pay for every one of those. No, not Africa. Lebanon. It's Lebanon, yeah. Thank you. Oh, that's close. Hey, you know what? We pay good money for them terrorists. We might as well take them out. Well, like that's the thing with Hamas, like maybe not now who when he wasn't before his prime minister actually funded Hamas, but it was before they were an anti-Israel group. Oh, yeah. Tell us. Well, the thing is, if anybody has actually looked at the history books about 1948, that when the Jewish people went in, they actually started slaughtering all the people that were there and told them if they don't leave, you are going to be killed. I'm pretty sure the Jews shared the Temple Mount. That was a big talk. Oh, no. You can actually watch, there's actually a video that Jimmy Doris showed where there was a guy, two soldiers actually, who were sitting there laughing and joking about going in and actually arring women and killing men just for the heck of it and actually not even letting them run away. Actually, they let them run away and then they shoot them in the back. See, the Jews didn't actually have control of the holy land of Jerusalem until the 60s after a war. There was a certain point, the pre-1967 borders, which is what currently Gaza and the West Bank are arguing for in the two-state solution. Before that, the Jerusalem was split between two nations and I know for a fact, I've heard a lot of Jewish people talk about it, when Muslims had control of Jerusalem, Jews were not allowed to pray there. Now, I watched Jimmy Doris show us funny. I'm not advocating for either of them. I pretty much come to a conclusion, they've both done some pretty crappy things to each other. What's fair game is fair game, but the simple fact of it is that you've got innocent bystanders that are actually taking the brunt of what's going on. When you have that going on, that's not good. Jimmy Doris, that's not going to look good for your human resources worker. There is not somebody you want to get information from. He doesn't even know what Medicare for all is. When he's anti-government, he's a big libertarian lefty, but when you ask him about Medicare for all, he talks about being like a direct link between people and their doctors, and we're going to get government out of the way. I know that. It's not a big link between your doctor and you. He's an advocate for government-controlled health care while simultaneously being anti-government. He doesn't even know what his own stance is on. He's just not a great source for information. I only watch him every once in a while. Ron Piccolo, the guy that does the voice impersonation hysterical. It's really funny. So like it is a good show. Oh yeah, the guy that does the voices. Oh yeah, I like him. Yeah, I just wouldn't trust anything he said. But yeah, in 1967 Israel took control of the Temple Mount and now Israel is one-fourth Arabs that are not Jewish live inside the Temple Walls of Israel. And they have access to the Temple Mount every single day. I really don't care what goes on over there. I really wish we would just pull our freaking forces out of there and just stop messing around over there, stop doing our thing over there. There's nothing for us over there besides trouble and trouble and more trouble. The United States is significantly stronger because not only do we have an advantageous ally and a very oil-rich and very resource-rich area, but that is a connection for the United States to deter its enemies, which are Iran, Russia, and China. No, I understand for us to have allies over there. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying we don't need to be over there causing issues and getting in the middle of everything when it's not our fight. It's really not our fight, if you think about it. It's been going on for thousands of years, so I don't know why we're still trying to sit here and settle something that they need to settle themselves. Right now the Biden administration's pussy-footing and Kamala Harris came out with a list of demands for the IDF that she doesn't have for Hamas where they have to like, she made up a word in it. I want to say it was like, I don't remember, but yeah, there's a list of demands from Kamala Harris that Israel needs to step down and stop killing civilians, and this and that. They're being held to a completely different set of standards than any other nation at war, and we're not really giving them much aid besides exchanging fire with the Houthis and Hezbollah. We're not actually, there's no boots on the ground. Are they actually listening to her words though? No, no. Are they actually giving her any respect whatsoever? Nope. What I think happened is like Biden probably called up BB and said, look, half of my party disagrees with this war, so I'm going to say some shit on TV, just ignore it and accept all the money we're sending. That's probably them. So you think it was okay to shoot Ashley, Babbit? I think it was a justified shoot. Thinking of how the police would justify this and how the gentleman actually did the shot her, when a violent crowd is coming at you, it is the equivalent of somebody holding a deadly weapon. That crowd itself at entity is a violent and deadly weapon, especially with crowd psychology. If somebody would have attacked that cop, a bunch of law-abiding citizens might have joined in because they're part of the crowd. So I could see why that cop felt like his life was at threat and that he was justified to shoot. Absolutely. Who here is actually saying that it's an unjustified shooting? I am. Kind of think both, but... Yeah, it's definitely on his side. I mean, he does have a point, but the other point is, is did he really have to shoot? Well, no, there's a better point I can make. That was the final line. If he was told this is the line, if they cross this line, use lethal force, that's like the standard that was set for that door and the shooting she puts through. Yeah, well, I understand that. But did he have to shoot an unarmed person now? That's the thing. Probably not. I think there probably are other ways to solve it, but you could say that for most police shoot. Like there's probably another way to solve it, but the guy was charging at the cop with a knife, so he was justified. That's all is he was justified. Well, there's a difference between somebody charging at you with a knife and somebody just coming through some plastic glass that's... Yeah, can I say something about that? I mean, one person coming through a window. It's one person coming through a window, how hard it had been for him to just go and kind of please go back. I'm sure she would have been like, okay, no problem. Yeah, I kind of want to hear drone jacks already. Yeah, so look, there's, well, there's a couple of things, but one, and I think this is the most persuasive is, so we had five years of riots and I don't, pretty intense ones, especially in Portland. I don't think anybody's ever shot, even though, I know I can think of a few instances where police were actually being beat in one case with a hammer. Nobody was shot. And in this case, even on January the 6th, during all of that that was going on, nobody else was shot. Nobody, I mean, there was much more violent things going on. And lastly, as I pointed out before, Ashley was surrounded by both not geared cops that were right behind her and a whole squad of like fully geared cops that were on the stairs just behind her as she was doing that. So, like literally they could have like tackled her. They could have tackled that entire room of people. There wasn't that many people in there. Yeah, but still, and the guy himself just watching the interview, I could just see in his eyes. He knows he was wrong. I can see it. Then I know it. 100%. Can we all agree? So there's a, I know, I don't know if it's Ashley have it in this group or not, but she, someone was saying that there, there was no window or there was no window of the door. And there's the argument that she wasn't pushing through the window. She was like shot through the window. But I remember the video clearly being that she's breaching a door through the window of the door. She's crawling through it. Fine. But you know, here's my thing is one, people have said he was telling her, according to him that, you know, don't come off, shoot, blah, blah, blah. Who knows if she heard that? One, who knows if he actually did that? I don't know if there's any, I don't know if the same proves that, you know, especially all this stuff I've seen about police, how they protect each other. And especially in this case, you know, we had people riding and destroying cities, killing people over shootings that were literally justified, actually justified. Okay. People with deadly weapons doing deadly things. And in this case, there was no, she was 98 pounds. She was surrounded by police. There was no, nobody, no reason to suspect she was armed. And as soon as she came through that window, that officer could have easily tackled her and arrested her. So no, I'm sorry. Like nobody else was shot that day, which is, you know, if we're, if we're going by what you're saying, I would think other people would have been shot. Let's say she jumps through the window, he tackles her. Another person reaches through that window, unlocks the door and the whole crowd comes through. He then loses control of the situation. That's why I say, that's why I say, that's why I say, if you look at the video, it's like maybe 30 people it looks like right there. And most of them aren't really doing much. They're just standing there. She's like trying and literally there's like fully gears, whole squad just standing there. Like they're not even doing anything. Like they could easily like do something and pull all these people. I'm not, I don't know why they didn't. I'm not saying that's part of like a conspiracy. I'm not saying that just so we're clear. I'm just saying that like other things could have easily happened. And I think he was just negligent. I think he just, I think he just shot her. That was secret service, wasn't it? That was secret service. He was Capitol officer. He was Capitol police. Okay. Yeah, I just, I don't know what their roles are as a police department. I can't, I do, I do think they put on some kid gloves when they dealt with a lot of the Black Lives Matter rioters around the country. Kamala Harris bailing out rioters to find out one of them was a murderer on parole, things like that. Down the memory hole. Yeah, I completely agree with you on that, but I just don't think that kind of deserves discussion here just because this is a different police force with different responsibility. It has a fuck, RW said, you could, they could have drawn that line there. Once they get past this point, it's the point of no return. We have to hold the line here. Please stop breaking through that window. Don't jump. And in his mind, he probably didn't need to, he probably needed to shoot, but I agree. If you look at it from 2020 hindsight slowed down. He probably had other alternatives he could have taken. I just think he was justified in the shoot is what I'm saying. He felt fear for his life because a crowd of people chanting for the death of the vice president were storming at him and breaking everything on their way to get maybe not his life, but his responsibilities. Yeah, the responsibility is to protect the government or trying to find that raw footage so I can show you, but I mean, it's, I don't know. I think that is worth showing. I really do because I'm trying to find the actual Jaden X footage for all footage. What is the name Jaden X? Wasn't that what it was? I don't remember the name. Did you, there's some new footage that got released. It was pretty interesting. It was the people were leaving and there was police like just randomly punching people in the back of the head and stuff and trying to start fights and that guy is among them. Theresa Bekind. I know you're in the server. Might as well join the crew here. Here we go. I think I found it. It's John Sullivan, by the way. That's his real name. A drone. It looks like there's a version on Austin Ketterman's YouTube channel, Austin Kellerman. That's heavily graphic. You have to refresh and then click through the content. It contains graphic or violent imagery. So it's a double wall. I don't know if they're going to show it. Oh yeah, they are. Hold on. Can always count on Steve finding those videos on the dark web. Right. What I'm seeing from the gateway pundit is there was somebody else shattering the glass and she punches him in the face. Really? Yeah, his name is Elam. She punched someone in the face for breaking the glass that she then crawled through. Yeah, then she turned around and crawled through it apparently. She was like, that was mine, bitch. Right there. Her husband was saying that she was trying to escape the mayhem and that broken window was her way out. Can you guys see that full screen? Yeah, I am. If you break it, yeah, if you kick it back, I don't necessarily want to show her being shot. We can start back here at the beginning. Yeah, I want to go. There's a point where you can see kind of everybody. I don't think it's this video and you can see I'll have any police are in there. The other angle. Oh, look at that guy, man. What the heck? Why didn't he get shot? They legit had multiple police behind them too. Yeah. It was only like 10 people at the door as well. Right. That's what I'm saying is like, I don't understand why they didn't do more to stop them. The cops moved. Right. And when you see like they're like you said, there's not that many people there. These people are dumb though. Like, wow. I definitely think like these people should be charged 100%. This kind of shit. I'm just like, yeah, that was, you know, all right, kill it. You got to see there. She went and that's not the video either. All right, hold on. That's not the video I'm talking about. Let me I'll just get my own stream because I have my stream of it and I'll just use that one second. But that did show more than enough. And her husband again is saying you couldn't see though. I mean, you could see that part. But I think pulling back a little bit, which this video does, you see a little different perspective. We find it here real quick. Yeah, I didn't. I didn't see her in the video I just had. But yeah, I didn't. In the very end, you see her jump through the window. Yeah. Well, I just said I said to kill it because I didn't know if that was going to show anything that would get YouTube flagged. I just want to point out the rest of that bill I was talking about earlier. So it's Ukraine funding funding for Israel and funding for the border. So Mike Johnson tied in Ukraine funding with Israel for funding and border fund. So they're going to have a bunch of new troops on the border apparently to help with illegal immigration as a result of funding Ukraine. Did you say Mike Tyson? Mike Johnson. Okay, just make sure. Like, wait, what? All right, I got it. I was seeing if I put a link in here. I didn't. So sorry for the double thing here, but you can at least see. So this is behind her on the stairs. I don't know if you can see it. And I'll click through it here. You can see there. When I click off, I don't think people on mine can see it. Here. Let me do this. All right. Oh, there's, you can see right there. That's some of the fully gear guys coming up. Damn it. That footage cuts. There's a longer footage, a national file on YouTube. I'll see if I can find that. That national file video, I think has more, but you can see there. You can see more at another point. There is video from the other side of that door. I know that. Damn, well, I'll see if I can find that raw video. But yeah, the point is, I mean, we're really like, I don't know. I don't think I could agree that it was a just fine shooting at all, especially like after I witnessed riots over like scumbags, getting shot by police who deserved it. I just can't. I don't think you can judge every police department one to one, especially those cops on the street. They have different training to deal with different groups of people and whatnot. Sensitive in particular, lack of training. Most of those riots went out in blue cities where they're really big on police sensitivity training. And this DC cops probably don't have that. So they're probably more like old school cops. You cross this line. I'm shooting because I feel threatened. I get she probably wasn't the bad person she's made out to be. It looks like again, her husband is saying, I saw her throw a punch at one of the riots, but she hopped through that window when that guy was telling people not to go through it. And that's kind of probably why she got shot. Yeah, I can't get down with her husband being like, yeah, she was trying to escape the chaos, turn around and go the other direction. At what point in time are you forced to be where you're standing? More like she was caught up in it. Yeah. Well, I think I'm going to wrap this up, guys. I'm pretty beat from the day. So do you guys have anything else you want to talk about here? That's all of the next comments that I wanted to comment on the other ones I agree with. Yeah, I wanted to get into the replacement theory thing, but we don't really do we have any opposition to that or anything? I honestly don't even know what that is enough. So you want to just explain it in concept? Well, I'll just quickly say, I mean, there's not a ton to say, but like he said that it's real, which I think he's right. I mean, at least since 2004, Democrats have been openly promoting their plan to basically flood the country with people from South America who they think will vote for them. Maybe I always hear these people are conservative and I think largely it hasn't worked out for the Democrats yet, but I think, you know, you flood the country. I think there's been 8 million over 8 million in the country since Biden's been president. Like you keep up those kind of numbers and you get these people dependent. I hear they're getting $5,000 cars when they come in. I don't know if that's true. I've been seeing it reported as well as some other things. You know, they're going to feel obligated. I see these people getting swept up into stuff and voting a certain way. Anyway, that is basically what replacement theory is, except for the white supremacist stuff. They have a version of it where it's like, you know, the Jews and they're replacing the white man. And I think that is, I don't think it's the Jew, you know, I don't think it's a Jewish conspiracy, but the white vote, the white voter is going to be, you know, replaced in a way or at least those of us standing against the left will be replaced and our votes won't really matter anymore. Where is this, where is this being shown as openly democratic agenda? Like where is the, where, where are they saying, yeah, this is totally your idea. And this is where look up the browning of America. That was the phrase they used a lot about 10 years ago. Well, there's the emerging democratic majority, which was a big book when it came out in the early 2000s. And then on top of that, you, you have Democrats and I can post some, or I can play some video montages where they're talking about, you know, Democrat, demographics are destiny. And, you know, the white majority is going to be the minority. And that's a good thing. And that's going to be, you know, great for the Democrat party. And, you know, the, you will have these returning these red states purple and then blue. And that's their plan. Yeah, it comes from the Obama first Obama coalition, the rainbow coalition, they called it where they took all these minority groups and banded them together to vote for Obama against white people. The idea is if you bring in more of those groups, then you're just going to have more Democrat votes. It has not been working out that way. The Hispanic vote has been not only saving the Republicans, but also saving white people because Hispanics tend to identify white within four generations to come in the United States about 60% of the time. Four generations is a long time. It is. So here I can show a video real quick. If you want to have an example of kind of Democrats on the media doing this. Yeah, sure. I guess I was asking if there is like some, some where website standard where it like it's a bullet point for their doctrine or belief system. Well, yeah, I think so. I think I can find that for everybody here. Let me let me play this and see what you think. Great to the entire immigration debate. Demographic change is the key to the Democratic Party's political ambitions. This conspiracy theory has been increasingly echoed by many who are on the right. Those like Fox's Tucker Carlson, who continue to push dangerous and baseless conspiracies. I really think because of demographic changes in this country, I think that the Democratic Party is going to win Texas moving forward and the Democratic Party is going to be in power for the next 30, 40 years. The demographic change that's happening in America right now gives the upper hand to Democrats. The census that just came out especially drives home the point that Texas is next. It's a state where the demographics are changing in ways that are favorable to the Democratic Party. Demographic changes that help the Democrats. Democrats for a decade now along with Arizona and Texas have had on this sort of long term project of trying to take some red states across the Sun Belt and flip them blue as demographic changes are taking place there. Democrats should be asking themselves as a matter of fact. Why are they dominating the political landscape? Two decades ago the influential book The Emerging Democratic Majority predicted they would due to demographic changes in the country. We've been predicting for some time that demographic changes were going to eventually move North Carolina, Georgia, Texas. Stacey Abrams and her former campaign manager Lauren Groh Wargo argued in a recent New York Times op-ed that any state can turn blue. Demographic change will precede electoral opportunity. If you look at what's happening in Georgia. They won one party role. It's so obvious. Just the demographic changes alone over the last 10 years gives us some measure of hope. Yeah. And oh, I do want to play that. Let me play one more clip real quick here. Hold on. Yeah, here we go. Here we go. Democratic candidate Tim Ryan calling out his opponent J.D. Vance's previous comments supporting and amplifying the conspiracy theory that Democrats seek to replace white voters through their immigration policies. White people will be replaced as a majority of the people in the country. That's not racist to say that. Just as a fact, the question becomes, why are you so upset about that? And why are you blaming that on elites or on Jewish people and on a conspiracy theory? Because in fact, it is just about birth rates and death rates. And yes, immigration does play a role in that. Okay. All right. So if immigration plays a role in that and Democrats are driving the immigration policy that's replacing whites as he just said, then is it not like a conspiracy? Like it's so funny to me that in one breath, literally she says the whole thing is a conspiracy theory. And then Charles Blow gets on there. It's like, we, yes, white people are going to be replaced. Like, why are they upset about that? Like, to me, that's insane. Like what? I mean, they're basically saying that people are just scared of change or what is there to worry about the fact that your nation's about to change drastically, or not drastically, but you're going to have change coming from outside of your border and outside of your culture. What's the big deal with that? And the answer is, how much is it going to change our country? Because I not really, I like America. Right. Like, we're not, you don't hear, like we talked about this in a past stream, but like, you only hear about this happening and being like a good thing, which is unquestionably a good thing. You hear it repeated endlessly by these people, how great it is, especially Joe Scarborough and all these types. But like, I asked the question, what's so great about it? What's so great about it for us? What's so great about it for the world if like, white majority countries become white minority countries? Like, should white people be a majority in any country? Apparently not. Like I find that there's some kind of a various Iceland. And then in movies and TV, which is a major cultural mover, like it's a powerful propaganda tool. And like, what are we seeing? We're seeing it started with like replacing, you know, fictional white characters and movies with black people or whatever. And it doesn't seem like that big of a deal. But now they're literally replacing like white historical figures with like black people and like literally erasing white people from history. Like, why are they doing that? That seems, again, pretty nefarious to me, but I guess it's racist to think that. On the main note of the tonight's debate, talking about like Vivek and the GOP debate that just happened, I'm just curious if you have any comments on it, Steve, because we haven't had a chance to hear much from you tonight. Been chilling? Yeah, I do have maybe a few comments. I thought Vivek didn't sound very good. I thought, frankly, they all sounded kind of off. I thought it was an off night for everybody. I was interested to hear Chris Christie basically backing up parents' rights to choose gender affirming surgeries for their children. And his argument on that was solid, but it wasn't very Republican in my mind. Vivek attacking, Nikki was interesting because she did have a good space out when she was trying to name the provinces in the Ukraine that she couldn't come up with at the moment. And then Chris Christie jumped to her defense, which was interesting. Yeah, I mean, all in all, it was a shit show. If I was to say anybody came out ahead in that, I'd say nobody. I think they all par or slightly sub par. That was my thoughts on it. At least it doesn't matter because none of them are getting in, right? Seemingly. I think the moderators did good. Yeah, I agree. Good questions were asked. Megan Kelly proved why she's a great news person with some of her questions. But yeah, if you watch Chris Christie in the first debate, he advocates for using the government to steamroll vote when it comes to the DAs and not that they vote for in their local district. The second debate he advocates were using the government to steamroll teacher. The third debate he uses advocates were using the government to steamroll other people. And then the fourth debate, he goes full Doug Burgum and he's all about states rights. Finally, I just seemed really inconsistent. He really seemed like the guy that would shut down a bridge on the whole to until this debate. Right. Yeah. And that was one of the original reasons I would never be able to for him because of that fiasco in New Jersey. Yeah. Where he weaponized government in the same way he's bitching about Trump doing that. All right. I gotta go get somebody. I'm starving. It's about too late. Thanks a lot for everybody for hanging out. And before you go, Steve, your stream Saturday nights, Saturday night, 7 30 Eastern Standard Time, Smoke Steve's International Pub on my channel on YouTube. The channel is called Smoke Steve. They should check it out. Yeah, it's fun. Tyler, you've never been by. If you have a minute, you want to have a drink, or you don't drink, I don't give a shit. Swing through, man. But whatever. Don't worry, the other guys will drink for you. Yeah, Steve gets a lot of guys on there and they go pretty late. So it's fun. Check it out. To be an invite. Absolutely. Here you go. I have it set up on the event for the server. So through there, you'll grab them. Thank you. All right, everybody. I'm going to go ahead and end it for the night. Thanks everybody for watching as always. And we'll do this again next Thursday. Good night, all. Thanks for coming, guys.