 Okay, so I wanted to start by talking about the homework one last time, because a few more people got in the homework, and I realized there was a point that I just didn't stress with sufficient clarity. And I've decided the way to do this is to make up an English xiejiang series, okay? So I'm going to have a phonetic, which is going to be a circle with a dot in and it's a spot, yeah? So this character alone can write the word spot, okay? And these I don't know, imagine these are the reconstructions, because they're the actual presentation. So this is the character that writes the word spot, yeah? So this is the character and it represents the morphing spot, yeah? And then there's a character where we put this radical, this metal, you know, you know, determiner maybe? So this character, this represents the word pot. Oops, actually I, I, I intended to do it slightly differently, which is because, you know, pot might be made of metal, but let's instead use the heat, right? Okay. And then that means the metal which I can use for, for this one, bot, yeah? So that's one. And then at least in my dialect, let's say we have one more, which will be this one, which is also bot, exactly the same translation. Okay, so now how would I romanize these in my system? So here what some people did in their homework was they said, well, the, the sort of mother of the Sheikhan character represents the sound spot. So I will then romanize this one as something like ed for each and then spots. That's, do we do that? Yeah, that's wrong because, because, or I'm going to say that's saying that what people did when they saw this was they applied the sound in the morphing spot and then said, okay, but I know it's not spot. It sounds like spot somehow, but that's something to do with eating. Yeah. And of course that is historically what happened. But what I instead asked me to do is to kind of abstract away from the specific pronunciation of specific morphings to say, what is it that the, the character as a phonetic said about pronunciation, right? So it doesn't say it has an initial S because we're going to initial S and P in bot and there's no initial S in bot. So, so what I want you to write here is an pop and actually kind of even more precisely, but I wouldn't think that actually writing this, you use a capital being that it's a P or B, right? Or pH because the information that is actually contained in this phonetic, qua phonetic, rather than qua character to write this morphine doesn't care about the manner of articulation, right? So, so this one would be bot and then this one would be, you know, mess bot and then this one would, you know, I don't know how to say by Latin. Well, that's the point. So this is, this is what my romanization is trying to do is, is when you say every phonetic, there kind of represents two different sounds, if you like, the sound of the word that it as a standalone character, I've backed myself into a syntactic quandary here, you see what I mean? This symbol, this sign, this character does represent the morphine spot. So in a sense, it represents the sound spot. But as the mother of the Shesham series, it doesn't. It is, you know, equanimity with regard to whether or not there's an S, what the tone is, and what the manner of articulation is. So we want to represent that equanimity in our, in our romanization, right? I hope that makes sense. Yeah. So, and a lot of people had already understood this, but some people hadn't. So that's why I thought I would just go through all the time. Okay. And I'll end there talking about this somewhat assignment.