 As a panelist, it repeats before you will ask your question waiting until the microphone arrives at your place because we aren't here in the medical sequence. Yes, when you discussed global warming, and you said in the beginning you weren't going to discuss the science of the evidence, I think you did a wonderful job. But I wanted to recommend to everyone here if you're not familiar with it. A cover article in New Street. 1975, the cooling world. It was pointed out that the Earth, and this was a fact that can get progressively cooler in the decades of the 1975, it was certainly going to cause a cataclysm, and the governments of the Earth were too calibrating to get action to combat the cooling world. So I recommend that everyone here please look it up on Google, type in New Street, but the cooling world, April 28, 1970 a lot. Yes, two very good comments. The first one is that, when I went and said, I'm going to run out of time because both the topic movie of the global cooling scam is basically the same title. In fact, in the 1970s, the symbol in the movie industry was The Day After. And today, the symbol of the global warming fight is The Day After. Maybe when we let the next come, the movie will be The Next Women, I don't know. But the most serious talk of this is about the global warming scam. Now, if you accept the mainstream approach to this kind of issue, you will arrive to this unbelievable conclusion that since The Day After, we have said that global warming will make the world take the world in a more positive position. And so we have to pay people for not consuming, basically, in order to prevent higher temperatures. We were also told in the 70s that cooler temperatures were better. It means that we are exactly in the optimal temperature measure. So we should design policy in a way that we pay people for not consuming when the temperature goes up, and we should pay people for consuming more when the temperature goes down, and more when the temperature goes down. Which seems the perfect situation when you have a market phase for whatever it does. I'd like to ask how did you start about the 110,000 terminal prosecutions for political offenses in Germany in 1994-2004? Could you describe? I wasn't aware of this. It sounds horrendous. Could you describe what types of political opinion offenses these were? And give us a little bit more pictures? Yes. If those pictures, it includes, of course, a hard point to deal with. Because it depends if you are hard to deal with. Sorry, can you speak a little bit? What are some of the might you got here? That, of course, of these opinion offenses that are prosecuted. And it includes, of course, music, for example. It includes pictures. It includes the right arm above. And it includes to deny the protocols, of course. So, mostly, what is the nonsense? Yes. I see. It's not getting to the global warming. You include the home store prosecutions that is... No, it's not included. It's an extra food. Of course, don't kill us. It's not easy to be prosecuted. It's impossible. Yes, you can try it. You have very much problems. Perhaps a little bit. Perhaps you'll have your children and they'll be kept away from you. What's the problem? I just add something. This is the last question. If you paint very hard reports on the wall, and you want to make sure that you don't kill James with this, you just have to say that you've tried to sign the document. You know, this kind of thing on the wall and you're not very clever. You paint me. If you have no problems, you don't. I've just come from Italy, and I wrote you all something to give you an impression of the correct value. I mean, what's the problem about this? I found something few years ago in Italy. I found that this is cigarette. I don't know if you can see this. The name of this cigarette is an alzionale. I think you can probably put it like this. And that's this N-A-Z-E. N-A-Z-E. N-A-Z-E. It is... You see the colors from the images. They're dangerous colors. I don't know. I will not smoke these cigarettes in Germany because the people of this place are very old. Sorry. Sorry, yeah. The other hand, in Austria, I mean, in Austria, yes, in the old days, you can go and buy cigarettes and I bought a chain. And you have the face of a Chigimara on it. And it's completely, without any problem, you can still check it everywhere in Germany. But this leaves you with a pressure for all of its culmination. If I also made a very brief comment from this, to create some bit of craziness, you should let people know that Chigimara is actually patient. You can get the kind of policies, the kind of policies that we don't know yet on education. So, in a way, it beats us. My point was also, as I said, which is, the only thing that depends on what you're saying, like the food says it, and the sales, it's a hundred dollars. And I've written my magazine, The Heart and Heart, which may be very problematic for me. I feel, I feel amazing. They wrote it very often, with the heart and heart and the elevator. And the magazine, it's not worth it for that, because today's magazine refers to the relationship to which extent do you think this completely correct anti-attention is a spontaneous expression of the mindset in which it stands to essentially orchestrate this planned and organized character through what it's doing. To which extent do high groups and national socialists can be affected by the correct counter-attack together on education, or physical violence? I think the main group is, of course, the Nazis. And I think step-by-step, now, other content fields, I think, but by law, by this, this law says, it's a bit of a jail. I think this feels generally so far, if you are Nazi, but if you are a terrorist. Let me let me add one interesting point in the F1. When I were talking in Germany about political correctness, and really, the main audience was no leftist. I said, okay, political correctness exists. And, okay, it's a problem but not for me, because I was not taught to talk about it. And then there are leftists. Of course, they say, okay, political correctness exists. But political correctness exists. And I think there are two more groups which are very interesting. In one group, I think it's the Latterians in Germany. The kind of Latterians that are not allowed to prove society. These people say, oh, there doesn't exist political correctness at all. They also say that political correctness besides its laws and so forth, besides its jail sentences. And I think these people they have no feeling for this, that there exists a kind of pre-protest or a kind of informal correctness. And then there's a force group. And the force group is people who live unaccompanied, really unaccompanied. And in these groups, in this people's state, yes, it exists. It's an awful sign that the society right to to tell it, to tell it, to talk to society. And I think it is interesting. In my opinion, after a few years in Germany, is that all the politicians in Germany see themselves as kind of human engineers. I really have impression that some people who claim this, they want to create and use the human being. They want to create new men, like, but they think it better than them. I don't know. The humans, they have to be out of themselves. Once we get the other economists and these economics, all my colleagues use this apparatus in this classroom called the ISLM Curve, the Geometric Exposition of Pain in the Economics. All sorts of square lines. And a Jewish student that is complaining to the administration that it looked like a spastic. And he was fearful for his job. He took him in and made him the pre-education training, the training, but the question for Andre is I did have a lot of apologizing for politically-inferring thoughts. So I'm interested in that. I've observed that the Americans had been for about 20 years for the leftist motivation to be able to demand to apologize to your existence. And I wonder if you do something about the genesis of this tactic from where it comes from, whose idea might have been or maybe you don't know how this might have been to understand. So it comes from I said it's the most policy in tomorrow's time in the project. Shining on the enemies in this region you have to do. I think these people will go into that critical practice trap. As I said they lose their job they are isolated in the society in these things. And this happened to usually when they went into a project for their for their works. Perhaps the woman that I mentioned this TV was one of the first who didn't apologize. Occasions not being seen on television again are actually said as books very well while she's doing some internet television and these things. And she can use this to apologize because she's not in any political party. Because these people who imagine this a particular incorrect trap who are political practitioners and the out difference the so-called out difference were always the first who said only ethical questions. What we're doing today is kind of diagnosis of what is happening and what will be corrected and how to change the kind of system. But the really interesting question is my point how do we get out of this? I mean what do we have to do? That's why I learned from Lenny who wrote his famous words about the idea of what to do. And that was all I mean already said what's happening is has never been sort of the model of the crimes of China. And I think maybe the solution comes out of this Chinese culture again because I already had a criminal law and this criminal law of course it was committed to say absurd things he just has absurd things of punishment. And so maybe and this is what I like from Professor Hammond this morning he said that's had fun maybe the way out is to say absurd things into the faces of all these people and coming back again to the German situation I can quote that's all I do but I will read just I quote from the National Socialist Party Program from 1920 that's point number 20 and it says two world people have the children and if these children are intelligent the state should take them away from the family and educate them to make them good members of society in the economics and this was National Socialist Party Program and in 1949 29 years later the GDR constitution said simply the same again so you have how it said that GDR was a fascist across this is one of the same left is right and right is left then I mean you can quote that off and go around of course I think it's great to make this clear of the camera both out rock and so a social democrat has really good last year he claims to be a specialist for health care and this guy has made this a lot good he wrote a book that he says exactly the same what as I told you National Socialist Program for families and of course the GDR program and he writes the same in his book at the street where all these guys they celebrated as one who can take us out of the situation of little children being intelligent having cool people and have a cool group of parents and are getting out of their situation and if you just hold the mirror onto this society and tell them that this is what is happening and again as a way into the totalitarianism they might find this absurd but it does something and if I may have two other senses which seem very important for me for what is on the scene on the ceiling they are on the wall today from the climate change I think there are these apparatus who wants to create some hostilities between CO2 and the climate and from one point these attempts to make explanations are so crazy just like in the beginning of the 16th century when I went around and said if you put your points into this box you are so just into heaven and this is the moment for people to tell the truth and to just spread enlightenment and to do what just to to translate the Bible to explain counts and then suddenly you are of a tiny little minority but you are the beginning of a great new age of and really thinking people that's what I don't that's why I'm here today in a long time ago when the when the neo-conce came to power in Romania one of the plans the parliament was to officially condemn the communist regime in Romania now under let's say the Christian democracy in Germany would it be such a movement for the German parliament to condemn the communist regime in Germany and why not given that Nazism was condemned because Nazism we we we would he would and you and you which is the first detailed extent thanks to the position of a totalitarian society, the greater sense it should give. It's an obvious desire to totalitarianism. It's interesting that both Republicans and the Nazis blame Plato as their indirectional criticism. A question for Mr. Gheber. Your remarks suggested that you think the public health system should be producing more sickness than young. Do you think it is also an inheritance of logical sense that the health system, together with all the hospitals, disappears and they actually see the average health from citizens rise? Think a science emergency treatment. I'd say it's a good thing you've reached a point where people entering hospitals on average leave them less healthy than they went in, where it must seem like students entering public universities leave them more students. I think I don't go so far, but I dare to say that the health system does not correlate to the status of health of white fellow citizens, but have nothing in common. It's just a way that the Minister of Health, Germany, Mrs. Schitt, she's a communist. She was sparkling as a communist in the 70s and then in 1983 she became suddenly a social democrat and I almost mentioned, waking up, she ashamed herself of the model that she saw herself in the bathroom in the front of the corner of the row of Chicago. I'm a social democrat and I'm not a communist. And then she wants to point out that what she does is, specifically, she wants to have power and light over the people and what we see now, and this is again why we can't condemn the GDR's history, what we see today is the politics of Mrs. Schitt getting rid of single doctors in the country and putting them together in only few days and making them industrial medical healthcare and the pattern is just the same like in the GDR, where the owners of houses, you know, owners of houses, private owners of houses, who are not allowed to have their houses, but who's making public take, but who's taking away, but the state said you can take rent of 30 parts if they want and if something is wrong in the house you have to pay, you can steal the owner of the house but you need to pay for it. And in the end the state, the claim, the status, but the Italian maybe are making a few proposals and you can't say no to them. And I'll take over this house and we don't have any problems. And this is the same, this is today happening to Germany with single doctors. They are not with any physician, they do not get paid appropriately and they lose their jobs, they lose their lives, at least they don't get paid and then the state comes and says you have a chance to give me your importance in the very good living. We work on food, it's just the same. So we come to the GDR's screen, but all this has nothing to do with health. This is the story of the question and the address of most data on trade. The others also should be able to answer. Depending on what you have, a lot of history in Germany and Austria that has been in use in the last 25 or 30 years, it seems that the Germans in Austria have started very war since ancient times. And to investigate some of these historically, we're serious to be discovered that there are gaping holes in the evidence. For the first world war on, for our situations with both sides of the plane, the Germans in Austria, the Russians in the plane. Other words, people are treated to be in that as a bad side. There's even one story told where there's a German army war that ended in the 1890s against Germany's fall. It was never a war. But the question is, are people supposed to believe this? Do historians believe their story is about German and Austrian military wars, or early war, not just the second world war, early war, they didn't perceive the second world war, or is this something purely didactic, which here, tentatively, it caused the neighbors to overshadow their standards? See, this was not believed in the war, but by all the people. It doesn't seem interesting. But they know that from people that had money, schools, they know that, of course, only the Germans could have thought of this as a more important question. They had not as easy to answer. Of course, they had to work more for one, it was possible for Germany to do, but I think it doesn't seem interesting to do. I'm telling the heist system, I think a lot of what is happening is not to happen. It's due to a confusion in most people's minds, which is the confusion between many people. The fact that it is the state of the two-way service, is it possible to look forward by giving money to them, to create a health insurance in the public sector? Is it possible to look forward by giving money to the whole community in the public sector? But the states made this confusion between the two of them, that people believe that in the word of the two-way service, they are perfect, etc. It's more sort of what we describe as not a comfortable fact that they have bought or worked in comfortable fact that it is the state of the two-way service. So perhaps more of this issue should be put on the fact that the two things are different, because the case for not having the voice very hard to push, and the case for having a crisis with the state giving the ball to get the private insurance, they're not easy to push. So perhaps inside this hand is always the least sure of what is the cause and what is the effect. Because if you have to do one thing, we don't know which is first, the CO2 goes up, or the role gets warmer, and for what I've learned is that the first world gets warmer and then the CO2 gets up and they will fix it up, and it's very difficult for the health system to explain to normal people how they are directly caused by politics because the system is willfully made in such contexts that nobody except of lunatics and lawyers are able to understand the system. What you can do is this was one of the great, one of the main aims of all those who use information is to get down from this complexity and community aid that the state is not your friend, whether you have a system or the state is strong is a good health provision and that people understand is that when they want to understand that in their minds they will run after their own goals. Thank you.