 Some points on the related paper. I think what it really needs is more precision and some issues need to be made more explicit. For instance, it's not really clear what exactly you are looking at. What are your precise and explicit research question? What are your processes? What are your conceptual and theoretical grounds? For instance, that also includes the part on aquifood systems. You would need to define in a better way and a more explicit way what exactly is it, what is world transformation furthermore and also a bit more empirical evidence would be good. And then furthermore also the issue of what are now the translating mechanisms between the different issues you are looking at, because you really should avoid the impression that we are talking about something like demographic determinism. You don't do it but I think you should really avoid that and probably you should also discuss a bit, for instance, the role of non-ecoculture, economic sectors, certain social factors, because we have now a debate going on for some years. Young people are increasingly turning their backs against a particular subsistence, the traditional peasant farming. So these things should come in. I know that you cannot really write in length about all of these topics. Of course, we would need to cut down a bit of the redundant seasons, but I think that would be really important. Furthermore, you were mentioning also the climate change impact and you are saying that and also writing that it is not really fully understood and you are not writing about that, but of course there are also issues which are making the whole relationship even more complicated. The trap population issue, so people who are not able to move at all and also here one may wonder what is your clue, what is your conclusion out of that? I mean what does it now mean for this whole story? On the actual methodology, on the data, I think you would also need to make more clear here or at least more explicit how were in particular these projection simulation data, how were they constructed, what were the pre-assumptions here, because one might suspect that if they are based on similar or even the same pre-assumptions, then the outcome of putting them all together would be something like a self-affirming prophecy. I know it's not the case, but I mean also here there's a need to make it more explicit. I really like that in post-presentation, actually, you stressed the importance of seasonal migration, but actually I would shift that or expand it by not only looking at seasonal migration, but rather something like translocality, because that is somewhat, maybe not in economics, but in social science, the overarching concept for all of these circular, seasonal, temporarily limited forms of migration. And back to the role of policies, the paper is also called challenges and opportunities, but so far it remains a bit vague or actually it's not there at all. What are now the challenges and opportunities and what is or what are policymakers supposed to do with regard to equity systems, demography and migration? Thank you.