 A lot of ideas out there. You've suggested on the campaign trail that January 6th was an inside job, that the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer was a job of inside entrapment that the House of Republicans, let me finish, that the House of Republicans impeachment inquiry is part of a Democratic plot to sideline Biden, that there is a devious Democratic scheme to actually nominate Nikki Haley. The reality is none of these are top issues for Iowa voters. So why are you focused on these conspiracy theories? Well, I'm focused as a heavy hand at word, Dasha. If you take 80% of what I said, I'm talking about policy in future direction of the country, talking about how we'll increase the supply of energy to bring down the cost for everyday Americans. And so that's 80% of what I'm talking about, but I'm not going to hide from what I do believe are realities hiding in plain sight that people deserve to know about, which the last item that you described, it's not a secret that Larry Fink is going to fundraisers of Nikki Haley, prop in her up, that actually one of the biggest funders of the lawsuits against Trump, including efforts to keep him off the ballot, is Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, that's a quarter million dollar donor to super PAC supporting Nikki Haley. And so I reject this mainstream media general narrative of dismissing something as a conspiracy theory, when in fact I'm a big fan of going after facts hiding in plain sight. But you know that when you say these things, you know when you bring up the Gretchen Whitmer thing, you know when you bring up January 6th. January 6th being an inside job. Yes, 80% of what you talk about might be policy, but when you hit those issues, that's going to take over the news cycle. You know how it works. I think it should. I'm speaking the truth. But you're a smart guy. You know how it works. Are you using that to get attention as you've been slumping in the polls? To the contrary. You have a lot of political analysts that look at this and say exactly what you're saying. Is that like a helper? Is she like a fact checker? Is she going to like fact check about this? Yeah, you talk about the chicken. I was just wondering why she just slowly looked over to right. That was the weirdest thing that was hilarious. Why aren't you just saying what causes you to pull that three signs? But every other political candidate's doing they're taking with their consultants to serve them up. Here's what the voters say are the top issues, spout back to them what the voters want to hear. I'm sharing my true convictions and I think if we want to revive our constitutional republic, we deserve a government that tells the people the truth again. Not just when it's easy, but when it is hard. Our government has systematically lied to us on things that really matter of the origin of COVID-19. We were told for years that didn't come from a lab in China when it absolutely did. In fact, you were suppressed on social media for saying it. The eve of the last election, I think it's shameful that the Hunter Biden laptop story was systematically suppressed. But that's not what you're talking about. You're talking about Gretchen Whitmer being inside job of an attractive government. The same FBI that's investigating conservatives, the same FBI, and the same law enforcement apparatus, Jack Smith that has subpoenaed millions of Americans for anybody who liked or retweeted a Donald Trump post in 2020. That's Orwellian, but that's the same federal law enforcement apparatus that put people up to an alleged kidnapping plot that they otherwise wouldn't have been put up to. Multiple defendants acquitted on grounds of entrapment. And so is this a top issue that voters bring up on the mind of voters? Absolutely it's not. But at the mainstream media is pushing and the establishment of both parties is pushing one established narrative. It's not a priority for voters. Why are you so focused on it? Because truth is a priority for me. That's the answer. Truth is the priority for this campaign. And I don't need to speak into it. Every other professional politician is spouting off. We need to speak the hard truth that other candidates are unwilling to touch. And even though that doesn't pull necessarily on what NBC or the Des Moines Register or another media outlet is going to ask voters what are the top issues on their mind, it's important. What really is important to many voters, I believe, is a government that trusts them with the hard truth again. That hasn't happened for a very long time. And so my view is, if that's what the voters want, that's what they're going to get from me. Why? That we should be able to trust the government? Well, because it's like, if let's say Chris Christie gets elected, he just goes along with these narratives. And so you can't, there's going to be a huge chunk of this country that will never trust anything that, you know, comes from him. And so yeah, I like his angle there. I mean, it's, he's saying, and he deals with her questions so well here. He doesn't, you know, start, you know, what's that called, gish galloping or any of that. He just basically says, look, I don't really care if this is pulling. I care about what is true in these cases. The media doesn't care. We know that, you know, that's great pointing that out, because they don't care. All they care about is, you know, repeating a narrative. Steve, is that her actual name, Breanne Fafninschneel? Yes. Who is it? Who's Fafninschneel? The Pink Lady. Oh, Pink Dress Lady. She's kind of creepy. What is she doing? What's her purpose? Moral support. Get an increment of the reform, things change tax rates by one percent, one direction or another, and call that a legislative accomplishment. Go with somebody else. That's not me. But if you want a candidate who is actually going to revive the ideals of 1776, who is going to trust the people transparently with what the government knows to be true. If you want a government that actually is oven for and by the people again, I think I'm the sole candidate in this race who can deliver that. Yeah, man. I'm going to vote for Vivek, man. I like Vivek. He'll kill you. It's not made out of snakes. I swear. Trump should be Vivek's VP. Yeah, I agree. I believe Trump, Vivek should be Trump's VP. Oh, man. Oh, no. You specifically said Trump should be Vivek's VP. Right. Exactly what you said. But how about new? How about new? No. Well, if you think about it real, that means that he could be a president again for years from now when he's dead, probably, but you know. Wait, is that bro? Is that? I think, what is the thing? I think he's VP when you're, oh, yeah, you can fuck. I don't see what I think. I think I think Vivek should be the successor to Donald Trump, you know. I'm riddled. Join the VR chess, bro. The VR. How many times can you be a vice president? That's my question. I think, you know, only be vice president two times like the president. Interesting. We'll get a bit of it. There you go. He's the most interesting vice president ever. Well, Trump. Yeah, it depends if you're a part of the right order. Because if you are a part of it, Vivek, Vivek, Vivek, Vivek. Listen, did I pronounce it wrong? No, dude, you're fine. And the only reason I know it's Vivek is because it is a little rapid as Vivek rises.