 So at the moment, I'm a principal investigator on European Research Council-funded grant in collaboration with the British Museum and the British Library. And SOAS has two sub-projects as part of this grant. One is the decipherment of the Pew language of ancient Burma, and the other one is a reconstruction of Proto-Burmish. So the Burmish language family is a group of quite small languages spoken in northern Burma. On the one project, so on the decipherment of Pew, we had a research trip to Burma where we went and filmed inscriptions in C2 and in museums. And we use this technology primarily called RTI, which is Reflectance Transformation Imaging. It produces these very large files where you can look at the inscription under different lighting circumstances on your computer. And all of those files have been uploaded to the ERC's platform for data sharing and data archiving, Zenodo. So those are available there now. And then on the other project, on the reconstruction of Proto-Burmish, the primary data is word lists, primarily from existing publications, but not entirely of words in the language, like Lasi or Atsi. And then what they mean, usually in Chinese, because most of the research in this area has been done in Chinese, and we've had those word lists digitized and we have a software package where we're processing them. And that's currently on GitHub, and it's available for everyone now, but it's more of a sort of an environment for our workflow, and those will also go on Zenodo when different pieces of the project are ready for publication. There are two reasons why we're sharing our data openly on these projects. One is because we're compelled to do so by the European Union. Another thing is I also believe in open access. So if we're going to say that a Pew inscription says something in a publication, it's important that our readers be able to consult the primary documents themselves and verify for themselves that's indeed what the inscription says. But in a publication, all you can include is maybe a small photograph. You can include a huge RTI file, so those files need to be made available somewhere. So I think it's an issue of it's only by making your primary data available that other researchers are able to verify your findings and to build on them. Otherwise it's just you pontificating into a paper. I think in linguistics, even though we have seen an increase in the amount of information that's being archived, primary data including audio and video recordings and annotation, it's still not common practice to cite primary data in publications. And as a strange as a philologist, that's quite a shock to me. No one would say here's a Greek document and I'm not going to tell you where it is or how it was published. I just know. Someone told me. But that is the standard in linguistics and that should be changing soon. I think. And personally as a personal practice that I've promised to do to myself is if someone submits an article to a journal that I'm asked to review and it doesn't cite its data and make it available openly, then I just reject the paper. So I think that's what people need to be doing in order for us to change our practices in this area.