 Welcome to the ITU studio here in Shamakhshake, where I am here for the Radio Communication Assembly which is prior to the World Radio Communication Conference 2019. And I'm very pleased to be joining the studio today by Jaume Pujol-Ugget, who is Head of Market Intelligence and Strategy at CELNEX and is also Head of Policy for Broadcast Networks Europe. Jaume, welcome to the studio. Pleasure to be here. Thank you. Now I'd like to start off by talking a little bit about the Radio Communication Assembly and also the World Radio Communication Conference. Why are these two events major in your calendar? Well, for sure, for sure, as we are here not only as a broadcaster but also as you said as a representative of Broadcast Networks Europe, which is the association that gathers all the Broadcast Networks providers in Europe. We've been in the ITU, specifically on the study group 6 but also in the whole process of the ITU since, I cannot remember, since a long time ago, so we are really involved and we do think that here is the place where we can get this regulatory certainty that we need in order to make our investments in order to deploy our networks. In fact, DTT, Digital Tristan Television, is one of the most worldwide successful services because it's provided in more or less 150 countries around the world, covering about 90% of the population. So I think it's quite a big success. In addition to that also, the platform provides not only good content but also helps to political cohesion, helps to cultural values, helps lots of things that we do think that it provides a lot of value for the society. And for that, we ask for this kind of regulatory center. In fact, the agreement we get during the WRC 15 in Geneva, the Resolution 25 says, okay, we will decide about the ban in the conference of the 2023 and we will have the study period between 19 and 23 to study the ban and we will see what happens. Okay, we are now in this point of time, we are looking to keep this agreement alive and we are more than happy to be here. How important is the work of study groups to the broadcast industry and talking about resolutions and reports and the studies themselves? No, it's really important. As I said, we reached this agreement after long and hard work at the ITU. I think that one of the main important things of ITU is the consensus approach. It requires time, it requires effort, it's complicated, it's not easy but it provides a lot of value to the decisions. So I think it's a good strategy. So we reached this agreement on the Geneva conference in 2015 and now we are working on the study groups, we are trying to collaborate and we are trying to help on such a kind of studies, we are trying to speak up in our voice and we are trying to defend our interests as all industries do. So from this point of view, we do think that it's really important to be here and to participate in such a kind of study. What are some of the key topics that you will be discussing here over the next five weeks? Well, again, the respect of the agreement taken on the Resolution 205 would be probably the most important topic. A part of that, I mean, this resolution has been the trigger for the deployment of the DTT in more than 30 countries after the Geneva 15th. So I think it's important to, again, to repeat on this regulatory centre that ITU can provide. For that, that could be probably one of the most, probably not, the key issue to look at. In top of that, for instance, in the Radio Assembly, where we are now, we've been working on a couple of resolutions also for the role of the broadcasting and for the broader broadcasting. So we are trying to work, we are here working hard and trying to defend our interests. For those uninitiated with the processes and procedures here, why does it take so long? How could you explain to somebody who is not, as they are involved and hasn't been at WRC or an RA previously to that? Why the process is such a lengthy one? Frankly speaking, you are fully right. It's a long process and it's complicated to try to explain that. When I try to explain to my children, to my wife, they cannot understand. What are you doing? Four, five, six weeks, they're all together in a row. Yes, it's really complicated. But again, as I said before, the consensus approach, I think it's difficult, it's complicated, requires a lot of effort, but requires the agreement of all the parts. That needs time, that needs effort, but that provides a lot of value. I think that's one of the key strategic assets that ITU can provide to this telecom world. OK, and finally, you've come a long way to be here. Just wanted to find out, have you got a message here for participants at WRC? And the RA? Well, I come here, I enjoy the conference and also enjoy the country, which I'm here for three, four days. I think it's a nice country, nice people, nice weather, for sure. And come and enjoy. In terms of the... We'll just take back a little bit. In terms of the outcomes of WRC, what for you would be the best outcomes of this conference? The best outcomes for us could be a sort of certainty that provides us a good framework for the studies required between the period 19 and 23, a good group, a good study group with good people, clever people. We need a lot of work and we need the best ones there in order to get the best results. That could be probably the... With that result, I would be more than happy to be here. Excellent. Well, thank you very much for joining us in the studio. And perhaps we'll catch up with you again at some stage in the near future. More than happy to do that. Thank you. Thanks very much indeed. Thank you.